Overclocking (Main Thread)
in Desktops ·
http://processorfinder.intel.com/det...px?sSpec=SLB9V
The voltage range and thermal specs are all listed right here....
The voltage range and thermal specs are all listed right here....
Posts by darkowl72
1354 posts shown.
Where can I find a power cable?!
in Computer Peripherals ·
http://www.grzelka.de/datenblaetter/...%20GP-2000.pdf
- page 4, those N- and NS markings
or maybe something like this: http://www.eta-usa.com/powercord.html
So, where am I supposed to find that?
At least you've got photos and some labels you can show someone... if they don't know what's up at Chipotle, try checking here—they usually carry everything: http://www.microcenter.com/
One thing though: is it just a cable? Or does it include the transformer? If there's a transformer (that heavy brick) on the cord, you could technically use any external power supply as long as the voltage matches (but check that carefully!!!!!), and you could probably get a technician to solder on a new connector...
Then again, with how much hard drives cost these days, I'm not sure if it's even worth the hassle...
- page 4, those N- and NS markings
or maybe something like this: http://www.eta-usa.com/powercord.html
So, where am I supposed to find that?
At least you've got photos and some labels you can show someone... if they don't know what's up at Chipotle, try checking here—they usually carry everything: http://www.microcenter.com/
One thing though: is it just a cable? Or does it include the transformer? If there's a transformer (that heavy brick) on the cord, you could technically use any external power supply as long as the voltage matches (but check that carefully!!!!!), and you could probably get a technician to solder on a new connector...
Then again, with how much hard drives cost these days, I'm not sure if it's even worth the hassle...
New monitors, new resolutions
in Computer Peripherals ·
And you can see for yourself there’s nothing else available $300... the only option is a 19", but I wouldn't touch that with a ten-foot pole...
Look, if you grab a 20" with 1680x1050, you've got something decent $333, even if it lacks DVI.... you could find an Asus model or maybe something from LG....
Look, if you grab a 20" with 1680x1050, you've got something decent $333, even if it lacks DVI.... you could find an Asus model or maybe something from LG....
Power Adapter Issues
in Computer Peripherals ·
The output data is barely readable...
Whatever, just grab it and head to a store that carries Linksys gear; they’ve got plenty of their switches all over $33. Just double-check the output specs—voltage and amperage—against the connector. If both match up, you've solved your problem, and it'll be way cheaper than trying to hunt down a specific adapter on your own.. 😁
The only downside is you'll end up with an extra switch lying around... 😁
Whatever, just grab it and head to a store that carries Linksys gear; they’ve got plenty of their switches all over $33. Just double-check the output specs—voltage and amperage—against the connector. If both match up, you've solved your problem, and it'll be way cheaper than trying to hunt down a specific adapter on your own.. 😁
The only downside is you'll end up with an extra switch lying around... 😁
Laser printer calibration tips?
in Computer Peripherals ·
http://www.normankoren.com/printer_calibration.html
http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/color...al_printer.htm
http://www.displaymate.com/prtcal1.html
http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/color...al_printer.htm
http://www.displaymate.com/prtcal1.html
New Dell UltraSharp Monitor
in Computer Peripherals ·
http://www.wikihow.com/Fix-a-Stuck-P...an-LCD-Monitor
CNN Partnership
in Computer Peripherals ·
Check this out: Take a look at thurgood's thread and actually read through it...
Otherwise, here are a few things you should keep in mind:
- I'm not sure if your graphics card even has a standard 4-pin S-Video port that plugs directly into a TV. Usually, cards have multi-pin outputs, so you’ll need an adapter like this:
or maybe something like this: 
.
Only then can you plug in your 4-pin S-Video cable.
Also, don't bother with a prehistoric graphics card. It needs to support DirectX 9.0c, otherwise, you're just wasting your time—it won't work.
On your PC, go into the video properties and set it to "clone display" just to get things moving; that way, the image shows up on both the monitor and the TV. If you're using AMD Catalyst or similar software, try setting the TV as your secondary display there. Sometimes it won't kick in until you reboot the machine.
Anyway, give that a shot first...
Otherwise, here are a few things you should keep in mind:
- I'm not sure if your graphics card even has a standard 4-pin S-Video port that plugs directly into a TV. Usually, cards have multi-pin outputs, so you’ll need an adapter like this:
or maybe something like this: .
Only then can you plug in your 4-pin S-Video cable.
Also, don't bother with a prehistoric graphics card. It needs to support DirectX 9.0c, otherwise, you're just wasting your time—it won't work.
On your PC, go into the video properties and set it to "clone display" just to get things moving; that way, the image shows up on both the monitor and the TV. If you're using AMD Catalyst or similar software, try setting the TV as your secondary display there. Sometimes it won't kick in until you reboot the machine.
