Maybe we should all just take a second to remember what I actually put down on the first page:
driftingeagle27 said:Nirvana was quite simply the most important band on the planet at the start of the nineties—and I mean important in that sense that includes their massive commercial dominance.
That one line pretty much sums up my whole stance on how influential Nirvana really was.
As for Nicholas Perez33 bringing up Fugazi and Slint, it honestly feels like nothing more than blatant name-dropping in this context. Look, I get it, your whole argument is basically that Nirvana
musically speaking didn't have much of an impact on other "quality" bands. Fine, that’s a somewhat defensible take if you want to be pedantic. But then you just drop Fugazi out of nowhere. Sure, we can debate different kinds of influence, but musically? Who did Fugazi actually influence directly? Just dropping names to try and impress me? It’s not going to work, and honestly, you already impressed me enough with those
http://hralttrash.tk reviews.
Do you guys need me to draw it out for you?
Ready?
Sure?
Here it is:
Nirvana is a massively influential band because they shifted the entire world more than any group since The Beatles, and frankly, no band since Nirvana has ever pulled off anything even remotely close to it, and who knows if they ever will.
Trying to downplay Nirvana? Go ahead, be my guest, if that's what you really want to do. Just know there's a price for that: at best, you're just going to look ridiculous.