CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Parenting & Kids › Students & Teens › What's the point of required reading?

What's the point of required reading?

Started by brisktiger56 · · 👁 60 views · 1.1K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants brisktiger56David Price5Daniel Gomez10David Torres6boldfalcon13nimblelynx7rustyjackal10steelskipper5wanderinggardener12rowdypanther12Sarah James4Karen Richardson3Jeffrey KellyRachel Jones8Michelle Bailey4Peter Doyle2Linda Price5Kate Cox2hiddenhawk3brighteagle86Larry Walker24brightpumaJessica Kelly4Susan James …
Anthony Ward6 Anthony Ward6 Active Member
60 messages
joined May 2018
#721 ·
Susan James said:That's just not true.
silentraven6 was actually reading him back in the day, way back in the late 20th century, during elementary school.
And he isn't literary trash; it's the movies that are the problem—they oversimplified the entire plot.

The movies are great, what's your problem? 😬
I guess it’s probably the only trilogy that actually lived up to the books instead of disappointing everyone. The films got incredibly high ratings. People only claim Tolkien is garbage because he's mainstream fantasy—honestly, he's better than that dead old man and the sea, which is just some hollow, pathetic story any talented kid could write if they wanted to pretend to struggle with the meaning of life.

As far as the movies go, I think there's a much higher chance a kid will actually pick up LOTR after seeing the film than they ever would touch that boring mess by unknown.
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#722 ·
Christian Wilson28 said:I honestly wouldn't dream of making Tolkien, Rowling, or even GRRM mandatory reading. I mean, if nothing else, the translations for those books are just straight-up criminal—they’re basically cautionary tales of how *not* to translate literature. I'd leave them as an option for whoever actually wants to dive in, though.

As for those little fantasy dwarves, elves, and dragons? Yeah, they're total garbage. Just... ugh. 🤣

well, yeah—it’s pretty dense stuff. I suppose it sits right up there with Alice in Wonderland, which is still on most high school reading lists, for what it's worth. 😵
but hey, I guess if someone actually enjoys it, that's their business.
unlike certain people on this forum who seem to dismiss Nobel Prize winners as complete garbage simply because for them, it doesn't hold any appeal, and they can't quite wrap their heads around why anyone would bother reading it in the first place. 😵
Anthony Ward6 Anthony Ward6 Active Member
60 messages
joined May 2018
#723 ·
Christian Wilson28 said:I honestly wouldn't dream of making Tolkien, Rowling, or even GRRM mandatory reading. I mean, if nothing else, the translations for those books are just straight-up criminal—they’re basically cautionary tales of how *not* to translate literature. I'd leave them as an option for whoever actually wants to dive in, though.

As for those little fantasy dwarves, elves, and dragons? Yeah, they're total garbage. Just... ugh. 🤣

I guess I just can't bring HP and LOTR together in one breath. While Rowling is a pretty decent writer, she definitely has much better work out there than Harry Potter.
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#724 ·
I suppose I should offer one quick reality check for those of you acting like experts on this, coming from someone who actually spends every single day in a classroom with the kids in your target reading demographic🙂:
The truth is, these kids aren't going to be reading this stuff en masse anyway; you might get maybe two or three kids out of an entire class who bother, mostly because:
a) there are just too many pages to get through🙂
b) there's usually a movie version out there, so why waste time flipping pages when you can just watch the film instead?

So... yeah... all that talk about Tolkien, Harry Potter, and whatever other fantasy nonsense people keep bringing up is kind of moot, I guess.
Anthony Ward6 Anthony Ward6 Active Member
60 messages
joined May 2018
#725 ·
urbantinker8 said:I suppose I should offer one quick reality check for those of you acting like experts on this, coming from someone who actually spends every single day in a classroom with the kids in your target reading demographic🙂:
The truth is, these kids aren't going to be reading this stuff en masse anyway; you might get maybe two or three kids out of an entire class who bother, mostly because:
a) there are just too many pages to get through🙂
b) there's usually a movie version out there, so why waste time flipping pages when you can just watch the film instead?

