Posts by neonsailor12

I would certainly consider watching it, but it appears the theaters are only showing the dubbed version... 😢

Since we are already splitting hairs here, if we are being pedantic about the fourth point, one shouldn't say "naprasto," but rather "naprosto"... 😬

Perhaps I am merely feeling a bit influenced by the atmosphere, given that there were no children with popcorn rustling in my ear to ruin the experience.

Evil Dead - 🙏

And as for the take on Lost, it is just as debatable as the age-old question of whether Deckard was an android or not...

Now, let us not be absurd.

The motion picture is quite simply top-tier Trash film. It is shallow, it moves at a breakneck pace, it lacks any semblance of realism, yet it remains immensely entertaining and delightfully foolish; you have Nicolas Cage portraying Elvis Presley, the presence of Eva Mendes, and even a horse that somehow outpaces a motorcycle—honestly, how could one ask for more?

I recall the specific scene where be Elliott instructs Nick to sterilize the needle, yet he proceeds with such misplaced bravado, attempting to ignite a flame with his bare hand. "No, use the boiling water..." 🙂

It is rather amusing that you are disparaging this film when the primary antagonist is actually named silentpilot6... 🙂

Austin Roberts8 said:As far as my own understanding goes, I am inclined to argue that Harry Potter Fantasy doesn't actually fall under the umbrella of the Fantasy genre...

Forget about it. I was merely attempting to draw a comparison, which is why the thought occurred to me in the first place...

slyowl9 said:Dragonlance: Dragons of Autumn Twilight (2007)
I find myself once again contemplating the cinematic landscape, specifically regarding this particular entry from the IMDb database which serves as a gateway to a much larger discussion. When one considers the weight of such a production, it becomes difficult to remain indifferent, even if the subject matter strikes a somewhat dissonant chord with the contemporary sensibilities we have come to expect from modern Hollywood movies !!!. There is an undeniable gravity to the way certain stories are told, yet I often feel that the essence of the narrative gets lost in the pursuit of visual grandeur, much like how a complex fantasy novel can sometimes be stripped of its soul when translated to the silver screen. One cannot help but draw parallels to the epic scales found in works like Lord of the Rings, where the atmosphere is just as vital as the plot itself. It is my firm belief that true quality lies in that delicate balance, a feat that many directors struggle to achieve in this current era of blockbuster-driven storytelling.

I have come to the realization that this will inevitably become an animated series. They have even gone so far as to include Xenu within the narrative to lend the production its own voice... 😬

Latin American dances...

I have a profound appreciation for the Fantasy genre, yet this particular motion picture stands as one of those rare instances where I felt a desperate urge to simply walk out of the theater mid-screening. It was utterly tedious. Furthermore, it is saturated with clichés to an almost overwhelming degree. The acting, the cinematography, even the depiction of the dragon—it was all quite dreadful (though I must concede that Sienna Guillory was absolutely captivating). In terms of its cultural weight, Harry Potter holds for him what Lord of the Rings holds for Harry Potter. I truly could have spent that time attending a lecture on Norse sagas instead, but alas, I had school obligations to attend to.

Avoid this one at all costs...

Predator, without any shadow of a doubt. That film features the highest concentration of muscular physiques by far. In almost all other movies, you might find one such individual, though in Rocky, there are consistently two. I am quite perplexed as to why Die Hard even appears on this list, given that Bruce Willis simply does not possess that level of musculature...

Will Ferrell absolutely stole the show the moment he stepped onto the screen. It truly is a missed opportunity that the crude, over-the-top gay brother or the grandmother characters didn't receive a bit more screen time to develop their bits.

Regardless of those minor grievances, the film is nothing short of a masterpiece. While it doesn't quite reach the heights of Dodgeball or Zoolander, it remains an absolute classic... 👍

'Switchblade Romance.' It is truly an exceptional piece of French cinema. You could find a copy on a DVD shelf in almost any local video rental store across the country.

rapidstag74 said:Zoolander is easily the finest comedy released within the last decade or two. You really ought to develop some actual taste, you jerk.

