CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › New Age spiritual technologies

New Age spiritual technologies

Started by Benjamin Taylor6 · · 👁 4 views · 60 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Benjamin Taylor6Ryan Wilson2Elizabeth Castillo87wearyowl29Lisa Cox4Paul Jones7blueraven6ironharbor8Sandra Morgan2Larry Wilson25Henry Fox2
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#1 ·
I was wondering if anyone here has actually gone through any of these modern techniques.
What was the experience like—not just during the actual course, but how did things settle for you afterward?
http://www.esentio.eu/index.html

1. Intensive Gnosis
2. PEAT
3. DP4
4. Transcendent
5. Sunjata
6. Kreaton
7. Aspektik
8. Holographic Processing
9. Excalibur
10. Memento
11. Entity Processes
12. Transdimensional Breathing

This gentleman over here offers some very similar methods: http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/
Ryan Wilson2 Ryan Wilson2 Regular
387 messages
joined Dec 2002
#2 ·
For heaven's sake, I haven't even attended a single 😲
Elizabeth Castillo87 Elizabeth Castillo87 Active Member
93 messages
joined Jun 2012
#3 ·
Not me. Honestly, now I’m feeling a little awkward about the whole thing.
wearyowl29 wearyowl29 Regular
715 messages
joined Feb 2014
#4 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:I was wondering if anyone here has actually gone through any of these modern techniques.
What was the experience like—not just during the actual course, but how did things settle for you afterward?
http://www.esentio.eu/index.html

1. Intensive Gnosis
2. PEAT
3. DP4
4. Transcendent
5. Sunjata
6. Kreaton
7. Aspektik
8. Holographic Processing
9. Excalibur
10. Memento
11. Entity Processes
12. Transdimensional Breathing

This gentleman over here offers some very similar methods: http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/

From what I gather, he even suggests sexual union outside of the standard program for certain people.😂
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#5 ·
Let’s be honest—we’re pretty pathetic when it comes to this spiritual stuff. There are all these incredible techniques being laid out right in front of us, yet we just sit there, completely paralyzed. We either claim we don't have the time, or more likely, we don't have the cash. It's frustrating, really.

wearyowl29 said:From what I gather, he even suggests sexual union outside of the standard program for certain people.😂

I suppose that’s what they call Tantra in practice—getting it straight from the master himself.
But honestly? I highly doubt he’d offer that kind of "service" to just any woman. Not to someone like
.
Lisa Cox4 Lisa Cox4 Member
46 messages
joined Jul 2005
#6 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:I was wondering if anyone here has actually gone through any of these modern techniques.
What was the experience like—not just during the actual course, but how did things settle for you afterward?
http://www.esentio.eu/index.html

1. Intensive Gnosis
2. PEAT
3. DP4
4. Transcendent
5. Sunjata
6. Kreaton
7. Aspektik
8. Holographic Processing
9. Excalibur
10. Memento
11. Entity Processes
12. Transdimensional Breathing

This gentleman over here offers some very similar methods: http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/

It's a bit sketchy to drop Ivanov's link when we're clearly talking about techniques that are straight out of Slavinski's playbook.

And honestly, DP4 is just Peat—it’s basically just the technique evolving into its advanced version (just like how DP2 and DP3 exist).
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#7 ·
Lisa Cox4 said:It's a bit sketchy to drop Ivanov's link when we're clearly talking about techniques that are straight out of Slavinski's playbook.

And honestly, DP4 is just Peat—it’s basically just the technique evolving into its advanced version (just like how DP2 and DP3 exist).

You seem to think Ivanov isn't part of the M. Ž. Slavinskog school of thought, but based on what he actually offers? He absolutely is. Look at these examples:

http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/index...d=63&Itemid=74
http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/index...d=59&Itemid=68
Paul Jones7 Paul Jones7 Active Member
190 messages
joined Mar 2015
#8 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:Let’s be honest—we’re pretty pathetic when it comes to this spiritual stuff. There are all these incredible techniques being laid out right in front of us, yet we just sit there, completely paralyzed. We either claim we don't have the time, or more likely, we don't have the cash. It's frustrating, really.

I suppose that’s what they call Tantra in practice—getting it straight from the master himself.
But honestly? I highly doubt he’d offer that kind of "service" to just any woman. Not to someone like
.

