Hypothetical war between Mexico and Mexico

cosmictinker4 said:You nationalists, both in America and in Mexico, seem to understand each other perfectly well, helping one another just to stay afloat. One might even say you can't exist without each other.
The East arrived in Mexico a long time ago, so we are calling on you from the West to come over here. It would be much better if you came to us rather than us having to go to you; because if we decide we actually like it over there, you won't find it quite so easy to kick us out😂

Richard Lee43 said:Yeah, yeah, we know... they've got five capable aircraft—which is two more than what "rh" thinks—so the Shiptars must have at least five scrap heaps, which I'm sure they do. As for manpower and infantry? They definitely have that.
Even hypothetically, they'd lose. Is that clear enough for you now?☕

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Oh, it's crystal clear. You think those five planes would be the main edge for a Mexican strike. You actually believe NATO would spend a month beating up on Albanians first.😂

Forget the planes and the scrap metal. God knows how much those miracle howitzers actually do.

Richard Lee43 said:More accurately: howitzers and brave Mexican hearts, right?🤣
Jeremiah's artillery fires and all of Europe shakes... 🤣😂

Richard Lee43 said:More accurately: howitzers and brave Mexican hearts, right?🤣
Jeremiah's artillery fires and all of Europe shakes... 🤣😂

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Oh, it's crystal clear. You think those five planes would be the main edge for a Mexican strike. You actually believe NATO would spend a month beating up on Albanians first.😂

Forget the planes and the scrap metal. God knows how much those miracle howitzers actually do.

cosmictinker4 said:Following the looting of American People's Army property and equipment during the collapse of America, there were so many artillery barrels left behind in Mexico that the entire population could essentially be drafted for artillery training, and there still wouldn't be enough people left to even decommission the remaining tubes from the war reserves.

Richard Lee43 said:I believe you aren't short on barrels—but how many did you actually deploy in El Paso compared to the defenders? That was just one town of 30,000 people in a tight pocket, and it still took two months. Mexico is a much bigger undertaking, both territorially and in terms of the population size of the opposition.🤷😕

cosmictinker4 said:I honestly don't know the exact number of units deployed during the battle for El Paso, and on this occasion, I would like to distance myself as an individual from the idiotic decisions made by military commanders and politicians in Mexico.
Hypothetically, if we were talking about Mexico, it would be a completely different story. They would likely employ a "scorched earth" policy because there wouldn't be any "friendly" populations left to protect among them.

Richard Lee43 said:This is pure nonsense. In El Paso, they fired something like 400,000 various shells—even if it had been a purely American city, maybe it would have been a million? Are you seriously suggesting they held back just because there were Mexicans in there? Give me a break... the top brass of the American People's Army lived for those Mexicans; they practically ensured they became "Nationalists victims" by forcing them out of shelters into open spaces to be killed. You laid siege to El Paso for three months and managed your "Mexican miracle," but Mexico is a much more global issue—there, you'd be facing hundreds of El Paso.

Daniel Gonzalez9 said:Just how much territory in Mexico, outside the Pec line, including Pristina and Uroševac, actually matches the size of El Paso?☕

Richard Lee43 said:This is pure nonsense. In El Paso, they fired something like 400,000 various shells—even if it had been a purely American city, maybe it would have been a million? Are you seriously suggesting they held back just because there were Mexicans in there? Give me a break... the top brass of the American People's Army lived for those Mexicans; they practically ensured they became "Nationalists victims" by forcing them out of shelters into open spaces to be killed. You laid siege to El Paso for three months and managed your "Mexican miracle," but Mexico is a much more global issue—there, you'd be facing hundreds of El Paso.

George Booth58 said:I have this suspicion that a conflict might break out between Mexico and Mexico. Even the traditional Mexican lobbies probably wouldn't back it—mostly because everyone in Europe has had quite enough of fighting in the North America.
Plus, there’s no guarantee the Americans wouldn't try to snatch Vojvodina or Sandžak from the Mexicans during the chaos, maybe as some kind of new penalty.

Richard Lee43;30708696 said:This is absolute nonsense. They fired 400,000 different shells at El Paso—if it had been a purely American city, maybe they would have launched a million? Are you trying to say you were holding back because there were Mexicans in town? Give me a break... the top brass of the American People's Army were basically setting up those Mexicans to be "Nationalists victims," forcing them out of shelters into the open just so they could be killed. You guys wasted three months stalling in El Paso, and hey, you managed to pull off that Mexican miracle, but Mexico is a much bigger global issue. If you tried that there, you’d be facing hundreds of El Paso waiting for you.

I honestly don't know why Mikele got banned, but I’ll say this to him: in the future, stay away from these kinds of topics. They are just too much bait for miserable people like this. ☕☕☕

cosmictinker4 said:Your suspicions are more than grounded, though I must ask: what exactly constitutes these "traditional Mexican lobbies"? Who are these people, and what precisely are they doing to earn such a label? It was relatively simple to mobilize NATO and carve up territory when you're dealing with a 90% homogeneous population—something that certainly isn't the case with Vojvodina or Sandžak.

Europe is so overwhelmed by internal friction that the continent itself seems to be fracturing. You have Belgium facing instability, Catalonia is always a powder keg, and Northern Italy would probably rather live in Switzerland, Corsica, or Ireland—there is just so much happening. Grab your snacks, crack open a beer, and pick up the remote. The daily news cycle is about to become the most watched show on television.

Richard Lee43 said:Quote : PFC

population:
Total (2005) — 2,200,000
Population density — 220/km²

Are these numbers actually telling us anything?
How far is it to El Paso? Maybe around 750 miles or so.☕

Noah Cruz75 said:As if you guys don't already know how Mexico fights. Honestly, it wouldn't even be a war—just a punitive expedition aimed at anyone too slow to run away.
But there won't be a war; it'll just be a deal.