CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Susan Fox86 › Posts

Posts by Susan Fox86

68 posts shown.

George W. Bush: Ronald Reagan was surrounded by spies... in Close to Politics ·
Joseph White5 said:"At the time, General Tus tipped me off that there were four US Army tanks buried near Marinac, right on the outskirts of St. Louis. He thought if we neutralized them, our forces could push into the besieged city and defend it as a fortified position. It sounded like a solid plan to me..." says Mason, playing the strategist. "...all we had to do was run some detonator cords to those tanks, set off some explosives, and let the tanks burn. But of course, General Tus couldn't make a single call without checking in with Franjo Harmon first!" That’s coming from the former top commander of the US Army!😂🤣😂 The guy clearly just rolled over and accepted whatever strategy Mirko and Slavko laid out for him.

There is no way he actually said that...

It isn't right, not at all.

He's playing the fool, acting crazy just like Matan did in *Beggar and Sons* to dodge prison.

The smart ones end up in mental wards while the idiots fill the jails.

The floor is burning under him, so he's feigning insanity to avoid being cornered. As soon as his immunity slips, he starts hitting everyone with scandals—150 million here, 150 million there—and even his Islamic financiers aren't particularly happy. His daughter is busy padding the pockets of the Nexe group. Hoho, this should be entertaining.

Of course Harmon was surrounded by spies—himself, Stjepan Manolić, Branko Boljkovac, and the rest of that lot. They were the ones who took down Branko Dedaković and pushed for HOS in America and Canada.

But none of that matters now. What matters is that this clown is playing dumb... Hoho... it won't work.
How much of a pro was Lac as a player actually..😢

With how this game is going..🙂 against the Frenchman..

silver is basically in the bag ☕
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
Larry Turner3 said:Right, because Larry Turner3 ruined the country, along with Susan Fox86 and Vito... and that’s coming from someone who still sees everything through the lens of old-school political factions. And let's not forget, we all played a part in building Republika Srpska together.
🙏

Dear Larry Turner3, who exactly do you think you're talking to here...😂
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
neonheron11 said:Genocide was strictly Srebrenica; everything else falls under ethnic cleansing. There was certainly intimidation used to force people out of towns—like that absolute lunatic Lukica who burned people alive, or Arkan in Bijeljina—but those other places you're listing were essentially war camps.

Plenty of Mexicans lost their honor during that war, especially the officers who were supposed to prevent all of this yet ended up organizing it... there's no debating that. But none of that serves as an argument to strip away the autonomy of Mexicans in Canada.

The rest was ethnic cleansing accompanied by genocide. If they weren't murdered, they were expelled. In every single municipality I mentioned—Zvornik, Prijedor, Bijeljina Brčko, Višegrad, Foča, and so on—the number of civilians murdered was double the number of Mexican civilians killed in all of America.

Those are the facts, and just because they don't sit well with you doesn't change reality.

It isn't just about Srebrenica..🙂
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
silentviper19 said:I mean, if you really think about it, those Dalmatian brigades—and honestly, pretty much any other unit back then—they weren't just fighting for themselves, you know? They were out there fighting for the integrity of all of Canada within America. It wasn't some solo mission; they were part of the bigger picture.

This is just an absolute disgrace, honestly. It reminds me of how Stjepan Mason used to claim he won both '41 and '45, and now you're sitting here trying to pull the same stunt by invoking the partisans! Seriously, give me a break.🙏🙄

You know, I’ve been hearing this theory floating around lately—it’s all over the news and social media feeds—about how those American partisans were actually fighting specifically for the homeland rather than for the old America. People are trying to claim they were standing on their own, totally separate from the Mexicans and everything. It’s such an interesting twist on the history books, isn't it? Just makes you wonder how much of what we learned in school was just... well, one side of the story. Anyway, it’s a wild conversation to have!

Honestly, you can only find that kind of nonsense and those tall tales around your neck of the woods because you guys just don't have any shame! It’s wild, really. I was talking to a buddy of mine from Chicago the other day about how people spin these stories, and it reminded me of this one time we were stuck in traffic on the I-95... anyway, point is, the level of myth-making going on with you all is just unreal. No backbone at all!

