CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › James Taylor3 › Posts

Posts by James Taylor3

670 posts shown.

NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
boldranger said:The three-pointer is a safe bet, but they might split the prize—I figured that would be part of the All-Star setup.
Though "field" doesn't really strike me as the right term here, but what else could be on the menu? 🤷

Where are you guys even placing bets for the All-Star events? There’s nothing for hat tricks or slam dunks in the sportsbook. Not even three-pointers. No dunk contests or any of those other gimmicks.

Edit: Oh, right. That "field" thing might just mean anyone else—basically any player on the roster who isn't explicitly named in the offer.

Exactly, that’s what "the field" refers to. 👍

My bad—I didn't realize the full list wasn't provided. 🙈

Anyway, I won't be betting on it. It's just an exhibition game. 😁
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Joshua Gonzalez33 said:Jones is a genuinely elite shooter—I suspect those 4.5 odds exist simply because he isn't a household name. If he were more widely recognized, he'd be the favorite at 3, so it’s worth a shot. As for the dunk contest, anything can happen. I'd lean toward George, but since they don't just judge the dunk itself—it's the whole package and the flair—it feels too risky for me. Basically: take Jones and wait for the rapper to show up in the pocket.

I don't see him pulling it off. My money is on Morrow—he's been a top-tier shooter for years—and Anderson, who has been absolutely on fire since late last season. 😁

Regarding the dunk contest, there's no judging anymore; they scrapped the jury scores. It's strictly SMS votes and fan engagement now.

Man, I just want some luck. 🤣

So, can someone clarify what this last part means:

image

🤷
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Alex Cook said:Prika, you're forgetting that Shumpert will likely be paired up with Jeremy Lin. 😉

Schumpert is dealing with an injury or something—he pulled out of the dunk contest, so we won't be seeing any dunks over Jeremy Lin's couch. 🤣

Which subforum are you posting in, mod? I hope it's under other sports. 😁
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
I was halfway through writing a long post when I accidentally closed the tab. 🤦

Here’s what I had:

Anderson in the three-point contest @ 4.51—the guy could probably sink 52 straight threes without breaking a sweat, let alone in a competition. ☕

Derrick Williams in the dunk contest @ 4.36—he might mess something up alongside Rubiom, but we all know how much the fans have been obsessing over him lately. Since this is a fan vote, if I recall correctly, he’s a logical pick. 😁

Pinny also has the Skills Challenge on the menu. That's that nonsense where players sprint around cones, weave through hoops, and finish with a layup. At least, that's how it worked last year. It’s pure explosiveness, and in that department, John Wall is unbeatable @ 5.23.
To be fair, Westbrook might actually be slightly more explosive, but he tends to make mistakes—he might lose his handle or miss a turn around the cones. 🤣
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Forget about betting the under. 🙂

The Golden State Warriors dropped 39 in the first. 🙏 😠

The Cavs are pushing it too. 🤣

Honestly, I should have just waited for the All-Star break.

For the rest of the season—I'm only playing the playoff contenders and the ones who actually think they belong there. ☕
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
One last one before bed:

Cleveland vs New Orleans pick
Pick: Cleveland -5.5


odds: 2.02

Stake: 4/10


Cleveland is clearly the superior side here compared to the Hornets—who are still dealing with a massive wave of injuries, particularly in the frontcourt. Honestly, they’re easily the worst team in the league right now. This is their third game in three nights—a brutal b2b2b stretch—and they just exhausted themselves in overtime last night. Cleveland is on a back-to-back, sure, but since they're playing at home, there's no travel fatigue involved, unlike New Orleans.
The Cavaliers might be looking ahead toward the playoffs, which should give them some extra bite tonight. I think they take this.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Nicholas Chase34 said:I actually stumbled upon him the other day 😁

Just hoping they don't shut it down over copyright issues or some other nonsense. 😁

Nicholas Chase34 said:Agreed—not sure why the spread jumped by 4 points 😕
It’s definitely sitting higher now, maybe by 5 or 6 points 🤷

Doesn't make sense to me either, but whatever—let them have it. 🙂
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
33w/35l ; +17,258 units ; ROI: +5.11%

Phoenix vs Golden State
Pick: Under 206.5 total points


Odds: 1.917

Bookmaker: Pinnacle

Unit: 8/10


The line feels a bit inflated for tonight. These aren't those old-school run-and-gun squads that were routinely dropping 130 points back in the day.
Phoenix is a veteran group—two of their starters combined are pushing 80 years old. I'm talking about Steve Nash and Tim Hill. That said, Marcin Gortat might actually be their most impactful player this season; he’s finally seeing real minutes and proving his worth. He's got genuine double-double potential, so the Suns made a smart move there. The rest of the roster is finding its rhythm after a shaky start, specifically Gerald Dudley and Al Frye. Even the rookie, Marcus Morris, looks promising, particularly on the defensive end.

Golden State has struggled on the road (3-8), and they haven't even managed to beat Phoenix at home in their last 13 meetings. The last time the Warriors took a win in Arizona was all the way back in 2005. Monta Ellis has been inconsistent, and frankly, he hasn't looked great this season even when healthy.

A quick look at the numbers: Golden State ranks 4th offensively, averaging 99.0 points per game, while Phoenix sits at 16th with an average of 94.3.
Defensively, Golden State gives up 100.6 points per game, whereas Phoenix allows just 96.8.

Injury reports are relatively clean for both sides. Phoenix is fully intact heading into tonight, while Golden State has been missing center Kwame Brown since the start of the season, and they'll be without Andris Biedrins tonight as well. It looks like Andre Udoh is healthy and available to suit up.

Both teams are facing their final matchup before the All-Star Break (Phoenix doesn't play again until Jan 3rd, and Golden State isn't back until Feb 28th, so they have plenty of downtime). They'll likely bring maximum intensity on the defensive end—there's no reason to save anything for later.

They've met twice already this season, and both contests stayed well under tonight's projected total. The first meeting in Phoenix on Jan 2nd ended 102-91 for the home team, and the second, held in Golden State, saw the Warriors win 102-96. Total scores were 193 and 198 respectively.

In my view, tonight's line is overshooting by about 5 or 6 points, so I’m taking this with high confidence. While I think Phoenix is in better shape and likely to win, the under is the much more attractive play here.

I don't see either side breaking the 100-point mark, let alone anyone clearing 110.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
That's right, panda—if I recall correctly, they played Detroit constantly last season in their matchups, and the odds were always solid. 👍

Hey, that link in your signature is top-tier; I only just realized how good it is. 🙏 🙏 🙏
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
I thought I’d hold off on the betting until the All-Star Game, but I need to get back in the action—today's slate is too good to pass up. 😍

Dallas Mavericks, LA Clippers, OKC getting dismantled... 🤷
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Ethan Kern11 said:NBA betting odds
Chicago is the better team and should take this one—though I can't recall the last time they blew the Bucks out by 20 points. No matter how much you look at past stats, I don't see a matchup like this happening. The Bucks had a day off, too; they should be able to hold them to something under 20.

I'm not sure of the exact score—can't check right this second—but didn't the Bulls absolutely dismantle them about two weeks ago over in Milwaukee? 🤷

I know they held a lead of about 30 in that game.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
stormyseal9 said:I've been following him since his days at Duke—he was born in Anchorage, if I recall correctly. And honestly, I doubt Carlos is his actual first name; it just doesn't sit right with me. It feels a bit too perfect.🤷Honestly, why anyone trusts Wikipedia is beyond me—anyone can write whatever they want on there. By the way, I messed up earlier: Carlos Boozer of the Utah Jazz was born in Juneau, AK. I know he's from Alaska—my mistake—but that has zero bearing on this conversation unless some random ancestor drifted there a few centuries ago. And look, let's not get bogged down in debates about where someone is from or their heritage; it doesn't change the reality here. In sports, you can never truly predict how many shots a player will take or just how efficient they'll actually be.

He was just born in Germany, at some military base—I read about that last year. He’ll probably end up being some soldier type of dad. 🙂
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
stormyseal9 said:Actually, Carlos Boozer is from Alaska, so maybe everything isn't the fault of the refs this time.

Do a quick Google search.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Man, you’re just talking nonsense now—completely forgetting about the Bulls and the Hawks.

James Richardson3 said:It doesn't matter—just joking around since I realized I missed the thread. But regardless, here's my take: I'm not totally sold on Jeremy Lin right now because if C.A. returns, we all know how much he demands the ball—that could limit his opportunities... anyway, what are the odds of this hitting? Not that I care deeply since I'm focused on soccer, but I'm curious.

Yeah, Lin might see fewer touches—Carmelo is back, you've got J.R. Smith in the mix, maybe even Baron Davis. Who knows? The guy is on a roll, though; they might decide to feed him tonight.🤷
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
placideagle said:Marc, don't be surprised—James Taylor3 is just messing with everyone at this point.☕

I only take advice from my elders. ☕
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
James Richardson3 said:The Lottery? 😕 😕 I don't get it—not looking for links, just opinions.

Just kidding—I see you got redirected from that other NBA thread. 🤣

That parlay of yours is basically a lottery ticket. Too many legs, slim chances. 🤷

Personally, I’d cut one or two games and bump up the stake. 🤷
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
James Richardson3 said:1. Jeremy Lin over 20
2. Dwight Howard under 21
3. Memphis Grizzlies win away at Houston Rockets (according to the betting lines, this would be an upset) 😕 😕
4. Marc Gasol over 15
5. Milwaukee Bucks win at home against Orlando Magic (another upset according to the books) 😕 Just some thoughts for today—curious to hear what everyone else thinks.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
James Taylor3 said:Portland vs. LA Clippers over 188.5

Odds: 1.926 Pinnacle

Stake: 5/10

I’m too tired to write out the full reasoning—just want to sleep—but I suspect the line will be missed by about 6 or 7 points. Expecting both teams to hit near the 100 mark.

🤦

Yeah, they missed the mark entirely; game ended with 145 total points. 😂

Taking a few days off.

Ethan Kern11 said:Pierce under fine ☕

Thanks to everyone who recommended this to me. 😁

And what about me, since I was the one who told you to defend him? Nothing? 🙂
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Portland Trail Blazers vs. LA Clippers: Over 188.5

Odds: 1.926 Pinnacle

Confidence: 5/10

I’m too tired to break down the specifics right now—honestly, I just need sleep—but I think the line is set way too low by about 6 or 7 points. Expecting both teams to hit near the 100 mark.
NBA Betting: Vol. 2 in Betting Forum ·
Ethan Kern11 said:What’s the consensus—is Pierce almost certainly going under?

Just waiting on that one specific outcome before I commit a massive chunk of my bankroll—not sure if I should build my position yet...

edit: just doing some reading here and seeing everyone is pretty convinced. Fair enough.😁

Alright, let me weigh in so it isn't just a unanimous vote for the Pierce under. 😁

I don't think that 16.5 line is an impossible mountain to climb—Pierce has a habit of taking over, even when he's having an off night. He knows how to draw fouls, too, and he's reliable at the charity stripe when the game is on the line.
Deng is a solid defender, but a guy like Pierce can catch fire and drop a few triples to cruise right up to that number.

Just my two cents, though. 😁