CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › IT › Software › Anyone still running Windows 7?

Anyone still running Windows 7?

Started by nimblemason4 · · 👁 25 views · 4.3K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants nimblemason4Daniel Vaughn3Noah Sanchez39feralmarlin8Karen Wright8Betty Rogers2Jamie Hughes6Jesse Johnson4driftingmarlin70Michelle Lopez86stormycanyon4Jason Castillo50Keith Bennett38darkviper7Edward Parker2Jack Bailey2wirednomad6Jamie Phillips4Kate James21velvetsurfer9Brandon BoothJeremy RamirezJoshua Garcia3Joseph Bishop4 …
Terry Booth45 Terry Booth45 Member
22 messages
joined Dec 2009
#161 ·
Eric Wilson75 said:Just to wrap this up: should I go with the 64-bit version if I can, or stick to 32-bit?

Go 32-bit... since you're only running 2 gigs of RAM... though technically that shouldn't matter...
Gary Evans69 Gary Evans69 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Jul 2011
#162 ·
Adam Moore said:Thanks, but my RAM is running at 800 MHz, so I'm honestly not sure what I should even try doing here...

Try dropping that frequency down to 667MHz. That'll let you see if the speed is actually the culprit or if we're dealing with something else entirely.
Sophia Ramos19 Sophia Ramos19 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jun 2013
#163 ·
Alright, one more thing—the installation is going onto my C drive. I was wondering if everything else on my other partitions (E, F, and G) is going to be wiped out, or if it'll stay put? I've got game folders, educational stuff🙂 and all that kind of thing sitting there.
darkviper7 darkviper7 Member
25 messages
joined Jan 2008
#164 ·
Don't sweat it—all your porn stays safe and sound on the other partitions 😬
Sophia Ramos19 Sophia Ramos19 Newcomer
5 messages
joined Jun 2013
#165 ·
Phew, thank God. I really wouldn't want to go through the penance of downloading them all over again.
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#166 ·
SQL Server 2005 and Visual Studio 2005 on 64-bit Windows 7 Home Premium

I already posted this over in the Programming section, but it looks like the debate is happening here too. So, here’s the deal: I just picked up a laptop that comes pre-installed with Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. My main concern is how—or if—SQL Server 2005 and Visual Studio 2005 will actually run on it, considering they are both 32-bit. What's the move here? Is there anything I need to tweak to ensure total compatibility so I can migrate apps and move database backups back and forth to my old 32-bit Windows XP machines without everything breaking?
dustyranger4 dustyranger4 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Sep 2009
#167 ·
Jeffrey Hall6 said:I also think it's time to move on to 7 - micu.

The only issue I'm running into is deciding whether to download the 32-bit or 64-bit version. What's the actual difference?

Right now, I'm running Windows XP, and it recognizes 3.23 GB of RAM.

Thanks in advance for the help.

Personally, I find myself missing XP. I tried installing Vista a while back, but ended up jumping right back to XP. Honestly, I feel like heading back to XP again—the Week: Control panel is a total mess, and don't even get me started on how disorganized the file management feels. While Windows Media Player is a slight improvement, I still find myself reaching for VLC most of the time. You can't pin everything you want to the taskbar, either. It frequently slips into sleep mode and wakes up acting completely erratic—almost like it's possessed. It’s frozen on me several times, too. Just like every other Windows version I've used, it starts feeling noticeably sluggish after being installed for a while. It boots up much slower than Windows XP Home. But the absolute worst part? All those annoying pop-ups asking, "Do you want to investigate why the system crashed?" followed by "Do you want to approve this or that?" And Internet Explorer is its own special kind of nightmare—clunky and awkward—it crashes constantly, asking if you want to return to the previous page (and if you say yes, there's a good chance it just crashes again). Oh, and one more thing—there's no built-in mail agent anymore. Now you have to install something like Live Mail from the web, which is incredibly cluttered and prone to crashing. Sometimes my emails actually send, and sometimes the screen just freezes mid-way.
All in all, it feels like a glorified version of Vista that doesn't work nearly as well as XP. If you're currently using XP, my advice is to skip 7. When they claim "you won't need drivers," it's only half true—in practice, you'll likely run into issues with most of your devices. Occasionally, windows will start glitching or "cloning" themselves in slow motion if you have a demanding program open, regardless of how powerful your hardware is. It's a disaster. It seems like they tried to mimic other operating systems, but failed to pull anything off perfectly.
Karen Ward2 Karen Ward2 Member
34 messages
joined Mar 2009
#168 ·
I’m usually a pretty level-headed guy, but whenever I see these hacker posts and issues that fall under the "No connection" category, my blood sugar spikes, my mouth goes dry, and my vision starts getting blurry...
Terry Booth45 Terry Booth45 Member
22 messages
joined Dec 2009
#169 ·
dustyranger4 said:I find myself missing Windows XP. I tried installing Vista, but ended up rolling back to XP. Honestly, I feel like I’ll have to go back to XP again soon. The Control Panel in this version is a complete mess, and don't even get me started on how disorganized the file management is. While Windows Media Player is slightly better, I still find myself reaching for VLC just to get things done. Even the taskbar is restrictive—you can't pin everything you actually want there. The system behavior is unpredictable, too. It constantly drops into sleep mode and wakes up acting completely erratic. It’s frozen on me several times already. Like every other version of Windows, it feels noticeably sluggish after being installed for a while. It also boots up much slower than Windows XP Home. The worst part? The constant interruptions. "Would you like to send an error report?" followed by endless prompts asking for permission to do one thing or another. And Internet Explorer is its own special kind of disaster—clunky, awkward, and prone to crashing constantly. When it does crash, it asks if you want to return to the previous page, but clicking that usually just triggers another crash. To top it all off, the built-in mail agent is gone. Now you're forced to download something like Live Mail from the web, which is a cluttered nightmare that crashes all the time. Sometimes it sends emails, sometimes it doesn't; sometimes the screen just freezes entirely.
All things considered, Vista is just a glorified facelift that doesn't perform half as well as Windows XP. If you're still running XP, my advice is simple: don't bother upgrading to 7. They claim you won't need to hunt for drivers, but that’s a half-truth at best; in practice, you'll be hunting them down for most of your hardware anyway. Even on high-end rigs, the UI stutters—windows start "cloning" themselves like some kind of slow-motion glitch if you have a heavy program running. It's a mess. It feels like they tried to cherry-pick features from other operating systems and ended up failing to get any of it right.

