CheckEmoji Community · the emoji forum
🏠 Home 🆕 What's new ❓ Unanswered 🔥 Popular 📡 RSS Members 👥 0 online log in · register
Home › bluepuma9 › Posts

Posts by bluepuma9

129 posts shown.

Raymond Anderson4 said:Kvyat is actually a decent driver when you consider that Mazepin is making it into F1.
Or even looking at the fact that Giovinazzi is staying in the sport.

Yeah, I don't get the Giovinazzi thing either. It's hard to argue Ferrari doesn't have any real young prospects left, because he definitely hasn't proven himself yet. 🤷
I'm not even sure if Mick Schumacher made the right call jumping into Haas. His stock might just tank after a season or two there, regardless of how much talent he has. If I were him, I’d probably stick around for one more year in F2.
ruggedhawk20 said:Seriously, why the heck do you have "Steinlager 2" on your avatar?

Why wouldn't I?😁
The most successful guy at the Whitbread, and the only one to sweep every single leg of the race.
Perez definitely deserves to stay in F1.
I wonder if he'd actually take a seat at Alpha Tauri if Kvyat moves on.
Amanda Kelly said:Kimi's got two, JPM's got four. I wouldn't call that a "good chunk" of races.
Might be down to the drivers, too.

I'm not taking anything away from Alonso's title. I'm just saying the McLaren was a more reliable machine back in 2005, and Raikkonen—who was likely at his absolute peak then—could have just as easily been the champion.
Amanda Kelly said:I’d throw 2005 into the mix too.
I've always felt the McLaren was actually faster than the Renault that year.
Alonso beat out two massive talents at McLaren (Kimi + Montoya), which makes that title pretty damn impressive.
IMO

Sure, it was fast, but since they blew up half the time due to reliability issues, it didn't really change the final result. 😁
ruggedhawk20 said:They found the evidence for Singapore. And Flavio is currently serving his ban.

I don't see the problem.

Actually—if they managed to prove the Singapore thing in just a single year, then they could've definitely caught the TC usage over those 26 years, assuming there was any truth to the whole story.

One question though: why would you even have TC software sitting in the car if it wasn't supposed to have TC? 🙂
ruggedhawk20 said:The FIA found the software, sure, but they never found proof it was actually being used.

Owning traction control software isn't against the rules—using it is. And they never found any proof of that.

Do you honestly think a massive, deep-pocketed organization like the FIA couldn't hire the best experts on the planet to find that evidence? Look, if the FIA never found a single shred of proof that the software was used—why are you still buying into this?

Sorry, but this whole Benetton TC story is straight-up flat-earther nonsense.

The way some of Schumacher's starts looked that season makes me think it's perfectly plausible the software was being used. Even if it wasn't, just having it in the car when it wasn't allowed is a huge red flag.
They probably wouldn't have even caught an illegal fuel valve if Verstappen hadn't had that meltdown.

Plus, knowing Schumacher and Briatore's characters, I'd say it's entirely possible they were running it.
ruggedhawk20 said:What does someone's attitude have to do with anything?

You could basically accuse anyone of financial fraud or, I don't know, being a predator just because they're annoying to deal with. We don't have a single shred of evidence against you—just like you don't have anything on Michael Schumacher.

It's the exact same flawed logic! You're just accusing someone because you don't like them.

There is evidence, plain and simple. The FIA found the software; they just couldn't prove they actually ran it. It’s a lot like what happened with Ferrari and their engine last year. 😁

And let's not forget when Benetton used that illegal fuel valve that allowed for lightning-fast refueling, which is why Michael Schumacher was able to jump ahead of Ayrton Senna in Brazil during the pit stop. That didn't come to light until much later in the season, after Jos Verstappen nearly caught fire.
Back then, Benetton was running a literal dream team of schemers: Flavio Briatore and Tom Walkinshaw. Match made in Heaven.
ruggedhawk20 said:So you got actual proof that the software was ever even turned on?

Or is your "evidence" just the word of one single witness claiming he heard a certain sound.

That lone witness happened to be dealing with an unproven, unofficial assassination attempt fueled by revenge at the time, plus he was under official investigation for physically lunging at Eddie Irvine—facing a potential 14-month suspension.

He never even saw that suspension come down, though, because he ended up dying after a messy accident in a Formula 1 race car.

I don't have any proof. But honestly, looking back at how Schumacher acted during those years and the way Flavio Briatore operated... I can't rule out the possibility that things weren't exactly above board. It wasn't just Senna pointing fingers, either.
I honestly don't get why everyone is acting so shocked by how quickly Russell has settled into the Mercedes-Benz seat.

Look at what Nico Hülkenberg pulled off with RP; he hadn't even touched a Formula 1 car for months before that. These guys are pros. That’s literally why they’re in the paddock and why their paychecks are so massive. Mind you, driving a Mercedes is probably a hell of a lot easier than wrestling a Williams.

And while nobody is actually debating whether Russell is a huge talent—we already knew that long before this race—he’s clearly one of the frontrunners to step in for either Bottas or Lewis Hamilton, assuming Lewis is the first one out the door at Mercedes.
ruggedhawk20 said:Schumacher was disqualified at the 1994 British Grand Prix because he overtook during the formation lap. So, nothing to do with the race car.

After that, he was disqualified at the Belgian Grand Prix because of a plank on the floor that was thinner than allowed. That's a car issue. But, he was disqualified. He walked away with exactly zero points with that car.

At the Italian Grand Prix and the Portuguese Grand Prix, he was banned from racing due to his behavior at the British Grand Prix where he ignored the black flag. So, again, absolutely nothing to do with the car.

I'm telling you, he drove an illegal race car only once. At the Belgian Grand Prix. And he got disqualified for it. So, he scored exactly zero points with that car.

Everything else is just nonsense and straight-up unproven slander.

Unproven slander?
Those Benetton cars sat in various collectors' hands for years, and they eventually found hidden traction control software that could be triggered through a secret menu. And let's not forget, back in '94, Ayrton Senna was saying he could clearly hear them using TC coming out of the corners.
stormybadger8 said:Probably because even Schumacher's race car wasn't anywhere near as dominant as the Mercedes...
And talking about legality is just mindless noise. Who's to say this Mercedes isn't "illegal" anyway?🙂

A race car is legal until they find something wrong and disqualify the crew.☕
As far as I know, Schumacher's cars were never disqualified or ruled illegal, so they're just as legitimate as the Mercedes...

Regarding Lewis, yeah, he's sitting in the most dominant machine ever made, but you still need consistency and you have to stay at the top to win.
Every title he grabbed was absolutely earned. Anything else is just fairy tales...

Saying "anyone could do it" is just pure nonsense...
In that car, pretty much anyone on the grid would win a race or two during a season, sure. But winning a championship is a different beast entirely, and winning them back-to-back is on a whole other level...
There are way fewer drivers who could snag a title than there are who could grab a single win—honestly, I doubt half the grid could do it. And as for those who could win consecutive titles? I'm not even sure there are three or four of them on the entire grid.
One guy I'm certain wouldn't be in that group is Kimi, whom I personally love, but he definitely wouldn't be winning titles in a series... he'd be too busy getting hammered after his first win. There are plenty of drivers whose mental game would just crumble under that kind of fame...

But honestly, the "GOAT" talk is also a stretch. A true GOAT wouldn't have choked in a single race or qualifying session, let alone against the relatively mediocre competition of Nico Rosberg...
He also dropped a mountain of PP's (45!!! 🤦) and wins (31 🤦) against Valtteri Bottas and Rosberg... who are supposedly equals, except for the fact that the boss tells the media Bottas is the "perfect wingman," and James keeps telling him to move out of the way at Turn 12 so Lewis can pass, and then he actually does it at Turn 12 so Lewis doesn't ruin his tires overtaking... and we're supposed to believe they're equals? 😍

With Rosberg, things were somewhat obscured, but with Bottas, it's not hidden at all. It's obvious, loud, and public: he's the Number 2 driver.
At the end of the day, it's clear enough that his talent doesn't even come close to the level of that car; he was brought in as the Number 2, and that's his ceiling. Honestly, there are plenty of drivers out there significantly better than him.☕

It’s wild that even looking at the stats, Rosberg and Bottas have twice as many poles as multi-time champs like Alonso, yet they're basically mid-tier Formula 1 drivers... I mean, Rosberg is definitely better, but it's not even a huge gap...
Hamilton alone has 22 PP's over his long career, while Bottas & Rosberg have 45 PP's🤦 even though their win counts are identical...

So, we were looking back at those different championships from 2000 to 2004. Aside from 2003—where tires were basically the only thing making a difference—Ferrari had the best car on the grid, and they weren't just winning; sometimes they were a full second per lap faster than everyone else.
Even the Benetton back in '94 and '95 was an incredible machine. Looking back at '94, sure, maybe Williams had more raw pace, but their cars were way too twitchy and unpredictable to handle.

The race car stays legal until someone finds a loophole or a trick they didn't like, and then the whole team gets tossed out. It’s all fine until it isn't. ☕
As far as I can tell, Schumacher's race car wasn't disqualified or ruled illegal. So, if you ask me, it was just as legal as anything Mercedes is running today.

Maybe do a little more homework here. Benetton actually got disqualified a few times back when Schumi was driving because the race car just wasn't up to code with the regulations.

