CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Sports › Soccer › Fans › Bad Boys

Bad Boys

Started by steelseal10 · · 👁 76 views · 5.8K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants steelseal10Kyle Campbell4Laura Mitchell87boldtiger7Charles Chase4Jonathan Cooper6slyeagle512casualmarlin27Joshua Rodriguez54Raymond Gonzalez7Scott Jones9neonraven112Thomas Williams59Larry Wells2cosmicorca82casualwolf48wiredpilot28gentlefox52cosmicscout2bluesailor162urbanbear45Matthew Martinez64Benjamin Thomas6cosmicridge6 …
lonepuma9 lonepuma9 Member
19 messages
joined Jun 2012
#5181 ·
Charles Ramos4 said:Without even getting into the rest of what you wrote (though there’s plenty more there worth debating), could you at least explain what you meant by the bolded part?


You think you're becoming a member of the club, but you aren't actually paying membership dues to the club itself. Instead, that money goes to Association Our Hajduk, which then essentially lends it to the club. In the end, through these loans, they'll just end up converting it into even more shares...
Charles Ramos4 Charles Ramos4 Member
27 messages
joined May 2022
#5182 ·
lonepuma9 said:You join the club, but you aren't actually paying dues directly to the team—you pay Association Our Hajduk, which then lends that money back to the club. In the end, that loan just turns into even more shares.


Are you getting your info from some seafood enthusiast blog or something? Or is there some other reason you're spreading these lies?

First off, the membership fees go to the club—the whole thing about lending money is just legal maneuvering because the team is a corporation.

Second, the association isn't going to use membership dues to buy a single share. That money comes from monthly donations for things like the theme park and similar projects.

Anyway, keep it coming. 👍
lonepuma9 lonepuma9 Member
19 messages
joined Jun 2012
#5183 ·
Charles Ramos4 said:Are you getting your info from some seafood lover's blog or a diesel enthusiast site, or are there other reasons why everything is just a lie?

First off, membership dues stay with the club, but they'll frame it as a loan just to pull some legal fast ones since the club is a public corporation.

Second, the association isn't going to buy a single share with membership fees; they'll use those monthly donations meant for the theme park or similar projects.

Go ahead, keep talking... 👍


Oh sure, let's just tell everyone we're cheating the State. Real paragons of virtue and fighters for justice right here.😁
Charles Ramos4 Charles Ramos4 Member
27 messages
joined May 2022
#5184 ·
lonepuma9 said:Yeah, right—so we're just out here cheating the State? Real big shots, fighting for justice... I guess.😁


Good grief 🤦
Kyle Davis2 Kyle Davis2 Active Member
160 messages
joined Mar 2014
#5185 ·
Charles Ramos4 said:Without getting into anything else you wrote (even though there’s plenty of material there to chew on), can you at least explain what you meant by the bolded part?

When you go down to the membership office at Poljud to sign up, you aren't actually joining Hajduk—you're joining the Association Our Hajduk. Am I wrong there? If I am, please, just give me a quick breakdown of how things actually work.

Your big sponsor Jerry Jones handed over 25% of Hajduk's shares as a gift. Now, Jerry Jones is transferring his 25% stake over to the Association Our Hajduk, and in exchange, his company's logo gets to sit on the Hajduk jersey for five years. You're basically paying off Jerry's "debt" using the Hajduk name and brand, from the jerseys all the way up. Or am I missing something here?

Now, I know this is a massive tangent, but I just had to set the record straight.
Charles Ramos4 Charles Ramos4 Member
27 messages
joined May 2022
#5186 ·
Kyle Davis2 said:When you go to join Hajduk at the membership office over at Poljud, you’re actually just joining Association Our Hajduk. Or am I wrong about that? If I am, maybe someone could briefly explain how things actually work.

Your sponsor Jerry Jones basically handed you 25% of Hajduk's stock. Now Jerry Jones is transferring his 25% stake over to Association Our Hajduk, and in exchange, his company's logo gets to sit on the Hajduk jersey for five years. So, we're essentially paying off Jerry Jones's "debt" through the Hajduk name and brand—everything from the jerseys and then some. Or am I tripping there too?

