bluemason3 said:People talk nonsense all the time, especially when there's money involved. The internet is basically just an ocean of stupidity.
There’s a decent chance he communicated with Vivekananda, but if I recall correctly, the stories don't actually use real names. It’s mostly speculation (for instance, Vivekananda might have mentioned "a certain scientist" he was in contact with, assuming that part is even true).
I think it’s a stretch to claim him for those traditions. Even if there was some intellectual curiosity or correspondence, it's unlikely he ever identified as a Hindu or anything similar.
As for the comments, they're spot on. Aside from the dates clearly being off, that interview is actually part of a stage play. It has nothing to do with the real Tesla or a real interview.
Tesla Mind isn't some total load of nonsense—it’s actually a top-tier exhibit, technically and otherwise. All this stuff you see online is just pure fiction. It’s classic New Age behavior, honestly—just making up "scientific theories" and forcing them into their weird worldview. Besides, there are actual biographies out there, and people who put this whole exhibit together have probably studied his life way more deeply than any of us ever could...
bluemason3 said:People talk nonsense all the time, especially when there's money involved. The internet is basically just an ocean of stupidity.
There’s a decent chance he communicated with Vivekananda, but if I recall correctly, the stories don't actually use real names. It’s mostly speculation (for instance, Vivekananda might have mentioned "a certain scientist" he was in contact with, assuming that part is even true).
I think it’s a stretch to claim him for those traditions. Even if there was some intellectual curiosity or correspondence, it's unlikely he ever identified as a Hindu or anything similar.
As for the comments, they're spot on. Aside from the dates clearly being off, that interview is actually part of a stage play. It has nothing to do with the real Tesla or a real interview.
That’s just straight-up false—I’d start by using that exhibit as proof, then move on to the biographies, and finally pull up some actual, solid eyewitness accounts from the web...
bluemason3 said:People talk nonsense all the time, especially when there's money involved. The internet is basically just an ocean of stupidity.
There’s a decent chance he communicated with Vivekananda, but if I recall correctly, the stories don't actually use real names. It’s mostly speculation (for instance, Vivekananda might have mentioned "a certain scientist" he was in contact with, assuming that part is even true).
I think it’s a stretch to claim him for those traditions. Even if there was some intellectual curiosity or correspondence, it's unlikely he ever identified as a Hindu or anything similar.
As for the comments, they're spot on. Aside from the dates clearly being off, that interview is actually part of a stage play. It has nothing to do with the real Tesla or a real interview.
Just look at that ascetic lifestyle he led... I mean, if you don't buy his relationship with Vivekananda, maybe that alone should be enough proof for you. He wasn't strictly Hindu, nor did he belong to any other specific religion—but then again, he read the Bible cover to cover too, so he wasn't exactly part of the Christian crowd either... basically, you don't have to be labeled by one group to understand and practice elements from different faiths...
bluemason3 said:People talk nonsense all the time, especially when there's money involved. The internet is basically just an ocean of stupidity.
There’s a decent chance he communicated with Vivekananda, but if I recall correctly, the stories don't actually use real names. It’s mostly speculation (for instance, Vivekananda might have mentioned "a certain scientist" he was in contact with, assuming that part is even true).
I think it’s a stretch to claim him for those traditions. Even if there was some intellectual curiosity or correspondence, it's unlikely he ever identified as a Hindu or anything similar.
As for the comments, they're spot on. Aside from the dates clearly being off, that interview is actually part of a stage play. It has nothing to do with the real Tesla or a real interview.
I’ve read two of them and I already know exactly which interview we're talking about—you can find it on YouTube under "Nikola Tesla, Adjusting to Angels"...
I don't get it—am I really supposed to go out of my way to tear someone down just because they haven't bothered to read a biography or even look up what he actually did... just so I can feel like I've won some imaginary argument? I mean, books exist... legit websites exist... you know, things people use when they actually want to be informed