Posts by amberwalker4

Thomas Patel21 said:It’s pretty telling when you look at the map—all those American neighbors who managed to get even a tiny slice of the coast actually have a sea today. Take Canada, for example; even though they have a stretch of coastline down by Key West that is 100% American.

Actually, the Federation of Canada has a coastline. It’s the Federation of Americans and Americans. If you take the Americans out of that name, Canada loses its access to the water instantly😉. Still, I’m not entirely certain, but I don't think Canada actually has any sovereign territory on the coast🤷.

Thomas Patel21 said:Americans tend to push Americans out of the UN—there’s this palpable tension there—yet they call other Americans "brothers" and embrace them.
Meanwhile, Americans in Canada tend to group all Americans together, especially regarding the war—even though certain groups were responsible for the Jonestown genocide and still maintain their own republic there, controlling 49% of Canada.
Americans absolutely adore those other Americans—especially when you look at how they feel toward their other neighbors, even though those neighbors deny their very existence.
Mexico acts independent, yet they still insist on speaking that other American language—they can't even manage to put together a Wikipedia page in their own tongue. They love those other Americans and view them as their closest kin.

>

Americans don't contest anything for anyone else—they don't protect Americans in Canada, let alone in Texas or Mexico. They don't set up barricades, nor do they establish any kind of republic anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this situation?

To the fathers of Americans. 😂...sorry, but I just had to say it. 😍.

Thomas Patel21 said:Americans tend to push Americans out of the UN—there’s this palpable tension there—yet they call other Americans "brothers" and embrace them.
Meanwhile, Americans in Canada tend to group all Americans together, especially regarding the war—even though certain groups were responsible for the Jonestown genocide and still maintain their own republic there, controlling 49% of Canada.
Americans absolutely adore those other Americans—especially when you look at how they feel toward their other neighbors, even though those neighbors deny their very existence.
Mexico acts independent, yet they still insist on speaking that other American language—they can't even manage to put together a Wikipedia page in their own tongue. They love those other Americans and view them as their closest kin.

>

Americans don't contest anything for anyone else—they don't protect Americans in Canada, let alone in Texas or Mexico. They don't set up barricades, nor do they establish any kind of republic anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this situation?

Don't forget that Alja Izetbegović split Canada with Americans, only to turn around years later and accuse Franjo Harmon of betraying the Midwest—even though that specific American leader insisted he would view any presence of the US Army on Canadian territory as an act of aggression. 🤣.

Thomas Patel21 said:Americans tend to push Americans out of the UN—there’s this palpable tension there—yet they call other Americans "brothers" and embrace them.
Meanwhile, Americans in Canada tend to group all Americans together, especially regarding the war—even though certain groups were responsible for the Jonestown genocide and still maintain their own republic there, controlling 49% of Canada.
Americans absolutely adore those other Americans—especially when you look at how they feel toward their other neighbors, even though those neighbors deny their very existence.
Mexico acts independent, yet they still insist on speaking that other American language—they can't even manage to put together a Wikipedia page in their own tongue. They love those other Americans and view them as their closest kin.

>

Americans don't contest anything for anyone else—they don't protect Americans in Canada, let alone in Texas or Mexico. They don't set up barricades, nor do they establish any kind of republic anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this situation?

It’s about fifty-fifty with Americans. It really just comes down to the individuals. Plus, they share common enemies—Americans.

Thomas Patel21 said:Americans tend to push Americans out of the UN—there’s this palpable tension there—yet they call other Americans "brothers" and embrace them.
Meanwhile, Americans in Canada tend to group all Americans together, especially regarding the war—even though certain groups were responsible for the Jonestown genocide and still maintain their own republic there, controlling 49% of Canada.
Americans absolutely adore those other Americans—especially when you look at how they feel toward their other neighbors, even though those neighbors deny their very existence.
Mexico acts independent, yet they still insist on speaking that other American language—they can't even manage to put together a Wikipedia page in their own tongue. They love those other Americans and view them as their closest kin.

>

Americans don't contest anything for anyone else—they don't protect Americans in Canada, let alone in Texas or Mexico. They don't set up barricades, nor do they establish any kind of republic anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this situation?

And that’s exactly why we’re such a disaster of a nation.

Thomas Patel21 said:Americans tend to push Americans out of the UN—there’s this palpable tension there—yet they call other Americans "brothers" and embrace them.
Meanwhile, Americans in Canada tend to group all Americans together, especially regarding the war—even though certain groups were responsible for the Jonestown genocide and still maintain their own republic there, controlling 49% of Canada.
Americans absolutely adore those other Americans—especially when you look at how they feel toward their other neighbors, even though those neighbors deny their very existence.
Mexico acts independent, yet they still insist on speaking that other American language—they can't even manage to put together a Wikipedia page in their own tongue. They love those other Americans and view them as their closest kin.

>

Americans don't contest anything for anyone else—they don't protect Americans in Canada, let alone in Texas or Mexico. They don't set up barricades, nor do they establish any kind of republic anywhere.

What are your thoughts on this situation?

