CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › wearyhawk83 › Posts

Posts by wearyhawk83

174 posts shown.

Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
northernbadger12 said:Wait, what's so obvious about that? I mean, I guess I might be missing something here! Maybe I just didn't see it at first glance, haha. 😛

I’m definitely skipping the family reunion this year. I just can't deal with it! It always turns into that same old loop where everyone starts obsessing over whether we actually broke up or if we should just play hard to get so they can chase after you again. It’s just too much drama for me, I guess.

Since I totally had my own little fictional crush back when I was younger, I was really curious to hear what you guys think about that! Maybe it's just me, but I'd love to know your take on it.

So, I’m just kind of trying to wrap my head around all of this... I guess? I mean, I keep holding onto this little glimmer of hope that maybe, just maybe, figuring it out will finally bring me some peace of mind. 😍

Look, I only posted that just for the sake of it. 🙂
Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
northernbadger12 said:Hey there, silly! 😁

But honestly, he isn't really blocking people out emotionally... he just seems focused on sex, you know? Like, he just wants to satisfy that physical need, though maybe he's saving all that for his sweetheart who's currently over in Japan right now. 😛

And from what he's telling me, it sounds like she isn't giving him any feedback at all. I mean, if I were in her shoes and actually wanted to be with him, I'd probably still be with him, even from a distance... we aren't kids, after all. Knowing that I'd eventually come back home to him would definitely help things along. It's like—he's waiting for me. I don't know, I'm just trying to wrap my head around it. 🤷

Look, you asked if you should pour all your energy into this or if you should let someone actually get close to you. Fine. Sex is totally irrelevant if it's *just* about sex. I already answered your questions regarding intimacy and what I'd personally do. I was just answering what you asked.

As for why you can't wrap your head around him? That's a whole different story. To me, it's not even confusing. It's like people chasing ghosts—something almost everyone goes through when they're young. It feels like it's bordering on pathological, but hey, let the "experts" or whoever else judge. There are plenty of them around here. Just move this topic over to the Lounge. 👍

P.S. Why are you even so into this guy? 😛 😁
Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
northernbadger12 said:Well, you two certainly found my thread just to pick a fight over
The whole thing is honestly just some fictional romance I cooked up.

So, here’s the setup—he’s totally in love with her, but she’s away studying in Japan. Before she left, they were super close friends, but that’s really where the story ends. They still talk, sure, but it’s no different than how you’d chat with any other acquaintance. He’s just sitting there waiting for the day she comes home, but she hasn't promised him a single thing.

And you're telling me I shouldn't let anyone else get close because of this??? Like, should I just pour all my energy into that one thought? Maybe?

Then she finally comes back, and she’s got this sweet Japanese guy with her—she tells him he’s the love of her life.

Anyway, I guess I started getting a little carried away with the storytelling, but whatever... it’s a wild topic, so I guess the drama follows. 😁

Sure, he can say he loves her, but loving someone without actually showing it in a way they can feel is just a vague feeling, not actual love.

They were super close friends before she left, but that’s where the connection ends. They still talk, but it's no different than any other acquaintance. He's waiting for the day she comes back, but she hasn't promised him anything.

So, what, he shouldn't let anyone else get close because of this??? Just put all his energy into waiting?

If he truly believed there was a future with her, then yeah, he'd wait and keep everyone else at arm's length. Of course, that kind of belief would require a massive amount of confidence—believing things will work out even though she hasn't promised a single thing.

But if he was actually as head-over-heels and "objectively" obsessed as he seems, he would have just packed his bags and headed straight for Japan regardless of the consequences, because I honestly feel like nothing is more intense than that spark between two people.

Still, it feels more like he's just blinded by infatuation, especially since she's keeping her distance, even if she isn't doing it on purpose. It's pretty silly to judge based on such tiny details. Honestly, I feel like an idiot now. 😬👏
Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
Gerald Ward61 said:@samting, solid post. I won't say it was "beautiful"... because honestly, calling love "pre-technical" feels a bit too clinical for me. 😉

Here’s what actually hit home for me:

When you look at love as a process versus just a memory, the connection between two people is the journey, while the memory is just what's left over. But let's be real—love only stays alive as long as it's being actively given or received. It doesn't exist just because of the people involved; it exists because of its own damn essence.

Beauty is truth. Truth is beauty. 🙂
Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
lonegardener said:Such as? 🤷

We keep growing and growing... but for what? Just to be "successful" once we're in the grave? What's the actual point?