Look, Windows 7 only came out two months ago. Windows XP has been around for over a decade. XP has three service packs under its belt, while 7 hasn't even seen one yet. What exactly are you expecting? For Windows to be flawless the second it hits the market? Slow down. Once we get to Week: Control with SP1, things will actually start looking perfect.
So, this "problem" you claim to have: The worst part of this whole ordeal? It’s that classic bureaucratic trap: they ask if you want to investigate why the system failed, only to immediately pivot and demand whether you want to approve one thing or another. Is anyone actually looking for solutions, or are we just checking boxes? You can tweak everything until the system stops bothering you, but those prompts are there for a reason—your own security. If you want to actually understand why Windows 7 behaves the way it does, do a little digging on Google. A bit of reading will reveal some useful tricks.

Windows 7 is giving me grief too. I installed the 64-bit version, and the audio keeps crackling with the driver I downloaded—the official Realtek one from my laptop manufacturer’s site, specifically updated for 7. So, I wiped it and let Windows install its own standard driver instead. Now, the crackling happens occasionally, and I'm constantly getting "not responding" errors. But look, this stuff just happened. You have to realize it isn't perfected yet. Then again, wasn't Windows XP still imperfect even after ten years? It's all part of the process. Stay safe, my friend.
briskfalcon16 briskfalcon16 Member
14 messages
joined Jan 2009
#170 ·
Terry Booth45 said:Look man, Windows 7 came out just two months ago, while XP has been around for over a decade. XP already has three service packs, whereas 7 hasn't even had one yet. You can't expect a brand-new OS to be perfect right out of the gate, right? Just hang in there—once the first service pack drops, it’ll be golden...
YOUR ISSUE AS YOU PUT IT: "The worst part is: 'do you want to investigate why the system crashed' and then having to 'approve this or that" You can actually tweak things so it stops asking you all that stuff, but those prompts are really just there for your own security... maybe do a little Google searching on Windows 7 and you'll find some cool tips...

Windows 7 is giving me a hard time too. I installed the 64-bit version and the audio keeps crackling, even with the official Realtek drivers from my laptop manufacturer's site meant for 7. I tried deleting them and letting Windows install the standard driver, but I still get occasional crackling and "not responding" errors. It's pretty new, so we have to realize it isn't fully polished yet—just like XP wasn't perfect even after ten years. That's about it, buddy... cheers!

Not a friend... a friend! Honestly, 7 is kind of a mess right now. If I had to choose, I'd stick with the original Windows Vista and just optimize it myself...
Zachary Reyes Zachary Reyes Newcomer
1 message
joined Dec 2009
#171 ·
Honestly, friend, you're talking such nonsense that it’s almost too easy... I can't stop grinning from ear to ear.
Terry Booth45 Terry Booth45 Member
22 messages
joined Dec 2009
#172 ·
briskfalcon16 said:She isn't a friend... she's a girlfriend; 7 is a massive pain in the neck. If I have to choose, I'll go with the original (Vista) and just optimize it myself...

My apologies if I offended you... fine, install Vista then, and we'll see if you end up breaking it again once 7 SP1 rolls out in a few months.
Jason Harris5 Jason Harris5 Member
24 messages
joined Jul 2010
#173 ·
Robin Rodriguez5 said:SQL server 2005 i Visual studio 2005 on 64-bit Win 7 Home Premium

I originally posted this over in the Programming section, but then I realized folks here were already chatting about it. So, here’s the deal: I'm getting a laptop that comes pre-loaded with Win 7 HP 64. My big question is, will SQL server 2005 i Visual studio 2005 actually run smoothly on there, since they're both 32-bit? Is there anything I need to tweak—if anything at all—to make sure everything stays compatible? I need to be able to move my apps around, handle database backups, and restore them onto 32-bit Windows XP without any headaches.

Basically, any 32-bit app just goes straight into the "Program Files (x86)" folder on your main drive, and they usually run just fine.

The bummer is that the Home Premium version of this OS doesn't include that special Windows XP compatibility mode (which would have been a lifesaver if SQL server started acting up). But hey, don't sweat it! If things get glitchy, you can always just spin up a virtual machine. You could grab the free Microsoft Virtual PC or maybe even Oracle VirtualBox. Just toss Windows XP onto one of those virtual machines, and you'll be back in business doing whatever you need to do.
Sandra Adams16 Sandra Adams16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2009
#174 ·
I am currently installing Windows 7, and while everything seems to be running beautifully, I am hitting a wall with the internet connection. It keeps reporting that there is no internet access—it’s quite frustrating... So, I have reverted back to Windows XP for the time being, where the internet works perfectly fine without any issues. Now, I am wondering—could this perhaps be solved by installing an antivirus program? I know they can be quite vigilant and constantly trigger warnings, so maybe that is the missing link to getting online... Or is it something else entirely? Does anyone happen to know what might be causing this?
driftingmarlin70 driftingmarlin70 Newcomer
3 messages
joined Jul 2010
#175 ·
Sandra Adams16 said:not sure if I need some antivirus first just to get online

lol
Samuel Scott8 Samuel Scott8 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Nov 2009
#176 ·
Sandra Adams16;24147508 said:I'm installing Windows 7 and everything seems fine, but I can't get online. It just says there's no internet access. Does anyone know what's up? I went back to XP and my internet works perfectly there... so now I don't know. Do I maybe need to install an antivirus first so it'll let me connect? Like, if it's being super strict and constantly throwing warnings at me? Or whatever... does anyone have any idea what could be wrong?[/QUOT

I ran into something pretty similar once, until I realized my ethernet controller drivers were totally messed up. On XP, I never really had to hunt down drivers; I could usually get the internet running in like five minutes flat. Honestly, I'm pretty happy with 7. I don't see myself ever moving to 8. 😍
Sandra Adams16 Sandra Adams16 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Dec 2009
#177 ·
Samuel Scott8;24148317 said:
Sandra Adams16 said:I just finished installing Windows 7 and everything seems to be running smoothly—except for the internet connection. It keeps telling me there's no access... does anyone know what's going on? I've reverted back to XP for now, and the internet works perfectly fine there. I'm wondering, could it be that I need to install an antivirus first to enable connectivity? (Since it’s constantly monitoring everything and throwing up warnings...) Or am I missing something else? Does anyone have any ideas?

I ran into a very similar situation once before I realized my Ethernet controller drivers were completely outdated—back on XP, I never really had to hunt for drivers, and I could usually get online in about five minutes flat. Now that I've sorted it out, I'm actually quite happy with Windows 7; I don't see myself moving to Windows 8 anytime soon... 😍


So, what should my next move be? How did you manage to get it working?
Samuel Scott8 Samuel Scott8 Newcomer
6 messages
joined Nov 2009
#178 ·
KrSkO;24148463 said:
Samuel Scott8 said:So, what am I supposed to do with that info? How did you actually get yours working?

Is your modem hooked up via Ethernet or a USB cable? If it's Ethernet, I managed to switch mine over to router mode, which helped... I used wizard 2009 because when I went into Control Panel > Add Hardware, nothing showed up. No device manager entries, no drivers, nothing—it was like the Ethernet controller didn't even exist on the system. But through wizard 2009, I spotted that it was a Realtek GBE Family Controller. So, I just typed "Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller driver download" into Google, grabbed the driver, installed it, and suddenly everything just worked...😁
Robin Rodriguez5 Robin Rodriguez5 Active Member
149 messages
joined Sep 2011
#179 ·
Jason Harris5 said:Every 32-bit application lands right in the "Program Files (x86)" folder on the system partition, and they run without a single hiccup.

The new Home Premium edition lacks support for Windows XP compatibility mode—which would have been your easy fix if SQL Server starts acting up. If things go south, though, you can always just spin up a virtual machine using free tools like Microsoft Virtual PC or Sun Microsystems' VirtualBox. Just install XP on the VM and run your legacy stuff there.

So far, so good. It’s actually doing its job. 👍 Sure, the installer threw a dozen "compatibility problem" warnings at me, but honestly? It seems to be running just fine.

I was just sitting here wondering what the hell that x86 directory actually does. 😁
Steven Hayes80 Steven Hayes80 Newcomer
4 messages
joined Nov 2009
#180 ·
Not too long ago, I was going on about how this whole week has been an absolute dumpster fire!
And honestly? I’m still standing by that.👎

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads