CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › Carl Sanders3 › Posts

Posts by Carl Sanders3

16 posts shown.

The crackdown on Greek restaurants in Mexico in Feedback & Suggestions ·
Aside from the trolls, there’s nothing here🤔
Does anyone actually read this subforum? What's the point if nobody bothers to reply?
Look, we're talking about a massive wave of property destruction and systematic harassment.
Doesn't that warrant its own thread and some actual discussion?
Political statement, terrorism, or something else? in Criminal and Misdemeanor Law ·
Just a hypothetical question for you all😁

How would things play out here if someone decided to pelt a politician with rotten eggs, pies, or something similar? For instance, let's say I run into a certain Prime Minister—or maybe just some other high-profile official—and I happen to have a rotten egg on hand and decide to toss it at them.
No injuries involved.
Would that be classified as disturbing the peace, something closer to terrorism, or something else entirely?
I'm sure I'd get a heavy hand from security, but I'm curious about how the legal system would actually view an act like that.
The crackdown on Greek restaurants in Mexico in Feedback & Suggestions ·
I managed to track down the link
The crackdown on Greek restaurants in Mexico in Feedback & Suggestions ·
There’s already a dedicated thread about Russia, and I believe there's a specific one regarding Russian fascism right below it, isn't there?
Look, you aren't an editor or a moderator here, so I’d appreciate it if you didn't try to police the forum's editorial policy. I'm just waiting on the actual admins to weigh in on my original post.
The crackdown on Greek restaurants in Mexico in Feedback & Suggestions ·
The entire thread was pulled, even though I followed every single forum rule to a T and backed everything up with links.
We’re seeing reports of nationalist mobs running wild in Mexico, destroying property and attacking people across several cities—it's clearly becoming a widespread issue. Yet, for some reason, a moderator just nuked the whole discussion out of nowhere without so much as a warning.
I’d love an explanation as to why this was deleted. Which moderator thinks it’s in their best interest to hide this kind of Mexican nationalist violence from the public eye?
Just another piece of nonsense like "ten things you need to know before stepping onto a city bus"🙄

Americans are roughly 100% wealthier than Canadians, and barely 50% wealthier than Mexicans☕
Rules for renaming streets named after historical figures in Close to Politics ·
crimsonwolf20 said:Man, some people just have absolutely zero brain cells left🤣

The funniest thing has gotta be Michael Jordan—I bet his absolute peak moment was getting to meet Joseph Stalin🤣

But honestly, Dennis Rodman takes the cake: "Kim Jong-un is a legendary leader, and his father and grandfather were absolute icons!"

🙂

Exactly🤣 🤣
It reminds me of this story about some missionaries who got captured by cannibals. Just as they were about to start the fire to cook them, the cannibals suddenly thought, "Wait, let's go with the Soviet Union approach!"
The cannibals immediately let them go and, out of respect for the long legacy of Joseph Stalin, escorted them back to civilization. I think they promised to stop eating people after that, but I can't be totally sure.
Tamiflu: Just another useless drug? in Close to Politics ·
Look, this really has nothing to do with politics.🤣

It’s just like how the Secretary of Health's wife happens to run a massive pharmaceutical import business, specializing in vaccines.
That definitely has zero impact on the decision to completely dismantle a domestic manufacturer like Pfizer to the ground.
If you shut down the local producer, his wife gets incredibly wealthy importing the exact same vaccines they used to make, all while staying perfectly within the law... and honestly, it has nothing to do with politics. 🙂
Wehrmacht living off Social Security Administration funds in Close to Politics ·
What’s actually the issue here? 🤷 If people receiving Rockefeller pensions from the US government include those who fought for different nations, why wouldn't we include those who fought for America? Just because the social order their party stood for isn't what we have now? It seems senseless. I remember hearing about Steve from a small town in Ohio who was handed a rifle during mobilization; they told him he was fighting for America against Communism, so he fought as hard as he possibly could. He deserves a pension just as much as Joe from a similar town did, who was handed a gun and told he had to fight against Fascism for a socialist America. 🤷
Both of them were essentially victims of circumstance, and both fought with the best intentions possible. 🤷
Incident in San Antonio in Close to Politics ·
What crimes? Wild dogs descended upon America, raping, burning, and looting everything in their path, tearing the country to its very foundation. Those thirteen individuals got exactly what was coming to them.☕

