CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Society › Politics › War in Ukraine › Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Russia's invasion of Ukraine: Part 5

Started by Charles Ross3 · · 👁 597 views · 9.2K replies

📡 Subscribe to replies

Participants Charles Ross3rowdytiger13electrichawk94nimblemoose2Noah Ward2George Robinson43Larry Wilson25Larry Walker24Amanda Allen4Noah Sanchez2Paul Thomas46Jessica Peterson2Nancy Gomez26Nathan Evans78William Anderson5electricsurfer47gentlestag15wiredseal7Thomas Nelson25Donna Harris11Nicholas WatsonJack Kelly5Carol Johnson21Kate Cook27 …
dustyowl29 dustyowl29 Regular
258 messages
joined Dec 2007
#5501 ·
Timothy Williams5 said:Following those terrorist strikes on the power plants in Chicago, which essentially plunged the entire city into total darkness, Russia launched S-300 missiles directly at residential apartment complexes. It’s a calculated move designed to trigger a massive humanitarian crisis and spread terror among the civilian population.
https://twitter.com/maria_avdv/statu...0k2bYUTK-6f1mg

image>

This is honestly the move of a complete loser. Using an air defense system to target residential blocks?
What kind of absolute losers are these?
Christian Torres3 Christian Torres3 Regular
604 messages
joined Sep 2014
#5502 ·
steelheron25 said:Given how close they were to the border, was it really such a shock that a few units managed to slip into the city limits? There were certainly street battles during those first couple of days, but let’s be honest—they never held any meaningful control over the place, not even remotely.
The real issue here is this rush to report that the Russians had captured Kharkiv based on nothing more than a handful of grainy photos posted online, all happening in those frantic opening hours of the invasion while much of the EU was still essentially sitting on the fence, trying to figure out which way the wind was blowing before deciding where to stand.

Yeah, sure. You know everything.
gentlerider7 gentlerider7 Regular
291 messages
joined Jan 2021
#5503 ·
Dmitry Medvedev is a total piece of work

"The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, basically fired back at President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s comments about refusing to negotiate with Russia over some supposed 'ultimatum,' claiming that the authorities in Kyiv are actually just holding out for a 'total surrender' on Russian terms.

“These current 'ultimatums' are nothing more than child's play compared to what's coming next. He knows exactly what's on the table: the complete capitulation of the Kyiv regime under Russian conditions,” he went on to say."

https://www-gazeta-ru.translate.goog..._x_tr_pto=wapp
Timothy Nelson5 Timothy Nelson5 Active Member
232 messages
joined Oct 2018
#5504 ·
steelheron25 said:Heh, who thought so? Pretty much everyone did, or at least the vast majority.

Had you even revisited the topics of Russia and Ukraine before February 24th? If you go back and leaf through those old threads—better yet, look at what was being said in 2014 and the years following—you'll see a prevailing trend of mocking Ukraine and its military capabilities, especially during those battles for the Donetsk airport and the months that followed. There was this general consensus that Ukraine was essentially a failed state; that narrative was actually spearheaded by a certain moderator we have here today, and anyone who wandered into those discussions would find that people were suggesting the Ukrainians would be better off committing collective suicide given how pathetic they supposedly were.
Then, if you jump forward to the posts from the first few days of the invasion, you'll see people leaving comments predicting that nothing more than a local National Guard unit could put up any real resistance. Even that same moderator felt the need to rush and change the thread title because the Russians had already pushed into Kharkiv.

That fart from the Kremlin and his sycophants are still mentally stuck in 2014, back when they easily seized Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, only to turn them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them as if they couldn't handle a small group of miners. That's exactly why they convinced themselves that Ukraine would simply collapse. Clearly, they slept right through the massive shifts happening within Ukraine itself, and indeed, within the world at large.

Well, Ukraine actually was a failed state back then; Crimea fell almost without a fight...

