CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › amberfox6 › Posts

Posts by amberfox6

9 posts shown.

Bad Boys in Fans ·
Jerry Morris2 said:It’s completely pointless to debate anything here when you don't even know who's poking at you from the other side... Is it some bottom-feeder who was never even part of the inner circle, or just some twenty-year-old kid brainwashed by whatever ideology his group's current leadership is pushing? Whatever group that may be.
The truth is, there have been mistakes on both sides, and there will be more. The supporter movement isn't exactly pure as driven snow—not how the younger generation probably sees it. I get that you guys have your politics, but they have theirs too. That doesn't mean anyone on your side is wrong; it just means there might be different ways and specific tactics for fighting.
Sometimes I feel targeted myself, getting attacked on this forum because of a message my group posted, but then I remember everything we've gone through versus what they've endured. You can't put those two things in the same sentence. Those are facts; everything else is just propaganda. Every single one of our people, from the kids leading the charge to the rookies just starting out, has had their sense of belonging to the club damaged because the team here has been a victim for so long of a populist, kleptocratic clique that worked hand-in-hand with their own clique until they finally cut ties. Those kids lived in the dark for years; they were supporters without any of the perks. They got hauled in by the cops for every little thing just to make them hate the fan life, all while their enemies grew comfortably, thinking about grabbing coffee on the Waterfront with girls or sipping bottles of wine at Matej while worrying about lighting a flare against Cleveland tomorrow... or how they'll attack a group of New York City kids because their own crew is practically extinct (I don't blame them for that, that's just how it goes). Beyond that, it's obvious in America which of our two groups commands more respect from rivals. Even on a small stage like this, it's crystal clear. It's also obvious how that cup in 2013 was celebrated when it was blatantly clear who handed it to them. It's obvious you guys were taking vouchers for years while we were barely scraping by. It's obvious you wrote messages attacking our struggle, saying stuff like we're just wandering aimlessly, while they were actually shooting at our kids. It's obvious you used a joint protest to mock us in New York City and pose for photos acting like some high-society crowd... it's obvious that if things had gone the other way, it would've been a total disaster... Everything is clear as day. Only an idiot could forget that, or someone who thinks it's in both our interests to raise a healthy scene. But that was never in your interest, because you've always looked down on everyone else, even though you really have no foundation at all except for a bunch of bottom-feeders who, if Jerry Jones were yours, would write his name and works in gold letters in Hajduk's history. It's all normal. Fan taunting is just a basic part of the whole thing; I'm not going to change some moron's mind, nor is that the point of this post. There's no sense arguing with a group that hasn't given nearly anything toward a common goal, yet wants to lecture you on everything.

Alright, fair enough, you have one opinion, I have another.
I'm not in the thick of it anymore, and even back when I was, I didn't write much. I always try to be objective as much as someone can from their own subjective angle. Since I see you're (actually) an okay guy, just one question, or rather a statement—if you want to answer, do you agree with it or not? If not, please explain.

I get it all, even the jabs regarding our Hajduk, although you could argue whether that's fan behavior or something else, but to post a message with the name "Jerry Jones" on a grandstand that, let's be honest, fought so hard against him. On a grandstand where the second tier of the crew sits, or parts of the first tier (the non-corrupt part), they're three times more worthy than that mercenary leadership. On a grandstand where people were actually shot for him.
So, what’s my actual point here... don't you think we're headed for another round where we have to drag these crybabies out by their hair? Does it smell like another era of mismanagement to you?
My take is simple: all the dirty laundry is going to come crashing out soon enough, and it looks to me like certain people have lost their way yet again.
THE REAL QUESTION IS whether there's enough healthy leadership left to actually take the reins back... if there's even any will left in them. Are there individuals who stayed true, or did everyone just flip sides when things got tough?!
I'll say it again—I'm not as deep in the trenches as I used to be, but I'm basing this whole thing on how those ultra-loyalists were being praised in the grandstands.
How could you guys let yourselves score such a massive self-inflicted goal?
Sending my best to my brothers up North who are still fighting the good fight!
Die-hard Ultras / Hardcore Supporters in Fans ·
Gary Green32 said:My quick take? We called the truce way too early... that whole "higher purpose" thing was absolute bullshit . It just felt like cheap political theater, honestly, just more of the same old Republican vs. Democrat nonsense. Does anyone actually get what’s going on here? Who would even bother showing up to a derby if the BBB wasn't there on the other side?