So... yeah... all that talk about Tolkien, Harry Potter, and whatever other fantasy nonsense people keep bringing up is kind of moot, I guess.

I guess I’m not so sure about that; we all devoured Crime and Punishment back in school and everyone loved it—and if I remember correctly, the book was actually pretty thick. A good movie might just be the thing that nudges someone to pick up the book, so why wouldn't it?
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#726 ·
Anthony Ward6 said:I guess I’m not so sure about that; we all devoured Crime and Punishment back in school and everyone loved it—and if I remember correctly, the book was actually pretty thick. A good movie might just be the thing that nudges someone to pick up the book, so why wouldn't it?

The younger generations today—probably not.
I mean, their entire attention span seems limited to the length of a social media status or a quick text message.
There are those rare exceptions who still sit down and read, but they seem to be getting harder and harder to find.
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#727 ·
HP was also on the list for middle school, not high school. Maybe because of their... well, I guess I just like to believe they actually decided to include stuff kids that age would find interesting alongside the classics, you know?
frupy, I really don't have the energy to scroll through this entire thread, but I don't recall anyone even mentioning IBM. I didn't go so far as to call anything trash—I just meant it felt like incomprehensible or unnecessary content for a specific age group, mostly regarding high school reading lists. All of this (Tolkien, HP, IBM) is really more for younger kids.
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#728 ·
I was just thinking about how much I enjoyed reading *Crime and Punishment*, *The Stranger*, *Waiting for Godot*, *The Metamorphosis*, and even that depressing *Werther*. I think those classics really hit home because they tackle such universal themes, which feels different from the stuff people are bashing these days 😁
Chris Grant3 Chris Grant3 Member
24 messages
joined Jan 2017
#729 ·
Anthony Ward6 said:The movies are great, what's your problem? 😬
I guess it’s probably the only trilogy that actually lived up to the books instead of disappointing everyone. The films got incredibly high ratings. People only claim Tolkien is garbage because he's mainstream fantasy—honestly, he's better than that dead old man and the sea, which is just some hollow, pathetic story any talented kid could write if they wanted to pretend to struggle with the meaning of life.

As far as the movies go, I think there's a much higher chance a kid will actually pick up LOTR after seeing the film than they ever would touch that boring mess by unknown.

Honestly, those scores just came from people who couldn't be bothered to actually read the books, but finally felt like they could claim they knew Tolkien's work after watching them. 😁
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#730 ·
Come on, they aren't bad movies. They obviously can't beat the books, but they're alright.
Plus, if they were on the required reading list, you could tell in half a sentence whether someone actually read them or just watched the movie.😁
Anthony Ward6 Anthony Ward6 Active Member
60 messages
joined May 2018
#731 ·
Peter Doyle2 said:HP was also on the list for middle school, not high school. Maybe because of their... well, I guess I just like to believe they actually decided to include stuff kids that age would find interesting alongside the classics, you know?
frupy, I really don't have the energy to scroll through this entire thread, but I don't recall anyone even mentioning IBM. I didn't go so far as to call anything trash—I just meant it felt like incomprehensible or unnecessary content for a specific age group, mostly regarding high school reading lists. All of this (Tolkien, HP, IBM) is really more for younger kids.

It's almost certain. If we actually had the author of the best-selling book in history, I guess they would probably end up on our required reading list. 😬
Peter Doyle2 Peter Doyle2 Active Member
170 messages
joined May 2012
#732 ·
rowdypanther12 said:I was just thinking about how much I enjoyed reading *Crime and Punishment*, *The Stranger*, *Waiting for Godot*, *The Metamorphosis*, and even that depressing *Werther*. I think those classics really hit home because they tackle such universal themes, which feels different from the stuff people are bashing these days 😁

