Posts by Carl Doyle92

Greetings, could someone take a look at my blood work and tell me if I should be losing sleep over this elevated cholesterol? I'm also curious about what the overall picture looks like regarding my blood counts.

For context, I’m 28 years old, standing 185cm tall, and weighing in at 75kg. I don't smoke, and I don't touch alcohol.
The tests were ordered during a routine follow-up with my cardiologist; I deal with supraventricular tachycardia (AVNRT), and I've actually undergone ablation three times now—unsuccessfully, all three of them. These days, when an episode hits, I manage to settle myself down within about five minutes, so I've become somewhat accustomed to the rhythm of it all. My blood pressure stays steady at a solid 120/80. As far as medication goes, I only take ByolCor once a day at 1.25 mg in the morning. Structurally speaking, my heart is perfectly healthy.

Hello. My mother (63 years old) is currently battling lung cancer that has unfortunately metastasized to her bones. She has completed three cycles of chemotherapy, and while we saw some success with the tumor shrinking, things took a turn when she developed pneumonia. She spent a week hospitalized, but she’s been discharged now with instructions to use supplemental oxygen (4L for 18 hours a day) because her levels have dropped significantly. To give you an idea of the situation, when she isn't using the oxygen, the pulse oximeter shows readings as low as 80—usually hovering somewhere between 80 and 85—yet strangely, she doesn't even seem to notice the dip; she isn't gasping for air or struggling heavily to breathe.
When she uses the nasal cannulas, her levels quickly climb back above 90.
However, here is the frustrating part: despite receiving continuous oxygen throughout the night, she often wakes up with a reading of 80, sometimes even lower. It feels like a losing battle because during the day, while she is using the oxygen, she stays consistently above 90, but the overnight drop is baffling. Does anyone know why her levels would plummet like this even though she is actively receiving oxygen? Is there a physiological reason for this phenomenon that I might be missing?
I can't help but wonder if she might be mouth-breathing in her sleep, which would prevent the oxygen from properly entering through the nose—I'm not sure if that's a valid theory. Perhaps she should be using an oxygen mask at night instead of those small nasal tubes? If it actually makes a difference, is there a significant clinical distinction between the full masks people often wear and the nasal cannulas?

Kevin Hayes83 said:Just typical American bullshit... 👎

The classic commentary you'd expect from some uncultured hillbilly...

Hannah Green2 said:Having reviewed the comments left here, I have decided to pass on this entirely. 🙂

Look, this isn't exactly the right venue to debate whether or not a film is worth your time; personally, I find much more utility in scanning the YouTube comment section under a trailer to gauge the general vibe.

Mark Gray3 said:Exactly. This movie belongs in a film school syllabus as a textbook example of how *not* to write a screenplay. From the dialogue to the structural pacing of the scenes, everything is just incredibly blunt—it’s forced, unconvincing, and it shoves information at the audience with such violent, unnatural frequency that it becomes painful to watch. On top of that, the plot holes are just left gaping wide, with absolutely zero effort made to bridge them. I haven't seen a script this poorly executed in quite some time.

Why even bother framing it that way? Why claim they should teach it in schools as a lesson in failure just because you personally didn't enjoy it? Personally, I thought the film was great, and I’ve actually recommended it to several people; since then, most of them have sat through it. Three said they loved it, one thought it was just okay—neither good nor bad—and one thought it was lousy. Look, I think it’s perfectly fine to offer criticism or point out what didn't work for you, but this kind of hyperbolic rhetoric feels foolish; it attempts to pass off a subjective dislike as an objective fact about the film's quality rather than just being one person's opinion.