Times change, I guess... if people want to fight, let them settle their own damn business in some field somewhere. The East Coast elites and us—we're all stuck in the same mess. We don't have to love each other, but respect? Patriotism? There has to be some higher goal... but the media has absolutely squeezed Mommy dry, and now we're seeing what an alternative looks like.
.

Exactly! I don't give a damn whether it's public or not—breaking this truce is the biggest self-inflicted wound we could have dealt ourselves as a group. It's incredibly counterproductive. We know exactly where the enemy is and who the real threat is... that's what we should be dealing with, not wasting energy on rival factions. Hopefully, we'll get the chance to fix this before we all finish sabotaging ourselves with our own stupidity.

Later!
New fan laws: What do we think? in Fans ·
Can anyone who actually knows their stuff give me the lowdown on what went down with The Cohort and those Demons?
I mean, specifically regarding the vouchers... or just showing up at the stadium?
Bad Boys - Part IV in Fans ·
Huge props to the Bills and to all of us!

That massive fan mentality was on full display from both sides yesterday... just incredible to see! 😉
New fan legislation in Fans ·
Look, feralpilot912, I’m asking you as a lawyer here, and please, I’m begging you, answer every single point:
1. As a legal professional, does it sit right with you that carrying an illegal handgun might just get you a misdemeanor, yet if they find you with a flare under this proposed sports fan law, you face criminal charges plus a ban for a set period?
2. Does it bother your legal sensibilities that this violates the presumption of innocence? I mean, even if nothing is proven against you and there’s no final conviction, you get slapped with a ban—say, for a year—during which you have to report in constantly, telling them where you’ll be every time your club plays, while the police show up at your house, work, school, or campus... and these kinds of measures aren't applied to any other criminals or even misdemeanor offenders, even if they’ve been fully convicted.
3. Does it bother you (under this new proposal) that if minors are caught with a beer outside the stadium or hit a blood alcohol level of 0.02, their school and principal get notified? Especially since we actually have laws on the protection of juvenile identity.
4. Does it bother you, naturally, as a lawyer, that this law contains an unwritten rule of collective punishment—something American law doesn't recognize? Take what happened in Bjelopolj, for example... all those guys from the Black Knights who were attacked while under police protection—half of whom weren't even fighting, they were just defending themselves—they all got two-year injunctions! Why? Simply because they were there. So, tell me, dear feralpilot912, if I were to go to San Diego with a buddy from the BBB—let's say he talked me into it—and we got jumped, and everyone in the van got hit with injunctions... would this law stop bothering you then?!
There’s plenty more, but I think you already get the gist of how the current law looks versus this "new" proposal.

If you truly are a lawyer, your answer to all four points has to be YES...
I mean, shouldn't you, as a lawyer, be fighting against passing laws that are unconstitutional and restrict human rights and freedoms, regardless of what you personally think about those fans?? Isn't that the whole point of being a defense attorney—that every person has their rights and everyone deserves a fair defense?

Okay, so you don't like fans—fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion. But your title and your knowledge of the law and the legal order should rise above your personal animosity toward them. In this case, you really ought to stand (at least declaratively) shoulder-to-shoulder with them/us!
So, feralpilot912, I expect an answer! Thanks!!

P.S. Benjamin Smith21 (hope you don't mind the shorthand🙂) wrote that "us against the world" slogan, but that doesn't fly anymore. This is politics now—and politics is nothing more than compromise. And that compromise has to involve giving up certain things... specifically the visible stuff that sticks out most to the average citizen, like throwing flares on the field and ZDS... There isn't much room left to maneuver; certain things just have to be accepted. Damn it—without support from the general public (at least a portion of it), it will be hard, almost impossible, to fight for anything. And that support can only be won through reasonable behavior, so we shouldn't give those "moral guardians" any ammunition to call us out or attack us during this time!
Because, as spitka said: It's now or never!! It simply has to be NOW!!!

Best regards!👍
New fan legislation in Fans ·
Anonymous said:A boycott isn't going to work. Once we hit those big European nights, the stadium will be packed with casual fans anyway, so you won't even notice the lack of hardcore supporters. As for the smaller matches? Who cares if there are a thousand fewer people in the North Stand? When the total crowd is only a couple thousand people including the die-hards, the difference is negligible.
The real move here is to hunt down specific legal violations where the current laws clash with the Constitution and fundamental civil liberties. This isn't something for amateurs; you need a high-powered, motivated attorney. Ideally, someone who actually gets the culture or maybe even an ex-fan themselves. I suggest we set up a legal defense fund for this—I'll personally commit $50-$33 every single month to get us started.