And I suppose one should keep in mind that at the very start of the invasion in February, things could have gone quite differently.
If Ukrainian special forces hadn't managed to break that Russian landing at the Kyiv airport, or if the ruling administration in Ukraine had decided to flee the country... who knows how this whole story would have played out.

That one decisive historical statement from Zelenskyy: "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition!" echoed everywhere; it rallied Ukrainians toward an uncompromising resistance.
It also shamed a lot of world leaders, many of whom were seemingly ready to just shrug their shoulders at the Russian invasion. After that statement, I guess hardly any Western politician escaped hearing their own voters ask: 'What are you waiting for? Send weapons to those brave Ukrainians!'

Quincy:
that Kremlin hack and his lackeys are still stuck in 2014, when they easily snatched Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, and then turned them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them for failing to defeat a handful of miners. Because of that, they convinced themselves that Ukraine would just fall apart. Apparently, they slept through some significant changes that happened within Ukraine itself, and in the world at large.
A lot of people seem to love forgetting that the real shifts in Ukraine started during President Trump's term. During his mandate, Ukraine began receiving Javelins and other sophisticated military hardware, and the training for Ukrainian officers finally kicked off...
Jessica Rivera37 Jessica Rivera37 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2022
#5505 ·
steelheron25 said:Heh, who thought so? Pretty much everyone did, or at least the vast majority.

Had you even revisited the topics of Russia and Ukraine before February 24th? If you go back and leaf through those old threads—better yet, look at what was being said in 2014 and the years following—you'll see a prevailing trend of mocking Ukraine and its military capabilities, especially during those battles for the Donetsk airport and the months that followed. There was this general consensus that Ukraine was essentially a failed state; that narrative was actually spearheaded by a certain moderator we have here today, and anyone who wandered into those discussions would find that people were suggesting the Ukrainians would be better off committing collective suicide given how pathetic they supposedly were.
Then, if you jump forward to the posts from the first few days of the invasion, you'll see people leaving comments predicting that nothing more than a local National Guard unit could put up any real resistance. Even that same moderator felt the need to rush and change the thread title because the Russians had already pushed into Kharkiv.

That fart from the Kremlin and his sycophants are still mentally stuck in 2014, back when they easily seized Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, only to turn them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them as if they couldn't handle a small group of miners. That's exactly why they convinced themselves that Ukraine would simply collapse. Clearly, they slept right through the massive shifts happening within Ukraine itself, and indeed, within the world at large.

I remember those days too, when a certain moderator and a forum member who isn't active on this thread anymore (ruka_slave) were constantly making fun of the Ukrainian military and interpreting events through a heavily biased lens—everything from the events in Odessa on May 2nd and so on. But hey, only a fool refuses to ever change their mind.

Russian Lieutenant Colonel captured without his trousers

https://gazeta.ua/articles/np/_rosij...on-zsu/1110514

Muscovite land and lease. This video from the article has been posted on the forum before, but I haven't seen this photo of the captured Russians yet.

https://gazeta.ua/articles/np/_moska...pantiv/1110750
Jessica Rivera37 Jessica Rivera37 Member
29 messages
joined Feb 2022
#5506 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:Well, Ukraine actually was a failed state back then; Crimea fell almost without a fight...

And I suppose one should keep in mind that at the very start of the invasion in February, things could have gone quite differently.
If Ukrainian special forces hadn't managed to break that Russian landing at the Kyiv airport, or if the ruling administration in Ukraine had decided to flee the country... who knows how this whole story would have played out.

That one decisive historical statement from Zelenskyy: "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition!" echoed everywhere; it rallied Ukrainians toward an uncompromising resistance.
It also shamed a lot of world leaders, many of whom were seemingly ready to just shrug their shoulders at the Russian invasion. After that statement, I guess hardly any Western politician escaped hearing their own voters ask: 'What are you waiting for? Send weapons to those brave Ukrainians!'