A woman isn't defined solely by the fact that she wears a skirt... 😲
Lisa Cox4 Lisa Cox4 Member
46 messages
joined Jul 2005
#9 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:You seem to think Ivanov isn't part of the M. Ž. Slavinskog school of thought, but based on what he actually offers? He absolutely is. Look at these examples:

http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/index...d=63&Itemid=74
http://www.vladimir-ivanov.com/index...d=59&Itemid=68

Look, you've got all these people out there running their own DIY versions of his techniques—even the ones who haven't had a single day of actual training—so who knows what kind of mess they're making? You really should have linked the actual creator of the methods.

Slavinski has his own certified practitioners; why don't you just shoot him an email and find out if Ivanov is even one of them? 😉
blueraven6 blueraven6 Member
19 messages
joined Dec 2013
#10 ·
So, I guess for you people, spirituality is just playing around with different techniques, attending endless seminars, and constantly studying just to convince yourselves you're some kind of "spiritual expert" holding onto secret knowledge meant only for an elite few.

And what do you actually get out of all that? You just swap one toy for another, philosophize endlessly, and act like you're somehow superior to everyone else... but honestly, it all seems like one big ego trip to me.

Unless life hits you hard enough to make you lose your mind or finally wake up from all those distractions, none of it matters. Those tools aren't necessary. Maybe they help at first, but eventually, you have to let them go because they stop serving any purpose. Most people, though, they cling to those little crutches their whole lives because they never actually move forward. They just stay stuck at the starting line, using those methods like a sort of spiritual painkiller to make things easier. But if that’s what passes for spirituality these days, then I guess I was wrong.
wearyowl29 wearyowl29 Regular
715 messages
joined Feb 2014
#11 ·
Paul Jones7 said:A woman isn't defined solely by the fact that she wears a skirt... 😲

And sure, just wearing a flannel shirt and some jeans doesn't automatically make you a man either!😂

http://www.grimmemennesker.dk/ugly-people-575.htm
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#12 ·
Lisa Cox4 said:Look, you've got all these people out there running their own DIY versions of his techniques—even the ones who haven't had a single day of actual training—so who knows what kind of mess they're making? You really should have linked the actual creator of the methods.

Slavinski has his own certified practitioners; why don't you just shoot him an email and find out if Ivanov is even one of them? 😉

The thing is, Slavinski rarely responds to emails—and when he does, it’s pretty stingy. Unless, of course, you order one of his incredibly EXPENSIVE books 😁 (his own, naturally)
Otherwise, here is the list of instructors according to Slavinski: http://www.esentio.eu/treneri.html

Whether or not Ivanov is actually his student... honestly, I don't think that even matters for this discussion. What matters is whether someone here actually has hands-on experience or has completed one of these specific courses.
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#13 ·
blueraven6 said:So, I guess for you people, spirituality is just playing around with different techniques, attending endless seminars, and constantly studying just to convince yourselves you're some kind of "spiritual expert" holding onto secret knowledge meant only for an elite few.

And what do you actually get out of all that? You just swap one toy for another, philosophize endlessly, and act like you're somehow superior to everyone else... but honestly, it all seems like one big ego trip to me.

Unless life hits you hard enough to make you lose your mind or finally wake up from all those distractions, none of it matters. Those tools aren't necessary. Maybe they help at first, but eventually, you have to let them go because they stop serving any purpose. Most people, though, they cling to those little crutches their whole lives because they never actually move forward. They just stay stuck at the starting line, using those methods like a sort of spiritual painkiller to make things easier. But if that’s what passes for spirituality these days, then I guess I was wrong.

You sound like a true Zen Buddhist. 😁 , But even they utilize meditation techniques. Those things actually have to be learned.


MOTHERLY ADVICE
Jiun, an instructor to the Shogun, was a renowned Sanskrit scholar during the Tokugawa era. In his younger years, he used to give lectures to his fellow students. When his mother heard about this, she wrote him a letter:
“My son, I don't believe you became a follower of Budin just so you could act like a walking dictionary for others. There is no end to teaching, explaining, seeking glory, or chasing prestige.
I would like you to stop giving these lectures. Retreat to a small temple in a remote part of the mountains. Devote your time to meditation, and through that, reach true realization.”
Lisa Cox4 Lisa Cox4 Member
46 messages
joined Jul 2005
#14 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:The thing is, Slavinski rarely responds to emails—and when he does, it’s pretty stingy. Unless, of course, you order one of his incredibly EXPENSIVE books 😁 (his own, naturally)
Otherwise, here is the list of instructors according to Slavinski: http://www.esentio.eu/treneri.html

Whether or not Ivanov is actually his student... honestly, I don't think that even matters for this discussion. What matters is whether someone here actually has hands-on experience or has completed one of these specific courses.

That isn't a list according to Slavinski, it's just the Esentio list. 😉

Is Ivanov his student too? Honestly, I don't think that matters for this conversation.

Actually, it matters because you're painting a totally distorted picture here.
All that matters is whether someone actually has experience—you know, if they actually finished one of these courses.

Courses are just there to introduce you to a specific technique, right? So finishing a course doesn't mean squat if the person doesn't keep training and actually working with the technique. Plus, if you want to be a decent processor, you have to put in the hours through long-term practical work with clients.

I've already "finished" most of the courses on your list, and I've been working intensely with a DP2, DP3, and DP4 processor since 2003. Even though I was "trained" for processing ages ago, I only actually started doing it myself this year. Peat is an incredibly powerful technique, and I truly believe it deserves its reputation as a New Age technology; it's just such a shame that the technique gets cheapened by being lumped in with spoon bending. 🤣
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#15 ·
Lisa Cox4 said:That isn't a list according to Slavinski, it's just the Esentio list. 😉

Is Ivanov his student too? Honestly, I don't think that matters for this conversation.

Actually, it matters because you're painting a totally distorted picture here.
All that matters is whether someone actually has experience—you know, if they actually finished one of these courses.

Courses are just there to introduce you to a specific technique, right? So finishing a course doesn't mean squat if the person doesn't keep training and actually working with the technique. Plus, if you want to be a decent processor, you have to put in the hours through long-term practical work with clients.

I've already "finished" most of the courses on your list, and I've been working intensely with a DP2, DP3, and DP4 processor since 2003. Even though I was "trained" for processing ages ago, I only actually started doing it myself this year. Peat is an incredibly powerful technique, and I truly believe it deserves its reputation as a New Age technology; it's just such a shame that the technique gets cheapened by being lumped in with spoon bending. 🤣

Fair enough, though I’d say you can practically smell Slavinski’s influence all over this—it’s textbook. My only hang-up is that I can't quite pin down who on this list was actually trained *directly* by Slavinski himself, versus just being one of his students. And then there's the whole messy lineage of it—students of students, passing things down from one to the next like some sort of academic relay race. It gets a bit muddy when you try to trace the exact line of succession.😁

The problem here—and this is what really gets me worked up—is that you’re painting a completely distorted picture. It’s fundamentally flawed, and by doing so, you're just creating a total misconception of the reality we're actually dealing with.

Every teacher is really their own unique entity—you can't just lump them all together. I mean, Ivanov is almost certainly a student of Slavinski, at least when it comes to certain specific techniques. But honestly? I highly doubt Slavinski ever touched Reiki with him. It’s much more likely that Ivanov picked up his craft from a whole variety of different mentors over the years. Back in the day, I actually crossed paths with that whole "situation" involving Rade Sibila. He was supposed to be a TMa instructor, but the guy was essentially doing everything under the sun—just jumping from one thing to another. It was a massive disappointment to the mainstream crowd over at TMu, who really expected more consistency.

Look, let’s be clear about what these courses actually are—they aren't some kind of finish line. They’re just an introduction to a specific technique. Honestly, finishing a course means absolutely nothing if you don't commit to the long haul and actually keep working with the method afterward. It’s like signing up for a weekend intensive at a culinary institute in Chicago; you haven't "learned to cook" just because you held the knife for forty-eight hours. You have to stay in the kitchen. The same goes for anyone wanting to become a truly skilled practitioner. You can't just absorb a few modules and call yourself an expert. To become a high-level processor, you need sustained, hands-on experience—years of actual, practical work with clients. There are no shortcuts to that kind of intuition. If you aren't out there doing the work, you aren't really learning.

The whole point of this technique ought to be giving someone the actual knowledge and practical roadmap to apply it to themselves—properly, mind you. Whether they decide to turn around and start teaching others is entirely up to their own interests. It’s a personal choice, really. I remember my cousin—he’s a big Reiki practitioner—and his late wife; they both learned Reiki strictly for their own sake. Now, his wife actually reached the level of Master, but she never once took on a single student. Not one. She just practiced it for herself and her immediate inner circle, without ever bringing anyone else into the fold. To her, it wasn't a business or a mission; it was just something private.

I’ve already knocked out most of the courses on your list—though, to be honest, I’m still grinding through the more advanced levels using a mental processor that feels like it’s straight out of 2003. It’s been incredibly intense lately. Even though I consider myself "trained" to handle this kind of processing for quite some time now, it wasn't until this year that I actually started doing the heavy lifting myself. Peat is such a powerhouse technique—it really earns its reputation as genuine New Age technology. My only real grievance, and this gets me a bit worked up, is seeing how the technique is being cheapened. It’s honestly a shame to see something so profound being lumped in with those superficial, "bend-the-spoon" style gimmicks. It just doesn't belong in the same conversation. 🤣

Finally. Someone actually showed up to this thread who knows what they're talking about. Honestly, it’s about time. Regarding that whole "bending spoons" business—I don't think it's such a bad thing, really. If anything, seeing something like that would be exactly what we need to shake up the skeptics—those folks who think dialectical materialism is the only truth left in the universe. It’s written right here:
TIn the second half of this seminar, we’re diving straight into what I like to call "Columbus Egg" experiments. Now, most people—myself included, at one point—tend to believe the common sense notion that it’s physically impossible to balance an egg vertically on its end. It just doesn't happen, right? Well, that's exactly what we're here to challenge. By the time we're through, you’ll find yourself in such a unique relationship with these eggs that you'll be able to stand them upright on all sorts of ridiculous surfaces—smooth tabletop finishes, chair seats, even the floor... hell, maybe even on the surface of a tilted mirror if we get ambitious enough!! I’ve seen it firsthand at these seminars; people are genuinely floored by what they can achieve simply through focused, concentrated thought. It’s a bit jarring, honestly, to realize how much our mental state dictates physical reality. That is precisely why this experience shifts your entire worldview and changes how you interact with everything around you. And frankly, in my opinion, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Who knows what kind of practical, useful ways we might eventually apply these newfound abilities? It opens up a whole different set of questions.

Out of everything mentioned here, I’d say I have a slightly deeper familiarity with Intenziv gnoza. But honestly? It’s all just sheep nonsense if you haven't actually sat through the technique in person at a seminar. You can read all the books you want, but without the hands-on practice, it's just empty noise.
blueraven6 blueraven6 Member
19 messages
joined Dec 2013
#16 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:You sound like a true Zen Buddhist. 😁 , But even they utilize meditation techniques. Those things actually have to be learned.


MOTHERLY ADVICE
Jiun, an instructor to the Shogun, was a renowned Sanskrit scholar during the Tokugawa era. In his younger years, he used to give lectures to his fellow students. When his mother heard about this, she wrote him a letter:
“My son, I don't believe you became a follower of Budin just so you could act like a walking dictionary for others. There is no end to teaching, explaining, seeking glory, or chasing prestige.
I would like you to stop giving these lectures. Retreat to a small temple in a remote part of the mountains. Devote your time to meditation, and through that, reach true realization.”

Haha, I'm not anything special, I guess. I'm just looking at things realistically. I think I mentioned before that wandering through endless seminars and swallowing every philosophy you find doesn't actually get you anywhere. Maybe all it does is inflate the ego, making someone feel like they possess some secret wisdom, which is really just a wrong turn. There’s no such thing as "secret knowledge" when it's all published in books with million-copy print runs. It's all just a game, swapping toys around. Or maybe people call it spirituality because I don't really get the term. What even is spirituality? You need logic to achieve anything. Accepting certain concepts, philosophies, beliefs, or traditions feels more like playing around to me.

In the end, if it helps people find peace, joy, or better health, then let them play their games. But they won't reach the actual goal—not that most people involved in this stuff even want to reach it, I suppose.
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#17 ·
blueraven6 said:Haha, I'm not anything special, I guess. I'm just looking at things realistically. I think I mentioned before that wandering through endless seminars and swallowing every philosophy you find doesn't actually get you anywhere. Maybe all it does is inflate the ego, making someone feel like they possess some secret wisdom, which is really just a wrong turn. There’s no such thing as "secret knowledge" when it's all published in books with million-copy print runs. It's all just a game, swapping toys around. Or maybe people call it spirituality because I don't really get the term. What even is spirituality? You need logic to achieve anything. Accepting certain concepts, philosophies, beliefs, or traditions feels more like playing around to me.

In the end, if it helps people find peace, joy, or better health, then let them play their games. But they won't reach the actual goal—not that most people involved in this stuff even want to reach it, I suppose.

The goal isn't to attend seminars and soak up theories. The goal is learning how to *apply* those theories. For instance: http://www.esentio.eu/transcendent.html

TRANSCENDENT
Systems and methods of Spiritual Technology share a lot of similarities with computer science—they are becoming faster and more efficient every single day. Until one experiences the Transcendent system, or spiritual alchemy—the latest system by Živorad Mihajlović Slavinski—one can hardly believe that such simplicity, efficiency, and speed are even possible. One of the first people to go through a Transcendent seminar wrote: "For half the time during the seminar, I was in total awe, wondering—how is this even possible?"
This incredible system is based on the strict application of Spiritual Technology principles. During the seminar, you will understand, perhaps for the first time in your life, the truth behind the Jungian words: "A symbol is a psychological machine that transforms energy." You will learn how to easily and quickly use symbols for the alchemical transformation of your problems into positive states and ecstasy, allowing you to reshape your life's script into a series of happy experiences.
COMPONENTS OF TRANSCENDENT
The Transcendent system consists of three parts:
Removing problems and barriers
Creating a desired reality and achieving goals
Using religious, mystical, and spiritual symbols as tools to change the human experience.
Techniques included in the Transcendent system:
Epiphyseal breathing.
The Index Finger Method for immediate removal of severe trauma,
The Index Finger Method for removing current problems,
The Index Finger Method for eliminating deep-seated and long-term emotional and psychological issues,
The East-West Method,
The "Happy Moment" Method....................
blueraven6 blueraven6 Member
19 messages
joined Dec 2013
#18 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 but I get the feeling people just become addicted to the whole cycle, spinning in circles. What are they actually gaining by constantly searching and jumping from one seminar to the next? I guess they aren't learning anything, because if they truly were, they’d probably move past all this stuff. Honestly, doesn't it all just look like a bit of a game to you?
Benjamin Taylor6 Benjamin Taylor6 RegularOP
577 messages
joined Apr 2017
#19 ·
blueraven6 said:Benjamin Taylor6 but I get the feeling people just become addicted to the whole cycle, spinning in circles. What are they actually gaining by constantly searching and jumping from one seminar to the next? I guess they aren't learning anything, because if they truly were, they’d probably move past all this stuff. Honestly, doesn't it all just look like a bit of a game to you?

Well, it *is* a game if there's no practical payoff at the end of the day. And honestly, even prayer and meditation can be nothing more than a game. There are two things one actually needs to master 😁
Back in the day, I personally finished four different Transcendental Meditation courses. But look—those were just techniques you were supposed to pick up at the seminar so you could actually USE them every single day. I mean, surely there's something within this massive pile of techniques that is meant for daily application, right?
Provided, of course, that it actually serves a purpose. If it doesn't yield results, then the whole thing is pointless.
ironharbor8 ironharbor8 Member
41 messages
joined Dec 2008
#20 ·
Benjamin Taylor6 said:Well, it *is* a game if there's no practical payoff at the end of the day. And honestly, even prayer and meditation can be nothing more than a game. There are two things one actually needs to master 😁
Back in the day, I personally finished four different Transcendental Meditation courses. But look—those were just techniques you were supposed to pick up at the seminar so you could actually USE them every single day. I mean, surely there's something within this massive pile of techniques that is meant for daily application, right?
Provided, of course, that it actually serves a purpose. If it doesn't yield results, then the whole thing is pointless.

It seems to me that "spirituality" conflates two different goals—they aren't mutually exclusive, but you need to know which one you're chasing. On one hand, you have using techniques as tools to make life smoother, like resolving internal conflicts, clearing mental blocks, or dismantling negative beliefs. On the other, you have using insight and meditation to completely detach from suffering and exit the cycle of worldly engagement entirely—what Buddhists call reaching Nirvana.

If one technique actually granted Nirvana, we wouldn't need any others; the job would be done. But we know that isn't how it works. Most techniques are just attempts to iterate, to become "better" or more refined than the last version. People chase the next shiny thing, thinking it holds the missing piece of the puzzle. "Just a little bit more and then I'll finally be happy..." I fell into that exact trap myself, so believe me when I say I know what I'm talking about. Meanwhile, Vipassana hasn't changed in 2,500 years; it remains exactly as it always was, or so they say. 😁 It serves its purpose, provided you actually practice it. 😍

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads