CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Nicholas King › Posts

Posts by Nicholas King

1236 posts shown.

Petition to bring Facebook back in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Charles Wells71 said:just give me a massive Facebook facepalm here, please 😉
because obviously I mean until the next one—not like I actually think it'll last until this year 😛

your wife did a lovely job explaining how we're all being calm and polite, but honestly, the longer I spend reading about politics, the more I feel my sanity slipping away.

Just for you: :facenapalm:

😁

Well, obviously, I don't actually believe things will ever get this bad again. 😛

:optimist:
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
ruggednomad5 said:There's nothing to wait for... what if Anne Frank had been dealing with that kind of "puberty"???

It isn't exactly a productive use of time to sit there and obsessively scrutinize everyone else's posts.
what if Anne Frank had been dealing with puberty like this???

What on earth are you talking about? Where did Anne Frank even come from? 😕
Petition to bring Facebook back in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Peter Thompson5 said:Seriously guys, just give it back already 🙂

Things are getting pretty ugly without it 😢

And I honestly don't get the people in the poll who voted saying they'd love to have it by Christmas 🤣

Not to mention, there isn't even any specification regarding which Christmas we're talking about.😬

I can't say I'm actually missing the facepalm, considering the facepalm has always been—and will forever be—right here—just look at it🤦.

What I find fascinating is observing how, in some arbitrary situation, the mere stalling of a trivial matter gets elevated into something you supposedly need to be godparented, pleaded with, or begged for—only so that, after about fifteen seconds of finally satisfying a request, it looks as if those above have somehow proven themselves to be, I don't know, incredibly merciful and, above all, diligent (hard work, major changes) toward those below.

Once those fifteen seconds finally occur, I have absolutely no doubt there will be a flood of thanks, praise, and endless boasting.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Rachel Jones8 said:Wait... just sit tight and do nothing? Let a kid steal, scream, go out whenever they feel like it... just tolerate all kinds of nonsense without reacting?

Nah... even if you realize you've been doing it wrong for the last ten years... how would you even fix that? Especially since you're clearly someone who didn't know any better... And let's be real, it's way harder to fix things when the root cause is buried somewhere deep.
I mean... by the time a kid becomes a total wreck, they're already in puberty and stopped listening... so then finding out some specific mistake caused it all... what then? You just "fix" it and suddenly everything is fine? I don't really get how that would actually work in practice.
All I know is once things head down the wrong path, it's incredibly hard to turn them around.
It would be great if someone could give a concrete example of how to actually spot and solve these problems.

Precisely.

Didn't you claim—if I recall correctly—that "it's just puberty"? Well, if that’s your logic, there isn't exactly a way to "fix" puberty in a child. Unless you happen to know some magical method where a kid goes through puberty and then suddenly... isn't in puberty anymore? Because then, maybe, they wouldn't have an excuse to act like total jerks.

Which part of my sentence "if that's the case—which, obviously, it isn't..." was too complicated for you to grasp?
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Rachel Jones8 said:Ugh, you always say this stuff... but never anything helpful.
The cause is just puberty... either you can't figure it out, or maybe you aren't even to blame. Or maybe you just can't wrap your head around it.
Either way, the kid is still doing exactly what you don't want them to do.

If that were actually true—which, let’s be honest, it isn't—then there is no cure, I suppose; the only solution would be to just sit there and wait for that awful cause to simply... pass.

Blaming absolutely everything on "oh, it's just puberty" is pretty much like justifying every single instance of female irrationality with PMS🙂.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Rachel Jones8 said:I need some actual specifics here.
What would you personally say or do? And what happens if the same thing keeps looping and talking just isn't fixing anything?
Or... if you're stuck and don't have an answer... anyone else got thoughts?
What's the play in these situations? Just endless, boring arguments that go nowhere while the kid keeps acting out?

She mentioned that she could basically reprogram the little one in just three or four months—that they’d be completely transformed.

Since both of those notions strike me as somewhat alarming, I found myself wondering.

If it were me, I think I’d first need to take a massive step back and try to figure out what's actually driving the child's behavior—specifically, whether there is some level of accountability on my part for how things have turned out.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Jesse Fox5 said:Man... there are a ton of ways. Setting boundaries, having actual conversations. And consequences, obviously. 🙂
She needs to put in some work if she wants something instead of just sitting there demanding it. Like, if she doesn't eat the lunch she asked for, she's gonna end up hungry, simple as that. There are plenty of ways to handle it.
For example... when my little girl was three, she started pulling people's hair. Everyone was just taking it like an idiot. I wasn't. I gave her a little tug myself so she'd realize it hurts. That shut it down real quick.

