Posts by Daniel Ward87

Alexander Brown5 said:So, tell me, what exactly does Daniel Ward87 contribute to the New York Times, besides tanking everyone else's average?

Just doing my job...🤷

Daniel Ward87

We’re currently ironing out those issues with the transferred threads from the US, so just hang tight for a bit...

😉

This sponsored forum regular basically acts as our cleanup crew, helping us mods scrub deleted posts and threads through an offshore archive...🥳

Daniel Ward87

I'm reporting everyone and everything...☕

😁

Daniel Ward87

Raymond Sanchez7 said:And precisely what makes you believe you are superior to him?...
Why wouldn't they actually make better mods than you are?
Their behavior is nothing more than a rebellion against a Reddit structure built on questionable connections, the constant harassment of moderators, and a truly repulsive attitude toward the users, treating them as if they were somehow lesser beings...

I'm not saying I'm a better person than them, but if we're talking about who's fit for moderation, someone else would have stepped up by now. It’s bigger than just me; there's a lot more to the story.

Rebellion? 🤣...there used to be some, back when everyone was just messing around, but once you look at the big picture, things start to make sense.

Daniel Ward87

If we went by that logic, Vočko, Ris, and Vrag would be running the whole moderator team within three months...🙄...

Daniel Ward87

You just can't take down our little guy...



😁

Daniel Ward87

Fair point, you're right... we aren't exactly buddies... my bad, sincere apologies there.

What was I even getting at if not about the rules and who gets to make them? 😕 If a rule is passed stating a moderator can subjectively judge whether someone's signature is appropriate, then that's just how it sits. My whole point was simply that such a rule *can* be implemented—I was just echoing the idea that a site owner can't just ignore their own "rules." Of course they can. Now, does that apply to domains too? Like, does a .com have more freedom than a .gov? I don't know, I'm definitely not a lawyer, just a layman.

I'm not going to lecture you on what you write, how you write it, or why you post in one spot but not another... that's entirely your business.

Daniel Ward87

Jeremy Diaz9 said:this site isn't some private club; it's a public space.
Services like AOL Instant Messenger or IRC are more like clubs.
Newspapers, on the other hand, have a very clear editorial policy.
Exactly—it's just that a clear editorial policy is missing from our PDF rules.
And don't even try to claim you aren't covered by electronic media laws or that this isn't a public gathering place, because the rules in one specific PDF clearly state that you're acknowledging that status!

Sorry, buddy, but you can pretty much write anything into the rulebook...

Let me prove it using this link.

Especially pay attention to this part here:
"Using offensive or generally inappropriate signatures is not allowed. The moderator reserves the right to determine what is appropriate and what is not."

It’s not a .us domain, but obviously, something like this could be implemented on Reddit too. So now, any moderator here can decide what fits and what doesn't...😉 Basically, if you stay after those rules are added, you're giving the mods the green light to act as described above.

Daniel Ward87

Jozo Nabijac said:Should the site rules actually follow the laws of the United States?

🤷..Forum.hr isn't owned by the US government, any public agency, or acting as an official mouthpiece. We all know what's illegal to promote or incite under federal law, but when it comes to aligning US law with Forum.hr rules— 😕

Forum.hr is basically Anderlon's private playground where he uses his admins and mods to enforce his own vibe. If he decides he doesn't want to see extreme political shouting matches here, then that's just how it goes. As far as I can tell, he's not breaking any US laws. The owner gets to decide who stays and who goes because this is essentially his "house," and that’s a personal call. To put it simply, if you walk into my house and start acting out your radical politics, I'm kicking you out. I haven't broken any laws by doing that. You have your right to free speech, just not in my shop.

Anyway, that's just my two cents, not a formal stance, so take it with a grain of salt...

Daniel Ward87

Maybe it's because you have to follow the laws of the land here in America, but apparently, the rules on Forum.hr don't apply to everyone... if you're not feeling the vibe, there's the door. Peace out. 🙂

EDIT: And as for those little jokes you've got going in your signature - 👎

Daniel Ward87

Alright, let the games begin...🙂

Daniel Ward87

silverjackal said:What makes this thread nonsensical?? I'm just asking—not looking for a fight, just genuinely curious what was missing from the topic. If it was that bad, why didn't you just nuked it immediately? You even jumped in and posted a few times yourself. If you’d given it a little more breathing room, I bet it would have actually gone somewhere..

No worries, let's break it down...

So, the title: "How to indirectly test if a guy would (hypothetically) marry a girl who performs oral sex on him..." is fine by me. No issues there.

Then she goes off about how absurd the male brain is regarding this topic and invites everyone to dive deep... okay... but then at the end of the first post, she asks, "How many women lose their partner's respect by catering to his every whim?"...😕...see, that's a completely different conversation right there. Basically, the title and the actual post don't line up because they're tackling two totally separate questions. So, either we split this into two distinct threads, or we stick to the original premise without all the extra baggage...

Look, I let it slide for a bit because maybe the OP just struggled to word things, so I didn't want to hit the delete button instantly. I figured we might be able to narrow the focus in a few posts... only to end up with this: "it's just absurd that one thing is for a wife and another for a mistress... as if one woman can't handle both roles... true, being a mistress is way easier than being a wife..."

Now I'm asking you all... what "mistress" are we talking about here? Is she talking about the role of a housewife versus a lover, or is she talking about having a mistress on the side? And how does any of that connect back to the TITLE... Tell me again how that makes sense to you... or is this just people siding with her because they think I'm picking on her as a mod?

I gave it a few posts because I thought there was a point to it, but the author ended up providing headers for three different, unrelated topics. Either that, or she had a thought but just phrased it poorly. Alright, we're closing this one; feel free to start three separate threads for those specific points and we'll go from there...

Hopefully that clears things up... I really don't care who started the thread, I only care about whether the content actually holds water...

Daniel Ward87