Posts by Anthony Harris14

aaaaaaa...😵

It is also referred to as the sigmoid colon, or simply "sigma." It sits right between the descending colon and the rectum, which means it basically occupies the left lower quadrant of your abdomen. It gets its name from its distinct S-shape. Most importantly, this isn't some pathological finding; it’s just standard anatomy.

The sigmoid colon is just a standard anatomical section of the large intestine—in other words, EVERYONE has one. You’ve likely misread something, misinterpreted a term, or perhaps drawn a faulty connection between two unrelated things...

My eye doctor never actually gave me my full prescription because apparently, if I had, my near vision would have been a total mess—some technicality about focusing up close, I guess. Anyway, my prescription is actually a "little" stronger than yours.🙂

There’s also the option of a needle biopsy

Confidence doesn't exist in a vacuum without some level of belief in those around you—I mean, how can you even begin to gauge your own progress if you have no one else to measure yourself against?

graniteraven92 said:I’ve sat in the psychiatrist's chair myself. The meds I was prescribed didn't exactly solve the core issue; they mostly just acted as a dam to stop the situation from getting even worse. But eventually, the floodgates opened again. The amount of time I waste on these obsessive loops started creeping up. My own little deep dives into the subject haven't exactly yielded anything encouraging.😢
It’s nice to hear your friend had such a positive turnaround. Though, if I’m being honest, I went through a period of being head over heels once too, and it didn't do me much good.

ironfalcon27, in my case, this hit right alongside an anxiety and depressive disorder. Honestly, I can't even tell which one took the lead first.😕

Behavioral therapy is largely a bust when dealing with this specific disorder. It feels redundant. Telling someone it isn't "normal" to turn a key in a lock two hundred times—or whatever the ritual is—is essentially trying to explain how water works to a swimmer. It’s obvious. I am glad you sought medical help and got the prescriptions, but let’s be realistic: pills alone aren't a silver bullet unless they're paired with actual psychotherapy.

Confident people just serve as a constant reminder of everything I had to endure, even though I never should have had to deal with any of it.

It’s like these FF types have been swarming in lately, much like the crowds during the Miss USA pageant.👍

I realize true objectivity is a myth, but it feels like Pavičić at least makes an honest effort to be fair by actually explaining the reasoning behind what works or fails.
The absolute worst kind of reviews are those lazy star ratings paired with three sentences of nothing but superlative adjectives.

I have a real appreciation for Pavičić because he doesn't just spit venom at a film; instead, he actually discusses the work and breaks down the merits and flaws. To me, that feels like the most objective approach. I can't stand those critics who fancy themselves artists—those self-proclaimed "artists of criticism"—who vomit out a piece where they revel in their own brilliance, completely oblivious to the fact that they’re simply reacting to some deep-seated personal baggage. They feel an uncomfortable resonance with the material, spiral into a bit of hysteria, and then scribble a column thinking they've been struck by divine revelation. Honestly, that’s exactly how I felt reading the critique of Elfriede Jelinek's "Naslada" in The New York Times. It seems to me that while an author conducts actual research to write a book, a critic—who likely just studied a language or philosophy—starts lecturing everyone on why a specific detail in a novel is "this" or "that."

Good grief, so I guess these critics are just a bunch of basement-dwelling trolls and hooligans now?
I certainly didn't envision my favorite critic turning out this way.🙄

When I sit down for a movie, my main goal is to wipe the slate clean and forget whatever I watched previously. I’m primarily interested in the narrative—whether the characters and the plot actually hold up under scrutiny. I wouldn't call myself a cinephile by any stretch; I tend to only notice things like pacing or cinematography if they are incredibly striking.
Directors with an overly distinct, signature style often end up walking into their own trap. Once you've seen a handful of their works, you can practically predict exactly how the next one will look. In those cases, the focus shifts away from the story and the people involved, making it far too easy to just write off the entire film without a second thought.

In my opinion, her best role was that auntie character, the one from that movie about the woman with the obsession...😁

I suspect that in a certain percentage of cases, there is a deliberate exaggeration at play—essentially a "sour grapes" mentality where people pivot to highlighting negative traits whenever someone actually achieves something significant. It feels like a way to deflect from their own lack of progress. While this might be largely irrelevant when dealing with an adult who has already established their character, I worry it could genuinely harm children. If a kid shows early talent or abilities that don't strictly align with what society expects, they risk being sidelined by this kind of scrutiny before they even get a chance to grow.

silvermason16 said:cleared out my inbox

I’ve never been much of a journal writer. Though, I suppose it might be interesting to actually start
documenting one's thoughts.
But what follows?
Once you commit them to paper—do you just sit there and read them back immediately? Or...?
😕

Well, I suspect the impact is more profound after some time has passed. I'm not entirely certain—it feels like a bit of trial and error.😁

Lawrence Garcia93 said:But what if you aren't religious?

Journaling your thoughts? Hmm. Reading through all that gloom... honestly, it makes me feel like I’ve completely lost my mind.

Well, that is precisely the point.
You begin to see yourself through a different lens—not necessarily through the eyes of others, but through your own. You observe your reactions, how you experience affect, even when your actual thoughts don't align with your impulses. You see what triggers your anger and, more importantly, *why* it happens. It allows you to pinpoint where you stumbled and how to navigate things better next time. You won't stumble upon every answer immediately, certainly not, but at the very least, you'll be capable of asking the right questions.

Lawrence Garcia93 said:Personally, I find that getting some sunlight does me a world of good.
But what about dietary suggestions?

Carbohydrates,
chocolate, bananas...
Are you getting enough magnesium? You can find it in leafy greens, though if you’re dealing with high stress levels, magnesium and Vitamin C are quite essential.
There is also St. John's Wort—I believe that's the name—which acts as a mild herbal antidepressant and is available over the counter. As for how effective it actually is, I couldn't say for certain. It's essentially an extract derived from the St. John's Wort plant.

Kayla said:I live in New York City and honestly, the idea of going to the doctor terrifies me because antidepressants are handed out here as casually as an Advil. I really want to find a solution through more natural means...

Physical activity, watching what you eat, leaning into things that actually bring you joy, journaling—you can try to "dig" into the root causes of your depression yourself, though that’s always a double-edged sword; sometimes it just leaves you feeling paralyzed. Sunlight is great for your mood, and crying during a movie is perfectly valid. Avoid alcohol, too, since it tends to amplify whatever low feelings you're already dealing with. Maybe sign up for a class or meet some new people; seeing how others navigate their own struggles can be eye-opening. Really explore what makes you feel alive. And if you decide to see a psychologist, keep in mind that they aren't there to push pills on you.😬

stormyviper11 said:Oh, right... one of those movies from my childhood. Just rewatched it today after more than twenty years. I didn't expect some profound masterpiece, but it certainly didn't disappoint either. Pure entertainment—Marilyn Monroe was absolutely stunning, and having that forgotten Harry Nilsson classic on the soundtrack was a nice touch...
Has anyone else seen it? And honestly, while watching, I couldn't help but imagine a modern remake. Picture something directed by Michael Moore, where the protagonist is a Frenchwoman attempting to smuggle massive quantities of pâté into the USA. That breezy seventies vibe would be swapped out for modern anxieties like terrorism and all that other contemporary nonsense. It actually has potential.

Or what if someone from the South tries to sneak in some cured ham, artisanal cheese, and jugs of homemade wine?
Let's not forget the extra touches: bottles of olive oil in old moonshine jugs or cheap supermarket brandy containers, with the caps slightly crushed and everything wrapped up in old newspaper.🙏