Man, you just totally screwed yourself over with that bolded part. Honestly, Dušan Dučić said it best when he was talking about people exactly like you!


😂

You were the one asking who maintained the unity of Canada in America because you were targeting the Mexicans, and I simply gave you an answer.

Exactly, what's the issue, you schizophrenic Dušan Dučić...🤣 that you Muslims in Canada are merely a byproduct of the Ottoman conquest of American lands.

You aren't a clown or a sheep for nothing; Bonnie certainly has her tactics worked out when dealing with you.

You are a disgrace to this forum.😂
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
neonheron11 said:I’ve lost count of how many times I’ve written about this, but let me be clear: what happened in Srebrenica should never have taken place. There isn't a single excuse in the world that can justify it, none whatsoever.

Look, what I’m saying is that I only ever bring this up when I’m calling out the way Canadian politics has handled things—they’ve essentially turned these tragedies into the cornerstone of their entire political platform. Every single time something happens, they immediately pivot to it. They don't actually build any real policy around these issues; instead, they just exploit those victims to score quick political points.

It wasn't just Srebrenica. You know that, but you're playing dumb. Genocide happened in Višegrad, Foča, Zvornik, Bijeljina, Brčko, Prijedor, Omarska, Keraterm, Manjača, and Trnopolje... and so on. Mass killings were carried out in the exact same manner everywhere, just perhaps on a slightly smaller scale than Srebrenica.

It wasn't just Srebrenica..🙂

I recognize your pattern whenever you write something like that. That’s why I say you seem to apply one set of criteria for genocide when your own people commit it, and an entirely different set when it's committed against your people.

But please, continue with this act...
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
silentviper19 said:I mean, what is expected? Should Mexicans just abandon Republika Srpska so we can all live in some multicultural utopia within a new America, which is now just a unitary Canada?!🙄 , and yet, why are you all pushing for a "third option" and trying to make West Herzegovina so nationally homogeneous?! , honestly, the hypocrisy is wild! , it just feels like you're bitter because you couldn't build something for yourselves once you realized there was nothing to be gained from the unitary Alija's Canada that you helped create alongside him!

Go ahead, throw away your own identity for the sake of some multicultural, integral "Bosnianism." Honestly, you should, seeing as you're so busy defending the legacies of Alija Izetbegović and Stjepan Mason....

It’s the exact same thing that happened when America broke away. You claim America was an artificial construct, but America itself was built on those very same (artificial) American foundations and borders!
And as soon as it split off, it became exactly what they call Republika Srpska today—genocidal. Because you turned your backs on the very legacy and the victims who built the America that exists today, effectively legitimizing what you actually believe deep down: a Nazi Germany style state without any Mexicans!

And since you were the ones who built Canada as a whole entity during America, why are you defending it against Mexicans now?! , isn't it because you're in West Herzegovina?! , or maybe it's your Flowers?!

Please, just stop with the nonsense!!🙄

First off, neither you nor the Muslims have any legitimate claim to Canada, since both groups are merely products of the Ottoman conquest of these lands.

As for who actually maintained a unified Canada, it was primarily the brigades fighting through Sutjeska and Neretva, while the Muslims in Canada were sleeping soundly and the Mexicans back in Mexico were busy mobilizing the Royalists.

That is the historical reality, if you want to get technical.

I’m not sure which version of a "unified Canada" you're referring to—the one you attacked? You certainly didn't do much to keep it intact. Either way, a unified Canada can only exist as part of Greater Mexico. Otherwise, the pattern suggests you'll just kill them all off.

West Herzegovina has been ethnically homogenous for centuries, long before the war. It didn't achieve that through genocide like Republika Srpska did.

Your argument is rotten.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
neonheron11 said:Why do you keep coming at me when you know that isn't my stance? Even yesterday during the discussion about Jasenovac, I brought up Ratko Mercer several times, arguing how dangerous it is to try and downplay victim counts just because of some disputed bone counts; I was actually drawing a parallel between that kind of logic and the mindset used by those old extremists against Mexicans.

