43 posts shown.
Stop trolling.
That wasn't even close to what I meant, so please, let's not get pedantic about my wording here.
Let’s just get back to the original post.
And Admin, if you could please clear out these troll comments? They're honestly just a huge distraction from the actual point I'm trying to make.
briskbison55 said:The swastika was used to target gay people through blatant violence and inhumane experimentation. If someone is looking for a "provocation," I’d say being trampled by a crowd is a much more fitting target than someone who simply doesn't want to associate with you. That’s just my take, anyway—and honestly, people toss the term "homophobic" around way too lightly these days.
Oh, goodness, no! I am certainly not talking about *that* version of the symbol. I'm referring to the ancient one, the kind used ages ago in India as a beautiful sign of prosperity and goodwill.
Do you see where I'm coming from here? It's all about context...
boldwalker12 said:So, you're saying the swastika and the cross are exactly the same thing?
That logic really doesn't help your case at all.
Eric Hernandez said:Honestly, I think what would offend Christians most is you equating the cross with a swastika in the first place—long before we even get to the whole rainbow-colored cross debate.
Do you really think a rainbow-colored swastika would be blamed because of the symbol itself, or because of the rainbow colors?
I am truly, deeply sorry if my point hasn't quite landed with everyone here.
Regrettably, I can't exactly walk you through it myself.
Please, I beg of you, don't go down this path. We all know how this goes—when you try to have an argued, justified, and constructive debate that happens to clash with the Admin's personal convictions (regardless of the actual rules), things usually end up getting locked tight.
So, given that this topic actually has potential for some high-quality discussion, let's just leave it on its shaky footing without anyone trying to twist my comparisons into something they aren't.
Thank you.
restlesscanyon52 said:Why on earth are you claiming that debt is some exclusive trait belonging only to the LGBT community? Honestly, I find that incredibly offensive! 🙂
Would you guys actually be up in arms about this being... I mean, seriously, would you even complain if this turned out to be the case? It’s one of those things that really makes you stop and think! Personally, I find myself constantly weighing these little dilemmas. It reminds me of this time back in Chicago when I was trying to decide between two different coffee shops—one was much more upscale, but the other just had that cozy, lived-in feel, you know? Anyway, I'm genuinely curious! What’s the consensus here? Are we talking a minor grievance or a full-blown outcry? I'd love to hear everyone's take on it! So, I was just sitting here thinking about this whole thing—this idea of out-of-hospital treatment programs for kids. You know, when you step away from that sterile, overwhelming hospital environment and try to find a way to care for them closer to home. It’s such a massive topic, really! It makes me think of those times my own nephew was under the weather, and honestly, being stuck in those white hallways with the constant beeping of machines... it's just exhausting for everyone involved, isn't it? There's something so vital about the approach of treating children through community-based or outpatient programs rather than keeping them tethered to a hospital bed. It’s about more than just medicine; it’s about letting them be kids! They get to stay in their own beds, eat familiar food, and actually see their friends instead of staring at a IV drip all day. It’s a completely different psychological landscape. Of course, it requires an incredible level of coordination between specialized pediatricians and the families, but when it works? It’s absolutely transformative. It’s like moving from a rigid, institutionalized structure to something much more fluid and human-centric. Truly remarkable stuff if we can get the logistics right! Putting a rainbow on a cross? Honestly, I think that’s a brilliant move! A rainbow is such a bright, positive symbol, right? And the cross itself—it's a powerful, uplifting icon. When you look at what this organization actually does, their work is nothing short of inspiring. It's all about positivity. I mean, come on, who could possibly argue against that? No one!
Here we go again! 🤦 I’m going to have to ask that we please refrain from doing that. Honestly, I really think it's best if we just don't go down that road!
It’s just like how I could sit here all day and talk about the swastika being nothing more than a symbol of peace, happiness, and good vibes. I mean, I could even go ahead and paint it in rainbow colors... which would still be a positive symbol, right? And totally unrelated to the LGBT community, obviously!
How many seconds do you think it would take before I get hit with a permanent ban—no appeals, no explanations, just straight to the digital void?
Look, I’m going to ask one more time: please, for the love of all that is holy, stop playing dumb just to look like you know better than everyone else! 🤦
The message and that symbol... well, they're crystal clear! It's nothing short of pure provocation!
mistyseal8 said:Well, let me circle back to you for a second, Eugene. It’s not just that you’re rocking that specific avatar, either—it’s the way you throw around terms like "homophobe." Honestly, using language like that is just aggressive, insulting, and frankly, pretty sneaky.
