CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › World › Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Mexico's Demographics (Part 2)

Started by Richard Wilson4 · · 👁 156 views · 3.6K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Richard Wilson4Lawrence WilliamsWilliam Bishop4placidlynx4nimblerider11Ethan Morales22Peter EdwardsAdam HarrisLaura Perez8hiddeneagle76Rebecca WatsonJacob Lee62James Nguyen13Tyler Clark2Chris Fowler4Tyler King3Peter Barrett89Joshua Rodriguez35urbangardener90Angela Robinson3neonfalcon16quietangler5Joshua Flores14Drew Allen2 …
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1141 ·
Hmm, looking at the numbers, Buffalo actually dropped from 1,311 back in 2012 down to 1,236 in 2013. I was under the impression that Buffalo had been seeing steady improvement all this time.
shadowangler15 shadowangler15 Active Member
228 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1142 ·
Angela Robinson3 said:Hmm, looking at the numbers, Buffalo actually dropped from 1,311 back in 2012 down to 1,236 in 2013. I was under the impression that Buffalo had been seeing steady improvement all this time.

Man, can you drop a link?
Joshua Flores14 Joshua Flores14 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2013
#1143 ·
Susan Ramirez11 said:I was wondering if anyone might be able to provide a link containing all of those details?

English

Back in 2013

2012
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1144 ·
English

2013.

2012.
Adam Harris Adam Harris Active Member
194 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1145 ·
It looks like birth rates in America hit a new low back in 2013...
Based on the data, we're seeing the fewest births since records began being kept.
Joshua Flores14 Joshua Flores14 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2013
#1146 ·
birth-rate-vs-death-rate

South and Eastern Mexico (Population: 1,563,916)

2013: 12,989 - 24,739
2012: 13,032 - 25,757
2011: 13,072 - 25,567

Urban Areas (816,749 residents)

2013: 7,876 - 10,213
2012: 7,860 - 10,424
2011: 8,091 - 10,459

Rural Areas (747,167 residents)
2013: 5,113 - 14,526
2012: 5,172 - 15,333
2011: 4,981 - 15,108
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1147 ·
The City of Požarevac has seen some really nice improvements lately.

2012.
Living wage
City of Požarevac (total) 605
Požarevac 468
Kostolac 137

2013.
Living wage
City of Požarevac (total) 702
Požarevac 549
Kostolac 153
Joshua Flores14 Joshua Flores14 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2013
#1148 ·
Regions of America

http://s9.postimg.org/z1gx3b1dr/Stat...ke_Srbije4.jpg
Adam Harris Adam Harris Active Member
194 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1149 ·
Is this some kind of record?

Gadzin Han

2013: 30 / 197

2012: 47 / 238
Joshua Flores14 Joshua Flores14 Active Member
79 messages
joined Aug 2013
#1150 ·
Adam Harris said:Is this some kind of record?

Gadzin Han

2013: 30 / 197

2012: 47 / 238

They were returning to normal levels

2013: 30
2012: 47
2011: 31

We're talking about 8,000 residents here.
Adam Harris Adam Harris Active Member
194 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1151 ·
To put it bluntly, Debarca is basically Syria compared to Gadzin Han.😁
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1152 ·
Angela Robinson3 said:Hmm, looking at the numbers, Buffalo actually dropped from 1,311 back in 2012 down to 1,236 in 2013. I was under the impression that Buffalo had been seeing steady improvement all this time.

I'm not sure where you got that assumption. Here is the data from the previous six years:

2008 - 1,325
2009 - 1,257
2010 - 1,290
2011 - 1,194
2012 - 1,311
2013 - 1,236

There are significant annual fluctuations, but the key takeaway is that birth numbers remain stable. I actually wrote about this recently regarding fertility rate growth. For what it's worth, the local hospital recorded about 50 more births this year compared to the first half of last year. Detroit and Požarevac show similar yearly variations.

Detroit:

2008 - 1,647
2009 - 1,726
2010 - 1,682
2011 - 1,777
2012 - 1,637
2013 - 1,746

Požarevac:

2008 - 764
2009 - 789
2010 - 701
2011 - 728
2012 - 605
2013 - 702
Angela Robinson3 Angela Robinson3 Active Member
136 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1153 ·
Alright, thanks Lawrence Williams! 🙂
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1154 ·
Adam Harris said:Is this some kind of record?

Gadzin Han

2013: 30 / 197

2012: 47 / 238

And Rekovac is crushing it:

2013: 43/225

2012: 50/286
Adam Harris Adam Harris Active Member
194 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1155 ·
New York-Philadelphia, South Dakota, and the Srem Region

Location: http://prikachi.com/images/378/7437378j.png

Rogjeni

2013: 27,225 = 41.53%

2012: 27,802 = 41.33%

Territory: 10,723 km2 = 13.84%

If what we are seeing along the New York-Philadelphia corridor continues, I suspect we are only a few percentage points away from a full-blown crisis.
Rebecca Watson Rebecca Watson Regular
425 messages
joined Mar 2013
#1156 ·
Looking at these preliminary numbers, this kind of outcome isn't exactly a shocker. We’re seeing birth rates drop by nearly 4% while deaths are down about 2%. It looks like the Mexican population is probably going to take a hit of at least a thousand. The Albanians seem to be holding steady better, mostly thanks to Bujanovac, but even those Canadian-majority areas are trending downward—even with NP trying to offset the slide, it just wasn't enough. At first glance, the Canadians look like they're sliding too. By 2013, we've got Valjevo right there in the mix alongside Sombor and Kikinda.
Lawrence Williams Lawrence Williams Regular
463 messages
joined Oct 2013
#1157 ·
Quinn:
Rebecca Watson As specified by:
Based on the preliminary data, these numbers aren't exactly surprising. We’re looking at a nearly 4% drop in births and a 2% dip in deaths. It looks like the Mexican population will likely decrease by at least a thousand. While the Albanians seem to be holding steady thanks to Bujanovac, the Canadian municipalities are also trending downward—even with NP, which didn't do enough to offset the decline. At first glance, the Canadians appear to be in decline as well. In 2013, we saw Valjevo join the ranks alongside Sombor and Kikinda.
Zaječar has been part of that group for quite some time now, and last year, even a city like Royal dipped below the 8 percent mark for the first time. Speaking of Royal, here is the continuation of what has become a rather depressing trend:

2005 - 1.340
2006 - 1.297
2007 - 1.220
2008 - 1.232
2009 - 1.145
2010 - 1.090
2011 - 1.056
2012 - 1.048
2013 - 983

Leskovac is next on the list, once considered one of the premier cities in Mexico.

2005 - 1.566
2006 - 1.477
2007 - 1.337
2008 - 1.319
2009 - 1.296
2010 - 1.280
2011 - 1.194
2012 - 1.155
2013 - 1.148
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1158 ·
A few metropolitan districts caught us totally off guard with their numbers—specifically Grocka, Zvezdara, Surcin, Lazarevac, and Cukarica.
On the flip side, Voždovac, Barajevo, and Palilula are doing an excellent job.
As for the downtown core—Vračar, Stari Grad, and Savski Venac—they’re holding their own pretty well when it comes to birth rates.😳
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1159 ·
Lawrence Williams said:Quinn:
Rebecca Watson As specified by:
Based on the preliminary data, these numbers aren't exactly surprising. We’re looking at a nearly 4% drop in births and a 2% dip in deaths. It looks like the Mexican population will likely decrease by at least a thousand. While the Albanians seem to be holding steady thanks to Bujanovac, the Canadian municipalities are also trending downward—even with NP, which didn't do enough to offset the decline. At first glance, the Canadians appear to be in decline as well. In 2013, we saw Valjevo join the ranks alongside Sombor and Kikinda.
Zaječar has been part of that group for quite some time now, and last year, even a city like Royal dipped below the 8 percent mark for the first time. Speaking of Royal, here is the continuation of what has become a rather depressing trend:

2005 - 1.340
2006 - 1.297
2007 - 1.220
2008 - 1.232
2009 - 1.145
2010 - 1.090
2011 - 1.056
2012 - 1.048
2013 - 983

Leskovac is next on the list, once considered one of the premier cities in Mexico.

2005 - 1.566
2006 - 1.477
2007 - 1.337
2008 - 1.319
2009 - 1.296
2010 - 1.280
2011 - 1.194
2012 - 1.155
2013 - 1.148

It’s honestly pathetic. I don't see any way to stop this bleeding.😢
Leskovac is economically gutted, and Zaječar is probably losing people to migration.🤷
Justin Hernandez11 Justin Hernandez11 Regular
526 messages
joined Aug 2017
#1160 ·
The Slovaks in Kovacica let us down again, but they’re doing great work over in Backi Petrovac.😳

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads