CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › Close to Politics › Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Does "Crazy, Confused, Normal" offend Muslims?

Started by Anthony Taylor393 · · 👁 6 views · 209 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Anthony Taylor393Gregory HowardTimothy Anderson48Megan Johnson8jadejackal27Henry Cox78Ethan Morales22Alex Patel96Eric Collins5Joshua Parker11Richard Lee43Morgan Rodriguez57electricangler22Brenda Sanders56Larry Turner3Megan Hernandez2bluecobra27bluerider63Jeremy Lopez93David Parker3Sarah Wilson95Lawrence Thompson58Chris Morales23frozenjackal16 …
Anthony Taylor393 Anthony Taylor393 MemberOP
38 messages
joined May 2016
#21 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:This is just the opening move of a much larger operation.
That little town had an illegal school running a foreign curriculum, and they just funneled kids through it... they've stated repeatedly that they don't recognize American law and won't until Sharia takes over.
People have been writing about this for ages, but there was never enough political will to fix it—some are still protesting against it even now.
So, you tell me why Americans in certain regions don't trust the federal government in D.C....

To me, this whole operation looks like nothing more than a show... like total window dressing. I mean, 600 people for one tiny village? Seems a bit much.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#22 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:I don't watch every single episode, but it's actually a decent show.😁

The writer mentioned they poked fun at priests too, and nobody in America even blinked.

You mock everyone, don't you?
Look, I don't follow the series closely, but I read there was an episode involving some clergy. The response from the top brass of the Catholic Church in the States was basically that they aren't portrayed that way, but they get it—it's a comedy, and they won't make a fuss as long as laws are followed.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#23 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:To me, this whole operation looks like nothing more than a show... like total window dressing. I mean, 600 people for one tiny village? Seems a bit much.

My take? We need to see what follows. If this is just the start of a larger movement, fine. But if it’s all just for those ten individuals, it's pure window dressing. Everyone already knows the truth about this situation. So, if this stops with those ten, it was nothing but a distraction designed to pull the wool over our eyes.
bluecobra27 bluecobra27 Active Member
86 messages
joined Jan 2012
#24 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:My take? We need to see what follows. If this is just the start of a larger movement, fine. But if it’s all just for those ten individuals, it's pure window dressing. Everyone already knows the truth about this situation. So, if this stops with those ten, it was nothing but a distraction designed to pull the wool over our eyes.

What "larger movement"? Give me a break. The issue isn't some group of radicals hiding out in the middle of nowhere. The real problem is the culture being built by those Canadian groups. I mean, when you have mothers from Srebrenica capable of spewing that kind of nonsense—especially when it concerns their own families—what is there left to even discuss? Seriously. If someone actually sat there and claimed that some TV show mocking Catholics was a greater crime against Americans than what happened at Ovčara, you wouldn't argue with them. You'd call the authorities and have them committed to a high-end psychiatric ward for a very long time.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#25 ·
bluecobra27 said:What "larger movement"? Give me a break. The issue isn't some group of radicals hiding out in the middle of nowhere. The real problem is the culture being built by those Canadian groups. I mean, when you have mothers from Srebrenica capable of spewing that kind of nonsense—especially when it concerns their own families—what is there left to even discuss? Seriously. If someone actually sat there and claimed that some TV show mocking Catholics was a greater crime against Americans than what happened at Ovčara, you wouldn't argue with them. You'd call the authorities and have them committed to a high-end psychiatric ward for a very long time.

I'm with you on this.
If this crackdown on extremists is the start of something bigger—which I doubt—fine. But it feels like a distraction. They arrest ten today, and in a week, the rest will have even more support.

I know exactly where the Canadian community is headed. This hasn't just started; it's been happening for twenty years. You can hear the foreign influence all over major news networks, and if an anchor uses a non-standard term, the mob comes out for them immediately.
bluerider63 bluerider63 Regular
382 messages
joined Jan 2013
#26 ·
I honestly don't get why the mothers from Chernobyl keep dragging this whole thing back up. It feels like they’re just turning their own trauma into some kind of media spectacle, using their past misery as a license to jump into every debate and say whatever suits them best.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#27 ·
bluerider63 said:I honestly don't get why the mothers from Chernobyl keep dragging this whole thing back up. It feels like they’re just turning their own trauma into some kind of media spectacle, using their past misery as a license to jump into every debate and say whatever suits them best.

