146 posts shown.
Paul Kern12 said:I find myself wondering if you actually read your own posts. You complain about insults directed at the Ukrainian President, yet in the very next breath, you refer to the Russian President as a "fuhrer" and a fascist...
Regarding those comparisons between the "war" in Ukraine and the American Civil War, that subject has already been extensively debated. In my view, those two events simply cannot be compared for far too many reasons, and anyone attempting to draw those parallels is likely just trolling.
Mark Bennett36 said:Look, you clearly have no clue—you're just talking trash for pay. It’s obvious from the way you're blathering about him having more wealth than the Queen.
He lives in an apartment that was transferred to him by some elderly folks. And oh yeah, the biggest chunk of property was "brought in" by his wife, who comes from a wealthy family.
But sure, he's richer than the British Queen. That just shows how little you people care about actual facts. ☕
Charles Fox10 said:Nothing weird is going on here—it's just that we have two incredibly heated topics flying around right now, and honestly, we can't be everywhere at once from midnight to noon. That’s why we emphasize this—I’ve been jumping into specific threads, but please, just report, ignore, and keep the conversation moving. It’ll make things easier for everyone.
Charles Fox10 said:Believe it or not, this guy isn't actually staying on topic in the thread titled "Tomislav Karamarko, President of the Republican Party (Part III)"—just like he isn't staying on topic when he asks whether the man is some kind of clone or who the original is.
That isn't even the point—yet somehow it’s been brought up in at least six out of the last ten posts. You might not believe me, but honestly, the principle is always the same: if someone drops an inappropriate post, just report it and move on. Ignore them.
Look, most people just refuse to follow those simple instructions—it’s frustrating. Because they can't be bothered, topics that shouldn't even be controversial end up blowing up in our faces. That's why we have to step in and moderate based on the Rule PDF regarding politics, specifically this one:
If you want to know who got banned from this thread, go ahead and check for yourselves—I'm not running a detective agency here. As for everything else, that's up to the administration.
Student Union said:Minkenovac, what on earth are you talking about? Confess your obsessions to a psychiatrist. To the heroes of the American Civil War. You’re just spitting venom because someone paid you to. You can bring along whoever you’re talking about, too. That's all. You're gonna have to go find someone from the Midwest or something. Who’s actually going to understand that dialect of yours once you start talking about Vuk?
Student Union said:And the trolling just keeps on going. It’s only because they started asking where the confirmation is regarding whether Dejan Jović actually has access to classified info—and if he even passed his security clearance—that this all blew up. So, here is how a conversation with the guys on duty at the Republican Party headquarters goes down: First off, they're just trolling with stuff that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic at hand—typical. They throw out their little "vision" of how things work—and just like that, it becomes absolute truth. No questions asked, no fact-checking required. It’s instant dogma.
So, did Dejan Jović actually fail his security clearance? Because if you look at the facts, he already passed it—so you were lying there. If he's cleared, then where exactly is the proof that he has access to state secrets?
Is the trolling and the constant dodging of actual questions ever going to end? Is there any way to cover up for this Republican operative who failed his background checks but somehow still managed to land the job? Seriously.
☕
Student Union said:Now you're just being a straight-up jerk and trolling for the sake of it.So, did Dejan Jović actually fail his security clearance? Does he really have access to classified intel? Let’s stop dancing around the issue and get specific here—what exactly shows that Dejan Jović has access to those secrets?
Student Union said:Seriously, you're the one here insulting people, spamming, and—above all—flaming. There isn’t a single post where you aren't attacking your interlocutors. And we all know why you were attacking the general—that grudge from '95 clearly hasn't faded. 🤣
Everything is right there in the thread. Now, go beat it. ☕
Even old-school communists understand democracy—it's just that the Republican Party prefers forced consensus. So, who's the real leftist here?☕
Student Union said:It's actually kind of cute, scrolling back through this thread and reading these paid shills desperately trying to explain away why KGK won't be the Republican Party's candidate. ☕
Even old-school communists understand democracy—it's just that the Republican Party prefers forced consensus. So, who's the real leftist here? ☕
Student Union said:How long is the administration going to let these Republican trolls and spin doctors get away with this? This whole "personal attack" style of debate is always led by the same group of mercenaries, completely without consequence. ☕
Even old-school communists understand democracy—it's just that the Republican Party prefers forced consensus. So, who's the real leftist here? ☕
Student Union said:Troll. Now suddenly it matters who he meets with? When he was meeting with Milanović, you guys cooked up 101 different reasons why it didn't matter. Go ahead, keep trolling about Tomislav Karamarko before he even held power—just like you used to do. ☕
Even old-school communists understand democracy—it's just that the Republican Party prefers forced consensus. So, who's the real leftist here?☕
Student Union said:Are those Minkenovac supporters—who love to spit on our veterans—really going to sit there and judge who contributed more? Did you pick that up over in Germany or something? A troll? Or just some paid shill out here insulting American patriots?
