Posts by Alexander Thompson

Opica, are you telling me they actually tried to slip a non-existent Moreover transformation past you?

Moreover doesn't even exist—though I guess you did lean pretty hard into the whole moreover/furthermore thing in your text:🙏.

And then there's you, being your usual unrefined self, doubling down and starting to smugly brag about how you "corrected" this fake transformation of yours?

silverwolf88 said:What's up? Just hanging out, I guess. I was thinking about that whole thing earlier—you know, the way we look at physics and just assume everything fits into those neat little boxes we learned in high school. It’s funny, really. I guess I was reading up on some stuff regarding mass and energy, specifically how people try to reconcile things like the Mass of Jupiter = A3 / p2 Mass of Jupiter formula, and it just makes you realize how much we gloss over. Anyway, I saw what silverwolf88 was saying about it, and honestly, maybe there's something to it? I don't know. It feels like one of those rabbit holes where you start with something simple and end up questioning the entire fabric of reality. It’s a bit like when you're driving through a small town in the Midwest—everything looks straightforward until you realize the local legends don't quite line up with the official maps. I mean, if you look at the work done by guys like Newton or even the way Gauss's theories play into modern calculations, there's always that tiny bit of friction between the math and what we actually see happening in the world. It’s subtle, though. Most people just move on. But for some of us... well, I guess we just get stuck on the details. Not that I'm claiming to have figured anything out—I'm definitely not that guy—but it's worth pondering while you're staring at the ceiling at 2 AM, right? Did he write it?

Evo, ovo:

Дјоко, немој мене дрзати за дјоку.

Јамцим ти да ни један твој рад неце бити објављен у знанственом цасопису који ја уредјујем. Нити у било којем другом.

За то постоје тисуцу и два разлога.

Ова два су заправо један и исти су и у твом и у мом слуцају.

Ово сматрај загонетком, иако сумњам да си ју у стању одгонетнути. И не, рјесење није булдог.

BTW, unlike you, Gregory Thomas actually has some pretty interesting ideas—I'm thinking someone might reach out to him sooner rather than later.

Него, не описа нам експерименте којима си мјерио гравитацијску константу? Оно епиријски, сјецас се?
Ниси ваљда лагао да си ју мјерио?

silverwolf88 said:So, did you guys actually get around to reviewing Gregory Thomas? Like, did he pass the test? And more importantly—did you give him the green light to publish his work?

А сто ти мислис? Засто би инаце он писао да су ти израцуни лосији од оних из седамнаестог стољеца?

Hey, Opica, let me tell you—I could probably go on forever about Moreover. I guess I just haven't really found the right way to frame it all yet, but honestly? There’s just so much to unpack there. It’s one of those things where you think you’ve got the whole picture figured out, and then you realize you're only looking at the surface level... maybe. Anyway, I'll try to dig a little deeper next time. 😬

silverwolf88 said:If I hadn't factored in Moreover's correction, I probably wouldn't be able to nail down that smaller mass—but then again, I went ahead and tweaked Moreover's formula a bit myself.

Newton, Bato, Newton.

Gregory Thomas said:Basically, if you've got even a decent grasp of high school math—maybe middle school level, honestly—you can see that silverwolf88’s little tweak to Kepler's third law differs from the "official" correction by less than 1%.

So, he managed to mess up a formula from the seventeenth century by a mere 1%? Wow. Way to go!

And wait, there's more! I guess he actually went ahead and doubled the kinetic energy of a moving object too—so now energy isn't (mv^2)/2 anymore, it's just mv^2!

Which, unfortunately, is going to send shipping costs through the roof since we'll apparently need twice the fuel to hit the same speeds. But hey, don't worry, we won't let him publish his "revolutionary" derivation, so things should stay exactly as they are.

In short, it's just one donkey rubbing against another.

Olive oil.

Nicole Myers said:cheap, flimsy fabric

a punch tool

Isn't that cheap stuff usually just old work clothes?