Now this is a solid suggestion. Honestly, we have to start thinking about filing a case with the European Court of Human Rights (and sure, a petition to the Supreme Court of the United States wouldn't hurt, but let's face it, that's a long shot)... but unfortunately, if we want a quality legal challenge, it's going to cost a fortune.
So, we don't really have a choice left but to start raising the cash. The right way to do it would be for every supporter group to collect funds from their own members—take a page out of the book of groups like the Ultras, where all donations are totally transparent and posted publicly online to prevent any shady business... We need to launch this kind of drive immediately, because frankly, right now, only Strasbourg can help us...
If you look closely, there are plenty of groups involved, from the heavy hitters down to the small clubs in the 4th or 5th divisions... we need to get them all mobilized, and we could raise some serious money!
New fan legislation in Fans ·
Edward Hernandez60 said:It's over...
The law passed... This is the end of being a fan in America...

Look, friend, the law hasn't even passed yet. In the US, only Congress has that kind of power, and this thing hasn't even hit their desk for a vote...
The Government was debating it today, but—honestly, I think we all know the deal—not a single one of our proposals is actually going to see the light of day, even when they finally get around to voting...

@Spitka did anyone actually try reaching out to the Children's Ombudsman about this?
P.S. If you can't handle the heat, maybe scroll back a few pages...
New fan legislation in Fans ·
shadowranger522 said:Hey, boldtiger7, have you looked into trying to get that rule tossed—you know, the one where they notify the college or high school if someone gets hit with a penalty?

Building on that... I really think we need to get in touch with the Children's Ombudsman immediately. We have to lay out this specific part of the proposal to them. It is absolutely illegal to leak a minor's data to the public even after a conviction, let alone having authorities call up schools and alert principals about the POTENTIAL liability of some kid who’s only 15 or 16 years old... it's just wrong.

I am practically certain her office would take a stand against this clause in the proposed legislation. If we win this one little battle, it could provide the foundation for winning all the others...
New fan legislation in Fans ·
silentsurfer19 said:Illegal stuff and whatever else

Going illegal won't help you; if anything, it just makes it easier for those looking to crush you to finish the job!
@Spitka—you’re spot on about how retroactive laws work, but come on, anyone with half a brain knows our traffic laws are already partially retroactive... which means they should be tossed out by the Supreme Court. But here’s the kicker: the case hasn't even reached the Court yet because the strongest opposition party hasn't even filed the lawsuit. What I’m trying to get at is this—unfortunately, we can't just sit around waiting for the Supreme Court. Once a law actually takes effect, it’s set in stone for years to come... unless the legislature decides to overhaul it, though they'll probably just make it even harsher.
It might sound paradoxical to some, but we have to try and rally public support. It’s going to be an uphill battle, incredibly difficult, but we have to try. If we head into this fight without any public backing, we're basically dead on arrival... especially when I see the kind of mindsets some people have regarding this whole struggle.
Now, let’s get down to brass tacks:
I think the Des Moines situation is a massive ace up our sleeve. Why? Because in that case, the restraining orders were slapped on the victims too, even while they were supposedly under "police protection"... (And look, I'm not getting into who hit whom or who started what, so please, don't start fighting over that here)
The thing is, American law doesn't recognize collective punishment—or at least, it shouldn't. We can use this specific case to build a solid argument against unconstitutionality and state repression... things we can actually bring to the table when talking to the legislature and the Vice President.
Just glancing at the new bill, the real eyesore is this "masking" business. First off, how are they even going to define masking? Who decides? Where does it happen? And where does it end? For instance, if they seize a hat that cost $83, and they don't give it back, that’s an unlawful seizure of property. But the second point is much bigger: you can't just ban masking. In many countries, including right here in the States, wearing a hijab is perfectly legal because religious freedom is protected by the Constitution... in some places, you can even use headcoverings for your ID photos..
That’s the quick version of it. Hats off to the guys spending their time and sanity trying to fix this mess, but honestly, I think we only have two real moves left: first, we unite everyone behind this cause, and second, we take it straight to the European Court of Human Rights....