Student Union said:It’s funny how people love to mock leftists who haven't exactly built up an impressive resume—meanwhile, she's basically God to them.
And you just apply that same old leftist label to every single flaw she has—it’s getting a bit predictable, don't you think? Go ahead and troll—it’s clearly easier than actually coming up with an argument..
Student Union said:When are the moderators finally going to deal with this troll who just won't stop flaming everyone and stirring up trouble? So, they’re linking me to someone—someone I’m apparently fighting some kind of private war with? Seriously? Who exactly am I supposed to be at odds with here?
Student Union said:I honestly don't care about getting banned—it’s clearly just a few trolls who teamed up to stir the pot and provoke people. But you're just letting them get away with it. How much longer is this going to last?☕
Even the old-school communists actually understand what democracy means—it's just that the Republican Party prefers to run everything through forced acclamation. If they're the ones acting like a one-party state, then who exactly is the real opposition? :
Student Union said:Why? Honestly, I couldn't care less about those proven sellouts and traitors—or their precious little seats on this forum. ☕
Even Dr. Cak and the old-school communists actually understand what democracy means—it’s just that the Republican Party is the only group out there practicing pure acclamation. If they're the ones acting like the true opposition, then who is actually left to play the role of the real dissenters? ☕
Student Union said:Look, you’re just a troll who can't actually prove any of those party conspiracies or propaganda pamphlets you keep pushing.?☕
Even Dr. Cak and the old-school communists actually understand what democracy means—it’s just that the Republican Party is the only group out there practicing pure acclamation. If they're the ones calling all the shots, then who's actually running the show?coffee:
Student said:Look, you’re getting pretty tedious with all this whining and trolling. I know the Young Republicans aren't exactly the brightest bulbs in the box, but seriously—try to come up with something better.
I get that losing sucks, but don't make it so obvious. Were you out celebrating every Brazilian goal yesterday? Or were you too busy crying while celebrating the fall of America?☕
Even the old-school communists understand democracy—the Republican Party is the only group actually practicing forced consensus. So, who's the real leftist here? ☕
Student said:I don't waste my breath arguing with trolls and spammers—it's a lost cause. Besides, you'll be showing your true colors soon enough.
Once you can actually prove I'm attacking someone based on nationalism, then we can talk. Until then, take a hike.
And maybe the Young Republicans should think about why a nationalist would ever attack heroes from the American Civil War. ☕
Even the communists understand democracy—the Republican Party just uses it as a rubber stamp. Who's the actual radical then? ☕
Student Union; said:So, just how much did that troll actually prove? Is that how you write—just like those bottom-of-the-barrel tabloid hacks? Average.Coffee:
Student's; said:Sure, you can "see" it—if that’s how you want to play it. Look, go troll somewhere else—you're just not that interesting.
When is the police actually going to go after all those "patriots" living outside of Vukovar—the ones who claim they belong there just to cheat the system on their contributions?
Student Union said:Do you even realize when you’re asking questions just to troll? Seriously—why is this kind of spam even allowed on the boards?
Comparing Putin to Tomislav Karamarko is like comparing a grizzly bear to a common mole—it’s just not even in the same league. There's a reason people used to call him "the silent one."
Who on earth thinks they can compare that guy to a CIA spy? Seriously.☕
Student Union said:Aside from being nothing more than flame-war trolls. Since they've run out of actual arguments, people have started trying to link me to this whole forum persona—and apparently, others have joined in on that bandwagon too.
