CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Amy Mendoza25 › Posts

Posts by Amy Mendoza25

123 posts shown.

On the one hand in Movies ·
Richard Castillo15 said:Of course, taste is subjective—everyone is entitled to their own opinion on what works and what doesn't. However—and I mean this sincerely—this film is truly exceptional in both its substance and its execution; even someone without a deep background in cinema could see that. If it weren't the case, I highly doubt an American production like this would be celebrated globally or distributed through major theaters across Europe ☕

And hey, even some of those recent indie hits played internationally, including stuff from Vanja Sviličić or Brešanov's last one in French theaters—so go check how those actually landed with critics and audiences. That doesn't really prove anything.

I don't see "mastery" here. Honestly, I think the whole thing is built on a massive plot hole. Not that that's anything new with Ogresta. In *Through the Glass*, the solution just falls out of the sky, and in *Projections*, they got bogged down in unnecessary security camera shots. Here, they trip over the most basic thing: making the plot believable.

If she truly believes her husband is calling her... it's ridiculous. If she's just choosing to believe him to self-delude, the movie doesn't show that. To me, it's just a hole in the writing, no matter how you look at it.
On the one hand in Movies ·
Weak movie, forced script, but good performance by Marinković.
Best movies from America since 1990? in Movies ·
Bryan Rodriguez78 said:Does anyone remember the name of that movie starring George Clooney where he plays a soldier during that big American civil conflict...?

catch ya later, john smith
Life is a Highway (2015) in Movies ·
somewhere around 10k
Love (2015) in Movies ·
That soundtrack though! Pure bliss.
not sure, I just caught him on NBC a few days ago
northernfalcon78 said:Forgettable documentary. Just a bore without any real conclusion. And honestly, I didn't find the director glamorous or charismatic—just exhausting.

Yeah. Her first one basically told you right away—she’s exhausting. If you look at the whole thing through that lens, everything makes sense.
Remakes and sequels: how much is too much? in Movies ·
Go to hell.
CNN Indianapolis Motor Speedway 09/08/2013 in Formula 1 ·
@Jason Campbell70 and @stormybadger8

You two have officially ruined this section of the forum. Completely trashed it. Goodbye!
Jason Campbell70 said:It’s easy enough being a big shot in today's Formula 1.

Or is it?

Jason Campbell70 said:You might be onto something.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44xuZSuvX1I

If he hadn't made that mistake, Vettel would have overtaken him without much trouble, maybe even straight into the Kemmel Straight, or certainly later in the opening laps.

🙂
imagevia Imgflip GIF Maker

kohones and half.
Jerry Rogers6 said:I don't know what to tell you—it’s just one of those situations where everything feels completely broken. It's like watching a high-stakes game where the rules change halfway through the second quarter without anyone noticing. You expect things to follow a certain logic, a predictable pattern, but instead, you're left staring at a mess that defies any kind of reasonable explanation. Honestly, it's just frustrating.

Look, let’s be real—the tires they’re dealing with right now were clearly engineered to shred, but I don't think this specific kind of disaster was actually part of their game plan. 🤣

If you actually guessed this right with a 70% chance in the city, you'd be bragging about it to every single municipal worker from here to your extended family.
Jerry Rogers6 said:Here’s that BBC clip showing Turn 4—exactly what I was talking about earlier.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/23118588

View on imgur
stormybadger8 said:I honestly get the feeling more and more drivers are just going to walk away from Formula 1 because of Goodyear, Bernie Ecclestone, and all that nonsense...

Call me crazy, but I feel like that's exactly why Michael Schumacher and Mark Webber left.
At the end of the day, both of them were pretty loud and clear about hating this artificial circus of tires, DRS, KERS, and all these gimmicks that basically kill actual racing...
What we end up with is a bunch of sudden performance swings, piles of overtakes, and "unpredictable" races (which is just code for chaotic), but when you look back at the full season, you might find maybe ten actual, legitimate duels or passes. Everything else feels less like racing and more like what Webber called "American wrestling"🙄

For sure. Especially since this link kind of proves the point: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of...orts_contracts

By the way, considering how much they paid that guy in the number 14 car, he didn't exactly impress anyone either...

stormybadger8 said:I honestly get the feeling more and more drivers are just going to walk away from Formula 1 because of Goodyear, Bernie Ecclestone, and all that nonsense...

Call me crazy, but I feel like that's exactly why Michael Schumacher and Mark Webber left.
At the end of the day, both of them were pretty loud and clear about hating this artificial circus of tires, DRS, KERS, and all these gimmicks that basically kill actual racing...
What we end up with is a bunch of sudden performance swings, piles of overtakes, and "unpredictable" races (which is just code for chaotic), but when you look back at the full season, you might find maybe ten actual, legitimate duels or passes. Everything else feels less like racing and more like what Webber called "American wrestling"🙄

Personally, I think it was just age for those two.
Arthur Garcia59 said:did you lose your "signature line" somewhere along the way?
I just had this wild thought that Haneke actually ripped off Mirković 😁

The reality is just that Mirković and Haneke both hit on the same idea, then they went their separate ways and made their own films. Everyone gets what they deserve, I guess.🙂
Criterion Collection (2010) in Movies ·
Wait, where's my post? The one where I argued this whole thing is just a cinematic hoax designed to frame the entire history of USA filmmaking as being purely Mexican?
Biutiful (2010) in Movies ·
Looking forward to this one
Here's my take.

The American story: overproduced. Way too much talk, often veering into melodrama.
The Mexican story: over the top. Spoiler alert: putting a suicidal pregnant woman in the same room as the local mob boss in a town where he just murdered her husband a few days ago IS ACTUALLY RIDICULOUS.
The Canadian story: alright. Not groundbreaking, but it works.
The Mexican story: hard to say. Refer to the Mexican one, minus the spoilers. Acting was subpar.
The Canadian story: my favorite. Lucian Serbedziji knows when to shut up; it has a solid short film structure (setup-twist-development-final twist) unlike the others, and the technical side is great. Pepeonik did a killer job filming.

2, 2, 3, 2, 4. Average score: 2.6. It's okay, barely.

😁
Nancy Fox89 said:Fair point, I wasn't being precise. When I mentioned vague intentions and too much explicit dialogue, I was talking about the American story. Only the "vague intentions" part applies to the American one, which mostly relies on visual storytelling. My bad.

I don't know, the intentions in the American story seem pretty clear to me. It's a look at modern corporate society in the near future through a nun trying to escape her convent, only to lose that freedom immediately among the aisles of a shopping mall. Seems straightforward enough to me.
Can you please explain why there’s so much explicit dialogue and all those vague motives in the Canada story?