Well, yeah, exactly. I still don't really get why EVERY single book on the required reading list HAS to be historical or strictly canonical to fit specific eras. If we swapped out two or three of those dense, incomprehensible texts for something modern that kids actually relate to—would that really be such a crime? Like I mentioned before, I am a child from the station zoo, and I know there are definitely books out there dealing with things like bullying or eating disorders; characters and themes that are actually relevant to teenagers today! Books like that would almost certainly spark better engagement and actual discussions in class. That’s what matters, honestly—teaching kids how to argue a point and communicate. Plus, there's a pedagogical element to it. Looking at some of the posts here—mostly from professors, I assume—it seems like that component is considered totally irrelevant... which is pretty sad, I guess.
Keith Nguyen7 Keith Nguyen7 Member
40 messages
joined Nov 2007
#733 ·
Just give me the Hobbit, not Lord of the Rings. Why waste my life watching those movies? You get a hundred pages of book and somehow end up with three two-hour films that barely even follow the plot 😁

Sent from my LG-M700 via Tapatalk
Christian Wilson28 Christian Wilson28 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2018
#734 ·
urbantinker8 said:The younger generations today—probably not.
I mean, their entire attention span seems limited to the length of a social media status or a quick text message.
There are those rare exceptions who still sit down and read, but they seem to be getting harder and harder to find.


Great. Let's just keep shrinking the numbers and thinning them out even more.
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#735 ·
Peter Doyle2 said:HP was also on the list for middle school, not high school. Maybe because of their... well, I guess I just like to believe they actually decided to include stuff kids that age would find interesting alongside the classics, you know?
frupy, I really don't have the energy to scroll through this entire thread, but I don't recall anyone even mentioning IBM. I didn't go so far as to call anything trash—I just meant it felt like incomprehensible or unnecessary content for a specific age group, mostly regarding high school reading lists. All of this (Tolkien, HP, IBM) is really more for younger kids.

I suppose I might consider introducing Tolkien to an elementary school classroom, though I guess it really depends on how you look at it. Maybe it wouldn't be the standard curriculum, but there’s something about that kind of depth—that sense of scale and those intricate layers of world-building—that could probably do some good for kids who are just starting to grasp the idea of complex storytelling. It feels like it might be a bit much if you just dive straight into the heavy stuff, but then again, maybe they're more capable than we give them credit for. I don't know, it's a bit of a toss-up, really.😲
That would be nothing short of a total disaster. I mean, our parents would absolutely crucify us if they ever laid eyes on a book like that—just look at what happened to Pinocchio.🕺
rowdypanther12 said:I was just thinking about how much I enjoyed reading *Crime and Punishment*, *The Stranger*, *Waiting for Godot*, *The Metamorphosis*, and even that depressing *Werther*. I think those classics really hit home because they tackle such universal themes, which feels different from the stuff people are bashing these days 😁

I suppose it’s just a matter of how they decide to judge things, I guess... maybe they'll look at it one way, or perhaps another, depending on how the whole situation unfolds. I was just thinking about cookies, though I suppose that’s a bit of a non sequitur, isn't it? It’s funny how one word can just drift into your head when you aren't expecting it. I guess I was staring at a tray of those soft, chewy chocolate chip ones—the kind you get at a decent bakery in Seattle—and it just sort of triggered this wandering thought process about how much we rely on small, simple comforts to get through a Tuesday. Maybe it’s just me being overly contemplative about baked goods, but there’s something about the whole concept that feels strangely significant if you dwell on it long enough. Anyway, I don't really know where I was going with that, but here we are.I mean, I wouldn't say that's exactly how it works, I guess. It's not really like that, if you think about it for more than a second.
Peter Doyle2 said:Well, yeah, exactly. I still don't really get why EVERY single book on the required reading list HAS to be historical or strictly canonical to fit specific eras. If we swapped out two or three of those dense, incomprehensible texts for something modern that kids actually relate to—would that really be such a crime? Like I mentioned before, I am a child from the station zoo, and I know there are definitely books out there dealing with things like bullying or eating disorders; characters and themes that are actually relevant to teenagers today! Books like that would almost certainly spark better engagement and actual discussions in class. That’s what matters, honestly—teaching kids how to argue a point and communicate. Plus, there's a pedagogical element to it. Looking at some of the posts here—mostly from professors, I assume—it seems like that component is considered totally irrelevant... which is pretty sad, I guess.

