Posts by Rachel Cooper3

Dominance 🙏

Calm, calm, says Sandra. ☕

Well done. 🙏

It’s not part of the network 🙏

Sandra has certainly dropped quite a few pounds.

Let there be some actual fair play—meaning basic respect for everyone involved.

Good grief, that last shot... and there were at least two or three more just like it.

Total amateur hour.

For God's sake

She was truly elite in track and field. ☕

The old man absolutely crushed it—did anyone catch the news on CNN? ☕

He’s primed and ready—charging in with everything he’s got.

Bernardić to the Mexicans: Avoid any incidents; we will defend our own territory.

Btw, dealing with those Mexicans is nothing but trouble—we actually have better relations with the folks from Texas.

I’m not a fan of dictators, but...



These aren't trivial issues—they could be settled quite rapidly if anyone actually had the will to do so (and then we could finally move on, ha!).
The arguments from both sides are right there in plain sight. It’s impossible to stand on the side of anti-fascism while simultaneously claiming certain extremist slogans aren't what they clearly are—not to mention the endless cycle of debunking myths about casualty numbers and such. Once you address these issues—even if just to clarify the facts—then you can move forward. You can't make progress like this.

They’re really pushing him—not that I expect much, given how played out this concept is...

The Muse stays timeless for that very reason; there's a certain power to it.

Matthew Young35 said:How can you say they haven't done anything?
They helped the Republican Party take power. Twice.
And they'll do it a third time if given the chance.
Aside from that, you have a point. They didn't achieve much, but my issue is actually with what they *did* manage to do.

And what was their alternative—offer some brilliant explanation?

Sit in Congress like the Libertarians, making minor tweaks just like you and I do here on this forum?
I don't doubt the Libertarians have good intentions, but there is no real change without holding office. If they are smart, they will run on a joint ticket and sweep the losses.

🤣

By the way—Sarah ended up in the hospital.

They finally sent Karamarko into retirement.

Keith Miller30 said:If you take the latest polls at face value, it seems like that era might finally be coming to an end. ☕

That bandit is seizing control of the race again—and doing it without a single ad campaign or any media appearances. ☕

And who’s going to step up next? That dark force? Or maybe Elvis—who is everyone obsessed with anyway? She hasn't even spoken in Parliament, and honestly, even Bozeman could go around visiting sites of old communist crimes.

I started this thread to avoid getting flagged for being off-topic—since this isn't just about a single disciplinary action, but involves several other points I need to address.

KLCCLK The user said:And you just dive straight into the Sacha case—without a single shred of actual argument? If you're looking for conspiracy theories, just go check out the "Edge of Science" PDF.

Uncle Strile The user said:You claimed you said something and then immediately got slapped with a ban—that’s just criticizing the moderators. We all know exactly where to go if you want to appeal a penalty.

Your second outburst was nothing more than trolling—though you could have easily been flagged for off-topic comments.

So, conspiracy theories... I assume you all realize that half of this sub's policy documents would need to be purged if we actually followed the "conspiracy theory" rule? It took me—all of two or three minutes, mind you—to track down two posts that meet the moderator KLCCLK’s definition of a conspiracy theory, even though they were nothing more than... Opinions? Just as they are—is that really all there is to say? Opinion? My perspective remains unchanged—though I suspect many here would prefer otherwise. Why even bother asking? My posts—or any other posts regarding the tear gas attack.

So, we’re looking at these posts—they're scattered across different threads, but they all fall under the umbrella of "conspiracy theories."

And those are merely two among hundreds—if not thousands—of others. Or are they?

I assume you moderators are well aware of how much people love to claim that MOST is just a puppet project for the Republican Party—but I haven't seen any of these conspiracy theories being shut down. Or have I simply poked the hornet's nest by commenting on the "wrong" topic?

Would I get banned if I posted that Joe Biden had his hands in this Sacha situation?

Pick a side already—what exactly is permitted here? Is it just specific topics labeled as conspiracy theories, or does this apply to everything? I shouldn't be getting banned for "trolling" simply because I point out things that seem suspicious in my posts.

The Frenchmen are totally gassed in defense—it's a completely different story altogether.

And these games at the end 🤣

Insane matchups 🙏

+7 5 minutes left—this guy is basically playing for the breakthrough 😁

Total garbage from them until the whistle.

But man, that second-half defense? Solid. 🙏
And the keeper—saved us from a few certain goals there.

They might be quick, but the Frenchmen play defense just as poorly.

A total disaster.

Omeyer—it’s coming from everywhere at once, an absolute barrage.

The Frenchmen simply can't keep up with this pace.