Personally, I don't have any issues with that terminology at all, so I'm right there with boldwalker12 on this one!
briskbison55 Asks:
Not to take sides here—really, I’m staying neutral—but I just have to say, it’s honestly such a shame to see that icon get ruined if someone goes around coloring it in. It’s just a poor little thing! Was it a deliberate provocation? You bet it was. Does it have any actual impact on you or your faith? Honestly, no. So, please, don't lose any sleep over it! This whole thing has been around for thousands of years, weathering all sorts of shifts and changes long before we showed up, and it’ll keep doing just fine without us stepping in to save the day. 😉
And that’s really the crux of the whole matter! It all boils down to this one point. Once you allow a moderator to engage in deliberate provocation, the entire system just falls apart. It's quite a serious issue, if you ask me!
Matthew Anderson said:It’s actually vital to provide some context here—specifically showing that you just can't stand the LGBT crowd—because that casts your accusations about the avatar in a completely different light. Besides, rustydrifter10 already dismissed the whole controversial avatar issue right here, no need for links:
by Nick
All I really want from rustydrifter10 is a straight answer to my two questions.☕
Furthermore, I would kindly ask that you pass along my request for the owner of this forum to weigh in on the matter of modifying religious symbols.
And please, stop trying to deflect back onto me; instead, try arguing why I am actually wrong...
As for this business of "context" and "different lights," it honestly just proves that objectivity in moderating an American forum is hitting rock bottom.
Matthew Anderson said:I honestly feel like you ought to start by sweeping the porch in front of your own house before you go worrying about anyone else's yard! You really should focus on cleaning up your own doorstep first because...
He actually went and called the whole LGBT crowd "old biddies"!
b) A self-proclaimed homophobe, if I'm being honest about my own words!
So, there’s this one individual out there—you know the type—who goes around labeling the entire LGBTQ+ community as having "incorrect" sexual orientations. Just completely dismissive, right? It's honestly quite something.
d) That one guy who used to call women "chickens" and basically ordered them straight back to the kitchen.
...that one individual who used to refer to the LGBT community as some kind of "special, bulletproof breed."
And let’s not even get started on those endless, rambling conspiracy theories about "special interest lobbies" or some shadowy "forces of darkness" pulling all the strings!
And so it goes! I really think the Admin should definitely take a moment to actually look into why John Newman34 was banned in the first place when responding to this thread. It’s just so obvious—I mean, it’s glaringly apparent to anyone watching—that his whole attitude is fueled by this intense, blatant hostility toward the LGBT community. It's quite something, really!
That indictment under point D is a total fabrication! Even if someone took it out of context, there’s no way it wasn't just a joke. I mean, honestly, come on! It was clearly just some banter that got blown way out of proportion.
Look, I’ve got my own takes on this, which are pretty firm, if you ask me!
Completely irrelevant.Well, when I ended up getting flagged, it was strictly because I broke the rules. Honestly, I stepped out of line!
Just like how Eugene does it right now!
There’s really no need to focus on me here—this isn't actually about my personal business! It is quite fascinating, though, how you immediately recognized the logic behind my argument and decided to pivot straight into a counterattack instead. 🙏
Well, I think you’ve just gone and proven exactly how biased this whole setup is... honestly! It seems like it doesn't even matter if the rules were actually broken or not; all that counts is who gets to be the one to open the thread and report the violation in the first place. It's all about the messenger, isn't it? Just absolutely ridiculous!
Bravo! Way to go! 👍
True impartiality. 🙏
P.S. btw, that post is basically a textbook example of someone just posting low-effort bait just to get a reaction.
Richard Nelson84 said:I have absolutely no intention of getting into a debate regarding my avatar. I’m not planning on changing it, so I'll leave it up to the Admins to decide what they want to do with it. However, I just want to point out one specific thing. It seems like the LGBT community is being portrayed as if they are inherently enemies of Christianity. By doing that, you aren't just insulting gay Christians or any other homosexual individuals—you’re actually insulting me, too. Frankly, you are displaying deeply personal homophobic (yes, homophobic!) views. I don't hate Christians, nor is it my intention to offend anyone. My reasons for choosing this avatar are private, and they shall remain strictly private.
Eugene, you’ve taken a religious symbol in your avatar and modified it in your own particular way.
Can you really not see how that isn't exactly the most respectful move?
The LGBT community and Christians—just like with any other major religious organization—have never exactly been on speaking terms. That is simply a fact.
It shouldn't matter if their stances are completely diametric. The LGBT community has specific demands... ranging from the legality of same-sex marriage to the issues of parenting and adoption, which the Church, much like the leadership of any other dominant religion, stands firmly against.
Those are facts. We aren't talking about personal opinions here; we are looking at the big picture.
But honestly, all of that is secondary. What truly matters, and what should be the heart of this discussion, is whether religious symbols are allowed to be altered in a way that a single individual deems "appropriate" or "adequate."
I truly don't want to believe that you can't see just how controversial your little creation actually is.
You see, there's a bit of hypocrisy in your post.
You claim that certain viewpoints bother you and feel offensive—which isn't okay—but then in the very next breath, you argue that a specific opinion or creation is your own personal, private stance, implying you couldn't care less if others find it offensive or hurtful.
That's not exactly okay, is it? 👎
As for the Admins, I am simply waiting for answers to the two direct questions I put to them.
silvertiger11 said:If my memory from Sunday school serves me right, the rainbow represents a covenant between people and God—you see it pop up all over the Bible.
It’s kind of like how the swastika is actually an ancient symbol used in India to represent good fortune and prosperity.
So, if I were to sport a rainbow-colored swastika, I'd basically just be signaling my support for happiness within the LGBTQ movement! 👍👍 👍
Come on now, let's not pretend we're all acting clueless here! 😉
To kick things off, I’m going to lay out the general rules for the Marketing Forum, as posted by the highest level of management:
On this forum, we have a few ground rules you need to follow:
Breaking federal laws!
It’s just... honestly, it’s a total violation of everything we consider basic civilized behavior. We're talking about a complete breakdown of the social contract here! It’s one thing to be a little rude, sure, but this? This is crossing a line that most decent Americans wouldn't dream of touching. It really makes you wonder where the standard for decency went, doesn't it? Just completely unacceptable.
3. Harassment or insults based on any grounds whatsoever—be it race, nationality, religion, age, gender, or anything else...
Now, let's talk about the rules! We’ve got to address the basics here: absolutely no profanity, no flamewars, and—this is a big one—no spamming. I'm talking about those repetitive posts where someone just keeps hitting "send" on the same thought over and over again. It gets old fast! Let's keep things civil and fresh, shall we?
5. Copyright Infringement
Listen, we really need to clear the air on this one! Just a friendly heads-up that posting any kind of pornographic or erotic content—including those sneaky, "hidden" shots of nudity—is strictly off-limits here. That goes for all the violent stuff too, and please, don't even think about dropping links to those kinds of sites. We want to keep this space clean and welcoming for everyone, you know? Let's just keep things classy!
7. advertising (the kind that hasn't been given the green light by the Marketing Forum)
8. General Chat (Off-Topic Lounge)
9. The whole business of creating clones!
10. Doxxing and exposing other users' private information
11. being a troll (essentially, that’s when you start dropping snarky, rude, or just plain offensive comments specifically to annoy everyone else in the thread, stir up unnecessary drama, and derail the whole conversation just for the sake of it.)
Alright, let's get this out of the way—this thread is officially off-topic! Moving on!
Harassing other users... honestly, where does it end? It’s just one thing after another lately! I feel like I’m seeing it everywhere on these message boards—people just picking on each other for no reason at all. It’s quite frankly exhausting to witness. One minute you're having a perfectly lovely, civilized discussion about tech or whatever, and the next, someone decides to go on a complete tear against another member. It’s just not done! It reminds me of that time I was stuck in a long line at a Starbucks in Chicago—you know, one of those super busy ones where everyone is just on edge? There was this one guy, absolutely convinced he was the center of the universe, just being incredibly rude to the barista and snapping at anyone who breathed too loudly near him. Total chaos! And that’s exactly what this feels like. People are just lashing out because they can, without any regard for the community spirit we're supposed to be fostering here. We should be lifting each other up, not dragging people down into the mud! It’s just... well, it's disappointing, really. Truly disappointing.
