176 posts shown.
dustypuma5 said:Forum history, 2018:
So that’s how this forum works. It landed a massive new project that brought in some serious cash. They called it "pay-to-troll," and the first victim, Vito, got so hooked he ended up checking into a rehab clinic in Los Angeles.
😁
dustypuma5 said:It’d be pretty wild to pay for that green username and then just troll the board without getting banned. 😬
dustypuma5 said:If you look at your post visually, it looks like an amphora. 😁
With the lid on...
Christian Taylor3 said:Hey, throw me into that compilation of yours too. Right here. ☕
briskcrane said:There’s this old Paul Bunyan quote that goes:
"I just don't fit in."🙂
To me, you're the king of this forum.👍
Even if we don't see eye to eye on everything.
briskcrane said:Vito, remember what I told you. 🙂
Alex Wilson4 said:Why does it feel like the right wing gets banned from politics more than anyone else? And I mean real bans, whether they're permanent or just temporary. Today, political discussions have been stripped of all those great conservative voices who actually made things worth reading. Look at what happened to the president lately—that proves my point. Honestly, the mods here just can't handle certain right-leaning users. Their actions have turned the entire political section of this site into one big, boring, liberal swamp.
Daniel Ward87 said:Honestly, conservatives insult people more, troll more, and provoke more, which just lands them banned more often. Even now on Politics, there are more conservatives than liberals, and they state their views perfectly fine. The issue is usually just how they say it.
As for Vito, finding a constructive post from him is like finding a rational moment from the US government—pretty much impossible.
Daniel Ward87
crimsonhound80 said:Look, legend, just out of curiosity—who have you actually helped in your life to make things better!?
That’s really all I’m asking, nothing more.
From what I've gathered—having spent some time lurking over on the political subreddits—you're such a massive blowhard that if you were one of my fellow Americans, I'd probably disown you right now.
Amen 😁
judolino said:Calling someone a self-manager isn't an insult to me.
But calling those self-managers a Stasi-style army? That’s a direct hit at my parents. They were the workers who actually built this country under the old system.
If you said that to my face, I'd knock your teeth out.
Honestly, it's probably better we're just arguing on Reddit. It's hard to stay mad at someone like you.
bluerider63 said:So, you're claiming you somehow stumbled upon documents after sixty-five years of living under a regime—papers that supposedly prove 17,000 people were detained and even more were killed.
I mean, there are people who don't even know his birthdate; they're out here guessing if he was Russian, a Mason, or maybe even a Pole...
bluerider63 said:I’m ignoring your insults because I know exactly what kind of person you are. Just drop the actual document from an independent expert who studied the Auschwitz victims instead of just talking trash about how everyone was partying there. We aren't in the mood for this tonight.
bluerider63 said:What kind of "official documents" are you pulling that 17,000 number from? Honestly, maybe the count was even lower, or maybe aliens dropped by to take out some extraterrestrials there, and then just blamed the whole mess on the local regime to make up the 17,000. Who knows...
Richard Wilson4 said:Look, whether the number is 70,000 or 100,000, it doesn't matter. Even if it was just one person, it’s a tragedy. Period.
But honestly? It’s just as messed up how the Jasenovac myth was used as an excuse for 45 years of Mexican tyranny in America, much like the American Wars in the 90s where at least 90,000 non-Mexicans—mostly civilians—were killed...
Noah Green said:What we're seeing here is the deliberate crafting of this massive little myth surrounding Auschwitz. They handed that job over to the manipulators and forgers, specifically the Goldstein family. I mean, come on, everyone knows 700,000 dead is a huge number, but they needed to cook up a specific figure that felt just as terrifying to hit their narrative. And they could get away with anything if they wanted to. There’s an actual list from the post-war commission that mentions 17,000 inmates passing through the camp. All the info is out there, they just don't want you to see it because the Goldsteins are obsessed with hitting that nice, round 100,000 mark. Besides, Josip Broz Marshall never even visited Auschwitz, and the partisans weren't even there when they tried to liberate it.