#1441 ·
Thomas Hernandez21 said:Noah Sanchez39, I'd actually like to ask you something... What exactly is so magical about 64-bit Windows? 🙂 Here are a few thoughts of mine:
1. The x64 version of the OS has significantly fewer drivers available compared to the x86 version.
2. 64-bit software is almost non-existent, so the potential of the OS can't really be utilized.
3. An x64 OS doesn't support 16-bit programs.
4. For an x64 OS, drivers must be digitally signed.
5. If you install a 64-bit OS, then 32-bit programs (which is basically everything a standard user uses) run in an emulator!
I don't know where you heard that it's "faster," but there is absolutely no sense in putting it on a machine with
Don't get me wrong, but I truly don't understand why a home user would switch to x64 right now. 🙂
Fair enough, Zeleni. 🙂
I have no intention of disputing or proving anything you wrote wrong.
For the last two years, I've been working on a Mac with an Intel Core 2 Duo CPU 2.4 and 4 GB of RAM; Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard is both a 32-bit and a 64-bit OS, whereas 10.6, which came out right after, is mostly a 64-bit OS (if you're interested, check http://www.apple.com/macosx/technology/).
Maybe you're wondering what Mac OS X has to do with this discussion about Windows 7? Probably nothing. But I want to say that my "work" experience on one such newer configuration/machine has been more than positive. My main system is Mac OS X, and I installed Windows 7 (64-bit) purely out of curiosity. And I admit, I am pleasantly surprised—in other words, my overall impression of them (Windows 😉) is very positive.
A home user doesn't need to go to x86-64 (64-bit); x86 (32-bit) is plenty. This is just my suggestion for those who own newer computers.