JPMorgan Chase: specifically—meaning, in a direct manner regarding a particular instance, without all the beating around the bush.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Jesse Fox5 said:Wait, how does that even work? That’s basically just pre-puberty—it feels like you don't actually have an answer for this...
If it were my kid, I’d probably just enroll her in some intensive behavioral bootcamp or summer camp style program, and honestly, she’d be a totally different person in three or four months.

Alright, let's get real here—how does that actually work in practice?

The kid talks back to you or treats you like garbage for the very first time—what do you actually do or say in that moment?

Then, after you’ve tried your first "correction," the kid doubles down and disrespects you all over again—what’s your move then?

And what happens when you’ve gone through two, maybe even three attempts at handling it, and they still just keep pushing your buttons and acting out—what exactly are you supposed to do at that point?
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Jesse Fox5 said:Great. Just great.
So here's a question for you. My cousin has a 9-year-old daughter. She never disciplines her because... well, she doesn't want to "stifle her personality."☕
And I actually got a front-row seat to how that kid reacts when she's told "no" for perfectly valid reasons—like when she couldn't go horseback riding when she wanted to. We were all sitting at the dinner table and this little girl looks her mom straight in the eye and says, "I'd love to just take a dump on your head and in your mouth right now."
Talk about an awkward moment for everyone involved. And of course, the kid didn't face a single consequence for it.
Is that what we're calling parenting now? It's honestly pathetic.
So, please, oh wise one, I'm dying to hear your "expert" opinion on this.

You’re asking me this question about nine years too late.

It's roughly the same as dragging me to the middle of a massive forest fire that's been raging for days and then saying, "so, now tell me how to put this out".
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Jesse Fox5 said:I seriously love you, you always crack me up. But hey, actually read what I'm saying here—I already said I was down to chat.
Your kids are lucky if you have them—they can basically do whatever they want, right?

Honestly, this is the level of discourse we're dealing with here—where I'm apparently expected to snap back with something like, "Oh, poor little children of yours, I bet they aren't allowed to do anything at all, right?"

I don't think you'd consider me quite that dim-witted as to actually type something like that out, would you?
Quincy Adams:
I adore you...
What can I say? You'll just have to wait in line... :skroman:
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Jesse Fox5 said:Don't get me wrong—I am all for talking things out. Really, I am. But there’s a limit. If I spend months or even years trying to reason with someone who just refuses to listen and keeps pushing their own agenda, then that’s not a conversation anymore—it’s just straight-up provocation and disrespect. And honestly? There are ways to handle that.
Look, it’s like people forget who’s actually in charge here. It’s pretty wild to me that some folks think discipline and setting firm boundaries aren't necessary anymore.
We need manners. We need basic decency.
If having a little bit of fear regarding consequences is what stops—say—a teenager from hopping on some random guy's motorcycle without a helmet, then I say go for it. I'm all for it.

The fear of a damn fine is just going to motivate her to hide the fact she was riding from her parents, not to stop her from riding in the first place.

The fear of a damn fine isn't going to stop some drunk teenager from calling her parents for a ride; instead, she’ll just hop into a car with a friend who is equally wasted.

Ultimately, the fear of a damn fine sends the message that "it's bad to get caught doing this," rather than "doing this is inherently bad."
Why was the masculinity thread locked? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Robert Hall7 said:Sure, but I really don't have the energy to debate male vulnerability with you all. I messed up by posting this in the women's corner. Go over to the politics section and write there; stop whining. It’s not like you wrote a doctoral dissertation—it was just a standard post. I'm going to go read some news where things actually happen. We don't spend twenty-four hours a day on this forum, you know. Male vulnerability? Please. My situation is anything but vulnerable. Just like most men out there.

This isn't some debate over whether men are under threat.

It’s actually a debate regarding why feminism gets its own dedicated thread under "Politics," while discussions on masculinity get wiped out under the pretext that "we already have a feminism thread." If you don't feel like arguing about that either—well, the solution is pretty obvious and right at your fingertips.

Furthermore, there are two ways to look at this: anyway, I think the whole site should just shut down.
I am anything but threatened myself. Just like most men.

Your personal experience and, more importantly, your personal stance on the subject—how exactly is that relevant to this discussion? (Or, if I'm being honest, who actually gives a damn? :rosey:)

You are fully aware that you wrote, "I deleted the thread on male vulnerability because I believe men aren't threatened," right?
Why was the masculinity thread locked? in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Robert Hall7 said:I went ahead and deleted that thread for you. In my view, that kind of content belongs in the women's corner, not in politics. We already have a dedicated section for feminism on the politics board; having another one here is just redundant. Head over to the women's corner—you can go to the men's corner too, if you want—and write as much as you like about feminism or whatever else is on your mind.