14. SHOUTING IN ALL CAPS!
15. Playing dumb.
rustydrifter10, according to the hierarchy, the next one says:
We strictly prohibit anything that clashes with federal laws, promotes human rights violations, or constitutes any form of direct, blatant, or even generalized insult—basically, if it's inappropriate, it's out. Just like when we’re reviewing posts that someone claims are offensive, we have to look closely at whether an actual violation occurred or if it's just one person's subjective impression. We apply that same level of scrutiny to every other part of the profile to ensure all our guidelines are being followed to the letter!
First off, I really have to hand it to Eugene—that was a masterclass in subtle provocation! His new avatar is such a brilliantly placed little insult. Truly clever stuff! 👍
Absolutely brilliant! Truly spectacular!
It’s sneaky and blunt all at once, yet somehow leaves just enough wiggle room to spin it into some completely different interpretation!
I’m ready to learn everything you have to teach me!
So, I was just looking at his profile picture—you know, that little avatar thing—and honestly, it’s just straight-up chaos. Total mayhem!
Fact.
It’s quite obvious what that cross represents, isn't it? It serves as a profound religious symbol for Christians.
Fact.
That symbol representing a certain religion—and even its entire administration, really—has been quite cleverly modified in a specific way by the moderator who posted it! It’s actually pretty brilliant how they tweaked it.
He went ahead and splashed it in all those rainbow colors—you know, the ones used by the LGBTQ+ movement.
In that way, Eugene desecrated the very symbol of a specific religion—that entire faith! What exactly constitutes a direct, blatant, and general insult? I mean, talk about being indecent! It’s basically being offensive in every single way possible. Honestly, there's just no way around it when someone goes that far.
As far as he's concerned, he's gone and broken both rule number two and rule number three!
As for the Admin, they just don't seem to grasp why taking a Christian cross and turning it into a rainbow-colored design could be seen as offensive or provocative. It feels like a direct violation of Rule 15, which covers general conduct on the forum. I mean, it’s pretty straightforward, right? You follow the rules, you keep things respectful, and that's that! It's all about maintaining the standards we agreed upon when we joined this community.
I truly believe that any kind of tampering or modification of religious symbols should be met with real consequences. I mean, think about it—people attach such a profound sense of reverence, awe, and sacredness to their faith symbols. It’s deeply personal! And honestly, one shouldn't even have to spell out why there's such a fundamental incompatibility between Catholicism and the LGBT movement. It just doesn't align.
You all can keep playing dumb if you want, honestly! You can go on with those tired lines like, "Oh, it’s just a colorful crisis," or start whining about my avatar because it shows something you don't personally care for—as if that image is somehow promoting hate or discrimination, which it isn't! But, just like I’ve pointed out to this group before, acting like you don't understand the situation is strictly against the Marketing Forum rules.
Honestly, that avatar really should be considered controversial if we're talking about the standards of this Marketing Forum! And since it belongs to the Admin himself, I feel like there ought to be some kind of sanction put in place. It just doesn't sit right with me!
I would like to kindly request that the Admin reach out to Anderson and ask him to weigh in on this matter, seeing as the general rules carry his official signature.
Look, I didn't start this whole thread just to ramble on about my own little whims or marvel at things for the sake of it—though, heavens, that can be quite fun sometimes! No, no. I actually have some very specific questions I need to tackle:
Does everyone get equal footing here regarding religion on this forum?
Is it actually legal—and just how far can you go—when it comes to modifying the official symbol of a specific religion?
So, I’ve been sitting here thinking—really dwelling on it, actually—and I think I might finally be ready to change my avatar. It's been such a long time, hasn't it? I was just staring at the screen, wondering if a fresh look might be in order! 😉
Since I’m pretty well acquainted with how things work around here—and let’s be honest, we all know the specific leanings and "ideologies" this forum tends to favor—I have a very good idea of just how slim the chances are that the moderator is going to touch that tiny little avatar.
But look, if we’re still pretending there’s nothing controversial about it, then I’m calling you out, Eugene! Since you used that avatar to send what I assume was your "message of peace and tolerance"—you know, the whole "LGBT folks are also God's children" sentiment... though I suspect it was actually meant to be a jab at people's religious symbols rather than a genuine olive branch—well, why stop there? If you're going to take a religious symbol and splash rainbow colors all over it, why not go ahead and do the exact same thing with an Islamic symbol?
If you aren't just looking to spread love and tolerance within one specific circle, we shouldn't be discriminating! If you're truly such a brave LGBT knight, then come on, expand your field of operations! 😉
Of course, since the Admin says that simply coloring a religious symbol in rainbow hues isn't offensive in any way whatsoever, I’m absolutely certain that Muslims won't take offense either. In fact, I'm sure they'll find a way to thank both you and the rest of the forum staff for the gesture.
Whew, it feels like it’s been an absolute eternity since I last logged on here...
I know, I know—this is a total open-ended shitshow of a topic that I wouldn't normally bother posting about, but since it's that time of year and the moderators are being a bit more relaxed, and my initial report on the first post didn't really get anywhere before the mod finally moved it to this thread...
So, please, give me the full ban. Just wipe my record clean. (I've already bolded my request)
Thanks in advance!
supersoldier said:I'm not even going to dignify this with a comment.
We are talking about adults here who clearly haven't mastered basic grammar. What kind of "kids" are you even talking about? 😕
Do you actually realize what you're saying right now? It still hasn't clicked for you that in the 21st century, people who can't write are just plain ignorant. You keep bringing up doctors as if they're some kind of pinnacle of perfection... obviously, you have no clue how things work, so let me break it down: our healthcare system is a complete disaster. The only upside is that it's free.
Nicole Ruiz acted like the fool she is, and now I look like a fool just for trying to explain this to you.
Hehe, well, the exact same thing applies to you as it did to her above. 😁
People like you are living proof of why the rest of the world looks at us as backward, narrow-minded idiots. We spend all our time acting like we're so sophisticated, yet we can barely sign our own names properly. (And for some reason, everyone acts like that's perfectly normal 😁).
supersoldier said:I'm signing off on this one. You need confidence, vision, and all that, but with this ridiculous nonsense, you've shown your true colors, Nicole Ruiz. It’s exactly what I expected from someone like you.
It’s obvious life has handed you everything on a silver platter, but it’s also clear you don't have the slightest clue how to appreciate it. In fact, you actually use your status as a way to mock others.
All this pseudo-intellectual babble you're doing about quantum physics and other nonsense can be taken straight back to your dim-witted wife who might actually buy into it. And the same goes for the rest of your sycophants hanging out in your decaying, limited little circle.
Actually, thank you, because you just proved my point—you're nothing but a clown with a massive dose of snobbery and a totally inflated ego. I've debunked every single one of your baseless claims—they were just mindless ramblings about things you clearly know nothing about.
You can try to pull the wool over anyone else's eyes... but not mine. I'm perceptive enough to see that you're a total farce and a walking example of everything wrong with the USA. It's precisely because of people like you that it isn't worth staying here.
(Back to the topic)And thanks again, because you've just solidified my view on how incredibly difficult it is to meet a normal person who doesn't constantly play these social games.
That’s really the core of the issue when it comes to finding a partner, whether it's "fuck buddy" or whatever—are we actually prepared to wait for someone worthy of our attention, or are we just going to lower our standards because we're terrified of being alone? —in your case, that would mean lowering them all the way to the floor.🤣
Just so we are clear, the human body does not consist of 90% water; the actual numbers hover around 60 percent 🙂 - you are honestly just an uneducated peasant, blathering on about such nonsense, when you aren't even aware that at best, you just look pathetic ☕
supersoldier said:I don't doubt for a second that you all are happy. The mere fact that anyone would actually want to be with someone like you just reinforces my theory that most women end up with total losers and manipulators. We shall see how long this little idyll of yours lasts—maybe if you run out of cash, things will turn into a complete disaster 🤣
In any case, you aren't just being a judgmental, stupid, and lazy jerk toward your own gender, but toward normal men as well. It is pure luck that you live in the US, where people usually just roll their eyes at such flaws.
Oh, of course it was a typo. A typo in two different places, coupled with the fact that you poured every ounce of effort into writing this massive post that's clearly meant to make you look smart and superior.
Why should I care when you've run into the wrong person—namely, me? I can read between the lines, and I am certainly not going to let you pull the wool over my eyes with your nonsense. Don't even bother trying to throw more "scientific" garbage my way, because I am obviously much better informed on the subject than you are.
I never said women are sluts; I said they create these cosmic dating conditions while having nothing special to offer themselves. I said they chase bad boys in their early years, and then they get a rude awakening later when those same guys screw them over—which is entirely predictable. I said they usually end up with men who turn out to be idiots—and most importantly, I said that teenage girls and young college students often follow crooked paths, value the wrong things, and have skewed mindsets.
As for men, yes, men are mostly manipulative pigs who only want sex because they aren't mature or capable enough for a real relationship. They aren't even mature enough for a casual hookup; they just have constant air between their ears. Don't worry, I want sex too—plenty of it—but not in a way where my relationship feels like a battlefield where one person is constantly competing against the other.
You see, that is just my way of thinking, but it is also a fact. The statistics regarding breakups and divorces prove that theory. Just look at the number of TRULY happy relationships out there.
I don't have an aversion to everything, but I do have an aversion to manipulators like you whose IQ is on par with a desk lamp—which you demonstrated yourself through your shocking ignorance of basic facts—all while you try to hide behind snide comments. It doesn't make me happy, but it doesn't make me unhappy either.
Happiness is relative; I haven't found mine yet because I've been surrounded by fools who are just as much of a zero today as they were before.
And I would ask you to please stop commenting here. When I think about the fact that you can't even write properly, and yet you still have the audacity to toss out scientific trivia that you've even misquoted! (And then you claim it's a typo, wow, what a great excuse) You are repulsive.
And, staying on topic, I don't know why there is so much arguing about making moves and how men behave. If I make a move and it works—great; if not—I'll give a polite nod and walk away. Those who refuse to let it go are just low-class peasants, and truth be told, there are plenty of them, but that doesn't mean you all need to be closed off to everyone. Maybe you'll be pleasantly surprised one day.🙂
Nicole Ruiz said:Just wonderful.
The author goes on and on about how she’s constantly being hit on by married men who claim they’d do anything for her—which is really just a roundabout way of implying she’s physically stunning. Then, she pivots to how we're living in "strange times" because men don't splash cash on their girlfriends like they used to, or invest financially in their partners anymore. And right after all that, she casually mentions that, well, she's currently having some money troubles.
It is quite a beautifully packaged advertisement for providing sexual services for a fee.
Is there actually a rule somewhere stating that it's prohibited to offer illegal services on this forum, or even to encourage others to do so?
No, honestly, this thread isn't for the right key... let some girl go find her clientele elsewhere.
And believe it or not, some women actually enjoy sex just for the sake of the pleasure itself; they have no need to attach a price tag to sexual satisfaction, otherwise they'd be labeled... hookers.
anti-corruption said:Yeah, I'd sell my soul for cash. Happy now?
Alex said:Look, anti-corruption, we'll do it this way. I'm going to let this failed attempt at trolling the moderation pass without a ban, but consider this your second warning. Go read the forum rules. Furthermore, just because you started the thread doesn't mean you get to troll and demolish everyone else with aggressive rhetoric. Also, if you continue to advertise here as a way to solicit money for sex, even if it's born out of personal frustration or something that has nothing to do with us, you will be banned.
On top of that, the author makes these statements in another thread:
http://www.example-us-forum.com/showpost.php?p=4...9&postcount=19I'm not complaining about anything, I am simply offering further praise to our fantastic moderation team.
Bravo! 🙏
Sophia Thomas7 said:On the grounds that the moderator decided—rightfully so—that you're looking for a girl for a threesome, and those kinds of ads don't belong on the US Forum.
And besides that, why are we playing dumb? You know exactly what you're doing. If these types of posts aren't allowed, they aren't allowed—so what's there to argue about?
Well, I'm playing dumb because the other side is playing dumb too (you really should read this entire thread from the very beginning).
That is the whole reason for this massive uproar! And I truly believe you’re seeing the exact same things I am (+that section of the Forum I can't access, which I suspect would provide the "big picture" perspective).
Why do you think the administration is just ignoring this topic and the whole discussion? (I mean, you know... I assume there's a private debate happening in the moderator section)
Do you actually have any idea what it is I really want and am searching for?
Tyler Cruz32 said:Here is that text you posted from another thread some time ago:
I wouldn't say that...
Look, I put up an advertisement just like the one I had before, and a woman reaches out saying, "Sure, but I'm coming with my boyfriend, so can he go at you while I'm making out with you?"
God...
Ah, the US isn't even what it used to be.
It is quite obvious that you are looking for a third person for sex.
Lately, we have tightened our criteria regarding advertisements. Your ad was removed in consultation with my colleagues and the supermoderator, so I am not the only one who views your ad as being solely about sex. In fact, you admitted in your previous post that you are looking for sex.
For now, your advertisement has been deleted, and Nice can check our internal staff thread to see what others have suggested regarding you.
Users are reporting your ad and complaining because you are seeking sex, which makes us look unprofessional. That simply isn't fair. If the ad is deemed eligible to be reinstated, you will be notified accordingly.
So basically, because I make posts and comments on one thread, I get sanctioned on another? How fascinating. ☕
The Advertisement was identical to the X times I've posted it before without any issues whatsoever! Then suddenly, you "find a reason" to come after me elsewhere and—bam—"now I finally have an excuse." As far as I know, the rules for Advertisements haven't changed at all.
Where does it say that I am looking for sex? 😕
Oh, I'll be "notified," my foot... as if I don't know how you people work. But just so we are clear, I am not giving up. 😉
(Instead of this sneaky obstructionism, maybe it would be better if you just banned me. It would be much easier for you to get rid of me, though it would certainly be more direct, honest, and transparent than what you are doing right now.)
And I find it absolutely hilarious how you lot of virtuous moderators act like the very embodiment of tolerance and understanding... so liberal and full of respect. Well, mark my words, everyone will eventually vote against you in the national referendum, and you'll be standing there feeling all proud of yourselves for being such wonderful, lovely, beautiful, tolerant souls. Just wait until an Advertisement pops up for a gay girl or guy looking for someone similar to hang out with—how will your "love and tolerance" help them post such an Ad on the US Forum to find their pure, natural, and totally, definitely platonic love? But if a girl and a guy are just looking to hang out (without mentioning their sexual orientation), then oh, heavens, that's a sin, it's immoral, it's unnatural perversion, and it deserves condemnation, and they surely don't belong on the US Forum.
I know nothing is going to change, no matter how much I or other forum members try to prove you wrong using actual arguments and logic.
I just want to expose you all for the hypocritical and two-faced ***** you truly are. 🙂
Pusa Alexi 😘
Sophia Thomas7 said:You just deal with the consequences of PP Meadow, for example. ☕
Thanks, but I’d much rather hash this out in the open. Honestly, I have this nagging feeling she’s already been circling around here... just like the rest of the admin team. I mean, my post was wiped just a few days ago—clearly an attempt to stop me from pushing forward so they could screw me over just like last time! Last time, they locked down the whole discussion, which forced me to start this entire thread in the first place.
So, I go ahead and draft an Advertisement, post it a handful of times—everything seems perfectly fine.
Then, I submit the exact same thing one last time, and poof! It vanishes almost at the precise moment the moderator handed me a warning card (which, granted, I deserved) on that other thread on the US Forum.
Still, I am quite certain she’ll explain herself or set things right eventually... after all, that's her reputation, 🙂
.
Kazo Nica said in their last post in the "Is anyone tracking Advertisements in the US?" thread: drop a (PZK) here if nobody reacts for a while.
So, I’m genuinely wondering—if absolutely nobody on the PZK responds, where does one even turn?
🍿
Alright then... are we seriously going to drag this whole saga out all over again?!
So, I’m just going to copy and paste this Advertisement here. It’s been posted in the Buy/Sell section multiple times, looking exactly the same every single time, without any issues or penalties, and then—poof—it just vanishes into thin air.
I have a sneaking suspicion this was a little move by moderator Tyler Cruz32 right after handing out those warnings yesterday (which, let’s be honest, were totally deserved)...
Do we really need to go through the entire ordeal again and start digging up those old discussions?
analogwalker5 said:Hey everyone! I was wondering if the forum admins would actually step in if someone signed up and started posting exclusively in a language that most of us here can't understand—say, Turkish, Arabic, or Mandarin? If they did, what kind of crackdown are we talking about? Would it be an outright ban, just some warnings, or would the posts get wiped? And honestly, would you even bother checking what they’re saying? Like, would you pull up Google Translate to see if there's actual substance, or would you just assume they're a spammer or a troll and hit them with the ban hammer immediately without looking at the content?
Thanks in advance!
Well, let's be real, you rarely see much American English being used properly on this forum anyway... 🤣