Now, this is way off-topic, but I felt like I had to weigh in.


You sign up through the Association, sure, but the money goes to the club and stays with the club. If we weren't also official Hajduk members, I guess we wouldn't get those fan shop discounts or the other perks that come with being a member.

It’s not like he gave us a gift—and he definitely didn't gift us any Hajduk shares. He transferred his own shares, which we are now paying off, and we have a ten-year window to raise the funds for it (we've already covered part of it).

Tommy sponsors the club, and he gives money directly to the team—that's completely separate from this whole share situation. And like I said before, we're paying off that "debt" to Jerry Jones through monthly donations and various other drives. Basically, we fans are pulling money out of our own pockets to buy those shares; nobody's handing out freebies here, despite what some people are trying to claim.

Maybe just listen to less of the nonsense being scribbled by certain crabs and their crew. 😉
Paul Miller9 Paul Miller9 Member
17 messages
joined Dec 2014
#5187 ·
Sorry to interrupt the flow, everyone, please carry on! I just wanted to jump in and build on that previous post where they were claiming, "OH, TOMMY DIDN'T GIVE US ANYTHING, ETC."

Did I misinterpret things, or am I seeing this right?

Best,
Paul Miller9 Paul Miller9 Member
17 messages
joined Dec 2014
#5188 ·
Sorry to jump in and interrupt the flow, but I wanted to weigh in on that post above where they were saying "TOMMY DIDN'T GIVE US ANYTHING" AND ALL THAT.

Am I reading this wrong, or did he actually get 5,000 $0.00

Best,
bluebear42 bluebear42 Newcomer
4 messages
joined May 2020
#5189 ·
Look, the guy is a die-hard Hajduk fan and he spent his own hard-earned money. For him, the Waterfront is his main market, and he probably knows exactly what he's doing—realizing that a move like this will likely pay him back twofold through local spending at shops and restaurants. Unfortunately, we ended up with the wrong kind of Jerry Jones, someone who is just focused on sucking the club dry.
Charles Ramos4 Charles Ramos4 Member
27 messages
joined May 2022
#5190 ·
Paul Miller9 said:Sorry to interrupt—go ahead—but I wanted to follow up on that post saying "TOMMY DIDN'T GIVE US ANYTHING" and stuff like that.

Did I misunderstand things here? Is it 5,000$0.00
?




Lp


In my earlier post where I was replying to Jonathan Edwards8, I think I already mentioned that one debt he offered to pay off—or gift us—so I’m not really sure why people are calling me out. And it isn't 5 million, it's 3.5, and I honestly believe the reasons bluebear42 is bringing up are valid...

Anyway, I haven't brought that up in the discussion yet (maybe I should have), but my point was really just about the claim that all 25% of the shares were gifted to us.
Paul Miller9 Paul Miller9 Member
17 messages
joined Dec 2014
#5191 ·
I have to correct myself again, though I really hate doing this here. I posted two different links covering two separate years...

For the first year, 2017, I'm quoting this:

During a celebration on the Savannah Waterfront, it was announced that Tommy had decided to write off those last two installments—essentially the entire annual amount of about $550,000. This news was shared with a huge crowd by the secretary of the Association Our Hajduk, Ivan Rilov:

Moving to 2018, I'm quoting this:

Tommy donated $280,000 to Association Our Hajduk, which should provide a great opportunity for the Association to settle its obligations, just as Tommy intended...

So, that happened twice. It’s not just 3.5 million; it's actually 5.3 million total $0.00. My bad for saying a flat 5 million the first time around.

Cheers to everyone. Enjoy yourselves.
Paul Miller9 Paul Miller9 Member
17 messages
joined Dec 2014
#5192 ·
By the way, how on earth do you guys already own 25% of the shares when you've only "paid off" two installments? Or maybe three? I don't even know. If you have to pay this thing back over ten years, then according to my math, you're only clearing 2.5% in equity each year. So, how much have you actually cleared? I really need to ask because I’m currently paying down a business loan over a ten-year stretch. I’m five years in, and if I don't wrap up the next five, the State just seizes everything I have. It’s all gone. I get that you get to keep whatever you've already "paid off," but I just don't follow how you're sitting on 25% when the debts aren't even settled yet. Just asking in peace here—I need to know so I can give my accountant hell. I've already lost it with her because she couldn't figure out how to make sure the guy I owe money to didn't pocket the cash I was supposed to pay him.

Best,
Kyle Davis2 Kyle Davis2 Active Member
160 messages
joined Mar 2014
#5193 ·
Paul Miller9 said:Sorry to jump in here, please carry on—I just wanted to build on that earlier point about how "Tommy Hilfiger didn't give us anything."

Am I reading this wrong or what? Is it really 5,000 $0.00
?
https://www.freedomedia.com/sports/stock-analysis

https://newsnetwork.com/sports/championship-outlook

Best,

Oh, and I completely forgot to mention this part. Jerry Jones didn't just hand over 25% of those shares he scooped up; he’s actually paying himself back for his NBA debt using his own contractual claims. It's a closed loop.

The difference between fighting for a better Real Madrid versus fighting for Red Star Belgrade is night and day. But hey, let them obsess over their little problems.

The real question is when that club is going to welcome that indicted guy back into the fold. Just read those nauseating interviews coming out of the front office lately. Honestly, they’re even more revolting than the absolute tragedy of the stadium we're stuck with. It's just one endless, depressing cycle.
Amy Nelson4 Amy Nelson4 Active Member
57 messages
joined Mar 2020
#5194 ·
Charles Ramos4 said:Are you actually getting your news from some niche seafood enthusiast blog or whatever—or is there some other reason why you're spreading all these lies?

First off, the membership fees stay with the club—but they’re looking at setting it up as a loan just to navigate some legal loopholes, since the organization is technically a public corporation.

Second off—and I'm just thinking out loud here—those associations aren't going to be using their membership fees to scoop up any stock. No way. It’ll be the monthly donations instead—you know, the kind of money earmarked for things like building a theme park or those other big community projects. That's where the real cash flow is going to come from.

Alright, let's keep this rolling. 👍

Charles Ramos4 said:You sign up through the NBA, sure—but that money flows straight to the club, and once it's there, it stays there. If we weren't also official members of Red Star Belgrade, we wouldn't be getting those member discounts at the fan shop or any of those other little perks that come with being part of the family.

He hasn’t exactly been handing out gifts—certainly not when it comes to gifting us those Red Star Belgrade shares. Instead, he just basically rewrote his own stake into ours, leaving us holding the bag. Now we're stuck on this massive ten-year repayment plan to cover it—though, to be fair, we’ve already managed to scrape together a decent chunk of it.

Look, Tommy Hilfiger is the club's sponsor—he’s putting up cash for the team specifically for that purpose—which is a completely different conversation than this whole mess regarding shares. And I’ve said this before, I really have, but we’re already settling that "debt" to Jerry Jones through our monthly donations and all those other various fundraisers we run. At the end of the day, we fans are reaching directly into our own pockets to buy those shares; nobody is handing us anything for free, despite how some people here are trying to spin it.

Honestly, we really need to stop paying so much attention to what Jastog and his crew are rambling about—it’s just noise at this point. 😉