Honestly, all this talk about him being the G.O.A.T. is just pure fairy tale nonsense. A real G.O.A.T. wouldn't have blown it in a single race or qualifying session, let alone struggled against the kind of "competition" he had in Nico Rosberg.
It’s all just a facade. If things had gone differently, we wouldn't even be talking about PP's wins over Bottas and Rosberg. They claim those two are equals, right? Total parity. But then you look at the media coverage—the team principal keeps spinning stories about how Bottas is just the "perfect wingman." Meanwhile, James is constantly chirping in his ear, telling him to back off at Turn 12 so the Luxury driver can sweep past without losing time or shredding his tires. It's a setup. And yet, they still have the nerve to call them equals. 😍

With Nico Rosberg, there was still enough smoke and mirrors to hide what was actually happening. With Valtteri Bottas, there’s no mystery at all—he’s been very loud and very public about being the No. 2 driver. At the end of the day, it’s pretty obvious he doesn't have the talent to be in that race car on his own merits; he was brought in specifically to play the supporting role. ☕

It’s honestly kind of ridiculous. You look at the stats and see that Rosberg and Bottas have twice as many poles as multi-time champions like Fernando Alonso, yet those two are pretty much just mid-tier talents in the Formula 1 league. Sure, Rosberg is clearly the better driver of the two, but he isn't exactly operating on a different planet.
Look at the numbers. Fernando Alonso has only managed 22 wins in his long career, while Bottas & Rosberg have racked up 45. It just puts things in perspective. 🤦 And their win count is exactly the same...

Look, Rosberg is a hell of a driver. Why does Hamilton need to have some perfect, 100% win record against every single person on the grid just for us to call him the G.O.A.T.? That’s just not realistic. It's impossible.
In this modern era of Formula 1, none of the world champions have ever had teammates as solid as Lewis Hamilton. The guy’s been winning since his karting days, and he hasn't stopped since.
silverviper44 said:Are you sure about that?

Maybe double-check your math.

Rosberg, Button, Alonso. Where'd I miss the mark?
silverviper44 said:That’s only half the story. A great driver will always extract more from a mediocre car than an average one; there are plenty of examples like that in F1 history.

The influencer might be a talented driver, but he isn't nearly the superstar people make him out to be. The reality is he won everything because he was in the most dominant car ever built. We saw proof of that today when a driver who hasn't scored a single point was right on the verge of winning—he probably would have taken it if Mercedes hadn't botched that tire change.

Look, Lewis competed against three different world champions while driving for the same team—without any team orders in play—and overall, he came out on top. He doesn't owe anyone an explanation anymore. From his karting days all the way through Formula 2, where everyone is in identical cars, he proved he had the goods.
Compare that to someone like Michael Schumacher. He had teammates basically acting as water carriers, drove the best (or maybe questionable) cars for years, so people don't question his stats nearly as much.🤷
Sergio Perez is a hell of a driver. I’m not entirely convinced that Sebastian Vettel would be a better pick than him, but I get that there are plenty of reasons beyond just Formula 1 why he was given the edge over Perez.
Rosberg just sat down for a 50-minute interview with Wolff, and honestly, you should give it a listen. He touches on why they jumped ship right after Wolff arrived. It wasn't about any one specific person, though—it was all about Mercedes and how much they started pouring into F1.
stormybadger8 said:Not really my thing...☕

Was I messing with you when your favorite MSC was struggling out there on track?
Nah, I just affectionately called him Grandpa and spent every single weekend making excuses for him. 😁

Was I messing with you when Alonso was stuck in that junk McLaren? No, even though I could barely hold back.

Am I gonna mess with you now that you're pulling for Lewis Hamilton? Nope, because after today, everything is crystal fucking clear...

What does Hamilton even have to do with this race? 🤔
Alex Barnes93 said:Driver salaries don't count toward the cap.

And while there’s no cap to worry about, Mercedes is just quietly pouring massive resources into a new car, especially since their current one is basically in a league of its own, whereas everyone else is stuck without that kind of luxury.
In most cases, suspension is just extra weight you don't need, and honestly, you'll probably end up missing those 26" wheels too. My two cents? Stick with a solid 26" IBM, enjoy the ride, and save that $1,100 😁... I really wish I could have given this advice to my younger self.😁
Melbourne Grand Prix - March 17, 2019 in Formula 1 ·
Look, I’m not out here defending Sebastian Vettel. I’ve never been his biggest fan myself. This is just about using some common sense.
According to certain people, Vettel should have just compromised his line through the corner to let Charles Leclerc pass... but for what? When he enters the turn, Vettel is clearly ahead and taking the standard racing line. The tires and brakes aren't up to temperature yet, and the car is hauling a full load of fuel. It’s only natural that he’d use the full width of the track, just like anyone else would.