Like what, exactly? 🤷

Grow, grow, grow... just so we can be "big shots" by the time we hit the grave? What’s the point?[/I]

In that second sentence, > was actually talking about the relationship itself—that high-quality bond that needs constant nurturing, attention, and care if you want it to stay alive.

When they say love makes us "grow," they mean it leads to a fulfilled life. I'm talking about a life filled with genuine satisfaction and a harmonious vibe toward yourself and everyone else. You should look at "growth" more as a state of awareness where you're making conscious, daily choices that benefit both you and those around you, making every single moment count. Some people call this "living mindfully." Once you finally wrap your head around how things work, it's all about taking action. Without that practice, you can't even enjoy a tiny fraction of what you've learned. That "awareness" is the absolute key. When we are finally ready to step up and act for our own good, then we can truly say we love ourselves. But man, it is so hard to snap out of that everyday lethargy, laziness, and lack of motivation. There are so many moving parts to getting what you want, and usually, only the person involved can actually spot them, so everyone else's attempts to help are mostly useless.

Sure, it's easy to "grow" when life knocks you down a peg or when you make a conscious choice to be better for one weekend or one hour. But trying to maintain that kind of momentum every single day—creating a literal perpetual motion machine of positive action—is basically the peak of human achievement. So, "growing" isn't about walking a path to reach some destination; it's about growing so that you actually experience the journey at every single step.
At that point, you might as well take that idea from > about "living in expanding circles" and tattoo it on your butt, because we are the ones who decide whether this natural mechanism works for us or against us.

Regarding love being a process versus a memory: the connection between two people can definitely be a process, while the memory of someone is just the aftermath of that relationship. But love itself only lives as long as it's being given or received. It doesn't exist because of the giver or the receiver; it exists because of its own essence.

Everything else is just a byproduct or an expression of it. And honestly? People express it wrong all the time, and they interpret it wrong all the time. That's why you hear all this talk about suffering, or how people mix it up with possessiveness, or identify too much with the relationship, or mistake it for dependency. Most of all, people kill it by obsessing over the past or the future, even though love only knows the present. I often find myself wondering what everyone is waiting for, because the "now" is literally happening right this second. Then I remember that some people are just fundamentally wired wrong. They think they're going to walk into a gym once and suddenly have massive biceps.

Sorry if I'm rambling here; I don't even know where I'm going with this myself right now.
Love as a fixed idea in Psychology ·
It’s honestly so easy to catch feelings for someone when there’s distance between you. But once you put that love to the test in a relationship where you're practically glued to each other 24/7, that’s when you see if the quality is actually there and if you two truly vibe. Couples who live in that sweet spot—where there's constant daily satisfaction without swinging wildly between extremes—are the ones where love is actually winning in every sense of the word.

That’s why, personally, whenever I hear those stories where people idolize someone by saying they hit the jack pot, I don't take it too seriously unless they’ve already spent a massive chunk of their lives together. They can't predict the future, and in a way, it kind of devalues everyone else who deserves that same "treatment." I could easily point to a few people and claim they're my "soulmates" and go on forever about it, totally getting lost in the fantasy, but that would just be lying to myself.

At the end of the day, I think there are way too many incredible people out there to just single one person out like that. For me, the real backbone of a relationship isn't just having things in common or matching on certain levels; it's that unique individual space we build together over time. That space is what makes a relationship authentic and gives it real value. It’s just silly to go chasing some "dream" that only exists in old memories or an imaginary future, especially when there's a whole new field right in front of us, waiting for us to decide exactly what we want to plant.

Basically, you've got to live a full, awesome life on your own first (completely independent of any partner) before you can even start building a "movie-worthy" story. People should really enter a relationship or marriage as two individuals who already know how to thrive solo, but are simply choosing to share their journey together.
Paramahansa Yogananda in Spirituality ·
granitebadger2 said:If I may weigh in here:

But why even bother with a spiritual teacher? Look, I’m not saying teachers don't exist—anyone can be a mentor depending on who the student is and what’s being taught—but honestly, this whole guru/disciple dynamic, when applied as a blanket approach to living, absolutely grates on my nerves. It assumes there's some standardized blueprint for the human soul.

Now, if a teacher were to actually spend years studying their student—making a genuine effort to understand them deeply enough to truly grasp who they are and the specific path they are walking—only then might they have something substantive and tailored to offer.
What we see today in these mass movements has nothing to do with actual learning. It’s more about people blindly copying behavioral templates because they are so desperately obsessed with the idea of "freedom" that they are willing to mold their entire existence into someone else's vision of how life should look, just so they don't have to take the reins themselves.

We've reached a point where people try to "learn" about life, happiness, or truth (whose truth, exactly?) straight out of books. It’s all just an excuse to avoid actually living through it.

So, when I think about this guru/follower relationship, all I see is mutual parasitism.

Exactly, which is why I used those quotation marks! 🙂

People just love these concepts and standards, and hey, I'm fine with them, including "authorities." I actually enjoy hearing some smart insights; in fact, I think it's vital to be reminded of certain truths every now and then because people naturally gravitate toward the path of least resistance, which usually leads to picking up habits we definitely don't want.

And if some of it turns out to be total garbage or useless fluff? That's just life.

The only kind of parasite I'm interested in being is one snuggling in bed with someone. 🤣
Paramahansa Yogananda in Spirituality ·
@cenarius and @klimaks

Look, in my original post, I was strictly talking about whether or not the speaker actually matters to the student—nothing else.
The stuff you guys are reacting to (not sure about you, cenarius) is just me quoting an old message of mine and drifting into a slightly different topic.

To put it simply: I was just saying that most people learn by mimicking others, reflecting those relationships and building behavioral patterns. It’s like how a kid is basically a blank slate; 90% of the time, they aren't soaking up what their parents *say*, they're soaking up what their parents *do*. That was my whole parallel! I was trying to explain why @klimaks' point about the speaker being irrelevant isn't quite right. I’m telling you, it definitely matters, especially when we're dealing with things that hit close to home for the individual.

So, bottom line: I wasn't talking about ultimate truth or deep spiritual enlightenment, and I certainly wasn't thinking about grasping those concepts when I made my point.

Real life is a massive, complicated thing, and reaching some "ultimate realization" doesn't suddenly cancel out our need for food, a partner, or just living a balanced life.

When "spiritual" gurus start preaching about how to act or live, it is incredibly important that what we learn actually benefits us. After all, life is a lot more than just realizing that 2+2=4.
You’ve got to be able to navigate daily life without everything being a total struggle, living in harmony with yourself and the people around you. That usually means dealing with a huge spectrum of situations and perspectives that we have to constantly re-evaluate and apply to the moment. That’s what life is, plain and simple.

As for absolute, ultimate truths? I'm not trying to touch that, and I don't have much to add there. Absolute truth is always there, whether we see it or not, and there's really nothing left to say about it once you acknowledge it.
Paramahansa Yogananda in Spirituality ·
ambereagle642 said:Here’s another little story for you. This whole idea of being "worthy" or "unworthy"... I mean, what kind of relevance does that actually have? And for whom exactly?...
All you really are is a collection of endless variations of expression, without any actual qualitative difference in what's being shown.
Besides, let's be real, Tolle is more effective than any sleeping pill on the market...

Look, the expression itself doesn't really matter. But if we're looking at it from our perspective—as people trying to actually learn and grasp these things—then yeah, it matters big time! That’s why you see constant friction between religious leaders and the actual message they're supposed to be preaching; it's the perfect example.

If you look at this from any angle, it’s obvious that people learn primarily through how others act and behave, and almost never through what they say (unless they actually live it). Most people definitely operate this way, and psychology has been backing that up for ages.

So when we talk about relevance, it’s totally important. When someone talks the talk but doesn't walk the walk, it immediately kills their credibility for us. We just don't give them the time of day, though honestly, not many people are actually capable of spotting that disconnect.

We aren't talking about some abstract definitions or theoretical concepts that have nothing to do with real life here. We're talking about things where true understanding usually requires a specific way of behaving that backs up the words.

Basically, the more I think about it, the more I feel like people only truly learn and accept insights through actions, not through words. That's why, when we're discussing spiritual topics, it’s a huge factor for anyone who's still searching and struggling to tell the difference between truth and total nonsense.
What's the point? It's all meaningless. in Psychology & Therapy ·
electrichound94 said:I keep getting hit by this overwhelming sense of futility. For instance, I’m sitting here supposed to be studying, but I can’t help but ask—what’s the point? At the end of the day, we all die. So why bother?🤷 Instead of just living life to the fullest and having some fun.
It has even reached the point where scrolling through this forum feels pointless. (I mean, obviously, everything is somewhat meaningless😁, but at least it used to be engaging.) Now, I honestly couldn't care less about reading anything. What for? It’s just the same old topics, the same personalities—it’s all just a massive waste of time...
Nothing really feels meaningful anymore.