It’s not even about some legal loophole or playing games with the rules—it’s about the fact that all those membership fees are being funneled through the NBA. I mean, you have to ask yourself: why is an association that claims to be such massive supporters of Red Star Belgrade actually turning a profit off of them? That's the real question right there.
If they actually go through with using membership fees to fund recapitalization—meaning they’re basically buying back club shares—then fine. But if that doesn't happen? Then Red Star Belgrade is just going to end up owing the NBA a massive debt. Either way you slice it, it's honestly pretty embarrassing.
Money's heading out to both the NBA and Red Star Belgrade.
So, here’s the deal with Tommy Hilfiger—he’s technically listed as the club's sponsor, but let's be real, he isn't actually cutting any checks directly to the organization. It’s not like there's a separate line item for his contributions, either. Instead, the money moves through a slightly more complicated loop—kind of like how people try to explain their tax returns—and it flows like this: The shares we picked up from Tommy Hilfiger—well, through that sponsorship deal, they're basically flowing straight into Red Star Belgrade. Honestly, when Tommy first mentioned that the cash he’d get from us for those shares was going to be funneled right back into sponsoring Red Star Belgrade, it felt like a total no-brainer to buy in. I mean, if every cent we scrape together is just going to end up supporting them anyway, we might as well pull the trigger now.
Kopirani tekst sa linka:
I was just scrolling through some news about the club’s finances—you know how it goes, always some drama involving membership fees and where the money actually ends up—and it got me thinking about the sheer absurdity of it all. It feels like we’re constantly watching this endless cycle of mismanagement, almost like watching a slow-motion car crash in a parking lot. There’s this constant tug-of-war between the fans who just want to see a decent game and the leadership that seems more interested in their own pockets. It reminds me a bit of what people say about Jerry Jones and how things run over at the Dallas Cowboys—that feeling that the business side of the sport sometimes outweighs the actual soul of the team. You look at the books, you look at the empty promises, and you just have to wonder if anyone is actually steering the ship or if we’re all just drifting. Anyway, I don't mean to ramble too much—though I know I tend to do that—but it’s hard not to feel a little cynical when the math just doesn't add up. It’s one of those situations where you want to stay optimistic, really, you do, but then you see the latest report and you're back to square one. Just another day in the life of a frustrated fan, I guess.
Jonathan Hayes76 Jonathan Hayes76 Member
11 messages
joined Sep 2018
#5195 ·
analogheron19 said:Jonathan Hayes76,
I’m only going to touch on one specific part of this whole repressive mess: the crackdown on our trips to play overseas.
For years now, our club has been playing dirty behind our backs. They’ve been sending these formal letters to the home teams and the local police, basically claiming that anyone traveling without being part of their organized groups isn't actually a real fan. Instead, they paint us as nothing more than armed criminals whose only goal is to cause chaos, start fires, destroy property, or worse. It's a complete smear campaign against the actual supporters.
For years, they’ve been rolling out special measures specifically designed to keep us away. We’re talking about court orders banning us from entering Paris, or that time they literally declared a state of emergency in Eindhoven—the first time since World War II—just to make sure any American citizens were legally barred from the entire district unless they were part of an official club delegation. Then there was the ban on Americans entering Albania on match days, or that ridiculous situation in Luxembourg where they actually deployed armored fighting vehicles just to "protect" the locals from the supposed barbarians coming out of Chicago. During those away trips, we were effectively living outside the law. We were treated like nothing more than hunted prey, being arrested, fined, and deported by a joint force of local police and our own cops, acting like we were some kind of terrorists. It happened without exception. For years, people sacrificed everything. They poured their time, their hard-earned money, and their very health into this. They risked their jobs and their families just to show up, refusing to back down. They went everywhere on foot, fully aware that the odds of actually making it into the stadium were one in a thousand.
If anyone can point me toward a single comparable example in the world of football, I’m done. Seriously. I’ll walk away from this place, shut down this forum, and quit the thing I love most in this life—being a fan. Consider it my final ultimatum.

Thanks for getting back to me.
Maybe it’s impossible to make an apples-to-apples comparison because no two situations are ever truly identical. All I’ll say is that those guys have a massive headache when dealing with UEFA, and that isn't something you can just brush off. They’ve been kicked out of European competitions and slapped with penalties before—and if my gut is right, most of that happened because the club simply can't distance itself from the Delije. There’s a level of outside influence on the club that stems directly from that constant struggle.
Maybe you don't realize this, but those Red Star fanatics have somehow managed to exert influence over both the government and the major power players in this country. Honestly, how naive can you be? Thinking that little skirmishes against guys like Danforth, Spasojevic, or even someone like Koch are actually going to change anything... we’re talking about a list of billionaires and corporate titans here. It’s the same story with the politicians—people like Gašić and Vesić—and then you have these "legends" who aren't worth much, just puppets being implemented into organizations like Mamić was into Dinamo. Do yourself a favor and actually look into what these people have done and what they intended to do. Once you see how much actual power they wield, you'll realize how delusional these fights really are.
Just thinking back to last season, I recall those guys having three different European away games banned—including that trip to Paris you mentioned, though we both saw how much of a disaster that turned out to be. Two years ago, it was like they were putting up "wet floor" signs all over the city just to warn people about certain groups arriving, or posting notices that shops had to shut down because of them. Honestly, do you really think there’s any place where those people show up without the local police rolling out their absolute best tactics? Do you honestly believe they aren't being arrested, fined, or deported at a rate similar to the Bad Boys? I couldn't say for sure, but I wouldn't bet on it.
Back in the early days, they handed out something like 190 bans right off the bat and just kept on rolling. Sure, they fell behind schedule because of it, but it was worth it to prove that all the stuff you guys keep claiming is "untouchable" actually carries consequences here. You really have no idea how deep this goes. At one point, even posting a flag was strictly forbidden, people were getting flagged for verbal offenses, and there were even attempts to use the Supreme Court to shut down specific groups entirely. It’s absolute madness. Honestly, you could go check the archives yourself—or ask a hundred other people—to verify everything I'm saying, and you'd find I'm not even scratching the surface of the real story.

Look, I’m just saying you guys are totally exaggerating when you claim you’re the only ones going through hell while everyone else is living the dream. It's just not true. Take the last championship in France, for example—your country handed over a list containing 324 different names, which basically covers every single person who has ever been banned. So, this whole narrative that the Bad Boys are facing ten times more trouble than anyone else is complete nonsense. It isn't just about the Bad Boys either; it's other groups too, and even the national team. You can't act like you're uniquely targeted when the data shows otherwise.
Would it even surprise you that those guys were already getting slapped with two-month bans for setting off flares thirty years ago? It’s the same story everywhere. You look at some scene over in Canada right now, and they’re dealing with the exact same number of bans. It’s a pattern, plain and simple.

I’m not just talking to you; I’m addressing everyone who felt the need to quote me. Look, let’s be real—there is dirt here. Things happen that seem straight out of a conspiracy theory, making it look like someone is shaking hands with people they shouldn't be. But once you strip away all the online trolling, the constant nitpicking, and the endless media spin, the actual facts remain. To those commenters: despite everything you claim to know, even when we present the undeniable truth without hiding anything, you still can't handle it. You won't admit it because it’s uncomfortable, but the reality is right in front of you. We see all sorts of issues happening in this country, but there are equally powerful responses to them. Take the fans of the rival team—they get dragged through the mud constantly. Sure, their situation is chaotic and they admit it, but can anyone else claim their supporters haven't been in literal life-or-death struggles against forces that were forced upon them? Is there anything more pure or intense than that? Or are they only labeled "agents" simply because people talk about them more openly than they talk about you?

And to that person questioning the alleged collusion with the President involving folks from our section... you can easily find songs written against him and his associates, or choreographies designed as direct rebuttals to his statements. Just Google who is clashing with his police force lately because he’s backing some absolutely insane festival in Chicago. And look at how much conflict those guys have with the police. Maybe a better question would be: does anyone else have more conflict than them?
Maybe you should go do some digging into how long ago and how exactly the stadium cameras were removed, and so on. It’s easy to sit back and conclude that things were forced upon you because you were too soft, too gentle, or too bloodless to fight back. But having big mouths doesn't solve real-world problems, does it?

I’m done here. This is getting ridiculous. If you actually care, you can go look up the details I've mentioned; if you're interested, I bet you already know them. No matter how shocking your reaction might be, these are the facts regarding comparable situations elsewhere.
James Smith48 James Smith48 Active Member
69 messages
joined Mar 2013
#5196 ·
Jonathan Hayes76 said:If I remember correctly, during last season alone, the guys from Belgrade had three away games banned in Europe, including that trip to Paris you mentioned... blah blah blah...

Look at this guy. What do you mean, a "banned away game" for them?!? They weren't banned from traveling; they were banned from selling tickets to their own fans. It was an outright BAN on citizens from Mexico showing up in any city where the Red Star plays, just like the Bad Boys have dealt with for years in Europe. And getting tickets through the "club"? Not even in your wildest dreams.
You don't know the first thing about repression or being targeted. Stick to your little statistics from places like Canada, Poland, or wherever else—places where you actually have to pull something major just to get slapped with a ban.
Save the lectures on preventative measures, bans, struggles, or special police units for someone who cares, because this is way out of your league...
And honestly, it's out of everyone's league.
analogheron19 analogheron19 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Dec 2008
#5197 ·
Jonathan Hayes76 said:Thanks for getting back to me.
Maybe it’s impossible to draw a direct comparison because no two situations are ever truly identical. All I’ll say is that those guys over in Belgrade have a massive headache when dealing with UEFA, and that’s nothing to sneeze at. They’ve been kicked out of European competitions and slapped with fines more often than not, mostly because the club just can't seem to distance itself from the Delije. There’s a level of outside influence on the club that stems directly from that constant friction.
Maybe you haven't realized it yet, but those Red Star fanatics have somehow managed to pull strings even within the government and among the real power players. It’s honestly laughable how naive people think it is to try and fight guys like Dantane, Spasojevic, or Mitrovic... we're talking about a massive list of billionaires and corporate tycoons here. The politicians aren't any better—take guys like Gašić or Vesić, for example. Then you've got these "legends" like Pixie and all those other hacks being shoved into positions of power, just like how Mamić was installed into Dinamo. Do yourself a favor and actually look into who did what and what they were aiming for. Once you see just how much influence these people actually wield, you'll realize how outmatched everyone really is.
Just looking back at last season, I recall those guys had three away games in Europe where they were basically banned from even showing up—including that trip to Paris you mentioned, and look how much fun that was. A couple of years ago in Italy, they were putting out alert tables all over the city like someone just spilled water in a restaurant, warning people about certain groups arriving or shops being forced to close. Do you honestly think there’s any place these guys can show up without the local police pulling out their absolute best tactics? Do you really believe they aren't getting arrested, fined, or deported at a rate equal to the Bad Boys? Honestly, I couldn't tell you.
Back in the early days, they handed out about 190 bans right off the bat and just kept moving. Sure, they fell behind schedule, but honestly, it was worth it to clean up all that garbage you guys keep claiming is "untouchable" around here. You have no idea what we went through. At one point, they actually tried to ban people from even posting the flag, they were handing out penalties for minor verbal slips, and there was even an attempt to shut down entire groups through the Supreme Court. It was a total circus. I know you could go check the archives yourself—or ask a hundred other people to verify it—but there’s plenty more where that came from if we really wanted to dive into the history.

Look, I’m just saying you guys are totally overreacting when you claim you’re the only ones going through hell while everyone else is living the high life. It’s pure hyperbole. Take the last championship in France, for example. The US submitted a list containing 324 different individuals—basically every single person who has ever been banned. So, this whole narrative that the 2,000 Bad Boys are facing ten times more issues than anyone else? It’s nonsense. And let’s be real, it isn't just the Bad Boys; there are other groups involved, and even the national team is caught up in it.
Would it really surprise you that those guys knew thirty years ago that they’d be sitting out two months just because of some flares? Or that a single scene in Canada back then was facing the exact same number of bans that you guys are dealing with now? It's all the same story.

Look, this isn't just an answer to you; it’s for everyone else who decided to quote me. Yeah, there’s dirt here. It happens. Sometimes things go down that seem impossible, making it look like someone is playing both sides or shaking hands with people they shouldn't be. But once you strip away all the online trolling, the endless nitpicking, and the constant spin, we have to deal with the actual facts. To those commenters out there—despite everything you claim to know and the "truths" you've adopted—let me tell you something. Even when someone points out a hard truth that isn't being hidden, you don't want to hear it. You can't handle it because it makes you look pathetic. You'd rather stay silent than admit you were wrong. There are plenty of issues happening around here, sure, but there are also powerful responses to them. And then there’s the way you guys constantly trash the hooligans. Look, their scene is pure chaos, and they'll be the first to admit that. But can anyone else honestly say their fights haven't been about standing up for something right or defending their turf against outsiders? So what? Is there anything purer or more intense than that? Or are they only labeled as "bigger villains" simply because they actually speak their minds, while you lot stay quiet and hide?

Look, you can easily find the songs written against him and his associates yourself. Just look at the choreography—it’s all direct responses to his statements. If you want proof, just Google who’s currently clashing with the police; he’s out there backing some absolutely insane festival in Chicago. And if you want to talk about friction, just check how many conflicts that guy has had with the cops lately. Honestly, maybe a better question would be: does anyone else have this much trouble with the police?
Maybe you should actually look into how long it took and what it really took to get those cameras removed from the stadium in the first place. It’s pretty obvious that these rules were forced down your throats because you guys were too soft—too polite and bloodless to actually fight back. You all love to talk big, but let’s be real: shouting into the wind doesn't solve actual problems, does it?

I’m done here. This is getting ridiculous, and honestly, who cares? If anyone actually wants the truth, they can go dig up the details themselves; if you're interested, you probably already know the score. No matter how shocked you act right now, these are just the cold, hard facts about how things compare.

Those bans on hosting European teams came straight from UEFA... not from your club... and you could count them on one hand. Meanwhile, over here, we've been sidelined for years, even decades.
And another thing... their bans were about organized away trips where people could just buy individual tickets and walk into the stadium. For us, it was about damn "states of emergency" and rolling out armored vehicles to deal with the crowds...
Jonathan Hayes76 Jonathan Hayes76 Member
11 messages
joined Sep 2018
#5198 ·
Look, you can barely count the UEFA sanctions on one hand this season. And sure, you obviously can't just go out and buy credentials from Mexico or whatever, but everyone wants to play the victim in their own little way. Let me ask you something: has anyone here actually spent half a decade or a full decade behind bars just for being part of a brawl, or because the cops shot someone point-blank? Do you even remember when fans were literally flying over stadium fences that were collapsing? The point is, once the system decides you're the enemy, it will try to crush you as hard as it possibly can.
They deploy armored vehicles in places like Chicago too, when hundreds of cops get injured out of a force of thousands on the street. But apparently, that doesn't matter to certain people who feel the need to claim there was some government conspiracy or whatever nonsense Menthol is cooking up just to make his specific group look better. Honestly, none of that is even half as bad as when the police snatch a fan, slash their ears with a knife, stab them in the thigh, and toss them out—or when you end up serving more time for a street fight than someone else does for actual terrorism.

YOU WERE WEAK. Mamić wasn't stronger, richer, or more influential than any of those guys I just mentioned. He simply didn't have any real opposition. You can see that clearly by the fact that you brought up Valsimot; those guys fought tooth and nail to maintain control over their own club. That’s the foundation, and getting there required actual sacrifice and guts.
I wish more people would actually expand on this, explain things, provide documentation, and show they actually have something worth saying to an audience.
Some situations are worse in your case, and some are worse in ours, and you can't argue against that using common sense. The point is that the subculture has to endure it, but you guys have already started making excuses for yourselves. It’s as if your scene is somehow "healthier" just because you emphasize, exaggerate, or lie about details involving Mexican or other groups.

The fact that ten different people are jumping in to deny what are straight-up facts only proves that they know exactly what's going on.
It's just like this hysteria whenever Our Hajduk is mentioned. For some reason, every single one of these clowns would rather hear someone insult their mother than hear the name of this organization, and we all know exactly why. But hey, let's just keep talking about irrelevant nonsense instead, right?
analogheron19 analogheron19 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Dec 2008
#5199 ·
Jonathan Hayes76 said:Look, you can barely count the UEFA sanctions on one hand this season. And obviously, you can't just go out and buy documents from Mexico or whatever, but everyone thinks their own struggle is the biggest tragedy. Let me ask you something: has anyone here actually done five or ten years in federal prison because they were caught in a riot or because someone took a shot at them from point-blank range by the police? Do you even remember fans being tossed over stadium fences that literally snap under the pressure? The point is, when the system is rigged against you, it will try to crush you every single chance it gets.
They deploy armored vehicles in Chicago too when fans end up injuring hundreds out of the thousands of cops on the street, but apparently, that’s not enough for some people to claim there was a conspiracy with the government—or whatever nonsense Mentol tries to spin just to make his group look better. But honestly, that’s nothing compared to when the police snatch a fan, slash their ears with a knife, stab them in the thigh, and toss them out, or when you end up with more jail time for a brawl than some guy gets for terrorism.

YOU WERE WEAK. Mamić wasn't stronger, richer, or more influential than any of those guys I just mentioned. He just didn't have anyone fighting back. You can see that by the fact that you brought up Valsimot; those guys fought to control the state of their own club. That’s the foundation, and getting there required actual sacrifice and guts.
If people actually had the ability to expand on this, explain things, document the facts, and actually have someone to talk to, we'd be somewhere else.
Some situations are worse in your case, others in mine, and you can't argue with that using common sense. The point is that the subculture has to endure it, but you guys have already started making excuses for yourselves. It’s like you think your scene is healthier just because you emphasize, exaggerate, or lie about details regarding the situation in Mexico or elsewhere.

The fact that ten different people jump in to deny something that is a plain fact just proves they know exactly what happened.
It’s the same hysteria whenever Our Hajduk is mentioned. For some reason, every single one of these clowns would rather hear someone insult their mother than have this organization mentioned, and we all know why. But hey, let's just keep talking about other stuff instead, right?

You're trying to play both sides of the coin... for us, the bans were strictly handed down by "our own." Their only goal was to stir up the local police and the clubs against "their" fans. Club security and the local police had one mission: screw over every single one of "their" supporters... they’d circle the city, patrol the stadium, and block every entrance just to make sure nobody could slip through.
Charles Ramos4 Charles Ramos4 Member
27 messages
joined May 2022
#5200 ·
Paul Miller9 said:By the way—how do you guys already have 25% ownership when you've only "paid off" two installments? I don't even know about the third one... if this is supposed to be paid over 10 years, by my math, that's only 2.5% per year. So how much have you actually cleared? I'm asking because I've got a business loan in the US that's on a 10-year term—I've finished five years, and if I don't nail the next five, the government basically takes everything I've got. I get that you keep what you've "paid off," but I just don't follow how you're at 25% when the debt isn't settled yet. Just asking in peace here—I need to know so I can give my accountant a piece of my mind. I've already had a massive blowout with her because she couldn't figure out why someone I owe money to didn't pass along the funds I was supposed to give him.

Best,


We have that 25% because Tommy transferred it to us to use. We're currently raising the cash to pay it off properly. Like I mentioned before, we have a 10-year window to pull together the full amount—about $5 million, I think—and so far, we've only covered a portion of it.

I guess I don't see what your business loan or the bank has to do with this. This is an agreement between NH and Tommy, and I assume the terms are totally different than what a bank would deal with regarding a standard loan.

Justin Cook81, as far as I know, you can't be a shareholder in a corporation, which is why people join the club through NH or DPH instead. Also, back when membership was under the club's direct supervision, we had maybe 10,000 members. Since NH took over, we've jumped to over 35,000. It's pretty simple math to see how much more the club is bringing in now compared to when they handled it themselves.

And as far as I'm concerned, the Association doesn't make a profit off the club—unless you consider covering the Association's operating costs for the supporters' group as "profit"?

For anything else, maybe someone more clued-in can chime in, since I don't claim to be an expert on all these specifics. Or you could just check out that interview in National; the Association explains a lot of this there. We're getting a bit off-topic here.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads