Hey Kurtz,
One of the big unwritten rules here is respecting privacy. That’s why most people use handles instead of their full legal names. We have a reporting system in place specifically so users can flag posts that don't fit the vibe of this forum. Now, truth be told, it’s not totally anonymous because reports go straight to the moderators handling that specific thread. However, they are strictly forbidden from leaking who filed the report—doing so would break our core principles. So, your request for the identity of whoever "sued" you isn't going to happen. Not happening at all.
Also, regarding your comment about someone coming here to lecture you without any shame. Why do you think anyone would come here just to lecture you? Honestly, if we're being real, that exact sentiment could apply to your entire posting history, which I’ve read in its entirety, by the way. It’s just not cool or respectful to talk to the other members like that. The tricky part about running a forum is dealing with folks who dance right on the line between playful banter and outright insults, and they're usually pretty good at masking it. It takes a certain level of discipline to manage, and sometimes things slip through the cracks. Here are some examples:
mistymason1 said:Any kind of teasing crosses the line when the end goal isn't fun, but rather manipulation to boost the ego of the teaser. Those kinds of women (literally or figuratively) deserve a good old-fashioned slapping. Amen.
Flirting, though, is a completely different story.
Yeah, interestingly enough, any call for violence is strictly banned on this forum. Saying someone deserves to be "given a good slapping" counts as inciting or calling for violence. We don't allow that here. mistymason1 said:Look, I’d never actually hit a woman. But I don't see that as a virtue; I see it as a flaw. Beating a woman to death or breaking her ribs is savagery. But a little slap isn't violence, even if saying that sounds blasphemous today..
I’m sticking to my guns—even though, again, I personally would never lay a hand on a woman, I still think the behavior described deserves at least one smack. Then again, the little slut would probably just get turned on afterward, so maybe it's better to skip it. Maybe you're right. Maybe a kick in the ass is the better move. 🤣
It's funny that you consider not hitting a woman a flaw. Fine, I guess some people feel that way, but using terms like "slut"... it feels like there's an underlying, whether conscious or not, attitude toward women starting to leak out through your words.mistymason1 said:And who exactly is sticking up for them? Give me a break!
It’s just a bit deeper, no big deal. Female promiscuity is usually just a byproduct of mental instability, life's disappointments, or some subconscious urge to get back at a man. Real, empowered sexual freedom for women? Honestly, that’s just a myth. There’s always some deeper story running in the background if you just take a second to dig around.
Evolutionarily speaking, sex just isn't the same thing for men and women, and it never will be. Thinking that Western culture has actually changed the game since the sixties is honestly pretty naive.
It’s great when someone actually takes the time to dig into scientific papers—it's just a shame more people don't follow suit. But if you’re going to play that game, you should probably be fair about it. A lot of those studies and books actually point out that when you look at female promiscuity involving the traits you mentioned, the responsibility often falls on men and how they approach them. Since you clearly know how to pull facts from the data, it would be cool if you shared the whole picture. Right now, it feels like you're just cherry-picking info to troll.mistymason1 said:It’s funny how those subconscious cravings slip out—that deep-seated need to be completely taken over. Especially when it comes from a woman who swears up and down she’s all about being independent and totally self-sufficient. Those little accidental slips from the subconscious are honestly gold. 😉
That’s an interesting take. I’m actually pretty fascinated by your conclusion regarding women and those subconscious needs. You start to see this pattern emerging more and more lately. It’s all about finding the pattern. Like when you finally notice how a specific driver always hits their blinker three seconds too late—once you see it, you can't unsee it. So, are we talking about the experience of women being treated like... well, objects?mistymason1 said:You really think she’s never going to look you in the eye and ask, "So, who exactly is my dad?" 🙄
Like I said, you still haven't experienced the real deal. It’s like saying you love BBQ without ever having tried a slow-smoked brisket.
Look, Shero, you’re still living in a dream world. There’s no knight in shining armor coming to save the day—you're either going to learn that the hard way or the even harder way.
You’ve got a point—you’re basically saying I hide my actual opinions behind a veil of "just being neutral." It’s like a chef who claims they aren't picking the ingredients just to stay unbiased. But look, if we're being real, the mods should be looking at the subtext, not just the literal words, and the admins are there to back them up when things get subtle.
Here’s some of the "proof" behind why you got a partial. I honestly thought about scrapping this because, let’s be real, it looks a little sketchy—kind of like how you're implying someone just gets a partial out of nowhere without a massive file of warnings or a crazy track record. But, as usual, you have to dig just a little bit beneath the surface to actually make sense of things.
Hey there, just a heads up, the partial remains.