And I've always known a puncher as a tool, you know... like an actual tool.

hiddenmarlin14 said:dick😬

That’s basically about as useful as a screen door on a submarine, isn't it?

hiddenmarlin14 said:total 🙂garbage

jerk

silverwolf88 said:
If American media is basically just a constant stream of scantily clad women...

...and you don't see any naked guys popping up in the feed,

then I guess you probably shouldn't take those pseudo-intellectual news hacks too seriously when they start lecturing us about intelligence

There's a rabbit in that thicket—that's why everyone seems so obsessed with those tiny outfits 😬

Grandpa, oh Grandpa 🙄

And when I suggest that people should actually show up to the Viac sessions on a regular basis, you just think I'm kidding ☕

Look, our guy Oedipus—bless his little heart—he basically runs on pure socialist principles. Everything works just fine... as long as he’s spending someone else's money.

I mean, Djokica’s been rocking those tight briefs since he was a kid—his grandpa used to dress him in them back in the day, I guess, in this really quirky way, and he just ended up liking the fit.

It’s basically just pure rationalization—you know, trying to convince yourself and everyone else that dropping out of college was actually the smartest move you ever made.

Nothing comes of it, I guess.

silverwolf88 said:When it comes to those Italians, man, they really don't mess around when it comes to their work.

I'm with you there, man. That's probably why they just brushed you off instead of actually wasting time debating your half-baked nonsense.

bluecyclist64 said:Man, if I could just figure out how to pack pure logic into a little pill or something—seriously—I’d be absolutely loaded. Like, rolling in it. Forget all those overpriced hair regrowth serums and stuff... I'd make a fortune.🤣

Total waste of time—honestly, nobody’s buying that. It’s like trying to market a cure for stupidity or something... I guess? Just a complete non-starter.

Man, lucky you, having an aunt like that. I bet she'd even toss you a couple of bucks for an ice cream if you asked.

And you didn't exactly have a great relationship with your grandpa—was that because of that whole thing with the suspenders?

silverwolf88 said:My aunt actually told me that anyone talking trash about me is just crazy themselves...

So, I guess you're asking if someone who’s basically a total stalker—someone constantly hovering and trying to ruin your reputation everywhere they go—is actually suffering from some kind of mental issue?

Did she also mention how you're her special little guy, super smart and pretty as a girl??

wanderingpanther68 said:Guys shouldn't wear leggings—it's just plain indecent to be flashing your junk out in public like that... 🤣 🤣 🤣

🙂

So, what, Djokici, you're gonna go around stripping Americans of their constitutional right to look at other guys' junk? I mean, some people actually enjoy the view—it’s part of life, or whatever.

steelwalker26 said:Under the Penal Code:

"Failure to Render Aid

Section 123.

(1) Anyone who fails to assist a person in life-threatening danger, provided they could have done so without significant risk to themselves or others,

shall be punished by up to one year in prison.

(2) Anyone who fails to assist a person in danger whom they themselves caused, provided they could have done so without significant risk to themselves or others,

shall be punished by up to three years in prison."

Say, someone with a history of heart issues passes out. After how much time has passed—once you factor in coordinating witnesses with the police (deciding what gets said and how)—does criminal liability kick in for failing to call 911? Is there such a thing as a "golden hour" where a life can still be saved, or is there some other legal window?

Do these investigations launch automatically, as a matter of official duty, whenever there's suspicion of this crime? Because an investigation alone, using cell tower data, could pinpoint exactly how much time elapsed between the incident and the arrival of the paramedics.

You thinking like Stalin?

Melissa Garcia70 said:So, if we’re assuming being a bankruptcy judge or some corporate liquidator is basically a gold mine, does that mean the guy who actually gets caught is just some freak statistical outlier?!

I mean, that logic kind of explains stuff like those massive corporate scandals you see in the news.

Basically, these crooks spend years looting everything in sight—everyone knows what's happening, but nobody wants to deal with the headache. Until they finally run into a federal prosecutor who actually decides to make a move, and then suddenly, it's all over for them.