Posts by amberwalker4

Look, I just need to set the record straight regarding some lies being told here:

Nathan Phillips2 said:Basically, this user sent me a DM saying he’s annoyed by the "You have received an infraction on Reddit" notifications and asked me to stop sending them.

The reality is that it's ridiculous how often he hands out warnings—I know him all too well. I actually told him that if he’s so intent on getting rid of me, he should just ask another moderator to issue the warning instead. The other mods are more professional and at least explain why you're getting flagged ☕.

Nathan Phillips2 said:On the other hand, if my actions are correct, please consider that this user was previously banned but was pardoned (partly due to my advocacy), so we should consider if such a pardon was truly justified.

Another lie. When I was reinstated, I thanked that moderator and asked how he managed to get me back in, but he claimed it had nothing to do with him and that he hadn't heard anything about it.

Besides, that moderator and I have been communicating via email, so he surely would have notified me if that were the case.

It doesn't change the core issue, but it's just stupid when people lie like that.

P.S. Thanks for bringing this thread back to life.

wiredangler5 said:I have no idea why ZK can't see this subforum, but I'll ask the admins to grant access if this is just due to a partial ban.

ZK, regarding the review, your penalties stand.

I thought we had an agreement. We discussed lifting the partial ban and the permanent ban you picked up elsewhere on the site, provided you stopped engaging in the exact behavior that got you banned in the first place. You said yourself there was no problem with that—that you’d change things up and be on your best behavior. I also told you clearly that you'd lose access again if you kept this up, and I truly mean that.
What kind of review are you actually looking for? Based on these posts (specifically the snippets I've quoted here), the trolling penalties are justified. Why do you talk to people this way? I am asking you seriously. If others are having a normal discussion and making an effort to share their views or participate in a civil tone, then these kinds of attacks won't be tolerated from you. They aren't tolerated from anyone else, either. I don't see any reason to reconsider these penalties.

Look, this really is your last chance. If you keep going like this, I'm hitting you with a partial ban on the History section. You were given an opportunity, you really were, and now it's up to you. One more reason for a penalty and you're out of the History section for good. If everyone else can hold a conversation, you can too. It's all on you now..

Since it looks like everything has already been decided, there's no point in arguing. I'll just say this:

If DF is allowed to insult me, calling me a liar and a fraud in almost every thread we both participate in, yet I get slapped with a 45-point penalty just because I called him "The Infallible" due to his massive arrogance, then there really isn't any point in continuing.

That's it. I'm done posting in the History section.

(hey DF, go ahead and celebrate : d)

Goodbye. I hope God helps you churn out even more posts under that new handle 😁..

hollowtrucker77 said:you can't actually put mods on ignore

Well, I'm in trouble then. No big deal, thanks for letting me know.

Hey there.

I have a quick question. If I put someone on my ignore list, but they happen to be a moderator, will I still get a notification if they issue me a strike or a ban?

Might be a silly thing to ask, but I was just wondering 😁.

briskowl said:Let’s try to actually break down these "crimes" with some specifics. I mean, how many Nationalists or home guard soldiers were killed by the partisans and tossed into the Yellowstone pits?

Why didn't you ask this earlier? We're talking about the 33rd preparatory unit of the Colorado River. The partisans executed 218 captured members of that unit—all teenagers, just 17 and 18 years old, which is typical for guys drafted into preparatory units.

And no, that isn't just a "crime"—it's a shameful atrocity. It was a massacre of kids who had barely been drafted into a unit meant to train them for war.

Eric Collins5 said:And we shouldn't either. Honestly, changing our stance would just be wrong.

What are we supposed to do about all those anti-fascist monuments that the Republican regime tore down back in the nineties?

That was when they truly showed us what they were made of.

Who is "we"? You're too young to have ever served in the Red Army, so you don't have any right to speak on behalf of potential surviving veterans☕.

If you're into actual bloodsuckers rather than those trendy emo types, you should check out Carpenter's Vampire.

The only thing better than a good vampire flick is watching hunters track down that same kind of beast 🙂.

I’d also suggest Frostbite... that scene involving the SS deep in the American wilderness is legendary.

Frank Martinez16 said:try

http://www.docxrepair.com/

http://www.repairworddocuments.com/

Thanks for the help, but the first one won't open it for me (it's "rich text format", .rtf), and this one only offers an option for .docx 🙂. This second one works, but it only offers to recover the text I can already see using WordPad 🙂.

Are there any other options 😢?

Hey there!

I'm having some trouble with Microsoft Word 2007. Basically, I'm trying to get a document to load, but it keeps telling me the file is corrupted. I tried opening it in WordPad, but I’m still missing four pages. How can I get them back? I already tried the "open and repair" option, but that didn't work either. Please help. This is really important work, and I don't want all my hard work to go down the toilet. 😢.

This is actually pretty interesting—from what I can tell, the topic was opened with a massive, detailed post, right? And you still got flagged for it? Well, look at how the thread actually starts:

You basically just type one single word in the opening post 🙄.

The whole thing is a joke.

Tyler Ramos23 said:I've noticed it too. Lockheed Martin mostly hands out bans to anyone they disagree with. Even if they don't ban you, they get incredibly twitchy when they see an opposing view and start threatening people with bans. I don't get how a user like that can be a moderator.

It’s not just him, though. Most of the mods on that subreddit act the same way. Since the topics involve The New York Times, it’s expected that the mods will have their own political leanings, right? But their actual job is to set those biases aside and remain objective and neutral. They aren't doing either. In fact, they don't even try to hide it. It's shameful, but what can you really do 🤷?

briskmarlin22 said:That teaser is brilliant.

I agree. 👍

unnamed

Melissa Peterson19 said:Oh sure, because they could have built those highways for pennies on the dollar, right? How much would it have cost using the unnamed/Republican method? As for the internal debt left by the Reaganite right, it's being settled through the very sell-offs they initiated; when that wasn't enough, they turned to foreign loans. And once again, Clinton gets the blame. It's the same old story. The Republican Party leaves behind an internal debt of $35 billion that is absolutely destroying us, leaving no choice but to borrow from abroad. God willing, that goes through the IMF at a 2% interest rate. On top of that, there's still a budget deficit of about $17 billion. Totaling $60 billion—how much will the external debt spike under a new, forced Democratic-style administration? It'll be the unnamed one's fault, obviously!

Something like the nineties, when the right took control of things in this country?

Was the Republican Party in power back then?

"What would America look like under Republican leadership?"

Pure heaven on this corner of the globe ☕.

Tyler Ramos23 said:I've read plenty of your posts. And yeah, you're right—your connection to the Homeland is definitely deeper. But that's life, we aren't all cut from the same cloth. There are basically two kinds of nationalists:
- the chauvinists
- and those driven by true Patriotism
In my book, you definitely fall into that second group.

Is it really that hard to use American words🤦?

Emily Smith77 said:I don't care for either of them. Both signed those treaties with Rome. Why single out Ace? I only mentioned Anthony because of his past ties to the Right-wing
.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaties_of_Rome_(1924.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaties_of_Rome_(1941.)

The reality is that Anthony and the Nazi Germany regime didn't hand over California, Seattle, San Diego, or those islands. It was Ace and America. You're pinning everything on Anthony, which just isn't accurate 😉.

It's hard to call the Nazi Germany regime "Right-wing." They didn't really have a political platform. Sure, they tried to flirt with the rural working class and imagined their state would be built for farmers, but that never went beyond paper.

Emily Smith77 said:You're confusing Aco with Ante.😁

I didn't. Ace is the one who sold out California and parts of Florida to Italy ☕. That's just how people generally act.

Emily Smith77 said:If the Republican Party actually took control—based on historical precedent—we’d essentially be acting as puppets for Axis powers, while losing out on California, large parts of Florida, and Ohio entirely. 🤣

I don't recall Ante ever being a right-winger😲...I mean, how can a king even be a right-winger?😲?

Steven Allen9 said:The right wing exists for one reason and one reason only...

The left wing doesn't even manage that.☕

I did this first 😁