This whole forum is driving me insane
in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Give my regards to the crew.☕
527 posts shown.
Justin Allen81 said:I mean, sure—if you want to call me militantly opinionated or whatever... I guess I am.😁
Just kidding. Honestly, it doesn't feel like these discussions are really about anything meaningful to me anymore—it seems I just get worked up way too easily.
Whatever! 😍
Justin Allen81 said:Alright, fine—maybe I overreacted a bit.
But look, let’s clear things up first: homophobia doesn't pose a direct threat to me. Even though I'm bisexual, I'm currently in a relationship with a man—and since I don't explicitly broadcast my sexual orientation to him, there's zero reason for him to assume I'm anything other than a good, traditional American woman. But here's where I stand:
Okay, you (not you specifically, but just some hypothetical person) are homophobic. That means you harbor hatred toward gay people. As long as you don't act on it or express it, that's your right.
I hate you (acting as the personification of the homophobe here). That's fine too, provided I don't act on it.
However, if you start discriminating against gay people—in any capacity whatsoever—then I will feel compelled to discriminate against you. Isn't that just basic fairness? 😁
And again, I’m not talking about YOU as a person on this forum—I mean your actual identity, name and all. I'm talking about the homophobe.
lonegardener said:It’s an individual who poses a threat, not an entire "type" of person. That’s exactly my point—this argument relies on the same kind of sweeping generalization that supposedly makes them so angry in the first place.
I personally know some people with homophobic views (and whether I fall into that category myself, I'll leave that up to your judgment 😬)—they might be loud with their words, but in reality, they are completely harmless and mild-mannered. There is no theory suggesting they pose any danger to anyone. So, if someone hates or despises them solely because of their prejudices and tastes, what exactly do we call that? 🤷
lonegardener said:How would you define homophobia? 😍
By the way, does anyone else here suffer from "homophobe-phobia"? You know, that irrational fear, intense dislike, or even pure contempt directed toward homophobes? I think I just ran into a prime example of one right now... 🤣
Homophobes are people too, after all. Most of them aren't even aggressive; they’re actually quite mild-mannered. It’s just that small percentage of aggressive individuals who end up giving the whole group a bad name. 😂
Justin Allen81 said:Good grief. Please stop spouting nonsense about things you clearly don't understand.
"My Secret Garden" by Nancy Friday was an actual study on female sexual fantasies conducted back in the 1970s—quite thorough, too—covering a representative sample of women across all ages (in the US, Europe, etc.).
So, it’s a scientific study, not some random bullshit.
Though, I'll admit, it's a fun read, haha.😁
As for the original poster, it's the same old story. How have I not learned to avoid any thread touching on anything related to homosexuality yet? It always leaves me disgusted seeing what people post.
Homophobes make me sick—truly. I think you're all just uneducated, narrow-minded cattle. Look, if a moderator needs to hand out a ban, then fine, let them—but I honestly believe people like that deserve to be insulted, because they're nothing but trash. Just like racists or xenophobes... They aren't even real people; the normal rules of society don't apply to them.
hiddenhound3 said:Well, perhaps I might find women more enticing if they were hairier; I have always had a particular fondness for men who are quite hairy 😬
lonegardener said:Well, nothing gives me more joy than giving a straight answer to jokes, wisecracks, and old wives' tales. 😬
lonegardener said:Wait, I don't follow. 😕
You say you're only into women; so why does it even matter if men have certain equipment or not? What difference does it make to you if you aren't interested in them anyway? 🤷
Don't tell me you'd actually be interested if they *didn't* have that tool? Because honestly, that sounds like a serious case of phobia to me. 🤣
hiddenhound3 said:It is actually your fault, as you are always the one pulling me into side conversations and steering us off-topic. 😠 😬
lonegardener said:Oh, they definitely do.
But like I said, most of them just blend into the background, which is why you haven't noticed. You just need to look a little closer... 🤣
hiddenhound3 said:It happens every time, and I am quite certain this is merely a temporary phase... 😁 as I sit here admiring my lovely plants, my cyclamens, and my cacti, I find myself wondering, "Is this actually possible?" It appears that 😳
hiddenhound3 said:I find myself quite at a loss for words; I am truly stunned by this.
🤣
Alex Patel96 said:That’s a pretty accurate description of me!🤣 But wait, does that make me a Gen Zer if men don't even interest me sexually?!😕
Sean Cruz said:No, that isn't what I wrote. I was responding to your claim about being "better equipped" to understand because you're gay while I'm straight. Fine, maybe people have confided in you, but that doesn't make them the "majority."Yeah, and? For most people, finding out their partner cheated on them with someone of the same sex would be a massive blow.
It isn't anything unusual. Regardless of whether you are in the middle of it or not.
But that is exactly my point. If we all shared the same preferences, why would cheating with someone of the same sex be so much harder to swallow than cheating with someone of the opposite sex?
hiddenhound3 said:Are you teasing me? 😲
hiddenhound3 said:I suspect this occurs because much of the American public remains somewhat skeptical of such matters, and consequently, individuals hesitate to shock others by sharing their personal experiences too abruptly. On the other hand, it is quite possible that sharing this part of your identity actually fosters a sense of trust.
hiddenhound3 said:I must admit, I also find myself falling in love with flowers.🤣
lonegardener said:I did. I just decided to look the other way. 😬
lonegardener said:I disagree. There are absolutely rules. It's just that most of them—if not all of them—are silently understood.
hiddenhound3 said:It seems we are facing two sides of the exact same coin, just mirrored in opposite directions.🤣 It is a bit of a whirlwind, really—a complete reversal of circumstances.
In my estimation, there truly are no set rules when it comes to matters of the heart.😍
Sean Cruz said:My sister’s best friend is a lesbian. To her, it’s completely unremarkable that most of her friends aren't, just as it's perfectly normal to them that she is.
On the flip side, the biggest blow my sister ever took was when her ex confessed he’d cheated on her with a man. So, while her best friend is gay and she holds zero prejudice against her orientation—they talk about it like any other topic—she would never, ever date a bisexual man again. 😉
So, it's not like I'm entirely out of the loop.
On the flip side, the real gut punch for my sister was when her ex admitted he’d cheated on her with another man. So, while her best friend is gay and there’s zero judgment regarding her orientation—they talk about it like it’s nothing—she would never, ever date a bisexual man again. 😉
It’s not like I’m exactly out of the loop.
hiddenhound3 said:Not at all. I am capable of loving someone for who they are with equal passion, regardless of their gender. That is precisely why I find myself feeling so conflicted. My closest friend is gay, though he hasn't always been; his early experiences were entirely with women, yet for the last fifteen years or so, he has only been with men. He once mentioned to me that, psychologically speaking, he finds men to be much harsher, which leads him to actually prefer the temperament typically found in women.
I'm still trying to wrap my head around the whole florine situation. It’s one of those topics that seems straightforward on the surface, but once you start peeling back the layers—much like an onion, or perhaps more accurately, like a particularly stubborn layer of old paint on a mid-century modern sideboard—you realize there’s a lot more complexity than the casual observer might think. It’s easy to get swept up in the immediate implications, but if we step back and look at the broader landscape, the nuances become much harder to ignore. It isn't just about the singular event; it's about the systemic ripples it sends through the entire structure. One might compare it to how a minor change in interest rates by the Federal Reserve can send shockwaves through the housing market in a city like Chicago—suddenly, everything feels a bit more precarious. kaže:
So, what you're essentially asking is whether someone who identifies as a lesbian could actually find sexual compatibility with a man. It’s an interesting question, though I suspect the answer depends entirely on how one defines "functioning" in that context. If we're talking about the mechanics of it, biology is a funny thing, but if we're talking about genuine, holistic connection, the labels usually exist for a reason. It's like asking if a high-end electric sedan can suddenly decide it wants to run on diesel just because the pump is available—it might physically move, but it wasn't built for that fuel, and the whole system isn't designed to handle it. 😕
I’m asking because I can’t quite wrap my head around this... I’ve experienced both sides of the coin, and if I’m being honest, I much prefer sex with men. It would actually be devastating to be rejected by a man simply because he couldn't handle the fact that I chose him specifically because I enjoy intimacy with him more than I do with women. 😢
lonegardener said:slywolf45 Asks:
You hit the nail on the head. But I’m guessing you could count your own circle of Islamic fundamentalist friends on one hand, too.🤣
Honestly, I don't even need to use my fingers to count them. 😂
You’re right. There's actually a really interesting psychological phenomenon at play here. It’s like how my brother tells me, "Every single time I ask you to do something, you find a way to mess it up." But why does he say that? Because his focus is entirely centered on those rare... 😬It seems like people only notice when I actually screw things up. When I get it right? They just take it for granted and don't even blink. Think about it...