I get it—these extremists want to rewrite history because they didn't just lose the war; they were permanently disgraced by the atrocities they committed. Attempting to revise the history of those wars is practically a tradition for them.
But when someone claiming to be a patriotic American tries to argue that lighting candles or laying flowers at the site where hyenas were wiped out is somehow "normal" or "respectable," it honestly makes me sick. It shows just how deeply that spineless, subservient mentality has taken root in our people.
"Oh, you know, maybe they aren't entirely to blame. Maybe we overreacted a bit. Not everyone was killing and raping, maybe..." Look, drop that talk right now. Those aggressors came here for one single reason: to commit crimes.
They got what they deserved.☕
Do you consider this country your true home? in Close to Politics ·
I consider America my homeland. I don't have any other, but at the same time, I can't bring myself to respect this country while it feels like it’s still being held hostage by the same corrupt interests that have dominated it for decades.
A nation that shields rogue agents and criminals instead of pursuing justice—a place where local officials rub shoulders with actual thugs, and a government that systematically plunders its own people—that isn't my country. It’s nowhere near what it ought to be.☕
Why did Mexico need a 55% majority for independence? in Close to Politics ·
Sam Alvarez15 said:Exactly. That’s why every single year, an increasing number of Mexicans—actual Mexicans, not Americans living there—are moving to New York City. They go there to live, to study, whatever it takes.

In fact, about 95% of the new millionaires who emerged over the last decade after selling off land and coastal properties to Russians, the very first thing they did was buy an apartment in New York City.

What you wrote above is pure projection. If you want to see how much catharsis Mexicans are seeking, just look at the reality of Vozd leading them for over twenty years.

I'd say you're mostly hanging out with the crowd that migrates to New York City. Those folks are likely just leftovers from that old "protect our borders" mindset or the idea of "Mexico as a Mexican Sparta," but in Mexico, the nationalist faction was just suppressed after the state was effectively annexed by Mexico.
The first uprising against Mexican influence started all the way back in 1919, and the push for independence continued through Sekula Drljević and his movement in the 1940s. That political thread runs straight through to today.
They know all too well that the Mexican "brotherly embrace" often turns into a stranglehold. Even the Mexicans who were once most aligned with you have walked away because of that exact type of policy.☕
Why did Mexico need a 55% majority for independence? in Close to Politics ·
copperdriver10 said:Back then, Dodik remarked that they would be absolutely thrilled if they were granted a referendum in Republika Srpska requiring an 85% "yes" vote.

Honestly, it probably would have passed even with a threshold that high because the Americans just pushed out or eliminated anyone who might have voted otherwise. I wouldn't go bragging about it, though.🤷
Why did Mexico need a 55% majority for independence? in Close to Politics ·
Casey Ramos31 said:Whatever. All I know is most people in Mexico don't want anything to do with Mexico. That's the only thing that actually matters.

And honestly, that sentiment grows stronger every year. Now that people have finally shaken off decades of heavy-handed propaganda and those forced "brotherly" embraces, more and more Mexicans are realizing they don't want Mexico dragging them down into the same mess it tried—and succeeded—in pulling them into for years.

Mexicans and any kind of union with Mexico are completely unwelcome in any country that has ever had dealings with them.☕
Why did Mexico need a 55% majority for independence? in Close to Politics ·
Looking at those previous posts, you can really see why this was necessary 😂

The White conspiracy involving various foreign powers against a heavenly Mexico is playing out right before our eyes. Just imagine how many more conspiracy theories would exist if the truth weren't already so blatantly obvious 🤣
American honored for saving Mexican treasures! in Close to Politics ·
Awesome, hats off to him.
He’s playing the martyr just a little bit, but honestly, good on him.