From what I've been told—and I’ve heard this from a few different sources—that's actually a punishable offense. So, moderators—how much longer is he actually going to get away with this without any consequences?
And what kind of pathology is it—where someone develops such a massive vendetta against specific people on this forum?☕
Student Union said:Where did Tomo disappear to? Is he busy chasing some big payday with the general?☕
Alright, trolls—bring it on. So, who exactly is the general meeting up with all the time?🤣
Student said:The only real horror here is the sheer amount of spin and trolling you people are peddling.
So, he drove 31,000 miles just to take a kid to preschool? Seriously—think for a second before posting such mindless excuses.
Even if it were 3.1 miles, it's still way too much since it was paid for with taxpayer money. ☕
Student Union said:Of course it’s a yes. Honestly, I'm just fed up with these trolls constantly whining and making noise. It’s always the same story—always jumping to defend their comrades. Gotta earn that daily bread, right??☕
Student Union said:How much is that Republican gang of yours paying you??
When you start peddling nonsense like this—I mean, seriously—who is actually going to want to join your team? You can't build a high-quality crew if this is the standard you're setting.
Is this really a proven failure from the Sanader era that Karamarko is still clinging to?
Njavro, Dalicka, Suker?
Keep 'em coming. ☕
Student Union said:Just a question here—not looking to start a fight with the moderators.
Shouldn't people be warned against playing pretend? You know—insinuating you're someone you actually aren't. It’s a bad look. They’re constantly time-framing and baiting—it's just relentless provocation at this point.Is it just me, or is everyone suddenly jumping onto every single thread at once?
Isn't that actually a violation of the forum rules?
Let’s be real—I know that for some people, getting paid to post on forums is literally the only way they can scrape together a living.Look, I’ve had it—allowing these absolute traitors to insult anyone who dares to ask if they actually grasp the consequences of their "savior" ideas is just too much. They spout these half-baked theories like they're gospel, despite having zero facts to back them up. It's honestly exhausting.
So, we keep hearing all this big talk about "streamlining the bureaucracy"—which sounds great on paper—but nobody ever actually tells us where the surplus staff is going to end up. ☕
It’s the exact same thing with Pilatus—he just wraps his trolling in this "polite," sophisticated little package. He spends his time baiting people in the most subtle, obnoxious way possible, basically just screwing with everyone's heads to make them look like idiots. It's infuriating.
Seriously, when is the moderation ever going to allow this kind of stuff? When is someone actually going to start cracking down on this constant smear campaign? People are out here tossing around pamphlets that have absolutely zero connection to reality—it's pure nonsense. And after that, there's just a predictable wave of insults aimed at anyone who dares to question whether these things are actually accurate—or heaven forbid, asks if they’re even justifiable or practical in the first place.☕
Student Union said:Of course that’s fine with them—it’s the only way they can actually line their pockets.. For instance, look at how trolluc conveniently dodged the fact that the Republican Party was actually breaking its own rules regarding hiring restrictions. That’s his whole playbook—just spam the board until the actual facts disappear. ☕
Student Union said:Excuse me? What is this paid Young Republicans troll even talking about? Did he panic because there isn't a single shred of truth behind the lies he's peddling for those bandits?
Who, exactly, did I threaten, and when?
Even though I find myself agreeing with traitors, provocateurs, and yes—lapdogs who sell out party memos as absolute truth—it’s honestly better not to engage. To people like that, even the concept of being a gentleman is too much to ask. ☕
Actually, the best way to see who someone really is is through this quoted post, where they just lie and plant fake info, simply because they have zero facts to back up their claims.
From what I can tell, they do this to other users on here too. Take user Corleone, for example.
And now this person wants to lecture us on "arguments" and "tolerance" and whatever else. Why is this kind of unhinged flaming allowed to happen so freely within Tomislav Karamarko's circle of traitors?☕
crimsonjackal63 said:Yeah, that's me. Since you guys are only capable of talking through trolling and baiting. Like when people ask why certain Republican Party members with criminal records or indictments haven't been kicked out. It's common knowledge, yet provocateurs just spam the thread with cheap trolling. ☕
Verbal offenses are nasty, aren't they?