Best regards and enjoy the rest of your time on the forums!

Standard forum etiquette usually dictates that you move a thread in these situations rather than just nuking it entirely.

By the way, if we’re deciding that a discussion on masculinity belongs in the "women's corner," I suppose by that logic, a thread about feminism belongs in "Politics"? Because, interestingly enough, that specific thread hasn't been deleted... 😕
Besides, we already have a dedicated thread on feminism under Politics, so having yet another one seems completely redundant.

The argument here is essentially saying that "the masculinity thread is nothing more than just another feminism thread." In other words, the implication is that "masculinity = feminism." Which, thirdly, calls into question certain... competencies...
so feel free to write as much as your heart desires about feminism

Freudian slip or just a blatant failure to grasp the distinction between masculinity and feminism?

Anyway, if you look at the "Politics" section right now, the top threads are "Feminism" and "feminist protection of domestic abusers" 😬.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Charles Murphy6 said:I had quite the "clash" today. She was incredibly rude to this little girl, and while I usually try to stay out of it, my daughter often comes home absolutely distraught because someone hurt her feelings.
What I realized when I sat her down to talk is that her ultimate weapon is the waterworks. Pure, unadulterated manipulation through tears.😁
Then, amidst all the sobbing, she starts loudly justifying herself, practically shouting at me.
It made me realize how much I refuse to raise my voice. I stay calm, avoiding any histrionics, and when she starts escalating, I just calmly ask, "Am I yelling?" And just like that, she’s defeated...😛
My husband was eavesdropping on our conversation today and told me I handled it perfectly.
I’m done falling for the tears. Tears are just a precursor to hysterics, and frankly, neither of us needs that drama. Instead, she just sits there, acting like the center of the universe, while I talk and talk and talk...
The thing is, you never truly know if they’re actually listening to you.🤣
I wonder, what were we like? My parents claim they didn't even notice my teenage rebellion phase. Honestly, I have no idea. I know for a fact I was never disrespectful toward them.
Now, I have a question for you all. When I find myself in a situation where I need to issue some kind of punishment for disobedience, what should I actually take away? It’s not about computer time or her phone. She just stares at the TV...
She loves photography and all sorts of creative crafts. How can I even justify taking those away? I feel completely lost here because I haven't really dealt with outright defiance before, but I can see it coming...
What should I do?
Should I stop taking her to the park? That feels ridiculous. I'm honestly stuck wondering if I should implement light punishments or if I should just keep talking and talking...
For now, I'm sticking to the old-school method of constant lecturing, hoping something finally sticks in that head of hers.

That unknown singer was once talking in an interview about how his father would just go on and on—"talk, talk, and talk"—until he finally stopped and asked him, "Are you even listening to me?" And the guy replied, "...I was just staring at his mustache, watching one side twitch while the other stayed perfectly still.". 🤣
punishment for disobedience

First off, define what you mean by "disobedience."

And more importantly, define what you actually hope to achieve by using punishment—or whatever other tactic you're planning to employ.
Dealing with the teenage years is a nightmare in Students & Teens ·
Casey Booth3 said:Man, welcome to the teenage years! My daughter is the exact same way—she probably thinks yelling at us is a sign of maturity, when really they're all still green as grass. Honestly, it'll pass. Just try to keep your cool and don't let them get under your skin. These are just phases; hang in there for a few days and things usually settle down. God knows we weren't exactly angels at that age either. It’s just part of growing up. Once this stage hits, you'll actually laugh about it together—well, my daughter will... if she ever admits to any of it. They act like they know everything, constantly questioning authority—classic puberty symptoms. It hits hard, then it passes.

Oh, sure—feel free to claim "we weren't like that." 🙄

Just please, for the love of everything, don't start with that whole "back in our day, people had respect, things were done properly, etcetera, etcetera..." routine.🙂.
Brian Edwards78 said:I notice you never go after anyone who doesn't provide enough material to actually mock.

First off—and let’s be clear, nobody is demanding that forum discussions turn into high-society tea parties or polite salon debates—but let's not kid ourselves here: there are quite clearly certain, relatively rare instances where it actually makes sense to "raise your hand."

It is utterly pointless to advocate for behavior that isn't just permitted on this forum, but is actively encouraged by the administration (not toward everyone, mind you, but certainly not toward everyone). One thing I simply cannot wrap my head around is: what’s the appeal?