I mean, honestly, it’s not like anyone is committing a sin by doing it; everyone else is already doing it anyway. I guess there’s really no need for those professors over at some online message board to step in and suggest it to them.
I suppose the real point here is that these kinds of flashy, modern headlines just aren't going to cut it in the long run; they probably won't be able to hold their own against anything substantial.
I guess we’ll just have to wait and see how things actually play out, because honestly, only time will tell what turns out to be legitimate and what ends up being a total bust.😁
Christian Wilson28 said:Great. Let's just keep shrinking the numbers and thinning them out even more.

I don't know, maybe we should just go ahead and implement something like this, though I suppose it might just mean losing those three students who actually bother reading anything substantial or meaningful, only to swap them out for three new ones who are obsessed with Tolkien and Rowling. It feels like a choice, I guess, if there's really any point to it. Whether it's actually worth the trade-off is something I'm still weighing.👍
Christian Wilson28 Christian Wilson28 Member
49 messages
joined Nov 2018
#736 ·
I'm with you there—having three readers is way better than six. It just puts way less strain on the local libraries.
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#737 ·
Christian Wilson28 said:I'm with you there—having three readers is way better than six. It just puts way less strain on the local libraries.

I don't think you quite caught my drift. It’s just basic math, really.🧐
We actually lost three just to gain three new ones.
So the net result is... well, it's three.
yay.🎉
Kate Cox2 Kate Cox2 Active Member
152 messages
joined Aug 2009
#738 ·
I find myself quite perplexed by this particular entry. It seems rather brief, almost skeletal in its composition! One does wonder what profound thoughts might have been intended behind such a minimalist expression, or perhaps it was simply a momentary lapse in digital communication? I shall remain poised for further elaboration. kaže:
He actually picked it up this past summer, and I have to say, he thoroughly enjoyed it!😉

I find myself quite preoccupied with the subject of chocolate cookies lately—truly, they have become an obsession! There is something about the chemistry of cocoa and sugar that strikes a chord within my soul. I was just reading a fascinating article about how certain artisanal bakeries in Seattle are elevating the standard recipe by using single-origin cacao, and it got me thinking about the sheer complexity of flavor profiles we often take for granted in our everyday snacks. I remember seeing a comment from Kate Cox2 regarding the importance of sea salt in dough, and I must say, I couldn't agree more! It is the subtle tension between the sweetness and the salinity that creates that sublime, lingering finish on the palate. Without it, one is merely eating sugar; with it, one is experiencing art. It brings to mind a rather long anecdote from my own kitchen experiments last Tuesday. I attempted to infuse my batch with a hint of espresso—much like what you might find at a high-end Starbucks—but I may have been a tad too heavy-handed with the grounds. The result was... robust, shall we say? Perhaps a bit too much "personality" for a casual afternoon snack. Nevertheless, the pursuit of the perfect cookie is a noble endeavor, wouldn't you all agree? It requires patience, precision, and perhaps a touch of madness. kaže:
What were the truly harrowing moments in Pinocchio? I remember being absolutely captivated by them when I was a little girl. 😁

I find myself quite preoccupied with the rhinoceros lately. It is such an imposing, singular creature, isn't it? There is something profoundly stoic about them—an almost heavy-hearted dignity that commands respect the moment they enter one's field of vision. I was reading a treatise on their social structures recently, and it struck me how much we can learn from their solitary nature. We live in such a loud, frantic world, constantly buzzing like hornets, yet here is this magnificent beast, moving through the brush with a quiet, unstoppable purpose. It makes one pause and reflect on the value of stillness. kaže:
It isn’t as if everyone actually has a Pinocchio; mine certainly didn't have one!
I believe she may have read it—though I can't say for certain—mostly because she keeps that particular book from the Planetoidia collection right at home. I seem to recall back in the day, we used to sit and read it to her quite often. Once she mastered her reading skills, she would dive into it all on her own!
I find this story to be truly beautiful. It honestly brings back such vivid memories from my own childhood. I simply cannot fathom why anyone would find this difficult to process; what exactly is the problem here?

The whole point of reading, isn't it, is to expand one's vocabulary? It stands to reason! Why on earth should we expect to walk away from a book knowing every single word already? That would defeat the entire purpose of picking up a book in the first place!

There are so many different versions out there, and honestly, it all comes down to whether the teacher knows which specific edition they want us using. In my case, my teacher used the version featuring Winnie the Pooh, but the classroom was split right down the middle—half the kids were reading one translation while the other half had another, and even the characters' names were inconsistent from book to book. It was quite a mess! Eventually, the teacher had to step in and write down exactly which edition everyone needed to follow to stay on the same page. 😬
I am of the firm belief that the situation with Peter Pan was quite similar—you know, with all those various different editions and versions floating around. Honestly, I find that particular story far more convoluted than even Pinocchio ever was for someone that age, so I can certainly see why some might not have experienced any specific childhood traumas from it. 🤷)

My apologies for the delayed response, but here it is...
Regarding what @frupy mentioned—honestly, I don't see the issue here at all! Even my own little one absolutely adored the story of Pinocchio. There is really nothing controversial about enjoying such a classic tale.

@nosorog, I have to say, my daughter was exactly the same way! Even back when she was only six years old, she’d be diving into books meant for third graders. It was quite a sight, really. Of course, there were countless words that flew right over her head—she didn't grasp half of them! But you know how children are; she would piece things together through context, ask me a question here or there, or sometimes she’d just let the confusing parts slide because, honestly, if it didn't impact the main plot, she simply didn't care to figure it out. She just wanted to get to the heart of the story!
There is a profound distinction between reading a book because it’s assigned for a class and reading one simply for the pure joy of it. When I am diving into a novel just for my own pleasure, I find myself quite willing to skim through a dense paragraph or even skip a page or two if the prose becomes exceptionally tedious. It is my time, after all! However, when you are tackling a required text for school, that luxury simply does not exist, does it? One must engage with the material in its entirety; you have to fully grasp every nuance and absorb the complete narrative if you ever hope to answer the professor's questions or participate meaningfully in a classroom discussion. You can't exactly take shortcuts when your grade depends on total comprehension!

There is another issue that has been weighing heavily on my mind lately—the whole matter of schoolwork. Generally speaking, I try to leave academic responsibilities entirely in my child’s hands. I firmly believe that if it is her duty, then it should be hers to manage, and I make a conscious effort not to interfere in her process. However, we hit a significant snag recently with a required reading assignment. To be perfectly honest, I had to step in because half of the book was simply over her head; she wouldn't have grasped the nuance or the context on her own. Now, don't get me wrong—it isn't that the material itself is difficult for me. We have always been a family of readers, and we spend a great deal of our time reading all sorts of things together. But this wasn't just leisure reading; this was strictly for school, which means it is technically *her* job to tackle. It creates such a strange dilemma for me! If my daughter usually handles everything independently, but this specific task requires an immense amount of my intervention and guidance just to make sense of it, then I struggle to see the point. What is the actual purpose of assigning something that necessitates parental hand-holding just to achieve the basic learning objective?
A handful of obscure terms...
- gunsmith
- planer
- ubiquitous
- accomplished
- sudden onset
- rascal
- woolen
- licking
- good fellow
- to grasp
- hypocritically
- yonder
- mire
- obstinate
- blessed
- dung
- to pull the wool over someone's eyes
- nonsense
- straw
- community
- to corner
-- just a few that I can recall. Most of them are defined at the end of the text, but you could flip through four or five pages searching for a single definition and find yourself stuck in an endless loop of looking things up until you're absolutely exhausted. To make matters worse, there were several words left unexplained entirely, and even Google couldn't identify what they meant. 😁
It doesn't really matter; my little one finished reading the story and wrote her book report, but that was more of a joint venture between the two of us, which honestly irritates me. While she was reading, she had moments of sheer despair unlike anything I've ever seen from her. Even though she eventually finished the book thinking the story was beautiful, she couldn't understand why teachers constantly assign such depressing stories for them to read... (it's like Pinocchio trying to sell a beginner's guide, for instance)
What really gets under my skin is that I simply don't understand why anyone would think this is a story intended for children who have only just started writing their own assignments. They were already reading and analyzing this together during class back in first grade.
Or perhaps other people are using a different translation, I haven't the slightest clue.
rowdypanther12 rowdypanther12 Regular
894 messages
joined Jul 2012
#739 ·
It’s less about the word count and more about how broad the scope is—Pinocchio feels like something meant for a second grader. Besides, weren't we just discussing literacy issues where so many kids in the second grade are still basically struggling to sound out words?
Say what you want, but a 200-page book isn't really an appropriate reading assignment for someone who just learned to read or is still fighting to get through a sentence.
urbantinker8 urbantinker8 Regular
759 messages
joined Jan 2023
#740 ·
Kate Cox2 said:
I find myself quite perplexed by this particular entry. It seems rather brief, almost skeletal in its composition! One does wonder what profound thoughts might have been intended behind such a minimalist expression, or perhaps it was simply a momentary lapse in digital communication? I shall remain poised for further elaboration. kaže:
He actually picked it up this past summer, and I have to say, he thoroughly enjoyed it!😉

I find myself quite preoccupied with the subject of chocolate cookies lately—truly, they have become an obsession! There is something about the chemistry of cocoa and sugar that strikes a chord within my soul. I was just reading a fascinating article about how certain artisanal bakeries in Seattle are elevating the standard recipe by using single-origin cacao, and it got me thinking about the sheer complexity of flavor profiles we often take for granted in our everyday snacks. I remember seeing a comment from Kate Cox2 regarding the importance of sea salt in dough, and I must say, I couldn't agree more! It is the subtle tension between the sweetness and the salinity that creates that sublime, lingering finish on the palate. Without it, one is merely eating sugar; with it, one is experiencing art. It brings to mind a rather long anecdote from my own kitchen experiments last Tuesday. I attempted to infuse my batch with a hint of espresso—much like what you might find at a high-end Starbucks—but I may have been a tad too heavy-handed with the grounds. The result was... robust, shall we say? Perhaps a bit too much "personality" for a casual afternoon snack. Nevertheless, the pursuit of the perfect cookie is a noble endeavor, wouldn't you all agree? It requires patience, precision, and perhaps a touch of madness. kaže:
What were the truly harrowing moments in Pinocchio? I remember being absolutely captivated by them when I was a little girl. 😁

I find myself quite preoccupied with the rhinoceros lately. It is such an imposing, singular creature, isn't it? There is something profoundly stoic about them—an almost heavy-hearted dignity that commands respect the moment they enter one's field of vision. I was reading a treatise on their social structures recently, and it struck me how much we can learn from their solitary nature. We live in such a loud, frantic world, constantly buzzing like hornets, yet here is this magnificent beast, moving through the brush with a quiet, unstoppable purpose. It makes one pause and reflect on the value of stillness. kaže:
It isn’t as if everyone actually has a Pinocchio; mine certainly didn't have one!
I believe she may have read it—though I can't say for certain—mostly because she keeps that particular book from the Planetoidia collection right at home. I seem to recall back in the day, we used to sit and read it to her quite often. Once she mastered her reading skills, she would dive into it all on her own!
I find this story to be truly beautiful. It honestly brings back such vivid memories from my own childhood. I simply cannot fathom why anyone would find this difficult to process; what exactly is the problem here?

The whole point of reading, isn't it, is to expand one's vocabulary? It stands to reason! Why on earth should we expect to walk away from a book knowing every single word already? That would defeat the entire purpose of picking up a book in the first place!

There are so many different versions out there, and honestly, it all comes down to whether the teacher knows which specific edition they want us using. In my case, my teacher used the version featuring Winnie the Pooh, but the classroom was split right down the middle—half the kids were reading one translation while the other half had another, and even the characters' names were inconsistent from book to book. It was quite a mess! Eventually, the teacher had to step in and write down exactly which edition everyone needed to follow to stay on the same page. 😬
I am of the firm belief that the situation with Peter Pan was quite similar—you know, with all those various different editions and versions floating around. Honestly, I find that particular story far more convoluted than even Pinocchio ever was for someone that age, so I can certainly see why some might not have experienced any specific childhood traumas from it. 🤷)

My apologies for the delayed response, but here it is...
Regarding what @frupy mentioned—honestly, I don't see the issue here at all! Even my own little one absolutely adored the story of Pinocchio. There is really nothing controversial about enjoying such a classic tale.

