In soccer, you're fighting against the rhythm and yourself. In football, you're mostly just fighting yourself.
Think of soccer as trying to sing while playing an instrument at the same time. Football is just singing while catching an occasional, off-beat rhythm.
Soccer flows better, but it’s never so smooth that it becomes predictable.
Honestly, Antonio holds up pretty well for someone born in 1960. Since his co-star is 22 years younger, the age gap isn't even that noticeable.🙂
The movie lacks budget, innovation, twists, and energy, but it’s still worth a single sitting. They definitely went overboard with the depressing atmosphere and the robot designs.
That baby robot was a total fail, too. In just one evening, they somehow assembled a highly mobile, instantly intelligent creature out of random capacitors and old scrap parts. Whatever, let's just chalk that one up to higher intelligence.
The whole concept of adaptation and transferring consciousness is cool, but this version feels stale and uninspired. Naturally, most people in the story are portrayed as villains who kill robots and humans without a second thought.
And they could have come up with an answer regarding the rain changes that actually made sense if they had used their brains.😁 It pulls you in just to let you down.
Interstellar feels way too sappy. I can't stand that kind of melodrama, even if those films always seem to kill it at the box office. Still, I wouldn't be surprised if it's actually decent.
I'm skipping Fury Road because I'll probably walk out deaf.
placidranger said:I almost started fast-forwarding just to see if anything actually interesting would happen before the plot finally kicked in. I haven't seen anything quite like that. The ending was pretty easy to spot, though—mostly from the moment they both dressed exactly the same.
Exactly. That 2% didn't surprise me at all; I was just waiting for the final piece of evidence to drop.
Regardless, it's a solid example of how to make an engaging movie on a tight budget.
signature for solo. Danny Trejo is more feminine than her.
I still can't believe most of these photos are actually real. On some shots, Lawrence has a mole above her right nipple, and on others, it's the left one. 😁
Anthony Barrett37 said: 0.2 to 0.3 percent - coordination stays fine, maybe just a little euphoria or feeling less shy. No obvious depression, just feeling moderately relaxed, I guess.
0.4 to 0.6 percent - feels cheerful and relaxed. Inhibitions start dropping, plus there's a sense of warmth or euphoria. Judgment and memory might slip a bit, and caution goes down. Emotions feel heavier, and behavior can get a little over the top.
0.7 to 0.9 percent - some slight issues with balance, speech, vision, reaction time, or hearing. Judgment and self-control drop, along with memory. A person might honestly think they're doing better than they actually are. Euphoria kicks in.
1 to 1.25 percent - significant trouble with motor coordination and losing touch with reality. Speech might get messy, and balance, sight, hearing, or reaction times suffer. Euphoria is still there.
1.3 to 1.5 percent - major motor function issues and a lack of physical control. Vision gets blurry and balance is pretty bad. That euphoria starts fading, replaced by anxiety, depression, or restlessness. Serious trouble judging things.
1.6 to 1.9 percent - mostly anxiety, depression, and restlessness. Nausea might happen too.
2 percent - confusion and feeling lost or disoriented. Someone might need help just to stand up or walk. If they get hurt, they might not even realize it. At this level, some people deal with nausea and vomiting. There's a risk with the gag reflex or even choking. Blackouts can happen.
2.5 percent - serious impairment across all mental, physical, and sensory functions. Higher risk of choking on vomit or getting hurt from falls or accidents.
3 percent - a state of stupor. They don't know where they are. Sudden loss of consciousness is possible, and waking up from it is hard.
3.5 percent - coma is possible. It’s basically like being under surgical anesthesia.
4 percent or more - coma and potential death from respiratory failure, very low blood pressure, or choking while vomiting.
☕
Out in rural Kentucky, guys drive tractors with a 4.0. Anything under a 2.0 and they can't even drive a straight line on the road. And without those first three or four beers, the construction crews wouldn't even know how to mix mortar.
0.2 to 0.3 BAC - no loss of coordination. Slight euphoria and less shyness. No visible depressive effects; just feeling moderately relaxed.
1.3 to 1.5 BAC - major motor function impairment and lack of physical control. Blurred vision and significant loss of balance. The euphoria fades, replaced by anxiety, depression, and restlessness. Serious issues with judgment and perception.
I’m losing my modesty in this second paragraph, so this is where the real ranking begins for me. ☕
But seriously, people claim a liter of wine puts you over a .08 BAC, and that was always just our warm-up before heading downtown. What total nonsense.
Anthony Barrett37 said:A 0.25% blood alcohol content... that's serious stuff. It causes major issues with mental, physical, and sensory functions. There’s also a much higher risk of choking on vomit or getting hurt from a fall or some other kind of accident. I guess it's just dangerous.
☕
Give me a break. I've read these intoxication charts before. They were clearly written by people who have never actually touched alcohol.