Where is the satisfaction in collectively ganging up on some easy target? Where is the thrill in joining the fray just to toss your own bucket of crap onto an already massive pile? Is it funny? Does it make a person feel superior, or stronger, or... something?

I just don't see it.
Which is perfectly fine and normal behavior.

On this kind of forum, that is indeed perfectly fine and normal.

In fact, this type of behavior is supported at every level of administration—ranging from labeling it "standard American internet communication" (if you don't like it, go join a different site...) to moderators jumping into a "shout-laugh-spit" frenzy against some vaguely blue-themed user who opens a "dumpster fire" thread, all the way down to the blatant demonstration of a specific "forum hierarchy."

So, yes, this behavior is "normal," but not toward everyone.

There exists a "pool of easy forum targets," and then there are those who are untouchable. A Manchild can easily be slapped with a 500-point penalty—a punishment reserved for forum war criminals—because, well, god forbid, he's a Manchild, and we all know who a Manchild is. Meanwhile, if a fellow moderator gets caught exposing user clones, nothing happens. If a fellow admin writes whatever they want, it's just a helpless shrug and an "eh, there's nothing we can do about it." And no, the "untouchables" aren't just the ones with special badges.

The issue isn't about... well, communicating normally with a female user (certainly not *every* female user)—but when you start dealing with sharks, the cardboard starts tearing and the bans start flying. If other things were "dealt with"—if the other side tried to recount or expose the background details—without a doubt, the keys, the privileges, and the permissions would be getting shredded too... It's easy when it's like this, damn it...

This isn't me meddling in things that don't concern me; these are concrete examples of what was requested.

So, you're right—this is "normal" behavior for a forum like this.

Except—and again, I am speaking specifically about extreme cases like this one (refer back to my note about the tea-party debates)—it is simultaneously callous, petty, and sometimes downright inhuman. To dump your brazen crap while shouting "Because I can!" is just pathetic.

Tekut has spoken.
jadetrucker43 said:It seems like you might have cut off your thought there—or maybe you were just testing the connection? If you had something specific you wanted to discuss or a particular topic you wanted my take on, please, go ahead and lay it out. I'm ready when you are. Are you actually directing your question toward me? 🤔

Is there anyone specific I should be addressing this question to regarding the PDF titled...Reddit I suppose I should probably start by saying that I’m looking for some sort of... well, let's call it "guidance." I've been spending quite a bit of my time lately navigating the various corners of Reddit—trying to make sense of everything—and I find myself stuck. It’s one of those situations where you know there's a solution out there somewhere, but finding the right thread or the right person to ask feels like an impossible task. I’ve been attempting to troubleshoot some issues regarding my WordPress account—nothing too catastrophic, mind you, just some persistent technical hiccups—but I feel like I'm spinning my wheels. I've even tried poking around the moderator corner to see if there were any specific guidelines I might have missed, but it hasn't really yielded much. If anyone has experience dealing with similar headaches, or perhaps knows a way to better utilize Google Analytics to track what's actually going wrong, I would be immensely grateful for the insight. I guess I'm just looking for some actual help. Any advice? 😕
As a regular, low-level moderator—just one of those guys trying to keep things running behind the scenes—I have to say, I find the whole thing completely baffling. 🙂

There’s a link to my blog in my signature—and there's one in hers, too. Well, in her signature, not mine. I mean, in mine, it goes to my site, and in hers, it goes to hers. I guess I'm getting a bit tongue-tied here... I know, I know, I've made a bit of a mess of that sentence.

Not too long ago—if I recall correctly—when someone would click a link within my post (specifically in that one thread, you know the one, number X, under topic Y), the analytics would actually show exactly where that visitor originated. It’s how things usually work for any link posted on a website or even when search engines crawl through them; the referral data just flows right into the dashboard.

It’s not exactly a matter of life and death, I suppose—but it really is. It's just a joke. It’s actually pretty interesting to see when a ton of people all click on the same link within a single post—though, I guess, for me, it was always a bit of a thrill seeing a massive spike in clicks on my blog whenever someone from a subreddit would drop a link... selected Posted in the moderator corner 😬.

For a few days now, I haven’t been seeing any click data coming in from Reddit. Since everything else seems to be tracking perfectly fine—which is a bit of a relief, I suppose—it stands to reason that there might be an issue on Reddit's end. It feels like the most logical conclusion, anyway. So, I figured I’d just ask—rather politely, mind you—if anything has actually happened behind the scenes over there? And if something did go sideways, I’m curious to know what exactly went wrong and why.