That's what happens when you have to defend a former Secretary of State who didn't lift a finger in his department—unless we're talking about hiring cronies. It's just like how things "work" in the US Congress. ☕
And no, I'm not the topic here. ☕
crimsonjackal63 said:Anyway, you're just posting pathetic nonsense because you don't have any actual arguments. ☕
And now that you've been caught peddling party-line garbage, the excuses start flying. America needs a new government, but that certainly won't be the economic team from the Ivo Sanader era, which Tomislav Karamarko tries to pass off as his own despite their proven failure.
No matter how many mercenaries write about how Karamarko's crew wasn't in charge. ☕
Charles Fox10 said:That’s completely wrong—honestly, how many times do we have to debunk this before it sticks?
Consider the thread moved, albeit with a slightly adjusted title, since those gentlemen were essentially kicked out.
wiredangler5 said:Charles Fox10 was spot on—that post was total garbage. Honestly, I just upgraded the penalty from a warning to a 7-day ban. It was straight-up insulting, plain and simple.
I nuked his post too, and McA is also sitting out with a 7-day ban for theirs. Look, the Politics sub should have zero tolerance for either type of post we saw here. I’m with you on this one—that's exactly how I handled it.
Charles Fox10 said:I’m asking again—what exactly is the issue here? Both of those posts were already nuked.
I read one as a direct threat—and the other? Purely conditional.
If wiredangler5 decides that whatever this is counts as "cheap," then as a supermod over at r/Politics, he’ll ramp it up in a heartbeat—no second thoughts.
Threats are strictly off-limits here—period. As for the penalties, we’re talking anything from a slap on the wrist to a permanent ban, depending entirely on the context of what was said and how the debate was going. Honestly, it might even come down to whatever's written in the official PDF guidelines.
I can't even begin to wrap my head around this—it’s just absolute nonsense. Honestly, at this point, you have to wonder if anyone is actually paying attention or if we're all just collectively sleepwalking through this. It's ridiculous. kaže:
Exactly—it's not like Karamarkov's people have actually held power before. But hopefully, they won't be getting that chance anytime soon either. Well, you guys are absolutely toast once they finally get around to running that purge through the system.You’ll see for yourself that I'm right—just wait and see. Cheers.
I'm still waiting to see if anyone actually has a coherent thought about this—it feels like we’re just circling the drain at this point. Honestly, most of the commentary lately has been nothing but noise. I'll be interested to see if anyone brings anything real to the table, or if it's just more of the same empty chatter.McAuliffe Check out the post.
Look, man—you and all you other "tough guys" are more than welcome to hit my inbox. If you really want to go there, be my guest. I’ll be waiting right here to show you exactly how a guy with over 40 years of experience handles dental work.If you still have those people around—the ones sending stuff back home to their parents who are likely still hoarding their old Communist Party membership cards somewhere—then maybe it’s time for some serious re-education. Since you clearly missed out on being raised right the first time around...
Karamarkov held the reins just as firmly as Sanader did—and people like you are living proof of that.
You can pass whatever laws you want or push whatever agenda you like—it won't change a thing. At the end of the day, you’re still exactly who you were before.
Charles Fox10 said:Where’s the issue? That post was flagged, and so was the one right before it—which you guys all went nuts about—but strangely enough, nobody bothered to quote it here. Interesting. Just keeping things quiet while posts get wiped...
McAuliffe said:Look at this post
"Man, feel free to hit me up in the DMs—I'm happy to oblige—so you can see how a 40-year-old guy handles his business, assuming you still have teeth left to show. I'll send you back to your parents, who are probably still clutching their old Democratic Party membership cards, since you clearly missed out on a decent upbringing the first time around..."
The establishment types—the ones following the likes of Karamarkov or Sanader—have always been in control, and people like you are living proof...
Go ahead and act out all you want; you're still going to be exactly who you are.
hiddenfox64 said:it seems pretty weird to me that you have to be the lawyer for whoever received the threat...
it’s just like your little ranking system of who’s a "great" forum member and who isn't. The great ones get banned without any actual reasoning—just pure conspiracy theories—while everyone else just gets a warning...
honestly, it feels like we're back in kindergarten...
hiddenfox64 said:So, if you get threatened and then react, you're suddenly "offended" or something?