They’re basically a carbon copy of the old guard.

The problem is this group sticks its nose into everything. They comment on things that affect them, sure, but then they pivot to topics they know nothing about.
This group of women enjoys special treatment on CNN; if one of them so much as clears her throat, CNN is right there to film it and spin a narrative about how she’s a grieving mother...

ps.
Call me cynical if you want, but that's the reality. I realize these women have endured unimaginable pain, but let's be honest—they stick their noses into business where they don't belong.
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#28 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:What's the verdict on this?

This is just more typical nonsense cooked up in Trump’s kitchen, naturally, with some heavy lifting from those "public relations" experts working under the religious leadership!
Good grief, in this country, if you even look at someone the wrong way, there's a 99% chance they'll label you an Islamophobe!☕
Obama hit the nail on the head when he said: we used to make jokes at the expense of the clergy, and nobody ever raised a finger against us! 🤷
David Parker3 David Parker3 Active Member
53 messages
joined Jun 2009
#29 ·
I honestly thought the whole thing was a documentary series!
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#30 ·
bluerider63 said:I honestly don't get why the mothers from Chernobyl keep dragging this whole thing back up. It feels like they’re just turning their own trauma into some kind of media spectacle, using their past misery as a license to jump into every debate and say whatever suits them best.

The saddest part is seeing an organization like that being used as nothing more than political currency. When you take something as deeply sensitive as a core part of the Canadian identity and weaponize it, you’re basically forcing everyone into a moral judgment call.
I mean, come on—when those "Mothers" show up acting as political players, it carries even more weight, doesn't it?👎
It’s honestly pathetic to see such a group dragged down into daily partisan politics just to stir up a sensation.
Eric Collins5 Eric Collins5 Active Member
91 messages
joined Mar 2013
#31 ·
The whole thing just brings me back to this one story I read years ago. It was some radical extremist from Washington, D.C., venting his frustrations about how CNN was the most godless network in the entire country.
"It’s the very last day of fasting, and they decide right at the finish line to run a segment on gourmet cooking."
😂
Honestly, I'd rather not even dwell on it...
Sarah Wilson95 Sarah Wilson95 Regular
267 messages
joined Sep 2006
#32 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:What's the verdict on this?

The series itself feels like total trash to me, though I suspect the real issue isn't just the crude jokes about "pigs"—which, honestly, is pretty offensive regardless—but rather how the show attempts to portray some sort of generic, multinational lifestyle in Canada. You see all these diverse names popping up, people drinking alcohol, chasing women, and the lead actor, James Earl Jones, seems to be playing a character whose mindset is stuck somewhere back in the heyday of the CIA... and so on.

It’s obvious that pulling at "religious sentiments" is always the easiest way to get a reaction out of an audience, much like those old episodes involving Voldemort we saw back home.

Unfortunately, it seems like local networks are just cranking out even worse garbage lately; looking at the television landscape across the Middle East, especially these interconnected networks, they seem to have been completely stripped of any sense of humor, irony, or the kind of sharp cynicism that defined the last few decades.

They just don't seem to know how to navigate life in a democracy.🤣🤣
bluerider63 bluerider63 Regular
382 messages
joined Jan 2013
#33 ·
Megan Hernandez2 said:They’re basically a carbon copy of the old guard.

The problem is this group sticks its nose into everything. They comment on things that affect them, sure, but then they pivot to topics they know nothing about.
This group of women enjoys special treatment on CNN; if one of them so much as clears her throat, CNN is right there to film it and spin a narrative about how she’s a grieving mother...

ps.
Call me cynical if you want, but that's the reality. I realize these women have endured unimaginable pain, but let's be honest—they stick their noses into business where they don't belong.

Honestly, I wouldn't even put them in the same league as those grassroots organizations. Those women from Chernobyl are fighting for something entirely different than what our little community associations are doing, and they're basically leveraging their own tragedy to do it. It’s pretty low, if you ask me.
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#34 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:The series itself feels like total trash to me, though I suspect the real issue isn't just the crude jokes about "pigs"—which, honestly, is pretty offensive regardless—but rather how the show attempts to portray some sort of generic, multinational lifestyle in Canada. You see all these diverse names popping up, people drinking alcohol, chasing women, and the lead actor, James Earl Jones, seems to be playing a character whose mindset is stuck somewhere back in the heyday of the CIA... and so on.