@nosorog, I have to say, my daughter was exactly the same way! Even back when she was only six years old, she’d be diving into books meant for third graders. It was quite a sight, really. Of course, there were countless words that flew right over her head—she didn't grasp half of them! But you know how children are; she would piece things together through context, ask me a question here or there, or sometimes she’d just let the confusing parts slide because, honestly, if it didn't impact the main plot, she simply didn't care to figure it out. She just wanted to get to the heart of the story!
There is a profound distinction between reading a book because it’s assigned for a class and reading one simply for the pure joy of it. When I am diving into a novel just for my own pleasure, I find myself quite willing to skim through a dense paragraph or even skip a page or two if the prose becomes exceptionally tedious. It is my time, after all! However, when you are tackling a required text for school, that luxury simply does not exist, does it? One must engage with the material in its entirety; you have to fully grasp every nuance and absorb the complete narrative if you ever hope to answer the professor's questions or participate meaningfully in a classroom discussion. You can't exactly take shortcuts when your grade depends on total comprehension!

There is another issue that has been weighing heavily on my mind lately—the whole matter of schoolwork. Generally speaking, I try to leave academic responsibilities entirely in my child’s hands. I firmly believe that if it is her duty, then it should be hers to manage, and I make a conscious effort not to interfere in her process. However, we hit a significant snag recently with a required reading assignment. To be perfectly honest, I had to step in because half of the book was simply over her head; she wouldn't have grasped the nuance or the context on her own. Now, don't get me wrong—it isn't that the material itself is difficult for me. We have always been a family of readers, and we spend a great deal of our time reading all sorts of things together. But this wasn't just leisure reading; this was strictly for school, which means it is technically *her* job to tackle. It creates such a strange dilemma for me! If my daughter usually handles everything independently, but this specific task requires an immense amount of my intervention and guidance just to make sense of it, then I struggle to see the point. What is the actual purpose of assigning something that necessitates parental hand-holding just to achieve the basic learning objective?
A handful of obscure terms...
- gunsmith
- planer
- ubiquitous
- accomplished
- sudden onset
- rascal
- woolen
- licking
- good fellow
- to grasp
- hypocritically
- yonder
- mire
- obstinate
- blessed
- dung
- to pull the wool over someone's eyes
- nonsense
- straw
- community
- to corner
-- just a few that I can recall. Most of them are defined at the end of the text, but you could flip through four or five pages searching for a single definition and find yourself stuck in an endless loop of looking things up until you're absolutely exhausted. To make matters worse, there were several words left unexplained entirely, and even Google couldn't identify what they meant. 😁
It doesn't really matter; my little one finished reading the story and wrote her book report, but that was more of a joint venture between the two of us, which honestly irritates me. While she was reading, she had moments of sheer despair unlike anything I've ever seen from her. Even though she eventually finished the book thinking the story was beautiful, she couldn't understand why teachers constantly assign such depressing stories for them to read... (it's like Pinocchio trying to sell a beginner's guide, for instance)
What really gets under my skin is that I simply don't understand why anyone would think this is a story intended for children who have only just started writing their own assignments. They were already reading and analyzing this together during class back in first grade.
Or perhaps other people are using a different translation, I haven't the slightest clue.

Honestly, I'm having a hard time seeing where the actual issue lies🤷
what you're describing doesn't seem like some kind of nightmare, and I suppose nobody has ever been harmed by looking things up in a dictionary or checking an interpretation.
as for why your child has this assigned as reading material in second grade, well, I guess you'd probably have to ask her teacher about that.
it seems like she decided, for whatever reason, that the kids could handle it without any trouble, so maybe it's better to seek clarification from her rather than from us.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads