slywolf45 said:How many brain cells do you actually have left? Or rather, how many survived that last yellow haze of yours?
Regarding that bolded part... you aren't exactly speaking for me, are you? I work in a clinic, so what exactly are you implying, that I should be paying for my own treatment, or perhaps go beg Ljubicic to lower the drug prices? Do you honestly think I set the pricing?
Furthermore... why on earth would I personally care about curing an addict? Huh? Out of pure altruism? Honestly, it’s attitudes like yours that make me lose interest..
And don't try to frame drug use as being comparable to cancer. No one chooses to get cancer, but you? You were the one who drove the needle in yourself.
And yes, of course the injection is expensive. Look, if life-saving medications for HIV are priced so high that ordinary citizens can't touch them, I'm not sure what else you expect me to say..
And don't go assuming I'm some wide-eyed innocent who's never touched anything. I've seen plenty, but I was smart enough to know when to walk away.
Maybe I'm currently channeling all my intellect toward accepting and normalizing addiction from a global perspective, so that in the future, if I happen to use again, I won't feel quite so much guilt...
There isn't much left to say here... I'm out of comments.👎
Not the first one. Definitely the second...
When I wrote that, I wasn't talking specifically to you.
I was referring to the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture them.
There are vaccines out there for almost everything, including HIV and various cancers.
But no matter how much they charge for a vaccine, the profit margin won't match what they make once a patient gets sick.
Because, as we both know, a vaccine provides long-term protection.
By the way, have you heard of the Zodiac medication?
It's a drug that makes you quit smoking effortlessly. My mom is a perfect example.
I couldn't believe my eyes when she finally quit.
That medication is overpriced here, but in the US, it's practically free.
Basically, you just have to want it.
If there's really a fight against addiction, why isn't that vaccine provided for free? Even if it's a once-a-year thing?
Then addicts wouldn't have any excuses left.
If you're going to argue about costs, then why shouldn't the government step up? Why should the state suffer because of junkies? The government wouldn't be "suffering"—on the contrary, they'd be rehabilitating people to become productive workers, which means less crime, less theft, and less of everything else. Right?