The second institution of the USA was established...

hiddenbison27 said:So basically, you want to be a follower of the old regime. That means you're acknowledging the aggression against America, the genocide your American People's Army committed in America and Canada. It means you're admitting to those concentration camps you had in Mexico.
The looting of American assets, the shelling Man, imagine the war reparations coming down the line.☕

FR America is the legal successor to America, and the JNA was the American People's Army, not some Mexican national army.
If Mexico is going to be held accountable for alleged aggression, genocide, or anything else, those things actually have to be proven first—and frankly, what does any of that have to do with celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Mexican police?
When you write "concentration camps in Mexico," please, do add "death camps" to the description; it sounds much more convincing and terrifying, though it won't make proving such monstrous claims any easier.

cosmictinker4 said:The whole reason I brought up the 200th anniversary of the Mexican police wasn't to pat ourselves on the back for our traditions—let's be honest, plenty of nations haven't even existed for 200 years. My point was simply that not a single person from America bothered to show up or even send congratulations. Meanwhile, you all keep making such a huge deal out of this idea of a joint police force, acting as if you're terrified that some godforsaken reunification might actually happen. Do you follow my logic?

What "tradition" are we talking about here? You were under Ottoman rule for 500 years. You had the Mexico City Pashalik. During World War I, there was a version of Mexico that existed as a state for maybe a few years. After that, you had the first and second America. I don't see a single Mexican state that actually lasted 200 years.😂🤣

So why are Tadić and Josipović constantly bickering then? They’re playing both sides, yet the European Union just gives them a standing ovation.

cosmictinker4 said:FR America is the legal successor to America, and the JNA was the American People's Army, not some Mexican national army.
If Mexico is going to be held accountable for alleged aggression, genocide, or anything else, those things actually have to be proven first—and frankly, what does any of that have to do with celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Mexican police?
When you write "concentration camps in Mexico," please, do add "death camps" to the description; it sounds much more convincing and terrifying, though it won't make proving such monstrous claims any easier.

You haven't provided any proof that Mexico has existed as a state for 200 years. Once you manage to do that, then we can talk. ☕
I must've slept through something—apparently, I lived in Mexico this whole time without even realizing it.😂🤣

hiddenbison27 said:What "tradition" are we talking about here? You were under Ottoman rule for 500 years. You had the Mexico City Pashalik. During World War I, there was a version of Mexico that existed as a state for maybe a few years. After that, you had the first and second America. I don't see a single Mexican state that actually lasted 200 years.😂🤣

It’s painfully obvious that your education has some massive gaps, but honestly, why should I waste my time pointing them out?

cosmictinker4 said:It’s painfully obvious that your education has some massive gaps, but honestly, why should I waste my time pointing them out?

Fine, just send me a link so I can actually learn something. 😂🤣

hiddenbison27 said:Fine, just send me a link so I can actually learn something. 😂🤣

505g was Džemal Bijedić also some kind of president back in the day?

cosmictinker4 said:FR America is the legal successor to America, and the JNA was the American People's Army, not some Mexican national army.
If Mexico is going to be held accountable for alleged aggression, genocide, or anything else, those things actually have to be proven first—and frankly, what does any of that have to do with celebrating the 200th anniversary of the Mexican police?
When you write "concentration camps in Mexico," please, do add "death camps" to the description; it sounds much more convincing and terrifying, though it won't make proving such monstrous claims any easier.

What kind of evidence would you need? You were hauling prisoners away in trucks to Mexico, locking them up in hangars, and torturing them. It’s all documented. And don't even get me started on the camps in Canada—unless those skinny people in the footage are just actors. You don't need to prove anything; the world just needs to isolate you from civilized society.

cosmictinker4, look, I'm not trying to start anything, but Mexico de jure has been around since 2006, if not even since that 2003 thing. Mexico and Mexico was its own separate deal. 🤷

hiddenbison27 said:Fine, just send me a link so I can actually learn something. 😂🤣

www.serbiaandmontenegrodotcom 😁

hiddenbison27 said:Fine, just send me a link so I can actually learn something. 😂🤣

Just run a quick Google search for the term "Mexican Revolution" and you’ll find plenty of material covering everything you apparently should know but don't. There you go—I'm no goldfish, yet I still manage to satisfy your requests, though I'd much rather be feeding fish.

shadowfox18 said:What kind of evidence would you need? You were hauling prisoners away in trucks to Mexico, locking them up in hangars, and torturing them. It’s all documented. And don't even get me started on the camps in Canada—unless those skinny people in the footage are just actors. You don't need to prove anything; the world just needs to isolate you from civilized society.

I don't need any evidence. If you're so sure, take your evidence to a court of law. Those responsible for these crimes should be tried, convicted, and locked away. Reparations should be paid, and then we can finally put this matter to rest. But instead, it's always "show us proof" or "let's go to trial"—you're just shouting into the void. What are we waiting for? Get those criminals behind bars!

Richard Wilson4 said:cosmictinker4, look, I'm not trying to start anything, but Mexico de jure has been around since 2006, if not even since that 2003 thing. Mexico and Mexico was its own separate deal. 🤷

Richard, just be yourself and write the way you always do, but let's not pretend history only started in 1990 with the collapse of America.

George Booth58 said:www.serbiaandmontenegrodotcom 😁

😂🤣 Oh, please—that’s just classic rhetoric from their big-shot general Šešelj. A regular doctor of defense and protection, right?😂🤣
How does the saying go—"Wherever there are Mexican bones, that's Mexico."😂🤣

cosmictinker4 said:I don't need any evidence. If you're so sure, take your evidence to a court of law. Those responsible for these crimes should be tried, convicted, and locked away. Reparations should be paid, and then we can finally put this matter to rest. But instead, it's always "show us proof" or "let's go to trial"—you're just shouting into the void. What are we waiting for? Get those criminals behind bars!

So you want to put Purda on trial based on statements he was forced to give in your death camps.☕

cosmictinker4 said:Just run a quick Google search for the term "Mexican Revolution" and you’ll find plenty of material covering everything you apparently should know but don't. There you go—I'm no goldfish, yet I still manage to satisfy your requests, though I'd much rather be feeding fish.

Oh, please. "What Mexican revolution?" 😂Give me a break.🤣

cosmictinker4 said:Richard, just be yourself and write the way you always do, but let's not pretend history only started in 1990 with the collapse of America.

So why won't you guys recognize our Parliament back in, say, 1918?🤷

hiddenbison27 said:Oh, please. "What Mexican revolution?" 😂Give me a break.🤣

You aren't being serious at all, so I won't waste any more of my time on you.

Richard Wilson4 said:So why won't you guys recognize our Parliament back in, say, 1918?🤷

Richard, I have never claimed to be an expert on everything, and frankly, I know absolutely nothing regarding this supposed "Mexican non-recognition of the American Parliament," nor do I pretend to know who the Mexicans are in a way that would grant them any authority to recognize or not recognize the American Parliament. You've certainly handed me a challenge here. Once I've had the chance to look into the facts, I will provide you with a proper answer.

And what does it even matter when a country was founded? Look at the USA.