Anyway, give that a shot first...
Best 2.1 speaker setups?
in Computer Peripherals ·
They look decent enough, and 2x15W isn't a bad starting point—they’ll probably be just fine... but honestly? I haven't actually heard them yet, so I can't say for sure. Sorry...
Best 2.1 speaker setups?
in Computer Peripherals ·
Nah, it’s really just a matter of taste... with those 2.1 setups, you either get crappy subs that aren't worth the plastic they're made of, or ones that are way too overpowered... I guess that's just how it goes. I've had these Pulse speakers for a while now and the sound is solid... the satellites are perfect for filling up a room, but I can't push the sub past 40% or else it'll totally drown out the satellites twice over.
As for the 2.0 systems, the low end is actually handled quite well—it's not like they lack bass entirely... I could tell you about those Genius wooden ones at 60W; everyone raves about them and I've heard them in person, they're seriously punchy... the bass is really well-tuned, tight, and expressive... it's not that bone-shaking, brain-rattling kind of thump, but more of a softer, more refined vibe.
As for the 2.0 systems, the low end is actually handled quite well—it's not like they lack bass entirely... I could tell you about those Genius wooden ones at 60W; everyone raves about them and I've heard them in person, they're seriously punchy... the bass is really well-tuned, tight, and expressive... it's not that bone-shaking, brain-rattling kind of thump, but more of a softer, more refined vibe.
Best 2.1 speaker setups?
in Computer Peripherals ·
Look, if you're stuck with some neighbor's setup featuring 2.1 speakers pushing maybe 2 or 3 watts per channel, don't expect to actually hear any music... 😁
It really just boils down to how much cash you're willing to drop on speakers... check out this thread for some context:
And honestly, while Logitech is obviously great for peripherals, there are plenty of other high-quality speaker brands out there—sometimes even better and cheaper than Logitech. Those Genius models people were mentioning are solid, and you can definitely find some gems from Creative Technology too, but when it comes to pure value, these beat them all: — these are really good speakers with great power and sound, and they won't break the bank...
It really just boils down to how much cash you're willing to drop on speakers... check out this thread for some context:
And honestly, while Logitech is obviously great for peripherals, there are plenty of other high-quality speaker brands out there—sometimes even better and cheaper than Logitech. Those Genius models people were mentioning are solid, and you can definitely find some gems from Creative Technology too, but when it comes to pure value, these beat them all: — these are really good speakers with great power and sound, and they won't break the bank...
Genius speakers: any good?
in Computer Peripherals ·
The guy is a genius when it comes to speakers, and they’re legit. Every once in a while, he drops a killer limited run. Years ago, he released these wooden 5.1 setups that still absolutely crush it in terms of power, quality, and price. These ones are new, so I’m assuming they’ve leveled up... they’ve got an LCD and controls right on the sub, plus you get a remote. Honestly, I bet the built-in drivers deliver just as good a soundstage as the old models. As for raw power? A 100W RMS sub paired with 20W RMS on the other channels can easily push 80dB—enough to make your neighbors seriously regret living next to you.
Regarding those wooden 2.0s at 60W, I'm pretty sure I posted the links in the "Best Buy" megathread, so go dig through it... They're solid, punchy speakers with a headphone jack and an MP3 input. Even without a dedicated sub, the bass is handled really well. It’s not that aggressive, bone-shaking bass, though; it’s more of a "smooth" bass, which might annoy some of those hardcore audiophile types.
Regarding those wooden 2.0s at 60W, I'm pretty sure I posted the links in the "Best Buy" megathread, so go dig through it... They're solid, punchy speakers with a headphone jack and an MP3 input. Even without a dedicated sub, the bass is handled really well. It’s not that aggressive, bone-shaking bass, though; it’s more of a "smooth" bass, which might annoy some of those hardcore audiophile types.
Best 2.1 speaker setups?
in Computer Peripherals ·
The built-in card should be fine enough... but "fine" depends on how much cash you're willing to drop and how much volume you actually need from your speakers. You might want to check out some Logitech, Labtec, or Genius setups...
New monitors, new resolutions
in Computer Peripherals ·
@ Sean Wells73: I don't think that really matters... if you love it and you're happy with the T220, then go for it. It's a solid choice.
@ Andrew Howard14: Oh, great... can't wait.😁
@ Andrew Howard14: Oh, great... can't wait.😁
New monitors, new resolutions
in Computer Peripherals ·
Look, even Apple has some cheaper monitors available:
And honestly, a BenQ isn't exactly a massive step down from an Apple one either... it just comes down to what you prefer... 😁
Besides, you can't even compare the T series to this thing since it doesn't even have DVI...
And honestly, a BenQ isn't exactly a massive step down from an Apple one either... it just comes down to what you prefer... 😁
Besides, you can't even compare the T series to this thing since it doesn't even have DVI...
Need help picking out a new monitor
in Computer Peripherals ·
@ Andrew Howard14:
I don't know, man... on paper, they look great. These new 16:9 HDTV resolution models are cheap because manufacturers can maximize panel usage more efficiently. (You've hit on a solid point there), and both Samsung and Dell make them. Dell is actually a solid company that’s been pumping out excellent monitors for ages, even if they aren't always the easiest to find locally. Based on their laptops and all the online reviews for similar models, I don't see any reason to think this one won't be fine. I couldn't track down a specific test for this exact unit, though—it's just like with laptops, they hit the market so fast that nobody can keep up with the testing. 😁
I don't know, man... on paper, they look great. These new 16:9 HDTV resolution models are cheap because manufacturers can maximize panel usage more efficiently. (You've hit on a solid point there), and both Samsung and Dell make them. Dell is actually a solid company that’s been pumping out excellent monitors for ages, even if they aren't always the easiest to find locally. Based on their laptops and all the online reviews for similar models, I don't see any reason to think this one won't be fine. I couldn't track down a specific test for this exact unit, though—it's just like with laptops, they hit the market so fast that nobody can keep up with the testing. 😁
Need help picking out a new monitor
in Computer Peripherals ·
Look, if you're dead set on getting an Apple, then the Lenovo ThinkPad T420 is your best bet. It’s the newest one out there, and according to all the reviews, it really pushes the panel to its limit. BenQ makes decent monitors, but not this specific one since it lacks DVI support...
If you want to step up to something newer with HD resolution, check out this model:
There's also a smaller, cheaper option here: Just a heads up though, it's analog only—no DVI.
If you want to step up to something newer with HD resolution, check out this model:
There's also a smaller, cheaper option here: Just a heads up though, it's analog only—no DVI.
Buying a new graphics card - (read first post)
in Desktops ·
Look, the Gainward card is EOL and being replaced by a GS model anyway, plus it only comes with a 12-month warranty. Meanwhile, Sapphire Technology has actual heatpipes and a full 24-month warranty. The winner is pretty obvious here...
New monitors, new resolutions
in Computer Peripherals ·
We all know the drill: manufacturers pushed the transition from 4:3 monitors to 16:9 or 16:10 (8:5) formats because they claimed it was more "natural" for the human eye to look at... fine... we survived that shift...
But let's be real—LCD panel manufacturers just wanted to cut more individual panels out of their raw materials. The old 4:3 format was incredibly inefficient; there was way too much wasted material. By cutting more widescreen panels from the same sheet of raw material, they can sell them cheaper, which actually benefits us... You can still find 4:3 panels today, though they're rare and significantly more expensive for the exact reasons I just mentioned...
Even though this hasn't been that long and we aren't exactly begging for more changes, it doesn't save us any money. Again, the panel makers claim it's not their fault, but rather that the "entertainment" and "consumer electronics" segments of the market—which, if you ask me, is basically just us—aren't happy with widescreen panels because they don't meet their needs anymore... Translated into plain English: some idiot gets annoyed by having tiny black bars around the edge while watching a movie... which is just unused screen surface that you already paid for... what a joke...
So now, here we go again. Manufacturers have been trying to force these "new" resolutions and formats on us that are basically just variations of 16:9 or 16:10. They slap labels like "HD" or "HD Ready" on them, claiming they're perfect for enjoying HD and Blu-ray movies... We’re talking about resolutions like 1366x768, which is really just scaled 720p (1280x720), or Full HD at 1920x1080... Oh, and then there's that forgotten 1600x900 resolution used for DVDs... It's "almost 16:9," and it's making a comeback in the monitor market because they killed it off a few years ago saying it wasn't good enough...
Dell, which most of us mostly know for their laptops but is actually a much bigger player, has been pretty much dictating the trends in those "entertainment" and "consumer electronics" sectors lately. They were the first to roll out those Gemstone Blue laptops featuring these early HD or near-HD LCD panels.
Now, looking at monitors... the selection in the US has been pretty timid. They arrived without much fanfare—I think it was LG or Apple—and they're roughly split into two tiers: the budget stuff for the masses and the premium gear for the enthusiasts...
The mass-market models are dirt cheap, giving us unprecedented resolution for very little cash, provided you're willing to give up DVI and HDMI ports (meaning you're stuck with analog VGA). Meanwhile, the enthusiast models—you guessed it—are definitely not cheap, and they include everything the budget ones "forgot"...
Here are examples of both classes from the current catalog:
See that? Have you noticed why this whole mess is happening? It's because of a measly 0.4 inches. We used to have 22" screens, now we have 21.6". We had 24", now it's 23.6". And then they have the nerve to tell us size doesn't matter...
They probably have similar setups in other catalogs; I haven't looked everywhere. But what prompted me to write this is the arrival of these new Dell monitors in both categories. The budget ones are actually quite affordable, so some people might actually like them 😁... Unfortunately, I couldn't find a single decent review online, probably because they're too new... maybe you'll have better luck...
Of course, they all use TN matrices paired with a protective film to boost color perception and contrast. They come with a 3-year warranty, response times ranging from 5ms to 2ms for the top model, a decent 72% color gamut, 6-bit color, and they're extremely efficient with standby power staying under 1W...
So, we have one 20" model with that forgotten 1600x900 DVD resolution for a really low $325:
Then there’s this wannabe 22" Full HD model, aimed at the likes of $375:
And finally, a 24" squeezed down into a 23" frame, packed with all the ports you’d actually need and built-in speakers: perfect for people like $567. I won't even get started on that hideous piano black finish...
There, now you know (though I'm sure most of you already did... 😁)
edit: just so we're clear, I haven't actually touched any of these or tested them out yet... so I can't say a damn thing about the actual image quality or color accuracy...
But let's be real—LCD panel manufacturers just wanted to cut more individual panels out of their raw materials. The old 4:3 format was incredibly inefficient; there was way too much wasted material. By cutting more widescreen panels from the same sheet of raw material, they can sell them cheaper, which actually benefits us... You can still find 4:3 panels today, though they're rare and significantly more expensive for the exact reasons I just mentioned...
Even though this hasn't been that long and we aren't exactly begging for more changes, it doesn't save us any money. Again, the panel makers claim it's not their fault, but rather that the "entertainment" and "consumer electronics" segments of the market—which, if you ask me, is basically just us—aren't happy with widescreen panels because they don't meet their needs anymore... Translated into plain English: some idiot gets annoyed by having tiny black bars around the edge while watching a movie... which is just unused screen surface that you already paid for... what a joke...
So now, here we go again. Manufacturers have been trying to force these "new" resolutions and formats on us that are basically just variations of 16:9 or 16:10. They slap labels like "HD" or "HD Ready" on them, claiming they're perfect for enjoying HD and Blu-ray movies... We’re talking about resolutions like 1366x768, which is really just scaled 720p (1280x720), or Full HD at 1920x1080... Oh, and then there's that forgotten 1600x900 resolution used for DVDs... It's "almost 16:9," and it's making a comeback in the monitor market because they killed it off a few years ago saying it wasn't good enough...
Dell, which most of us mostly know for their laptops but is actually a much bigger player, has been pretty much dictating the trends in those "entertainment" and "consumer electronics" sectors lately. They were the first to roll out those Gemstone Blue laptops featuring these early HD or near-HD LCD panels.
Now, looking at monitors... the selection in the US has been pretty timid. They arrived without much fanfare—I think it was LG or Apple—and they're roughly split into two tiers: the budget stuff for the masses and the premium gear for the enthusiasts...
The mass-market models are dirt cheap, giving us unprecedented resolution for very little cash, provided you're willing to give up DVI and HDMI ports (meaning you're stuck with analog VGA). Meanwhile, the enthusiast models—you guessed it—are definitely not cheap, and they include everything the budget ones "forgot"...
Here are examples of both classes from the current catalog:
See that? Have you noticed why this whole mess is happening? It's because of a measly 0.4 inches. We used to have 22" screens, now we have 21.6". We had 24", now it's 23.6". And then they have the nerve to tell us size doesn't matter...
They probably have similar setups in other catalogs; I haven't looked everywhere. But what prompted me to write this is the arrival of these new Dell monitors in both categories. The budget ones are actually quite affordable, so some people might actually like them 😁... Unfortunately, I couldn't find a single decent review online, probably because they're too new... maybe you'll have better luck...
Of course, they all use TN matrices paired with a protective film to boost color perception and contrast. They come with a 3-year warranty, response times ranging from 5ms to 2ms for the top model, a decent 72% color gamut, 6-bit color, and they're extremely efficient with standby power staying under 1W...
So, we have one 20" model with that forgotten 1600x900 DVD resolution for a really low $325:
Then there’s this wannabe 22" Full HD model, aimed at the likes of $375:
And finally, a 24" squeezed down into a 23" frame, packed with all the ports you’d actually need and built-in speakers: perfect for people like $567. I won't even get started on that hideous piano black finish...
There, now you know (though I'm sure most of you already did... 😁)
edit: just so we're clear, I haven't actually touched any of these or tested them out yet... so I can't say a damn thing about the actual image quality or color accuracy...