Arthur Moore97 said:When I first saw the announcement that this was being produced, my immediate assumption was that we were looking at a subpar adaptation of R. L. Stine’s work. As it turns out, it wasn't just a bad adaptation; it was simply a mediocre film that bears almost no resemblance to the essence of Stine or the Fear Street series. The screenplay lacked a coherent central concept, which makes it entirely logical that the final product offered nothing of substance. Furthermore, the child actors delivered performances that were frankly worse than those in any of those recent low-budget American kids' movies—meaning, they were truly terrible. What disappointed me most, however, was the complete failure to capture the nostalgic 90s atmosphere present in his novels. If it weren't for the presence of those old CRT monitors, I wouldn't have even realized the story was set in the 90s. All in all, it was quite a disappointment. I certainly won't be sitting through the entire trilogy.

I haven't actually read the books, nor am I particularly familiar with the author or the specific lore, so I can't speak to how accurate the adaptation is. However, speaking strictly on its own merits, I found the trilogy to be quite enjoyable. Since I don't tend to dwell on the quality of acting unless it’s glaringly obvious, I find myself unable to align with your criticisms regarding the cast. If the story works, the performance shouldn't be a dealbreaker for me.

In what specific ways do you find the acting subpar? Personally, I only recognize "bad acting" when I watch those hyper-melodramatic, low-rent family dramas produced by small independent studios—those feel genuinely amateurish. But when I compare the talent in this film to the caliber of an Oscar winner, I don't see a massive chasm. My philosophy is simple: if a movie is fundamentally well-constructed, only truly atrocious acting can ruin it for me, much like those bottom-tier amateur productions. I almost feel a sense of pity for those who are so sensitive to subtle nuances in performance that they allow it to overshadow a potentially good plot; if that's the case, they are essentially depriving themselves of many decent films.

neonfox65 said:The soundtracks in these movies are honestly killer—think Iron Maiden, Nirvana...

To be perfectly honest, I rarely even register the music in films unless the entire plot revolves around it—you know, when there's actual singing or a performance involved—let alone being able to identify the specific artists on the tracklist. I find myself somewhat envious of those people who possess such an acute ear for these details, noticing how a particular score might elevate a scene or, conversely, detract from the overall cinematic experience.

I’ve finished it, and personally, I thought the film was excellent. I see a lot of chatter regarding the acting performances, but let me be clear: I am certainly no connoisseur of the craft. I’ve sat through countless films, yet I can't tell you whether an actor is truly "good" or not—not that such a distinction even matters to me. If the narrative holds my interest, the quality of the acting becomes entirely secondary. In fact, I have never once selected a movie based on its cast, with the sole exception of comedies. Now, if we are talking about a comedy starring Adam Sandler, Steve Martin, Jim Carrey, Ben Stiller, or of course, Rowan Atkinson, I will watch it without hesitation; sure, I'll catch other actors too, but with those specific names, I have a guarantee of quality. For me, choosing a film based on the plot rather than the star power is a winning strategy ninety percent of the time, whereas the few instances where I prioritized the actors over the story have almost always resulted in a disappointment.

Gerald Wright8 said:Not by any chance. I'm just worried they’ll start forcing this on us bit by bit—eventually making it a requirement just to get your kid into preschool or elementary school... and then we're really screwed

I find myself wondering: at what point in the future will a vaccine be considered sufficiently researched and proven safe? Beyond that threshold, I see absolutely nothing wrong with vaccinating children, barring those parents who have already made a firm decision against all childhood immunizations.

brightgull95 said:It hardly matters, because the "lockdown" is already in effect. Given the total ambiguity surrounding which specific type of paroxysmal SVT we are dealing with—whether it’s AVNRT, AVRT, FAT, AFib, UA, an aggressive sinus tachycardia, or perhaps even a narrow-complex VT—the only shred of comfort lies in whether that tachycardia was captured on a standard 12-lead ECG. If it was, identifying the target becomes significantly more manageable should they decide to proceed with an ablation due to frequent recurrences.