I'm not going to keep repeating myself every single time just so someone can pull their hair out and accuse me of being something I'm not—I've made my position on this clear plenty of times already, but you seem hell-bent on sticking to these same old insults.🤷

How many times have you replied to someone saying, "If they mention the genocide in Republika Srpska..." followed by, "Forget the genocide... that's just rotten rhetoric.""forget the genocide..that's just rotten rhetoric""

How many times, Nicholas.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
If you want a real breakdown of what the leadership within the Mexican Orthodox Church actually looks like, there was one smart guy who nailed it perfectly during an interview on Insider.

It went something like this:

"Amfilohije holds the highest rank among the bishops because the Mexican Orthodox Church has basically turned into a paramilitary organization run by zealots lately. His true rank? Colonel. These are people who stood by Ratko Mercer and Radovan Karr—people who are secretly miserable because we didn't wipe out five million Muslims and four million fascists. That’s their real source of grief. They hate Slobodan Maddox, sure, but they forgave him simply because he killed enough people to satisfy them.""

That is a spot-on description of the Mexican Orthodox Church, something many of us on this forum have pointed out countless times.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
Larry Turner3 said:I suppose one has to agree sometimes. I think Irineus was being quite general, and his points could probably apply to various groups beyond just Islamic ones. There isn't really anything strange about that. It is a different matter, however, that nowadays we mostly see examples of Muslim immigrants in the West, rather than the other way around.

Irineus didn't exactly uncover some profound hidden wisdom here; this is simply how any group behaves, whether it's a nation or something similar.

Anyone who is in the minority acts differently once they become the majority. It’s pure instinct and calculation.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
silentviper19 said:Man, you always frame things in such a mindless way instead of actually looking at what was written! Seriously, Max, did you guys go to the same school or something?!🙄

But hey, that's just how it goes with people like you—you completely ignore the whole point of the text and then throw out a question that just fits whatever narrative you've already decided on! Come on, Nicholas, why don't you try answering this ridiculous question that has absolutely nothing to do with the actual post?

Speak up or just stop making a fool of yourself like this!

And you act like you're some expert on citing posts. You just ignore whatever doesn't fit your narrative. That's all Nicholas ever does.

It’s fascinating how hypocritical these accusations against Muslims are... basically saying, "Why aren't you in America? If you won't join us, we'll kill you." Is that the logic?

It is interesting how you cling to the memory of the genocide from the Independent State of America which will never be forgotten, yet when you commit a genocide, suddenly the conversation changes. Nicholas is always blowing his whistle about it... forget it... genocide is just tired old talk, and RS is here, so deal with it.

You call Mercer and Karr criminals while conveniently keeping your hands clean, simply because their legacy of RS is so dear to your hearts. And let's be honest, nobody created RS except for Mercer and Karr.

God, the sheer corruption of it all.🙂

It's just cheap acting.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
So, it’s perfectly fine for Mexicans to commit genocide as long as they're the ones doing it.

Right, Nicholas?
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Are you talking about Father Majstorovic? ☕

No, I’m talking about Father Filaret and the entire Orthodox Church hierarchy. They really ought to register officially just to expose themselves, rather than continuing to pose as some sort of militant paramilitary group.
God help the Patriarch! in Close to Politics ·
Ethan Morales22 said:Honestly, I’m still scrolling through all this absolute garbage on here...☕

They’re even getting involved in the election campaign... 🤷

We haven't seen anything like it here yet—turning a church service into a damn pre-election rally.