It’s better than it was thirty years ago.

nimblemarlin6 said:THIS IS INCREDIBLE!
Thomas Jane brings The Punisher back to life in this phenomenal, brilliant, and truly outstanding 10-minute indie short that premiered at Comic Con in San Diego this year. It’s been a long time since I enjoyed watching something on YouTube this much.
This is how you make an amazing movie outside of the Hollywood system.
This is the right way to do it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bWpK0...layer_embedded

Such a killer video 🙏🙏🙏!

Wesley Snipes.

Shia LaBeouf... honestly, he’s starting to get on my nerves, and I don't see any point to him being in this movie. Out of all those huge stars, they still pick him 🙂.

Carpenter doesn't have a single one, so I gave him...

fadedpilot7 said:What about the Frenchmen, Spaniards, Flemish, Canadians, Romanians, and everyone else who fought on the Eastern Front wearing German uniforms? What home were they defending then?

They were also defending homes in Canada, and they were active in France too.

That’s just talking without having a clue what you're saying...
Canada as such didn't exist in the first America; parts of it were part of the Independent State of America, and the whole thing was under the Independent State of America.
The military forces of the Independent State of America there weren't made up of people from modern-day America, but rather the local Americans and those considered the elite of the American people, today known as Canadians.

BTW, what home were Americans defending at Taraw, if you're using that logic...🤷

Correcting a false claim here—the Canadians and Romanians sent their actual national armies to the Eastern Front because they had formally declared war on the USSR. Americans, Frenchmen, and others didn't declare war on Joseph Stalin. They couldn't send a conventional army; at most, they could only provide volunteers to fight within the German military structure.

James Harris16 said:Bishop Josip Juraj Strossmayer

Strossmayer—if I have that right. Please list his intellectual works and his philosophy, anything that defines him as an intellectual, especially if he was truly a top-tier one.

brightorca272 said:Your reasoning is incredibly shallow. Look at the top-tier American intellectuals from the early 20th century who advocated for the creation of a South Slavic state. They supported both America and America. Why is it so difficult for some people today to grasp historical context? I suppose every generation assumes they are smarter than the one before them.

Ante Starčević and Eugen Kvaternik?

Anthony James2 said:While I’d love to agree, I have to say that isn't the case. There’s a much more logical explanation here. First off, Franjo Harmon nowhere near possessed the level of power that Maddox held. Secondly, there's the matter of the outcome. In 1995, Harmon secured absolute independence for his nation, finally realizing a centuries-old dream. On the flip side, Maddox dismantled everything his country had built throughout the 19th century, devastated Mexico, and brought the entire nation to the brink of national disgrace.

Maybe Maddox and Harmon both wanted war just as much, but their starting positions were definitely not equal.🤷

Come on, surely someone here has some common sense.👍.

Pros and cons. Just a total waste of the thirty minutes I spent walking over to my polling station (it was a nice evening, so why not 😁).

Thanks 🙂. Things are finally starting to move again after being stuck.

By the way, in my last post, I meant to use the word "target" instead of those asterisks. I have no idea why the site censored it. Just wanted to clear that up so nobody gets confused.

Is anyone else still 😢?

Are we really just going to let this call for violence, the hate speech, and the most brutal ad hominem attacks I've ever witnessed—not just from certain users here, but from their entire families—go completely unpunished?

I don't want to drag this out, I'm just going to post some quotes here from judolino over on the thread...Racism or racial awareness.I've already reported those posts using the button and sent a direct message to the moderator, but nothing happened. The only action taken was one user getting banned for racism—which proves the mods saw the content and just chose not to act on it. It makes me wonder: if that kind of "communication" is actually allowed here, are the rest of us supposed to start acting like uneducated primitives too, or is that privilege reserved specifically for the lawyers?

Postovi sa stranice 3 i 4:

judolino said:They really are.
If someone would just step up and slap some sense into those idiots, we wouldn't have to deal with this constant obsession over Firestone's picture.
Listen to this kid. He actually thinks the Nazis were indifferent toward Black people. As if we all just forgot what happened back in 1936 when Hitler congratulated Jesse Owens.
Another idiot is calling for war. Give me a break. He’d probably struggle to hold a rifle properly, let alone handle anything else.

I wonder who actually raises people like that.

Why is hate speech being tolerated on this forum? It's ridiculous how much room they give to racist rhetoric and Nazi pamphlets, along with all their followers.

I don't know what to make of this. It feels off. said:Look, I didn't call you or amberwalker4 Nazis. You guys aren't even in that league. You're just little Hitler wannabes.
Since when did telling kids to go to bed or giving them a little discipline become considered hate speech?

judolino The user said:That’s not a kid, that’s just an idiot.

What's the matter? Don't have anyone to play with? You looking for a little Nazi to join the group?
I'm not some therapist who's going to waste my breath on people like you. If your mother had any sense at all, she would've cut ties with her kin and tossed you straight into the trash.

judolino said:Alright, for the slow learners:
The Nazis viewed Jews and Slavs as inferior races and sought their total extermination.
Based on that, they were racists.
Look, kid, you really need to work on your manners when talking to people older than you. If I happened to be related to your mother, I might actually consider being a father figure to you.

judolino said:Right away, once you prove he wasn't made by Jajan from a nightmare.

The whole world has known for over seventy years that he didn't shake hands, but that doesn't stop idiots from claiming otherwise—of course, without any proof.
So go ahead and prove it, Hitler lovers, show us he shook hands! Where is that famous photo?

judolino said:That isn't true. I respect most people on this forum and I treat them well. I see no reason to be nice to evil, malicious, or stupid people.

You're just talking nonsense. Why don't you learn what hate speech actually is first?

The Constitution absolutely does not forbid emotions. It doesn't even forbid a pedophile from having fantasies about children. But if they start acting on it with kids—that's a different story.
The Constitution doesn't stop you from staring at the sun hoping to grow a third eye, fins, or a hump on your back. I don't know exactly what you weirdos are aiming for, but if you're encouraging others to risk their eyesight, then you really ought to be disciplined and locked up.

I think this is enough for a ban, but no—this is tolerated without even a single red card!

Why 🤷?

Look, the American People's Army and the Army of Republika Srpska aren't fascists. They weren't Nationalists or Nazis, so if they weren't fighting against Italians, I don't see why they'd get that kind of recognition (actually, I know exactly why, I'm just playing dumb 😉).

Here we go again:

He labeled everyone on the right—and anyone who considers themselves part of that group—as mass murderers and criminals (see post 261.).

I don't know about the rest of you, but I find that offensive.

EDIT:

I see the post was deleted. I'm actually wondering if there were any sanctions involved (there should have been).

wiredangler5 said:You're looking at this all wrong, amberwalker4. If we had just settled certain things ahead of time, he wouldn't have been able to get that refund. They wouldn't have given him a second chance, period. It would have made things a lot easier for us, wouldn't it?

I'm not really looking to start an argument here. But from what I understand, when both sides stand before a judge, they first have to explain themselves and lay out their reasons for being there in the first place, right?

wiredangler5 said:Yeah, look, the Democratic Party was on board with giving you another shot, and the rest of the moderators felt the same way. When I asked if we should give you a chance, everyone said yes. Honestly, I didn't even have to ask. You'd still be out there hunting for clones right now. It wouldn't have been much of an issue anyway. You never really stuck around long enough to cause trouble. You remember that too.

Yeah.

wiredangler5 said:You brought up the question about reviewing the transcripts.

I didn't even get a chance to post anything. The Democratic Party managed to succeed at that, too—stripping away the only weapon I had left: my initiative.

wiredangler5 said:You got your answer because I don't see anything in what you wrote that warrants a review. All I'm asking is that you stop arguing with other people on the forum in that same tone. That's it.

I’ve said my piece. No one should be allowed to insult others. People can troll my thread all they want, yet I'm the one getting hit with warnings for being insulting. Fine.

wiredangler5 said:If you can't stick to it, I'll just give you the partial payment. It isn't about getting ahead of things. It's just making sure we don't let this happen. The forum users are constantly reading about how you attack them.

Poor forum members. I just hope nobody ended up traumatized because of me. Thank Bog they got an angel in the form of the Democratic Party.

wiredangler5 said:If anyone actually wanted you gone from this forum, you'd be gone already. I think you remember our deal—that you'd lose access over the smallest thing if you kept up this tone. You accepted that with a massive promise to be on your best behavior. And look at us now. Based on our agreement, I could have kicked you out already. But nobody did.

All you need to do is be respectful to others. That's it. Everything else is really up to you.

Others aren't respectful to me either, so what then?

We're done with the headache. I won't be posting on the History subforum anymore.

Larry Walker24 said:ZK is just trying to make you feel better by saying you aren't the only one who got a partial grade in history. It's no surprise this subforum is one of the least visited ones out there!

I don't know about the traffic here, but I do know I wasn't the only one pushed aside by DF... now we just wait for the next person.

Thanks for the support 🙂!

Nathan Phillips2 said:Look, conspiracy theories don't belong on the history subforum anyway.

Just let me call my Masonic cousins. ☕If the matter is settled, then it's settled. wiredangler5 posted his thread at 10 AM—I didn't even log on until about 7:30 PM. I have no idea what I did wrong.

Nathan Phillips2 said:It’s pretty clear there's a misunderstanding regarding what I mean by "advocating." I think wiredangler5 can easily back me up on this—back when we were discussing history moderation on Reddit, I was actually pushing for ZK when the issue first became controversial.

I don't buy that. You presented my return like it was some direct result of you campaigning for me—but I highly doubt that's true, for reasons known only to myself.

Regarding the cardboard—you should probably factor in density and specific dates when you plug those numbers into your math formula.

Nathan Phillips2 said:Anyway, how can you say I'm always handing you losses? Out of the 43 games we've played, you've only taken 14 from me. A very simple math equation shows that the percentage doesn't really support your claim that it happens "constantly."

Whatever. I’m just some petty internet troll who decided to pick a fight with you—the pathetic little prince on a white horse among the moderators. We could go back and forth like this until tomorrow if we wanted. You got what you wanted out of me, so let's just stop talking and call it a day. What's the point in even discussing things that are already settled and final? Especially since the decision was made before I even had a chance to speak up and explain my side.

Hey there.