It’s obvious that pulling at "religious sentiments" is always the easiest way to get a reaction out of an audience, much like those old episodes involving Voldemort we saw back home.

Unfortunately, it seems like local networks are just cranking out even worse garbage lately; looking at the television landscape across the Middle East, especially these interconnected networks, they seem to have been completely stripped of any sense of humor, irony, or the kind of sharp cynicism that defined the last few decades.

They just don't seem to know how to navigate life in a democracy.🤣🤣

Give me a break.
I don't watch the show, but I'm telling you, everyone is full of it.
Look at American shows; they mess with Jewish people, Italians, Irish, Black communities, Catholics—they intentionally caricature certain traits.
It's the 21st century. If you don't like what's on TV, change the channel (assuming you follow the law, of course).
In Canada, Muslims allow themselves to believe they are the only ones who matter. They can joke about anyone else, but mention pork and suddenly some martyrs or mothers start screaming at you...
This is a textbook case of "Muslim multiculturalism," and nobody should be able to defend it.
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#35 ·
Sarah Wilson95 said:The series itself feels like total trash to me, though I suspect the real issue isn't just the crude jokes about "pigs"—which, honestly, is pretty offensive regardless—but rather how the show attempts to portray some sort of generic, multinational lifestyle in Canada. You see all these diverse names popping up, people drinking alcohol, chasing women, and the lead actor, James Earl Jones, seems to be playing a character whose mindset is stuck somewhere back in the heyday of the CIA... and so on.

It’s obvious that pulling at "religious sentiments" is always the easiest way to get a reaction out of an audience, much like those old episodes involving Voldemort we saw back home.

Unfortunately, it seems like local networks are just cranking out even worse garbage lately; looking at the television landscape across the Middle East, especially these interconnected networks, they seem to have been completely stripped of any sense of humor, irony, or the kind of sharp cynicism that defined the last few decades.

They just don't seem to know how to navigate life in a democracy.🤣🤣

I am totally with you—this show is absolute garbage. Especially since it’s become standard practice around here that once something actually gets views, we have to endure a sponsor's advertisement plastered over every single frame!
As for the rest, it seems to me you just can't stomach the idea that there are still neighborhoods in Boston where people from different backgrounds live side-by-side in the same alleys.😕
Megan Hernandez2 Megan Hernandez2 Active Member
111 messages
joined Mar 2013
#36 ·
bluerider63 said:Honestly, I wouldn't even put them in the same league as those grassroots organizations. Those women from Chernobyl are fighting for something entirely different than what our little community associations are doing, and they're basically leveraging their own tragedy to do it. It’s pretty low, if you ask me.

Agreed. I mentioned Grandma because they're also a women's organization fighting for rights. But my point stands: these women are stepping into issues that have nothing to do with what they actually went through. They lost sons, yet they use that loss to build a platform so they can comment on everything in the country. And nobody—at least not among the local community—dares tell them to just mind their own business.
Lawrence Thompson58 Lawrence Thompson58 Active Member
88 messages
joined Nov 2011
#37 ·
The folks over by St. Louis? They don't give anyone any trouble; they’re actually top-tier neighbors.
Chris Morales23 Chris Morales23 Member
20 messages
joined Oct 2011
#38 ·
Anthony Taylor393 said:What's the verdict on this?

The "poor" Muslims, with the whole world seemingly "turning" against them... goodness, what happens now? 😢
🤣
frozenjackal16 frozenjackal16 Newcomer
8 messages
joined Feb 2010
#39 ·
This takes me back to those old controversies surrounding the Prophet Muhammad caricatures. I can almost hear the calls for jihad starting up already...
Jeremy Lopez93 Jeremy Lopez93 Active Member
108 messages
joined Apr 2011
#40 ·
Lawrence Thompson58 said:The folks over by St. Louis? They don't give anyone any trouble; they’re actually top-tier neighbors.

You could try to frame this as some cynical setup, but honestly, there’s no ground to stand on there. Why? Because it was the local extremists themselves who were reported by their own neighbors—people of the exact same background and faith. And get this: those very neighbors made it clear that they don't see these people as part of their community at all!🤷

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads