Posts by feralorca82

Dennis Doyle3 said:It's definitely Lethal Weapon 4. I counted the outfit he's wearing.

http://content8.flixster.com/photo/6...544230_gal.jpg

Or maybe it's Fist of Legend.😈

I led them all straight into certain death by feeding them nothing but bad intel.😈
mwahahahahhaha

4. movie list

2. movie list

3:
1. movie list
2. movie list
3. movie list
4. movie list
5. movie list
6. movie list
7. movie list
8. movie list
9. movie list
10. movie list
11. movie list
12. movie list

Demolition Man

amberwalker4 said:For me, the standout was that quiet Japanese man, Snow White, if I remember correctly. He’s basically Blade without the guns—just swords. My only gripe is he didn't get much screen time.

Snowman 😂
you were close 👍

Justin White402 said:I’m not really feeling Sin City either, despite all the hype. I can't say it was bad since I barely remember it, but honestly... the constant overhyping felt a bit much. I don't even know which comic it's based on, but the whole thing just felt silly to me.

It's a matter of taste, though I'm guessing you aren't much of a comic book person either.
Sin City is actually based on the comic series of the same name, just like 300, and they translated it almost frame-for-frame to the screen. It was a brilliant adaptation. 🙏

People seriously have no clue how to enjoy comic book adaptations.😢

What did you guys expect? Some bloated blockbuster in the style of the Rocky Mountains?

Nicole Foster71 said:Solomon Kane

That’s not exactly Middle Ages, but sure, let's call it that if it makes you happy.😉

The Pit and the Pendulum—let's just say that's roughly where we draw the line for the Middle Ages.

Pretty fun, honestly. It’s the perfect mix of action and laughs, plus the characters actually have some personality. They kind of remind me of the crew from the original Predator out on summer vacation. 😂
Definitely worth a watch 👍

For those interested, here's the full interview
http://www.collider.com/2010/06/09/k...-feature-film/

Anthony Smith3 said:Wrong again, lol😁
He wasn't even in that teaser. They just mentioned Sub-Zero, and he only showed up for a single frame in a picture...

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1672087/

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0012078/

wanna bet? 😈
I was actually grabbing coffee with him yesterday and we talked about it. 😁

Anthony Smith3 said:I mean, come on... it'll probably look totally different in the actual movie and you won't even see his face... these are just fan-made posters...

Either way... based on what he can do, the guy would be a perfect fit...🙂

No, no, no
in that short Rebirth piece, Adkins was Sub-Zero, but whether he shows up in Devastation is anyone's guess since they keep sabotaging that project

Quote : Warner Bros looking to reboot franchise, but Threshold Entertainment filed new breach of contract lawsuit to prevent it from moving forward.

Yeah, Adkins is playing Sub-Zero 👍

gentlebadger88 said:Just finished watching this movie and honestly... I hated it. Most of the runtime was actually decent—the plot was engaging, plenty of fights, action, and genuine tension... but then that ending hits. It completely nuked the whole experience for me. What a joke.

Personally, I thought the ending was actually the best part.🤷
And no, I'm not talking about the end credits.😂

Drew Sanders5 said:So, I finally sat down to watch that movie, and honestly? It was a total miss for me. 🤷
I couldn't even sit through the whole thing in one go—had to break it up into a few different sittings just to get through it.

Same here. Honestly, I don't think I've ever had to watch a movie in three separate chunks just to finish it. It was such a slog I had to pause halfway through and wait a few days just to find the nerve to see how it ended. What a joke.
I will say, the last thirty minutes actually held my interest. Too bad the first hour wasn't nearly as good. I expected way more from this. 😢

Eric Collins5 said:😠😠😠

And what was with that shady little smirk you used as an emoji right after mentioning the 190-minute version exists?

😠😠😠

I know you're sitting there right now, wearing a smug grin in front of your monitor!!!

😠😠😠

Paranoia's getting to you, huh? ☕
That wink was just me giving the OP a heads-up—like, "hey, just so you know, I've got the goods."
I'm really not here on this forum to mess with anyone's head.

Eric Collins5 said:

That is exactly the version I have sitting right here.

It is basically identical to the 177-minute version, except this one includes those flashbacks and double end credits.

There isn't a single solitary scene in here that wasn't already in the 177-minute cut; some parts just happen to repeat themselves.

And it arrives... wow, get this, it's spread across two DVDs.

I give up...

😠😠😠

EDIT:

Just so you know, I have never liked that avatar of yours!!!

😠😠😠

But I never actually said that. All I said was there’s a third 190-minute version (the TV cut, which I happened to get my hands on), and you jumped down my throat claiming I was wrong.
Exactly, the 177-minute version is just that one, filtered down. Did I ever say that wasn't true? I even dropped a link proving it.
Calm down a bit.

EDIT:
You're just jealous of my avatar.😉

Eric Collins5 said:😠😠😠

How on earth could I give you a partial transfer when I'm dealing with this stomach flu? That would be absolutely disastrous!!!

😠😠😠

By the way, did you know that PAL versions of films have fewer frames, so they’re usually shorter than the NTSC version of the same movie?

I remember one time I actually recorded a censored version of a film that ended up being longer than the original!

You're wondering how?

I was recording it off the TV onto a VHS, and there were commercials playing in between scenes.

😳

Quote: Alan Smithee version the 189-minute

The 189-minute "Alan Smithee" version was released in 1989. Prepared originally for syndicated television by Universal's MCA Division (and later seen on basic cable television networks) for a two-night broadcast, it was prepared without either participation or authorization by David Lynch. It includes a new narrator and a new prologue with a montage of painted pictures. It also reinserts approximately 40 minutes of cut footage, extending some existing scenes and adding others that were, until this version, entirely unseen. This television version also includes some repeated shots throughout the film

.

That's exactly the version I own 😉
and it's coming... wow, looks like it's on 2 DVDs