Why on earth would anyone try to handle stuff like this through private messages? I mean, personally, I don't see the point—it just seems like a waste of time. To an ordinary little forum regular. It’s just not clear—honestly, I’m struggling to follow the logic here.
placidorca16 said:Oh, sure, because a man's ability to pee against a wall and a woman's ability to give birth are totally equivalent, right?🙄

Aside from the fact that it’s honestly hilarious how you’re pretending to be incapable of handling a spin—one that I clearly and definitively debunked—it’s just pathetic. You’ve somehow managed to take a shooter’s mere "attempt at scoring" and rebrand it as actually "possessing ability." It's a joke. And honestly, if we're talking about actual male capability, even being able to write on a wall is... well, it's something. When we get into these endless debates surrounding gender equality—or the lack thereof—it’s always the same exhausting cycle. I mean, I guess you could say it’s become one of those topics where everyone thinks they have the definitive answer, yet nobody actually seems to be listening to anyone else. It’s all just noise at this point. There’s this constant back-and-forth regarding whether we’ve truly achieved parity or if we’re just moving the goalposts every few years—which, let’s be honest, feels like it happens more often than not. I suspect much of the friction comes from how people interpret the very concept of fairness itself; some see it as total mathematical equality, while others view it through a completely different lens of opportunity. It’s messy, it’s complicated, and frankly, it’s becoming increasingly difficult to have a civil conversation about it without someone taking offense at the slightest nuance. It’s just as nonsensical an argument as a woman's ability to conceive.

Or perhaps what you're actually suggesting is that we need to sit down and conduct an exhaustive analysis of everyone's individual capabilities—just so we can tally up some grand total score and, once and for all, declare one gender superior to the other? I guess that’s the logic here, isn't it? more capable I find myself wondering—and I mean this with all due deliberation—exactly what fundamental principles of nature lead us to the inevitable conclusion of inequality? It’s one of those questions that seems simple on the surface, yet once you start peeling back the layers, everything becomes incredibly messy. I guess you could argue it's baked into the very fabric of our existence, though I hesitate to be so definitive without more data. Perhaps there's a structural necessity for it, or maybe it's just an inherent flaw in how we organize ourselves. It’s a complex thought, really—one that demands we look past the immediate chaos and consider the underlying mechanics of how things actually work.
Casey Bennett said:Maybe the reason I don't feel insulted by certain descriptions is simply because they don't apply to me? 🤷
Did that possibility ever cross your mind? 😉

When someone (regardless of whether they are male or female) points out that there are plenty of women who are just plain boring, spending their entire lives glued to soap operas and gossiping, believe me, I won't feel the slightest urge to scream, "How dare you, you misogynist!" because, frankly, it’s the damn truth.

I have no interest in defending or representing anyone just because we share the same chromosomes, and I certainly don't want anyone speaking on behalf of women without my express permission.

Real struggle should be reserved for the disenfranchised, the oppressed, the hungry, and the helpless—regardless of whether we are talking about a child, a woman, a man, or an animal.

To summarize: feminism is, in my opinion, far too narrowly specialized, overly aggressive, and completely devoid of any sense of humor. I won't go so far as to call it fanaticism, but if anyone finds themselves offended by this, I wash my hands of their feelings.

Exactly.

However, there is a very simple distinction to be made here: the moment someone claims that all women are like that—or even just a massive percentage of them—your refusal to speak up stops being principled and starts looking like mere conformism, or quite frankly, just pure laziness and letting others fight your battles for you.

As for this whole "ability" argument, it’s a total miss—and honestly, a brilliant bit of spin: the original phrasing of "showing more ability" means something entirely different from the revised version, "having more ability."

And don't even get me started on bringing "childbearing abilities" into a discussion like this; it's a ridiculous pivot that invites the counter-argument of male "abilities like peeing against a wall, which women lack"—so, if we're going down that road, let's start counting...
Social Sciences: "Racism has arguments for... in Feedback & Suggestions ·
briskjackal5 said:Everyone is entitled to their own impressions, I suppose.

Back at home in the gutter, sure.

Beyond that—and this is just my impression—the world might actually be a better place if the Krinolince were wiped out. That’s just an impression. Not to mention my other little impression that those gays are nothing but sickos—again, just an impression.

But, honestly? I can't even be bothered. Not feeling it.
The term "discrimination" is misplaced here.

It isn't misplaced; it's just plain stupid 😁.

They should have used "disparagement"—that word is much more appropriate when you're describing some ethnic group as being ninety percent criminal.