Well, if it were VT, I suppose we would have certainly spotted it on the ECG.
Regarding the ECG, this particular variety is precisely the kind of thing you can't just spot through a routine reading; it’s something that remains invisible until they perform a full electrophysiology study. Furthermore, if the patient is headed for an ablation, the method used to record the initial tachycardia is ultimately irrelevant. Once they are actually in the procedure, the specialists will induce the arrhythmia themselves and terminate it immediately, providing them with the clearest possible picture right when it counts most.

Drew Martin3 said:Two years ago, I underwent an RF ablation performed by Dr. Anić in San Diego, which successfully managed my VES-ica issues—before the procedure, those things were hitting upwards of 15,000 a day, just relentless. Since then, I’ve dealt with a handful of SVES-ica, maybe a few hundred daily, nothing particularly dramatic, though I did find myself returning to beta blockers after an earthquake hit recently. However, two days ago, I was struck by tachycardia for the first time, and I honestly spiraled into a total panic. I genuinely thought I was dying. I’ve certainly endured quite a bit regarding my heart over the years (and let’s be honest, an ablation isn't exactly like a routine trip to the dentist; having someone tinker with your actual heart for several hours is no small feat), but I have never felt terror quite like this. The EMTs arrived, and since I had already taken a beta blocker, things started settling down within an hour. The guys from the ER told me it was paroxysmal tachycardia and advised me to call them back if it happens again. Now, I’ve spent the last two days paralyzed by fear, barely daring to step foot outside because I’m terrified it will strike while I'm out on the street. Does anyone have any advice, or perhaps just a few comforting words?

I’m a little confused here; it sounds like you went in for the ablation due to the VES-ica rather than the tachycardia. To be perfectly honest, I wasn't even aware they performed ablations for that, given that unlike the tachycardia you described, VES-ica doesn't usually have a singular underlying cause—it's mostly psychological unless there's some structural issue with the heart itself.
As for the tachycardia you mentioned, I’ve been dealing with that for ten years now, and it has happened to me everywhere. In recent years, I’ve simply learned how to coexist with it; I can't even remember the last time I ended up in the ER because I've become proficient at stopping it within minutes of onset. I've actually undergone three unsuccessful ablations myself.
Taking magnesium helps me quite a bit.

I work at a manufacturing plant, and there are five of us stationed in this one large workspace, though we’re spaced out about five feet from one another. The colleague sitting right next to me tested positive for COVID yesterday; his last day in the office was Monday afternoon, and by Tuesday, he was running a fever. We haven't had any prolonged or intimate conversations—just the occasional brief comment here and there while we were swamped with work—though there was one instance where he turned around and sneezed. Curiously, the only person ordered into isolation is the coworker to his left (I’m seated to his right), since those two work more closely together and spend quite a bit of time chatting. I find myself wondering how the rest of us escaped the mandate for isolation; has anyone else dealt with these kinds of inconsistent protocols at their own job? As for me, I showed up to work like normal yesterday and today, though I’ve been self-isolating from my parents at home just to be safe. Today marks the fifth day since my last contact with this infected coworker, and I haven't felt a single symptom. Generally speaking, what is the typical window for symptoms to manifest? To be perfectly honest, it isn't the physical isolation at home that’s weighing on me so much; it's this agonizing anticipation of whether or not I'll start feeling sick. I find myself constantly checking my temperature, obsessively monitoring for any sign of heat because I keep getting the sensation that I'm burning up, even though my readings haven't gone above 97.7 degrees. Overall, I feel fine, perhaps just a bit fatigued, but then again, he’s been working the early shift starting at 5:30 AM this week, so nothing is particularly out of the ordinary.