Quincy:
that Kremlin hack and his lackeys are still stuck in 2014, when they easily snatched Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, and then turned them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them for failing to defeat a handful of miners. Because of that, they convinced themselves that Ukraine would just fall apart. Apparently, they slept through some significant changes that happened within Ukraine itself, and in the world at large.
A lot of people seem to love forgetting that the real shifts in Ukraine started during President Trump's term. During his mandate, Ukraine began receiving Javelins and other sophisticated military hardware, and the training for Ukrainian officers finally kicked off...

That isn't really the point, though. The issue is that several users on this forum spent a long time outright denying the presence of the Russians and their active support for the Donbas insurgents (by the way, the Ukrainians refer to them as "ladybugs" because of that green Saint George ribbon that reminds them of a ladybug, which they call a *kolodarskiy zhuk* in Ukrainian). Furthermore, every single event was interpreted strictly through a Russian lens, without even a shred of objectivity. Honestly, I still remember the discussions regarding the events in Odessa back on May 2, 2014.
driftingfox66 driftingfox66 Active Member
57 messages
joined Aug 2017
#5507 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:Well, Ukraine actually was a failed state back then; Crimea fell almost without a fight...

And I suppose one should keep in mind that at the very start of the invasion in February, things could have gone quite differently.
If Ukrainian special forces hadn't managed to break that Russian landing at the Kyiv airport, or if the ruling administration in Ukraine had decided to flee the country... who knows how this whole story would have played out.

That one decisive historical statement from Zelenskyy: "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition!" echoed everywhere; it rallied Ukrainians toward an uncompromising resistance.
It also shamed a lot of world leaders, many of whom were seemingly ready to just shrug their shoulders at the Russian invasion. After that statement, I guess hardly any Western politician escaped hearing their own voters ask: 'What are you waiting for? Send weapons to those brave Ukrainians!'

Quincy:
that Kremlin hack and his lackeys are still stuck in 2014, when they easily snatched Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, and then turned them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them for failing to defeat a handful of miners. Because of that, they convinced themselves that Ukraine would just fall apart. Apparently, they slept through some significant changes that happened within Ukraine itself, and in the world at large.
A lot of people seem to love forgetting that the real shifts in Ukraine started during President Trump's term. During his mandate, Ukraine began receiving Javelins and other sophisticated military hardware, and the training for Ukrainian officers finally kicked off...

Good grief, are we really doing this on this thread too? 🤦
steelheron25 steelheron25 Active Member
61 messages
joined Mar 2022
#5508 ·
Timothy Nelson5 said:Well, Ukraine actually was a failed state back then; Crimea fell almost without a fight...

And I suppose one should keep in mind that at the very start of the invasion in February, things could have gone quite differently.
If Ukrainian special forces hadn't managed to break that Russian landing at the Kyiv airport, or if the ruling administration in Ukraine had decided to flee the country... who knows how this whole story would have played out.

That one decisive historical statement from Zelenskyy: "I don't need a ride, I need ammunition!" echoed everywhere; it rallied Ukrainians toward an uncompromising resistance.
It also shamed a lot of world leaders, many of whom were seemingly ready to just shrug their shoulders at the Russian invasion. After that statement, I guess hardly any Western politician escaped hearing their own voters ask: 'What are you waiting for? Send weapons to those brave Ukrainians!'

Quincy:
that Kremlin hack and his lackeys are still stuck in 2014, when they easily snatched Crimea from an unorganized and confused Ukraine, and then turned them into punchlines in the Donbas, constantly ridiculing them for failing to defeat a handful of miners. Because of that, they convinced themselves that Ukraine would just fall apart. Apparently, they slept through some significant changes that happened within Ukraine itself, and in the world at large.
A lot of people seem to love forgetting that the real shifts in Ukraine started during President Trump's term. During his mandate, Ukraine began receiving Javelins and other sophisticated military hardware, and the training for Ukrainian officers finally kicked off...

Crimea fell quietly because Ukraine was caught in such a heavy interregnum at the time, especially after the previous president made that rather unexpected move to flee to Russia.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy's stance during those opening days had a massive impact on how the international community viewed the entire war. Had he fled—which he could have done without much backlash, really—we likely would have been mired in debates over his legitimacy. As for that president who fled in 2014, word is he was already waiting in Belarus.
As for Donald Trump, I won't comment, nor do I wish to drag him into this specific discussion, but one has to admit that Barack Obama acted quite timidly back in 2014.
hollowdriver13 hollowdriver13 Regular
705 messages
joined Feb 2022
#5509 ·
Carol Johnson21 said:It’s been a while since I’ve checked in here, and honestly, I barely recognized this place once I started seeing all these pro-Russian usernames popping up. 😬
Hope everyone is doing well!

I have a question for the group. I noticed that on CNN, whenever there's even a tiny bit of news about Ukrainian progress, they immediately bring on some military analyst to warn us about the lines in the Donbas and the potential for a Russian breakthrough. What exactly is going on over there?

Glory to Ukraine!

At a pace of maybe five meters a day and one village every three months, they might have a shot at reaching Bakhmut by the start of the 22nd century.
bluemason3 bluemason3 Veteran
1.1K messages
joined Jun 2016
#5510 ·
gentlerider7 said:Dmitry Medvedev is a total piece of work

"The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, basically fired back at President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s comments about refusing to negotiate with Russia over some supposed 'ultimatum,' claiming that the authorities in Kyiv are actually just holding out for a 'total surrender' on Russian terms.

“These current 'ultimatums' are nothing more than child's play compared to what's coming next. He knows exactly what's on the table: the complete capitulation of the Kyiv regime under Russian conditions,” he went on to say."

https://www-gazeta-ru.translate.goog..._x_tr_pto=wapp

It’s funny watching him pivot from progressive optimism to acting like Putin's lapdog—basically a caricature that eventually settles into being Putin's court jester.
stormybear25 stormybear25 Active Member
62 messages
joined Sep 2022
#5511 ·
The Russian military is reportedly attempting to negotiate terms for laying down their weapons with the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the southern front—according to an OK "South" spokesperson. Per Natalia Gumenyuk, some Russian units are facing such dire circumstances due to the Ukrainian counteroffensive that they are actually seeking talks with the Armed Forces of Ukraine regarding surrender conditions and transitioning to protections under international humanitarian law.

Source-
Carol Johnson21 Carol Johnson21 Active Member
73 messages
joined May 2023
#5512 ·
hollowdriver13 said:At a pace of maybe five meters a day and one village every three months, they might have a shot at reaching Bakhmut by the start of the 22nd century.

It’s quite strange, isn't it? They manage to pair an alarmist warning about danger in the exact same sentence as a casual mention of some minor Ukrainian advancement.
Today, E Gojan actually stepped up and provided a more concrete breakdown of the counteroffensive's true scale.
On networks like NBC, the entire narrative often just depends on whoever happens to be sitting in the editor's chair that day.🤷
Timothy Williams5 Timothy Williams5 Regular
325 messages
joined Jun 2022
#5513 ·
stormybear25 said:The Russian military is reportedly attempting to negotiate terms for laying down their weapons with the Armed Forces of Ukraine on the southern front—according to an OK "South" spokesperson. Per Natalia Gumenyuk, some Russian units are facing such dire circumstances due to the Ukrainian counteroffensive that they are actually seeking talks with the Armed Forces of Ukraine regarding surrender conditions and transitioning to protections under international humanitarian law.

Source-

I assume they mean surrendering arms, not "assembling" them.
coastalbison6 coastalbison6 Active Member
231 messages
joined Jul 2018
#5514 ·
gentlerider7 said:Dmitry Medvedev is a total piece of work

"The Deputy Chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, Dmitry Medvedev, basically fired back at President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s comments about refusing to negotiate with Russia over some supposed 'ultimatum,' claiming that the authorities in Kyiv are actually just holding out for a 'total surrender' on Russian terms.