I know what comes next: people telling me to go see a therapist. But for what? To get "tools" to help me function until my time runs out? Why am I even here?🤷 Why should I do anything at all? It’s all just a Sisyphus job.

I totally get where you're coming from.

But look, having that realization doesn't change the current reality; it just proves you finally see exactly where you stand. From here, you either start moving—either by playing along with the "rules of the game" or by checking out entirely. There's really no middle ground once you see it clearly. We basically signed up for the first option by default, and if we choose the second, there's no debate about it—it's a done deal. But if we've accepted the first, then the choice is between just drifting through this lethargy or actually taking charge and building a life that serves your own interests. Most people just live their lives according to what their parents or society wants, but since you've "opened your eyes," it's only a matter of time before you take the reins and paint your own canvas, even if that involves dealing with these bouts of nihilism.
aquarius - I totally underestimated you, so I’ve got nothing left to say. Good luck out there!
copperfox22 said:it isn't a failure based on what actually happened. Not even close. You can't just erase beautiful moments from your history. A failure is when things don't land—when there's no longevity, no real alignment, none of that "click" where everything finally falls into place perfectly 😁

A failure is defined by the ache it leaves behind... because it saps your courage to try again. Who in their right mind wants to go through the meat grinder all over again? It’s a failure because you can't just walk away from the void it creates. It’s a failure precisely because it felt good, yet it didn't work out. No sane person wants to give up something that actually brought them joy

It's a failure because getting back off the ground after you've fallen is exhausting. And falling hurts. People haven't figured out how to bypass the pain yet . That sting of loss, the loneliness, the emptiness—that's the whole point. 🙂


Leah would never realize that if there are no misses, then nothing is a hit. You’d just zero everything out and blend into one. That’s when you truly find life, both in the "pain" and the "joy."
You have to find that "something special" within yourself first; only then can you truly live out love.
copperfox22 said:I’m not sure if we’ve covered a topic like this before. If we have, mods, feel free to lock this thread.

After reading through some of the discussions here and doing a bit of my own reflecting, I’ve been thinking about those "ghosts from the past" and how much weight they actually carry for us. Obviously, everyone is different—some of us are tougher, some more sensitive, some more confident—but I think there’s a common thread we can pull on. So, here’s my question: how much are your past romantic failures and poor choices subconsciously (or even consciously) holding you back when you try to move forward?

To kick things off, I’ll be honest about myself. I’ve started wondering if I’m just making excuses under the guise of "life getting in the way," essentially sabotaging my chances at finding a real connection. It’s not that I’m shy or confused about what I want, and I don't really deal with massive complexes (at least nothing that feels like a major issue)... I tend to march to the beat of my own drum and don't always follow social norms, though I wouldn't say I'm a rebel, since I generally fit in just fine with society.

To cut to the chase, as much as I try to convince myself otherwise, I think I still carry some baggage from my past that’s starting to cause friction. Instead of throwing myself into meeting new people or experiencing new things with an open heart right from the jump, I find myself internally telling myself, "Don't bother, it’ll just be another bust... stay guarded, keep your distance."

I can't tell if my brain is doing this because it genuinely believes I have a knack for picking the wrong people, or if it’s just a defense mechanism—a fear that if I actually dare to trust someone, I’ll just end up disappointed all over again.
Sometimes I catch myself wondering if there's a reason I'm perpetually drawn to the wrong crowd. Why does that happen? Because, honestly, the "perfectly stable" types usually don't interest me at all 😕... they're always these eccentric characters, slightly off in one way or another. Now, combined with everything else, it’s creating a total mental block. It’s like the moment I find someone attractive, there's always some glaring, dangerous flaw 😬

Anyway, bottom line: how much are your failed relationships and past mistakes actually messing with your head? 😁


But wait, what even counts as a "relationship fail" or a "bad call"? Does that kind of thing even exist? Seriously, think about it: if you spend a beautiful stretch of time with someone, and then they go and pull some total BS—like cheating or any other massive disappointment—does that really erase all the good moments from your perspective? Can those ugly moments actually dim the present and turn a bright sunny day into total darkness in your eyes? Heck no, they can't! Why? Because those moments happened, they were lived, and you can't change the past. There is zero point in denying them or letting them ruin the beauty of right now by getting tangled up in a web of dark thoughts. Instead, why not just move forward with a smile and the mindset of "life is beautiful"? I know, I know—it sounds nearly impossible when you're in the thick of it, but whenever you find your footing, you have the power to throw your hands up and say, "This is my life, and I'm going to live it exactly how I want!" The thing is, people haven't learned how to live with actual respect for life, for others, or for the world, so their passion just burns out fast. But even when that spark dies, and you're sitting there alone for those ten minutes before you drift off to sleep, that’s your most honest moment. That’s when you realize the only truth is the one you found in that burst of energy. The question is: are you going to get back up and keep pushing, or are you going to sit around wallowing in self-pity over coffee with friends? You can choose to finally learn the difference between right and wrong, beautiful and ugly, and start valuing the highs and lows of life equally. You can take that relationship where you felt wronged and finally start living by the code: "Yes, I am enough. I am freaking enough. I have value, and I don't need to play stupid games with myself or others to prove it." Why act out some fake role, trying to look superior or constantly struggling to be "enough" for someone else, when your most noble role is simply being enough for yourself? That is the only thing that truly matters.
Did the brawl in paradise actually happen? in Psychology ·
Truth is usually somewhere in the middle, just like it always is...☕
I’d honestly rather connect with actual human beings, but lately, it feels like people are disappearing. Instead, we're just getting surrounded by artificial stuff and all these fake, pink facades. It feels like we're totally losing our way.
Is it possible to empirically prove free will? in Philosophy ·
Look, if I’m being totally blunt and not just grasping at straws, my take is that it’s absolutely doable. It works assuming that only the present moment actually exists, which basically means that in almost every single "now" moment, you have the power to act exactly how you want to. (Unless you're physically pinned down by someone or dealing with some other extreme situation, obviously.)

The real kicker, though, is figuring out how many of those tiny little moments actually stack up to build a person's character or shape the different chapters—big or small—of their life. It's all about how those moments carry out a decision.

To make it super simple, think of it like this: If I can choose what to do right this second—like, I could go to sleep, stay on this forum, or literally fly to the moon—then I believe I have a choice. That's free will from where I'm sitting. We just rarely stop to realize we have that much control, and we often ignore the cause-and-effect consequences, but that doesn't change the fact that the ability to choose is there.

In my book, people exercise free will most when they're actively pushing back against their primal instincts. (Aside from basic biological needs, of course!)
If you could come back to life, would you? in Spirituality ·
ironharbor8 said:That’s a poetic way of putting it, 🙂

I'm just not quite sold on that last part. 🤷

Real freedom comes from being brave enough to question everything.🙂
How do you stay motivated? in Psychology ·
Honestly, navigating through this absolute chaos is such a struggle whenever I hit a dead end. The real question is whether I can snap out of it fast enough to realize that living entirely in the moment—where tomorrow isn't even a factor—is the only thing actually driving me forward. That’s what keeps me going, even if it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. But hey, that’s just how it is!
If you could come back to life, would you? in Spirituality ·
ironharbor8 said:Two-thirds of the world's population resides in what we call "developing nations." Every single hour, every day, and every year, 4,000 people perish from starvation. Roughly 30% of the people living in these regions lack access to clean drinking water—if they have any at all. That isn't even touching on the endless cycle of warfare, violence, exploitation, human rights abuses, gender inequality, human trafficking, racism, or religious intolerance. Would I choose to be born into an environment like that? Let me think about that for a second... 🙂 🙂


Everything you said is true, but there are also things that just hit you right in the feels and change how you see everything. You know the key is living in the "now," but without acknowledging all that darkness, you wouldn't truly appreciate the light you've experienced and know you have just enough of. It's like when a single drop becomes too much and the glass overflows; death isn't the end, but it sure makes it harder to push through the daily grind. You're speaking sense, wearyhawk83, and just remember: don't just pick a life, pick how you want to taste it. 😉
If you could come back to life, would you? in Spirituality ·
Michael Moore3 said:Imagine a moment where you’re facing your own end, fully aware of the finality of it all—everything you’ve built, everything you’ve owned, and the entirety of your physical existence on this planet...
And then, with that heavy realization, you’re asked a single question: Would you choose to return to an Earth like this one? You’d start over as a completely different person, free from the baggage and anxieties of your previous life, beginning from scratch with the absolute freedom to design a life exactly how you want it. The only thing that carries over is your core essence, the fundamental "you." Would you actually opt back into a material existence like ours?"

So, would you take that deal? Yes or no, and what’s the reasoning behind it? 🙂


Nope. Because honestly, I'm already living exactly what you just described. There aren't any shortcuts. It's a total delusion to think the amount of stuff we experience changes; it's all about how we perceive things. Right now, I'm keeping things pretty balanced, but who knows? Maybe tomorrow I won't be, and my answer might change. But for now, I'm definitely passing on that offer.