#701 ·
says:
That might explain why DDR2 at 1066MHz hits about 8533MB/s, while DDR3 at 1600MHz can swallow up to 12800MB/s. You’re looking at a third more bandwidth there... so, maybe that's the reason. And then there's the latency, obviously. I don't quite grasp why you're acting so surprised by this, or why you're basing your entire perspective on some benchmark from Microsoft's beta operating system...
PS: The fact that the OS is 32-bit shouldn't really change the math here. It makes little sense to give it the highest score just because its ceiling is capped at 4GB.
Fair enough, it's better to be "surprised" than to simply be confused. Thanks.