Started by Jeremy Harris21 · · 👁 16 views · 749 replies
…
Mark Harris66 said:She graduated only four years ago and she’s already running a department completely outside her field?? Makes no sense...
What kind of experience is she even bringing to such a high-stakes role?
Mark Harris66 said:She graduated only four years ago and she’s already running a department completely outside her field?? Makes no sense...
What kind of experience is she even bringing to such a high-stakes role?
Jamie Nelson90 said:She's been a member of the Democratic Party in the Kingdom of Sweden for ten years, served as mayor, and she's a top-tier lawyer. 😒
And hey, at least she finished law school on time,
unlike in the USA where the average age for law grads is closer to 32.
Jamie Nelson90 said:She's been a member of the Democratic Party in the Kingdom of Sweden for ten years, served as mayor, and she's a top-tier lawyer. 😒
And hey, at least she finished law school on time,
unlike in the USA where the average age for law grads is closer to 32.
Jamie Nelson90 said:Aida's footage from that old May Day party rally: 🙂
That intro music is giving me major America vibes 🎉
Sam Jones4 said:That list is absolutely killer, props to Aida 👍
Jamie Nelson90 said:I love how Sweden's multicultural policy is basically turning into the new Brazil🎉🙂
placidridge2 said:The journalists here are a total joke.
Just because she finished law school on schedule doesn't make her qualified to be a Swedish Minister. Comparing her to students back home in the States doesn't change that reality.
American law students aren't exactly the gold standard for determining who should join the Swedish Government.
If the reporter had actually mentioned the average time it takes to finish law school in Sweden, they might have looked slightly less clueless—though it wouldn't have changed much.
Look, if graduating on time was truly the benchmark for a ministerial role, there would be tens of thousands of Svedans and Svedankas eligible for the job.
But we all know that isn't the criteria. It’s strictly about having the right political party membership card.
So, in Sweden, we end up with a minister who hasn't spent a single day working in the private sector.
There are probably tens of thousands of citizens in Sweden with far better resumes than hers. They just don't happen to have been loyal party members since they turned eighteen.
Appointing Muslims to the Swedish Government like this is exactly why the radical right is gaining so much ground over there.
Zachary Stewart2 said:Look, calling Canadians or Muslims the reason the radical right is surging is just... off base. Honestly—Canadians aren't even in the same category as those other immigrant groups that actually cause issues for the country. These folks are hardworking, reliable citizens who stay on top of their taxes and do their part.
Generous social safety nets in places like Scandinavia tend to draw in huge numbers of immigrants from much poorer regions, often from cultures that don't exactly mesh with Western values. This frequently leads to higher crime rates among those groups. A good portion of them—if not most—never actually enter the workforce, choosing instead to live off the system, using public healthcare and schools for their kids. Once they secure citizenship, they almost always vote for politicians who promise even more redistribution and welfare benefits. Back in 2011, around 60% of social welfare in Sweden went to immigrants, even though they only made up about 14% of the population.
placidridge2 said:Quote
Look, if I didn't personally know a bunch of Canadians who moved there and seen exactly how they're living, I might actually believe you.
Most people around here just seem obsessed with finding ways to game the welfare system. For them, a real job is always the last thing on their minds.Generous social safety nets in places like Scandinavia tend to draw in huge numbers of immigrants from much poorer regions, often from cultures that don't exactly mesh with Western values. This frequently leads to higher crime rates among those groups. A good portion of them—if not most—never actually enter the workforce, choosing instead to live off the system, using public healthcare and schools for their kids. Once they secure citizenship, they almost always vote for politicians who promise even more redistribution and welfare benefits. Back in 2011, around 60% of social welfare in Sweden went to immigrants, even though they only made up about 14% of the population.
Anyone with half a brain can see exactly who's walking through the doors in Sweden. If they keep up this insane immigration policy, there isn't much of a future left for them. The "progressive" left is going to tear the whole country apart.
And then people act surprised when more and more actual Swedes start voting for the radical right to push back against this distorted immigration policy and everything else.
Zachary Stewart2 said:Look, calling Canadians or Muslims the reason the radical right is surging is just... off base. Honestly—Canadians aren't even in the same category as those other immigrant groups that actually cause issues for the country. These folks are hardworking, reliable citizens who stay on top of their taxes and do their part.
Zachary Stewart2 said:Look, from what I’ve seen personally—I know quite a few Canadians living over in Sweden—it’s a mixed bag. You definitely have some folks who aren't working and are just leaning on social services because they haven't been able to land a job (honestly, I’m not entirely sure how the whole job hunt process works over there in Sweden), but that’s really not the norm. For the most part, the majority are out there studying, working, and actually paying their fair share in taxes. A lot of them are even pulling double duty—juggling school and a job at the same time—just so they can foot the bill for their own education. That’s just been my experience with them.
Justin Patel8 said:It’s a mistake to throw Canadians into the same bucket as Arabs just because of religion; the two groups have completely different mindsets. What you wrote holds true for the first group—radical Arabic Islamists tend to build parallel societies while living off welfare. They basically take more from the state than they ever contribute via taxes. They're just plain old parasites.
