Amanda Roberts2 said:Precisely. There are absolutely no guarantees in this life. No matter how careful you are—and one really ought to be careful—you can never be entirely certain. I suspect most people just move through the world operating on a sort of fundamental trust, placing their faith in others, in themselves, or perhaps just in sheer luck.
p.s. And even if you go get tested, some of those nasty little things meant for men aren't even fully reliable; they can return false negatives... and when it comes to the more serious stuff like unknown or unknown, I’m honestly not sure how much time needs to pass after exposure before a test can actually confirm if someone is carrying a virus.
At my clinic, they told me—and you can find the same info online, too:
1. unknown - you do your first screening after three months, though it's recommended to repeat it at six—even though modern equipment is so advanced that manufacturers swear by its accuracy within a 12-week window, sometimes even sooner.
2. unknown - I'm not entirely sure when the earliest possible testing window is, but I was told that six months is the mark, and they suggest a final follow-up at nine months after any risky encounter, because occasionally, the incubation period can take that long. It isn't common, but it does happen.
It’s roughly the same situation for both.
Most people just come in for their annual check-ups to get screened for all these blood-borne issues.
Oh, I nearly forgot the most important part—there is also an RNA method that can detect viruses in less than a month after exposure, but I didn't go that route since so much time had already passed for me, making it unnecessary, and besides, they are incredibly expensive. Still, in those kinds of situations, price is usually the last thing on anyone's mind.
For testing and general information, I recommend checking out:
http://www.unknown.com/