Kate Kern6 said:If it’s actually true that women need to have their first kid before thirty—especially for their own health—then I am officially panicking. I turn thirty in a month (brrrr, sounds absolutely terrifying), and apparently, that "rule" doesn't apply to me anymore. If it's real? I just hope it won't be too late for me later...
You're stressing over nothing—as long as you're healthy, in my opinion.😉 If you're healthy, you can give birth without issues as long as you're still fertile. If you aren't, having a baby at twenty isn't going to magically fix that either. It’s highly individual. Age is really just a statistical data point—every woman is obviously much more than just a number. For instance, women around 35
typically get sent for amniocentesis just because they hit that age milestone. Of course, not everyone does it since they have the right to say no. But a fetus with Down syndrome can happen way before 35, just as it might never happen at all. Plus, the test itself carries about the same risk as the statistical chance of Down syndrome for a woman that age (around 0.5-1%). In that scenario, if people blindly follow every statistical claim doctors make, a 35-year-old might undergo the test just because of the stats and end up with a miscarriage, even if the fetus was perfectly healthy and didn't have Down syndrome.🙄
Obviously, health—including reproductive health—is a moving target, which is why I think the best way to deal with these fears is to actually know your own body. Listen to it and track it; you'll be able to figure out most things yourself, regardless of medical opinions—which, let's be honest, aren't always the smartest.☕