mistybadger2 said:The guy spelled it out perfectly. Most banks set everyone's limit to zero and swapped the permitted amount for whatever was considered the standard limit back before the decision at end of 2017.
Basically, they pulled the same shady stunt on everyone.
The few people who caught onto the game—the minority—negotiated a legitimate permitted overdraft. Everyone else is stuck dealing with the unpermitted mess.
Most people didn't realize that behind all this jargon, they were essentially getting fleeced for an extra 30%.
Meanwhile, that snake of a Governor has been smirking about it for four years.
You really have to watch out for these banking bottom-feeders. Given how easily Americans can be misled and the sheer corruption in our government, these guys have found themselves a gold mine that most criminals could only dream of.
First off, last night there was a paid fluff piece claiming the Federal Reserve "recommended" that banks stop screwing people over and offer meal-plan style repayments instead of freezing accounts (an anonymous article, obviously). Then today, we get another piece about how "Secretary Mnuchin reacted and announced new legislation," tucked right behind a paywall. And then you have Mr. "I shouldn't get involved" showing up here; I guess he has to justify that massive salary, even if it means listening to some kid from the sticks for half an hour. It’s easy enough to do what you're told when there's money in it.
First of all, we really are a colony, and second, we are a damn pathetic colony. It's an understatement to say they wouldn't act like this back home. I'll end up like those crazy people across America, shouting "End the Fed" -> "End the Federal Reserve." 😁
And Mnuchin... man, how can you be such a naive sucker?