“These current 'ultimatums' are nothing more than child's play compared to what's coming next. He knows exactly what's on the table: the complete capitulation of the Kyiv regime under Russian conditions,” he went on to say."

https://www-gazeta-ru.translate.goog..._x_tr_pto=wapp

That’s what happens when you start your morning with all that bravado. 🤦
I mean, the guy basically said it'll be doomsday if anyone even touches Crimea. 😁
loneskipper3 loneskipper3 Member
36 messages
joined Feb 2023
#5515 ·
Gregory Ramos3 said:Whoa, looks like a few people over in Russia are finally starting to realize what a massive mess they've gotten themselves into:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JuliaDavi...70513909022720

You really gotta watch this (or just skip to the end), because man, he absolutely nailed it with that last response 🙏 🙏

I was actually planning on posting this myself, but I scrolled through two pages just to see if anyone had beaten me to it. Remarkable. (And yes, I'm using the English word because, frankly, why bother with anything else?)
Sandra King3 Sandra King3 Newcomer
1 message
joined Sep 2022
#5516 ·
Kadyrov's latest
https://www.eurasiareview.com/160720...sian-analysis/

Sent from my LYA-L29 via Tapatalk
Carl Lee27 Carl Lee27 Regular
368 messages
joined Feb 2024
#5517 ·
Gregory Ramos3 said:Whoa, looks like a few people over in Russia are finally starting to realize what a massive mess they've gotten themselves into:

https://mobile.twitter.com/JuliaDavi...70513909022720

You really gotta watch this (or just skip to the end), because man, he absolutely nailed it with that last response 🙏 🙏

Even local officials are starting to call for Putin to step down
https://twitter.com/WhereisRussia/st...Xwos5WV7Q&s=19
I mean, obviously, they don't actually give a damn about the lives of Ukrainians, and they probably don't care much about Russians either. But hey, you've gotta pick a side early if there's ever going to be a regime change, right? It’s all about positioning yourself before the dust settles—who gets to take over ExxonMobil, or rather, who gets the girl next.
Joshua Myers432 Joshua Myers432 Regular
285 messages
joined Feb 2011
#5518 ·
coastalbison6 said:That’s what happens when you start your morning with all that bravado. 🤦
I mean, the guy basically said it'll be doomsday if anyone even touches Crimea. 😁

It’ll be incredibly interesting if the Ukrainians somehow manage to push their way into Crimea. 🎉
Winter is coming anyway; might as well turn up the heat a little. 🕺
Anthony Hill5 Anthony Hill5 Regular
379 messages
joined May 2024
#5519 ·
Larry Sanchez7 said:If a bear's biggest strength is hitting civilians, then to me, that "strength" looks more like pure desperation and weakness...
Because if they actually had the power, they'd be hitting the military instead of civilians...

It is quite clearly their established modus operandi. They strike at civilians and essential infrastructure, systematically making daily life an absolute misery just to crush any lingering will to resist. We have already seen this exact pattern of devastation play out in Syria.

Sandra King3 said:Kadyrov's latest
https://www.eurasiareview.com/160720...sian-analysis/

Sent from my LYA-L29 via Tapatalk

What kind of nonsense is this regarding Kadyrov? Do people truly believe he holds any real sway here? It will undoubtedly be someone from the intelligence community or perhaps Mishustin who ultimately pulls the strings.
Joshua Myers432 Joshua Myers432 Regular
285 messages
joined Feb 2011
#5520 ·
Anthony Hill5 said:It is quite clearly their established modus operandi. They strike at civilians and essential infrastructure, systematically making daily life an absolute misery just to crush any lingering will to resist. We have already seen this exact pattern of devastation play out in Syria.

What kind of nonsense is this regarding Kadyrov? Do people truly believe he holds any real sway here? It will undoubtedly be someone from the intelligence community or perhaps Mishustin who ultimately pulls the strings.

Infrastructure gets leveled in war; that isn't some unique Russian invention. I guess after six months they realized nobody was hanging flower boxes on their balconies anymore, so now they'll move on to leveling bridges, power plants, factories, airports, and rail lines. Just the usual routine.

You must log in or register to reply here.

Log in Register

🔗 Similar threads