I must apologize, though I am certainly close to the mark; one could argue that Dodgeball is the true king of the genre, particularly if one manages to secure the special collector's edition DVD. 😁

I caught a screening of Bio yesterday at an AMC Theatres premiere. The runtime clocks in at about two hours, though I found the first half rather tedious, punctuated only by occasional flashes of a young Elisha Cuthbert in just an undershirt and socks—there are those inevitable close-ups on her chest designed specifically to grab the audience's attention. Once you hit the halfway point and the killings actually commence, however, the pacing picks up significantly, and you find yourself watching it in one sitting. It isn't bad, per se, but I have certainly seen superior work.

Pros: Elisha Cuthbert, Paris Hilton (specifically that scene where she dies while performing a blowjob on a guy in a car while being filmed—truly wild), the inventive ways characters meet their ends, solid special effects—particularly when everything melts in the fire during the finale—and a decent amount of dark humor.

Cons: Total MTV trash, an all-male cast (I watched a documentary about the production, and honestly, those guys seem more suited for hookups than playing gritty fighters), and Paris Hilton. 😁

I had no idea Elisha was such a powerhouse. Also, the primary antagonist bears a striking resemblance to a young Bill Paxton.

I would give it a 5.5 out of 10. It’s worth a watch if you have some popcorn, a soda, and absolutely nothing else going on in your brain.

unspeakable said:The doctors have failed us all!😬

The most terrifying thing is when children become frenzied and possessed.😈

I find myself in complete agreement with my colleague here. Though, one needn't necessarily resort to the idea of demonic possession; it is quite sufficient for a child to be simply psychologically disturbed. There is truly nothing more chilling than a little brat with a cherubic smile looking up and saying, "Mummy, I love you!" while concealing a butcher knife or a vial of poison behind their back.

I recall being most profoundly unsettled during my youth by a certain vampire film starring Klaus Kinski. What made it truly haunting was the fact that they barely had to apply any makeup to him at all. It just goes to show that even the medical professionals can sometimes get it entirely wrong... 😁

redowl90 said:However, I am somewhat perplexed as to what their expectations were, given that there isn't much of a dedicated cinephile culture here in America, and half of those who frequent the local theaters—and I am referring specifically to the crowds in Washington, D.C.—are essentially just going to be seen, primarily for the sake of appearances.

But if that is the case, one must wonder why they bother dimming the lights during a screening when, in total darkness, one can see nothing regardless? 😁

Paramount Pictures was simply not up to par. Period. If that represents the pinnacle of our current offerings, then I suppose we should be grateful for its absence. Elvis Presley is dead, and it truly is a tragedy...

rustymoose54 said:I would be more than happy to donate mine, though I am under the impression it wouldn't actually make anyone's life any better.😁

That really depends on what exactly you are offering to give. 😉

I was entirely unaware there was an ongoing debate regarding the legalities of this matter. Since the article was published just today, I suppose that explains why I'm only just catching up...

Let us categorize this under Health.

On the index, there was news posted with the sensationalist headline 'Americans are having organs removed without family consent' (acting as a link to an article from a hyper-yellow tabloid like the New York Post).

I won't bother summarizing the whole text, but one particular sentence caught my eye: 'After lengthy legal battles, disappointed families lose their cases in court.'

First off, why on earth would anyone choose not to donate their organs after they pass away? If we look at this realistically, what is the point of holding onto them—you have absolutely no use for them once you're gone, right? And then, to make matters worse, the family steps in and says no. For what possible reason?
Is it so a deceased person looks nice and perfectly intact?

Now, suppose we are dealing with an emergency situation where the family says 'No,' yet the doctor proceeds to take the organ because they cannot reach the next of kin within a 24-hour window. That is when these legal battles begin. They aren't "disappointed families"—they are just fools, considering a human life was actually saved.

If my own people did that to me, I would rise from my grave like a zombie and haunt them for at least a year.

There once existed a hypothetical study exploring the potential consequences and ultimate longevity of an individual who decided to consume nothing but a single type of food every single day.

It was concluded that after enduring a grueling succession of various ailments and systemic physical distress caused by a profound deficiency in specific vitamins and essential nutrients, one would eventually succumb. It is quite evident that survival is not merely a matter of calculating the total calories ingested.

The clear victor in this scenario would undoubtedly be the gyro; it would likely grant a person approximately fourteen years of life.

I recall during my childhood, my grandmother used to employ this specific "roller" technique. It wasn't some flimsy paper thing, but rather actual linen cloth.

The methodology is quite precise: you take a piece of linen fabric and cut it into a triangle roughly eight inches across. You then soak this in melted wax—though I suspect standard paraffin from a common candle would suffice—and wrap it tightly around a slender rod, such as a wooden kitchen spoon handle, until you have fashioned a conical, cylindrical shape. One end should be tapered enough to fit comfortably into the ear canal, while the other end, which will be ignited, should be about an inch or two in diameter. Once prepared, you lie on your side, insert the tip into your ear, and place a protective cloth around the area to ensure no stray embers touch your skin before lighting the top. As it burns down a few inches, you simply trim away the charred section, ensuring the flame remains active. When the fire nears the ear, you snip off the entire burning portion, extract the remaining implement, and you are finished. You'll find a small plug of wax left inside, perhaps half an inch long. After that, the silence is so profound you could practically hear the grass growing in the neighbor's yard.

From what I understand, this is typically reserved for instances of ear congestion or similar issues, and I maintain it is a far superior method compared to traditional irrigation. For routine cleaning, however, it seems a bit overly elaborate; a simple cotton swab is perfectly adequate.

I recently spotted some miniature versions of these rollers at a Dollar Tree, priced at approximately $17. Honestly, I believe it would be both more effective and more economical to simply craft a larger version in your own workshop...

I once knew a close friend who presented with symptoms remarkably similar to those your friend is experiencing, and it eventually turned out he was dealing with schizophrenia.

After enduring a full year of intensive treatment and being heavily medicated, he now carries deep dark circles under his eyes and seems somewhat slowed down in his movements, yet I suppose one could argue that at least he is no longer plagued by those elaborate conspiracy theories and other such delusions.

I certainly do not wish to come across as a pessimist, but if I were in your position, I would strongly advise seeking professional medical assistance for your colleague.

Not too long ago, I found myself coming down with a nasty bout of the flu, which prompted me to start supplementing with Zinc. The illness actually cleared up quite rapidly—it only lasted about five days—but since I hadn't finished my entire supply of tablets, I have continued taking one or two daily.

I have been reading extensively about the various positive benefits associated with this mineral, such as heightened taste sensitivity, improved skin and hair quality, support for the reproductive system, and enhancements to short-term memory and focus. In fact, I can confidently say that I am experiencing these exact effects; ever since I began the regimen, my concentration has been sharp, my energy levels are soaring, and I feel just like Superman. It truly feels phenomenal.

However, one must also consider the potential downsides of excessive intake. There are reports of weakened immune function, nausea, headaches, vomiting, dehydration, stomach distress, impaired muscle coordination, fatigue, and even potential kidney issues.

This has caused me to pause and reflect somewhat on my current course of action.

Has anyone else here encountered negative side effects from Zinc? Furthermore, what would be considered an excessive dosage or an overly prolonged duration of supplementation? I am curious because, in men, it is my understanding that excess can be excreted through semen, which seems to mitigate some concerns, though I am still uncertain.

Ron Perlman.

However, I must say he truly missed the mark with
Hellboy.
It was his defining role, after all... 😁