Posts by Eric Fox7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXCq...ature=youtu.be

That’s exactly how it should be done—pure hype. 🙏

wanderingfox86 said:I'm not entirely sure how they handle a draw if three teams end up tied on points—I know it goes to head-to-head if there's just two of them, though. It'd probably be some kind of mini-table situation where everyone sits on 5 points. Like, Dinamo is at 5:4, Chelsea is sitting at 3:3 right now (still stuck on zero since they haven't settled anything), and Porto is at 4:5 with the worst goal difference. So, my gut tells me a draw is enough for Chelsea, while Dinamo pretty much cruises through regardless with a win.

Yeah, if they all finish with 11 points, it becomes a three-way tiebreaker triangle.
In that scenario, the Ukrainians take first, Chelsea grabs second, and Porto ends up dropping down to the Europa League.

Morgan Williams said:Too bad, the kid actually has potential:

🤣

And you actually think he's the only one with potential?

😁

Amanda Evans2 said:Asta BTJ

But let’s be honest, they just don't have the charisma of Boto
...

Asta🙏

BTJ, this editor from the Chaplin without units magazine🙏

🤣

Check out this absolute madness 🙏

https://www.facebook.com/Extreme/vid...8708171519727/

🙏

darkotter35 said:It doesn't say anything anywhere about not being allowed to file a yellow card appeal against someone else's penalty.

Well, Dorian already told you not to go down that road:

Dorian Gray said:Did anyone else pick up a yellow card somewhere?
Look, if that person wants answers, they can just walk up and ask him themselves—it’s not like you can jump in here and demand an explanation on their behalf.

If you can't be bothered to actually read the subforum rules—or even just the guidelines for this specific thread 🤷
, then honestly, what is there to say?
In short:

Dropping links in a foreign language without providing an English summary or explanation
Personal attacks (ad hominem)
Straight-up insults
Using slurs or derogatory names for politicians
Just being a pure troll

🤷

It seems pretty obvious to me—and I don't even usually post in the politics section—so I find it hard to believe you're struggling with this.
Besides, you've already been told that other people's yellow card appeals have nothing to do with you.

Looks like even folks from Turkey are paying their respects to the fallen:

Look, sure, you’ll find some bad actors even among Catholics, but let’s be real—groups like the IRA or the Provisional IRA weren't out there committing terror attacks in the name of the Bible or preaching Catholic doctrine; they were driven by Irish nationalism. Same goes for the Baader-Meinhof Group—they had absolutely zero connection to Catholicism. And as for the Black Hand? That was over a century ago, and from what I know, religion wasn't even on their radar as a motive. So, honestly, these comparisons you're making? You're way off base here.

As for Breivik, bringing up his mental health issues is kind of a moot point—it's just a distraction from the reality of what happened.

Even the local Muslim community is coming out to condemn those attacks in Paris 🕺

View on instagram

I find it pretty funny how some atheists feel this massive urge to defend Islam while simultaneously taking cheap shots at Catholics 😍

UCatolicaSan-CD SM Arica odg3+ @ 2,30 (HL)

The Chilean league—honestly, it’s pretty wide open and tends to be quite high-scoring. They don't face off against each other all that often, so we don't have a massive sample size here, but personally, I think what we have is enough to work with.
Out of five matches, they've been averaging about 4 goals per game, and they hit that "over 2.5" mark four times out of five (one was a 2:0, though). Looking at the league stats, the Catholics tend to average well above 3 goals, while the away teams sit just a bit below that.

Christian Morales said:I honestly thought you weren't going to show up. 😁

Wait, are you pulling my leg here? 🤔

Quote : the edge actually got back to you over a month ago 🤷

Ryan Vaughn7 said:Sorry about that—you ended up with six 'no' votes and not a single 'yes.'

Why not? I'm stuck at work right now, so I can't get into all my betting sites.

Here We Go Again...

Al Ain vs Orlando City SC - Both Teams to Score @ 1.60> (BTTS + Over 2.5 @ 1.85) (1:1)(SS)

USA League Cup☕
Usually a total goal fest.
Even though Al Ain averages just about 2 goals per match in this cup, the visitors are sitting at a massive 4.5—though if you look at their regular league play, both sides average around 3 goals a game anyway.
The head-to-head stats are actually kind of wild...
They’ve hit BTTS + Over 2.5 in 10 of their last 12 matchups.
And looking back further, they've cleared that mark 23 times out of 36.
Most impressively? In their last 16 meetings—actually, 19 of their last 20—both teams have found the back of the net.
Given those numbers, the odds here feel pretty solid.

Still throwing darts at the stats...

LA Galaxy - Melb City Over 2.5 goals @ 2.10 (HL) (2:4)

So, we've got this matchup in the American league between two teams that both made the semifinals last season—which basically tells you everything you need to know. When those heavy hitters meet, expect open play and plenty of scoring. The visitors—who, let's be honest, operate like a satellite club for Manchester City—have been absolute machines, averaging exactly 4 goals per game (an 8:8 goal difference). On the flip side, the home side has had a rough start to the season—though I suspect they're due for a breakout—grinding out just 2 goals while giving up 7 over their first 4 matches.
The away side has seen Over 2.5 goals hit in 6 out of their 9 games across all competitions this season. Plus, looking back at their head-to-head history, the last 7 meetings have all seen at least 3 goals, with both sides finding the net in 11 of their 17 total matchups.

Back to the numbers again...

18:30 Liefering - A. Lustena over 2.5 @ 1.50 (2:1) (over 3.5 @ 2.25) (2:1) PSK

To put it simply—looking at their head-to-head history—they've hit over 2.5 goals in 7 out of 9 matchups, over 3.5 in 6 of 9, and the average total score between them sits well above 4.5 goals.
So far this season, Salzburg's second squad has been averaging nearly 4 goals per game, while the visitors are sitting at an average of two—but honestly, those head-to-head stats are what really catch my eye here.

When you weigh the odds against how these teams usually play each other, we’re looking at a long-term profit of 16.5% on the over 2.5, and a massive 50% on the over 3.5.

If you want to get a bit more aggressive and bet on 5+ or even 6+ goals (again, just based on their history together), the long-term profit margins look even better.
In fact, 5 out of 9 matches—more than half—saw 5 or more goals, and the books are offering odds of @ 4.
And 4 out of 9 matches—about 44%—hit 6 or more, with the odds sitting at @ 7.5.

Obviously, the sample size is tiny, so there are no guarantees and nothing is a sure thing, but these picks definitely offer some insane value.

Looking at the head-to-head history here, this feels like a genuine statistical value bet.

9:30 Melbourne Victory - Wellington P. over 2,5 @ 1,55 (HL,SS) (3:0)

The reigning champs, Melbourne Victory, are hosting Wellington—and honestly, this league just loves high-scoring affairs. The visitors, in particular, have been absolutely relentless lately; they score plenty but can't seem to keep a clean sheet to save their lives. They’ve seen over 2.5 goals in 7 of their last 8 matches across all competitions, averaging nearly 4 goals per game. Even looking back over the last few seasons, they usually hover around that 3-goal mark. The home side isn't far behind either, hitting the over in 6 of their last 9 outings.
When you dig into the historical data, 19 out of the last 26 matchups—that's about 73%—have cleared the 2.5 goal line. Given the current odds, that represents a solid long-term profit margin of roughly 13%.

Morgan Williams said:The poll makes it crystal clear why that crew can't get their grammar right to save their lives.

Honestly, I’m just sitting here wondering how they even managed to get logged into Facebook in the first place. 🐔

Rachel Cooper3 said:That’s just a convenient excuse for people too embarrassed to admit they're actually Democrats. ☕

Total nonsense. Look, I’m someone who leans conservative by default—it's just how I'm wired—but even if I were dead drunk, there is absolutely no way I’d be casting a vote for a Republican party acting like this.

It’s all pretty much a lost cause when most people are just plain dim—seriously, they'll swallow any ridiculous fairy tale about old-school communists or secret police goons without a second thought. 🤦

Honestly, I’m almost rooting for Adeze to win this election—mostly just so we can finally go down in flames. If we're going to hit rock bottom, let's just get it over with. These guys running on "policy" and "platforms"? They don't have a single clue what they're doing. Not one.