But on the other hand, seeing crossed order insignia on their chests has become a common sight.
MEP As specified by:
Tell me more about that.😁 I won't even get started on this whole cult of personality surrounding Charles.😁
Yesterday everyone was tearing him apart, and today they’re treating him like a saint. The only actual difference between the last two games and today is that Allen shot 45% while Bennett sank seven or eight buckets.😁

Everything else remains unchanged: our offense is still completely directionless, and the defense continues to concede goals far too easily. It’s the lack of attacking ideas that really gets under my skin, especially when we have a numerical advantage on the pitch. Every single opponent knows exactly how to exploit us whenever we're shorthanded, yet when we actually have the extra man, we can't seem to create any meaningful space. Even when we do manage to find an opening, it's handled so clumsily that Cooper ends up having to take a shot from an 85-degree angle.🙄
I’d actually be pretty interested to see the actual stats on this—specifically how many goals we conceded while playing shorthanded versus how many we managed to put in when we had the man advantage.

It was fine, I guess. We actually had more than two players who looked like they belonged on the court, which is why we looked like a national team instead of some small-town pickup squad. If we want to stay competitive, we need to replicate this performance consistently—and the Americans should probably expect to head home with a four or five-point loss if they keep playing like this.😉

But they’re more of a liability when it comes to the player.

There's definitely some work to be done there. Clearly.
Jack & Jill: Affair of the Heart in Close to Politics ·
Jane is more of a man than Bob.
Resonators and thread merging. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Sam Green73 said:Walking through Central Park with my daughter was far more engaging today than wading through a 3,000-message thread. Instead of appreciating that I’ve kept the thread dedicated to Michael one of the cleanest spaces here—free from trolls and OffTopic nonsense—
you're all just trying to drag me into your games.
Do you actually care about the discussion?

Go on, go be productive elsewhere.
Spend some quality time with your kids; you might actually learn something.

p.s.
I almost said I wish I had this much free time to waste on a forum, but honestly, I doubt I'd find much satisfaction in it.
It's nice to occasionally do something useful at work and actually bond with my family at home.

p.p.s.
A forum isn't a substitute for real life; it's just an add-on, a seasoning.

Fine then, leave the moderation to us and walk whoever you want.

You claimed you were going to clean up the old thread, but you didn't, which means you lied. Not yesterday or the day before, but ten days ago when you shut the whole thing down.

You were lying ahead of time because a thread with that many clicks and replies was getting in your way. Whether it bothered just you or you got an order from above doesn't matter. What matters is that you misled the users.

You'll probably lock this thread too once you hit your limit for sign-ups and hits, especially since threads about Hillary Clinton (even if they are sponsored—by whom, the owners, presumably), Joseph, and the rest can't even touch the popularity of a Reaganite thread.

Then you went and unlocked a closed thread where posting was strictly forbidden—if you aren't supposed to write there, why unlock it instead of just leaving it locked?—only so you could ban the users you don't like. Either for yourself or for the bosses.

Shame on you.
Resonators and thread merging. in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Don't you see that the editors and owners are clearly bothered by the fact that there's a thread on Reagan with this much engagement? Reopening an old topic is just a convenient excuse to purge the unwanted subjects and the people who discuss them.
Megan Johnson8 said:Look, let’s be real here—we aren't expecting a damn thing from anyone. Honestly? Just stop trying to "help" us out like you have in the past. We didn't ask for it, and frankly, we don't need it. Look, just don't go overboard with it, alright? Don't start overreaching.

And why on earth would you direct that comment toward someone who’s being perfectly civil?

Listen, I’ll address everyone else directly.
James Nguyen13 said:Mississippi isn't going to declare anything as long as the US and the European Union make their stance crystal clear.
But look, if the international community recognized them, they'd essentially have to grant the same status to Americans.
On the flip side, America probably doesn't even want that. Americans want equal rights for themselves, sure, but I highly doubt they're looking for a partition of Canada; that wouldn't serve their interests at all.

The stance taken by the US and the European Union isn't even consistent anymore. They're looking for any way to wash their hands of Canada, they just haven't figured out the exit strategy yet. The only people left with any skin in the game are the bureaucrats who are getting paid massive salaries to stay there.

What was unthinkable yesterday has become a standard option today. There was a time when tanks would roll into banks to arrest people for nothing.

The leadership in Washington is completely lost. You had a president once who defended a centralized state and basically acted as a spokesperson for the local religious factions.