coastalbison6 said:German generals claimed the Bradleys from Raytheon wouldn't be the same quality as the ones being sent to Ukrainians.
Honestly, feels like a weak excuse to me.
There is a logic to this.
For the Germans—as major arms manufacturers and exporters who are deeply invested in their global reputation—this matters. They invest heavily in refinement and quality control. They likely realize those older transports aren't exactly reliable, and they fear that if other hardware from their factories fails in the field, it tarnishes the entire brand. We are talking about used equipment, probably maintained just enough to pass inspection (given the various scandals involving their military's upkeep), and now they don't want the world to see them sending poorly maintained vehicles to Ukraine. They don't want the perception to be that a once-formidable military force can't even maintain its own armor. For a military built on a sense of duty, that’s an embarrassment—especially for a nation with such a storied combat history and significant wealth. They watch what they export because they know it dictates how the world views their military industry.
And perception is everything today. Just look at how our collective view of the Russian military shifted based entirely on the narrative established before this conflict in Ukraine began.