CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Spirituality › Do We Know Anything At All!?

Do We Know Anything At All!?

Started by Daniel Chavez14 · · 👁 9 views · 84 replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Daniel Chavez14Douglas Brown4Jesse Wright24rustymaker5Brandon Hall88frozenangler9Dana Brooks3Anthony Perez9Hannah Wilson3casualtiger2brightnomad5Elizabeth Ruiz65AplacidrangerAustin Grant2Joseph Ramos11Nancy Thompson3quietmoose14casuallynx982Tyler Evans4
casuallynx982 casuallynx982 Member
14 messages
joined Sep 2008
#81 ·
I honestly walked away from that movie feeling so uplifted—it just left me in such a great headspace..
..you really have to manifest your own reality..for me, that positive energy from the film is what stuck, and honestly, that’s the whole point..if it's something you need to see, you'll find your way to it..👍
Joseph Ramos11 Joseph Ramos11 Active Member
51 messages
joined Jun 2006
#82 ·
Nancy Thompson3 said:Aha, I see what you're doing.
You’re overlooking one thing—or maybe I am—but we aren't just dealing with a single lonely proton in this experiment. We're talking about an entire beam, right?
Just confirm if that's correct or tell me I'm wrong before I go any further.

They've run tests using both beams and individual protons, and the results ended up being identical.
Nancy Thompson3 Nancy Thompson3 Active Member
86 messages
joined Apr 2007
#83 ·
Joseph Ramos11 said:They've run tests using both beams and individual protons, and the results ended up being identical.


I've been chewing on this problem for a while now. It’s pretty depressing, but the reality is that the Copenhagen interpretation just can't wrap its head around issues like this.
But hey, here's something to chew on—for you and for me, I guess.
Maybe you're already aware of this, and please don't take this the wrong way if you are, but if not, you really should give it a read:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohm_interpretation

It's usually referred to as Smith mechanics.
casualtiger2 casualtiger2 Regular
330 messages
joined Apr 2022
#84 ·
Fact Checkers

* The film claims we’re "90% water"—which is a stretch. In reality, newborns sit around 78%, one-year-olds at 65%, adult men at roughly 60%, and women at about 55%.[14]

* There’s also that bit about Native Americans being unable to see Christopher Columbus' ships. Honestly, none of the voyage journals actually mention this, and since the local oral traditions were wiped out during the next 150 years of Spanish rule, it's hard to verify. The Story in The film May be a garbled and mis-interpreted version of an incident described in Carl Sagan's Cosmos. Episode XIII describes an Oral retelling of How The Tlingit encountered The la Pérouse expedition in The 1780 S. The Tlingit were initially too terrified to even look at the ships—they thought the vessel and sails were some manifestation of Raven that could turn them to stone. It was only after an old man, who was nearly blind, paddled a canoe closer that they finally realized what the ships and crews actually were.

* That animation showing electrical signals jumping straight across a synaptic cleft? Misleading. Signals are in fact carried between neurons chemically via neurotransmitters; electricity only handles the propagation within the individual neurons themselves or through gap junctions.

* Then there's the claim that our bodies produce all 20 amino acids. Not quite—we only synthesize 12 of them. The other 8 are "essential," meaning you actually have to eat them to survive.
Tyler Evans4 Tyler Evans4 Member
10 messages
joined Mar 2007
#85 ·
Douglas Brown4 said:I haven't seen the film.
I am criticizing festivals, the film industry as a whole, and people involved in cinema and art in general. It is all Decadent.

So you're upset because of this one movie or whatever...\
Maybe it's because even after watching it, you still don't have a clue about... anything.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads