Posts by Jerry Sanders96

Emily Martin35 said:How on earth can you criticize an animated film😕 who even does that??🤔

Normal people, obviously.

youtube link

Honestly, this looks way better than I ever expected, especially when you consider who’s actually behind the director's chair here.

But let's be real for a second—that killer soundtrack is doing most of the heavy lifting in this trailer; I don't think the vibe would even be half as good without it.

I’m finally sitting down to watch this tonight. Honestly, I’ve been counting down the days ever since I saw on IMDb that Park (who is easily my favorite director outside of Steven Spielberg) was stepping behind the camera for a new project. It feels like the perfect lead-up to when I can finally catch The Last Stand (starring Liam Neeson 👋).

I have zero doubts that both of these are going to be absolute masterpieces... they're just that good 😁

SUCK Your vena !!!!!!

🤣🤣🤣

Natalie Portman😍

Jerry Martinez50 said:I haven't a clue, though I have my doubts. That said, the blog is truly excellent.

Yeah, it’s good... I find myself popping over there every now and then. Honestly, credit to him if he actually owns the thing (unless, of course, he's just busy copy-pasting everything from 😁 )

edit: actually, here , he mentioned on that The Walking Dead thread that it belongs to him.

Jerry Martinez50 said:Even the zombies were just copies:

I'm pretty sure he mentioned somewhere that this was his own blog...

unless he was just pulling our legs like 😁

Jerry Martinez50 said:Get this—every single one of those six threads he started? They're all just copies. 😁 Car!

I mean, I knew he was out there ripping stuff off; even that bit he posted in the chat about The Walking Dead recently felt totally recycled. It hit me as weirdly familiar, and then it clicked—I’d literally just read that exact same thing on a TV forum yesterday. 😁

bluebadger14 said:How does the saying go, fool me once—shame on you, fool me twice—shame on me!...

Maybe this was just a little test to see if we’d catch on? I mean, come on, surely nobody is quite dim enough to think we aren't hanging out with Google every single day!🤷

So basically, every thread he ever opened was just a setup... interesting.😁

@briskhound2
Unless the guy just spent his entire life copy-pasting everything he wrote, which I find hard to believe...

My bad... he definitely mixed up Audition and High Tension 😁

briskhound2 said:I feel like I need to dig this thread up from the graveyard—stumbled onto something by total accident... WTF?

🤣🤣🤣🙏

You honestly can't make this stuff up... I mean, look at the list... and then the guy actually claims he was hesitating for ages before posting. 🤣

But hey, you really have to give him credit for how beautifully he "translated" all of that.

William Price66 said:Honestly, why is everyone spreading such nonsense? You can watch any 3D movie you download via torrent right at home on a 3D monitor with glasses—you can find them on Craigslist for $17. I used to watch movies from rental stores using regular DVDs and those old paper 3D glasses. Let's not spread misinformation; if you couldn't watch 3D torrents on a plasma or LCD screen at home, there would be no point in even having them.

🤣🤣🤣

You're something else... really, you're almost better than JH😁

cosmiclynx57 said:Final Destination (2009)

Man, this was actually the last 3D flick I managed to snag via torrent. Honestly, don't listen to a word Edward Price6 said about the quality—I watched this whole thing in 1080p HD on my 22'' monitor and it looked great!
If anyone's looking for the link, just shoot me a DM.

🤣

So... how were the 3D effects? 😁

Well, I figured it was about time I jumped into this fray too... just to weigh in on points 1 through 6. 😁

ps. Dragon, seriously, major props to you for putting together these awards. 🙏

Right now, this whole thing feels like one really solid fantasy flick😁 Fichtner looks absolutely exhausted...

feralorca82 said:It’s not overrated. It’s just one of those movies where you either absolutely love it or think it's complete garbage. I don't think there's really any middle ground here.

See, for me, it’s right in that middle zone. It isn't total trash, but I wouldn't call it some kind of cinematic masterpiece either—it's just a slightly above-average flick... maybe worth a watch if you have nothing else to do.

And yeah... it is definitely overrated. 😁

Rebecca Harris said:Look, I’ve given my two cents. The first three times I watched it, I was completely lost, but yesterday I finally felt like I reached some kind of conclusion.
Plus, I’ve been scrolling through the threads here trying to finally make sense of all these scattered pieces of the puzzle. 😁

The reason you couldn't wrap your head around it isn't because it's some deep, complex masterpiece; it's because the movie is intentionally nonsensical. It’s designed to leave you hanging without any real answers, not because it's profound, but because it simply doesn't provide them.

Rebecca Harris said:I’ve seen the first two, but I haven't checked out the third one yet.
If you ask me, those first two are pretty much cut from the same cloth. Sure, people claim Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind has a more complex plot, but honestly, the core message is basically identical.
In both movies, you have this protagonist trying to save someone else, going back in time, and attempting to fix things for the better.
And let's get one thing straight—it's not like in Groundhog Day where he's just saving his girlfriend. He keeps looping until everyone is safe, no matter how messy it gets. Even when he decides to just stay in bed and accept reality, there’s that moment where the other character faces some tragedy—like cancer or something—and he ends up going back in again.

For me, the absolute best part is that final scene where they run into each other but don't even recognize one another. It hits so hard.

I actually sat down last night and rewatched Donnie Darko for the fourth time, digging through old threads on various forums and reading every single post to wrap my head around it all...

Donnie Darko doesn't have a "complex" plot at all; the director just failed to explain it properly, so everyone pretends the movie is somehow "deep"... give me a break.☕

feralorca82 said:Wait, wasn't it said they passed on him for the Deadpool role specifically because of his Green Lantern gig, and now they're looking for someone else?

Honestly, what a bummer... he would have been absolutely perfect for that part. 😢

gentlebadger88 said:But personally, I feel like Green Lantern actually has the potential to be a decent movie, so I'm not really sweating it.

Could be... though personally, I'd much rather sit through Deadpool.

Man... let's be real, the fourth installment is already a total disaster, so I seriously doubt anyone’s going to lose sleep over having the same actor back again. Honestly, what bugs me way more is seeing Reynolds juggling both Deadpool and Green Lantern at the same time; it feels like we're stuck in this endless waiting game for Deadpool just because he's busy playing Green Lantern first.