It’s somewhat surprising how quiet this thread remains, especially since they say so many people are dealing with this these days. My diagnosis is AVNRT.
In all my time navigating this, I’ve already undergone three ablations—two over at Magdalena with Dr. Robert Bernat and one with Dr. Anić down in Miami—yet these tachycardias just keep resurfacing. I’ve actually become quite proficient at recognizing them and stopping them myself quite quickly, but getting rid of them for good feels like chasing a ghost. It’s an incredibly unsettling cycle; I’ll have a week where I’m hit with three or four episodes, and then suddenly everything goes quiet for about three months before the whole ordeal starts all over again. Currently, I’m taking Byol Cor once a day at 1.25mg. Whether it’s actually doing anything is anyone's guess; honestly, I suspect the attacks might even be more frequent if I weren't on it. The only thing that truly keeps me in check is propafenone 2 x150 mg. When I rely on that, the tachycardia only flares up maybe once every six months, which is fine, but it’s hard to adjust to a rhythm when you've grown used to constant instability. That said, I try to avoid the propafenone because I've been told it can be harmful, even though I haven't experienced any side effects personally. Has anyone else gone through something similar?

Greetings. I find myself pondering a logistical curiosity: is it actually feasible for someone to send funds via Western Union directly to my bank account, thereby sparing me the tedious necessity of physically visiting an agent location to collect the cash in person?

Dear all, I am currently looking at the Wacom Intuos S graphics tablet ( Now, I should clarify that I am certainly no expert in this particular field; I am simply attempting to procure this as a birthday gift for my sister. However, I find myself somewhat adrift in the murky waters of software compatibility and bundled offers. From what I have gathered, the device typically comes packaged with certain complimentary software, but I am utterly perplexed by this specific promotion mentioned on the retailer's site regarding software up to $333. I reached out to their customer service for clarity, and they provided a rather cryptic response, stating essentially that depending on which tablet you purchase, you can select up to three licenses for use from the official Wacom website.
If anyone would be so kind as to demystify this situation for me, I would be immensely grateful. Thank you in advance.

mistydrifter56 said:He might be trying to pull a fast one on you. This looks like a pre-set order. I’d suggest heading over to the executed orders section to find the invoice, then just download it as a PDF like the user mentioned earlier and send that over. Just don't send him anything until that's done.

Sent from my Android using Reddit

The real issue here is that the guy clearly doesn't know what he's doing. I already told him to hold off on any payments until the funds actually hit the account.

Greetings, everyone. I find myself in a bit of a predicament regarding a transaction involving a contact who needed to transfer $50 to my account so I could mail him some items. We had a very clear agreement: I wouldn't drop anything in the mail until the funds actually cleared and showed up in my balance. He claims he already initiated the transfer of $50 and even sent me a screenshot as proof. Looking at the image, the account number matches mine perfectly, yet the money is still nowhere to be found. This was sent on Thursday evening via JP Morgan Chase online banking into my checking account over at Bank of America. I've attached the confirmation receipt he provided—does anyone know if there's an extra step where he needs to authorize this, or am I just dealing with some bureaucratic glitch at the bank?

View on imgur

Frankly, I don't see any reason to suspect he’s trying to pull a fast one on me. I was quite adamant about waiting for the funds to settle before shipping anything, and I made sure to tell him repeatedly that nothing would move until the money hit my account, simply so there wouldn't be any misunderstanding or accusations of me being dishonest.

Hey everyone, I’m running into a bit of a headache here. A guy needed to wire me $50 so I could get some items shipped out to him via mail. We had a clear agreement: nothing moves until the funds actually hit my account. He claims he already sent the $50 and even sent over a screenshot from his online banking app to prove it. I checked the details, and the account number matches mine perfectly, but the money is still nowhere to be found. He initiated the transfer on Thursday evening through Chase, sending it to my account at Wells Fargo. I’ve attached the confirmation photo he sent me—does anyone know if there's an extra step where he needs to authorize the payment, or is this just a typical delay on the bank's end?

View on imgur

Frankly, I don't see any reason for him to play games; I was very explicit about not shipping anything until the balance shows up in my account. I even went out of my way to tell him repeatedly that I wouldn't budge until the funds cleared, specifically so he wouldn't think I was the one trying to pull a fast one.