CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Terry Bishop83 › Posts

Posts by Terry Bishop83

7 posts shown.

Request to remove partial content from the Religion PDF in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Even before I officially signed up, I spent an incredible amount of time lurking and reading through the Religion section—and honestly, I just find myself hoping that specific sub-forum is never taken down. There’s this one user there who is just... incredibly unpleasant to deal with—you can practically feel the negative energy radiating off her posts—so I truly hope you guys don't cave to the pressure. That section of the site has such a wide variety of topics, after all... please, don't let the same old issues ruin it again...
Beautiful - San Diego PDF in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Charles Fox10 said:It’s obviously doable—provided everyone actually sticks to the rules and remembers this is primarily a forum for political debates and those discussions that skirt right along the edge of being controversial.

Are you talking about the Sky...forum?🙂

I find it highly unlikely that something like that would ever catch on here—honestly, there's just no way...
Rezon@tor PMbox in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Hmm... a private message is supposed to be private, but here we are in a public forum 🙂

Sam Green73, you can literally just download a plugin or some software online to archive your pm history—I honestly don't understand why you haven't found a way to do that and clear out your inbox already. This whole situation is frankly ridiculous... if someone sends a private message, it should actually stay private
Check out my blog in my signature! in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Kyle Carter2 said:I think I asked this somewhere on here once—whether or not you're allowed to drop a link to your own blog in your signature—but I never actually got a straight answer.

From what I could gather while wading through the forum rules... it’s a no-go. Apparently, you can only promote your blog in the specific sections designated for that kind of thing—certain sub-forums specifically meant for self-promotion—not just tucked away in everyone's signature, right?

Am I remembering that correctly, or am I totally off base here?
And look, if having a blog in your signature is against the rules, then surely you wouldn't mind if we reported those types of users, would you? I mean, you'd want that, wouldn't you? Exactly.

Oh, and why on earth would anyone be such a cheapskate about it? Please, enlighten me—what exactly do they gain from being so stingy?
Drew Edwards8 said:The French teams were basically untouchable from 2008 right up until this last Euro championship... though, if you ask me, I'm convinced Smajlagic stayed behind just so we could finally experience being the kings of world handball for once. Sure, maybe we wouldn't have swept all three major titles like the French did, but we would've snatched up that coveted European gold we've been dreaming about. We might have even walked away with a medal in Germany—and honestly, we probably would have celebrated at least a bronze in Beijing too. If we played in our own home arena, we definitely would've taken down those French guys... assuming they hadn't pushed out Kopljar and filled the roster with more of those Cervar's idiocies.

What to have against Kopljar?
Are you some kind of professional coach or do you actually play the game?
Where do you get the authority to claim Cervar was making mistakes—do you think you could do a better job?
Insults over "Chemtrails" threads are going unpunished in Feedback & Suggestions ·
mistyhound94 said:And where exactly do we draw the line? I see it’s perfectly fine to call everyone else idiots, fools, or backwards—that’s clearly allowed—so apparently, the only thing we aren't permitted to do is use profanity. 🤷

It's true, everyone does it—I certainly do—but I don't resort to personal insults, and that is the crux of the matter. 🤷

So, what? Now I can just sit there for a few hours, whip up some fake documents in Photoshop, and present them as "proof," right? Is that the essence of the Alternative movement? This whole discussion regarding Chemtrails—much like the existence of Chemtrails themselves—has been debunked by countless pieces of evidence and facts... yet the topic just spins in endless circles. Every time someone new wanders in, they start posting, and then everyone else has to re-explain everything from scratch, constantly battling trolls and clones, which this forum is absolutely crawling with. The thread needs to be locked. We should create a new master thread containing all the pro and con posts from the old one, with a mandatory notice to read the first two posts. Any unanswered questions should be moved to a new thread, and any repetition should be penalized—problem solved. It just takes a little willpower, though I am certain none of you moderators actually have the desire to step up and create a properly pinned Top Thread.
Right now, that specific thread makes zero sense being a Top Thread, because if we go down that road, we could just pull any of the most-read threads and pin them at the top. Besides, when the Chemtrails thread wasn't a Top Thread, it sat dormant for ages, only to be resurrected every single time some clone shows up to troll, forcing us to redo the entire explanation over and over again because nobody will just close the loop. You have my suggestion, but I highly doubt anything will actually come of it. ☕

Oh, give me a break! Where on earth has it been debunked regarding the chems? I would argue the exact opposite—it was proven long ago.
Mocking lesbian marriage in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Taylor Morales31 said:Look, I already told you—I’d much rather just stay out of it entirely.

Look, let’s be real: conflict is baked into every single relationship from day one. It's inevitable. And as for this guy’s testimony? It doesn't mean a damn thing. He grew up without a father—the man literally has no concept of what that looks like. Honestly, you can raise a kid without a mother too, and life goes on just the same. Moving on.

Look, this is just not right in my book. I’m telling you, do whatever you want with your own lives, but at least leave the kids out of it. They haven't done anything to deserve this. Especially since you all grew up in a hetero community—you didn't deny yourselves that experience. Sure, you didn't choose how you were born, but at least you had that option available to you...

If we’re talking Adam and Eve, then it’s Adam and Eve—it isn't just "Adam and Adam." That’s my take on it. Just like that's yours, we’re clearly not going to see eye-to-eye on this one. Look, I have absolutely nothing against you being with your wife, but honestly? I just feel for the kids.

Look, here’s the reality of the situation: even if you two want to have a kid, you still need a man—or at least his DNA. At the end of the day, we're talking about biology, and you can't just bypass the fact that it comes from a male. It’s the exact same logic as two men needing a woman to carry and give birth to a child. You can't run away from the biological necessity of a woman in that equation either. Period.
And of course, you all claim to love your own kids, your fathers, and your mothers—yet somehow, you’re perfectly fine with stripping those exact same rights away from these children. It’s blatant, it's reckless, and frankly, it's just plain disrespectful.

Look, I went a little overboard there, but what can I say? It is what it is.

Look, I didn't insult anyone. This is just my opinion. Take a second and actually think about it. Peace.

You are truly just a narrow-minded homophobe.
Do you have any idea what happens to kids in the foster care system? Have you ever actually stepped foot inside a state-run group home?
It's sad but true: those kids in the system are taught trades—often criminal ones. Once they hit eighteen and age out, they're just tossed out onto the street to fend for themselves. Where do you think most of them end up heading?

Have you seen the reality of these homes? The amount of abuse and exploitation? Have you seen how certain "high society" old men in cities like Chicago used to line up to exploit young girls? And you think *that* is better than them having same-sex parents who would give them every ounce of love possible? Your views are so closed-minded that you don't even realize you aren't actually "protecting" children. If you actually cared, you'd understand that a child needs love and a warm home, not some neglected institutional facility. Disgusting.