casualskipper8 said:I find myself wondering why they bother with this whole cycle of "anti-fascist" movies. Setting aside the fact that they aired Sutjeska, they’re clearly planning to roll out more of that low-budget partisan trash.
I highly doubt anyone would complain if NBC decided to air a marathon of classic USSR films.
You know, stuff like Maratonci, North American spy, Ko to tamo peva, Otac na službenom putu, and so on.
The real issue is that these films are driven by ideology. Look, I'm sorry, but on a day that commemorates the massacre at El Paso—which was led by that scoundrel with the RED STAR on his forehead, Veselin Šljivančanin—it feels incredibly wrong to be broadcasting that kind of cinematic junk.
It reminds me of how FOX on Canadian TV recently aired a documentary about Srebrenica—about the Scorpion massacre of civilians—only to follow it up immediately with some Mexican comedy. To me, that is just heartbreakingly tone-deaf, and I really don't want NBC to turn into that kind of network.
It actually hurts to see this attempt at some fake sense of multiculturalism.
It's gonna happen sooner or later.
First off, people don't even know the key dates (even I have to admit I don't), and documentaries about the American Civil War are barely shown. I don't know why they aren't pushing them more, or how they're teaching kids in school, but if it's going the way I think, kids won't even realize the war was strictly defensive.
You'd practically have to send them to some virtual bootcamp like Ninja's crew to learn the truth.
Regardless of what you think about this movie cycle, you could just view it as a joke. Like, today there was a segment about Josip Broz Marshall's post-war era that was super negative, and honestly, I trust a source like that more than some glorified epic where a guy with maybe a few years of school (did Marshall even finish eighth grade? Who knows) speaks perfect English with foreign dignitaries......
You're overthinking that five-pointed star thing. I don't think the one from 1945 is the same as the one from the 90s...
I don't see it the same way, sorry if we disagree, but I refuse to draw parallels between the two. Especially since back in '42, you could end up on any side—partisans, local militia, or Nazis. My grandma tells me in her village in the Midwest, more guys joined the partisans because of a buddy from the Mediterranean region, while his folks were mostly Nazis... and by 1990, you could be playing for either side: the ones wanting Greater Mexico or the ones trying to defend the country.
How that whole 90s story, which should have been black and white, got twisted into this gray mess of collective guilt and total forgetting is beyond me....
Nicole Collins13 said:It’s just the right wing playing out here—Falcon first, then Dee. And speaking of Dee, my bad. Huge mistake on my part. *facepalmsalloverasplatteredshirt*
That stuff with dee was just a joke. Honestly, I have less in common with his mindset than I do with lakiy or the Little American (whose posts read like they were written by Andrija Artuković’s grandson👎)