So, I was grabbing a drink with this person from Germany recently—someone from the upper-middle class, you know, well-off, owns their own house and all that stuff. And get this: they’re totally backing pro-immigration policies and those high-flying public sector elites while absolutely tearing into bank executives. Their whole logic? Oh, we gotta tax the bankers because capitalism is "dangerous," meanwhile, immigrants are supposedly here to save the economy, and the American working class is just a bunch of failed losers fueled by populism. Honestly, the whole thing gives me massive Roaring Twenties vibes—back when the German patrician classes felt forced to embrace the national socialist movement just to escape the grasp of Stalinist influence, which eventually triggered that huge baby boom. Is it actually populism, or just reality hitting them in the face? Look, collectivism always wins over individualism. Every single time. Individuals might lead the group, sure, but they don't wander off from it. People have fallen for this fairy tale about the "individual" instead of realizing that humans are fundamentally shaped by the genetic and cultural heritage of their collective group. You want the best example of a liberal collective? Look at a corporation. It's a collective effort where individualism only exists if the boss says so. Even the supporters of liberalism are basically just filling up the state treasury, which—let's be real—is a collective entity. Personally, I think if you aren't a liberal in your youth, you lack sense, and if you haven't turned conservative in your old age, you've lost your mind. You can't even build a society, let alone post on a forum, without collectivism. The only question is: who do you belong to? Now, the dam has broken. Liberals are chasing extra profits, Marxists are screaming for more redistribution to "save the proletariat," and the Right is finally waking up to how this all hurts them. They're pushing for a traditionalist system—something that actually works in non-Western nations. Those traditionalists from the Third World aren't going to follow Marxism or liberalism either; those are just brutal ideologies that treat human beings like objects.
Vatican City never actually recognized Nazi Germany—meanwhile, their supposed ally, fascist Italy, was busy invading and carving up territory right from under Vatican City State. If you’ve ever wondered why the Americans were so motivated during World War II—like, seriously, why on earth would capitalists and communists actually team up against Hitler?—just look at this mobilization poster: http://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/im...DdgYF6yGglCTQE
And this? This is how the Nazis actually viewed the Bible: http://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/im...4AIiS5kJtyRACw
In his book *Horror of Delusions*, Ante Pavelić wrote about how he didn't subscribe to the whole "as it is in heaven, so it is on earth" thing. He claimed he only supported Christ in heaven, but down here on earth? It's all about inequality and evolution. Honestly, it just shows the true face of the Church—that Christianity is theistic, while communism is atheistic. But if you strip it all back, aren't they basically working off the same playbook? I mean, look at the shared stance between the Church and communists regarding immigrant acceptance—something Nazi Germany fought tooth and nail against with their racist policies.
Look, it’s not that easy to just throw those kinds of rhetorical questions at them—seriously. In small towns, that kind of thing is a total disaster; I know exactly what he's going through. My advice? Just feed them exactly what they want to hear. Tell them you’re planning on marriage and all that fluff—just sell them the dream. I mean, if the Church can sell people pure smoke and mirrors, why can't you? Save your cash. Tell them you’ve made a vow to God about waiting until you marry, so they’ll keep funding you while you scrape together enough money, and then—boom—get out of there. That’s honestly the only way to survive. People once told me I needed a wife and a kid living in my 250-square-foot studio apartment, so I just called them a bunch of hicks to their faces. In a small town, you can't actually live your own life because the herd mentality is always stronger than the individual. It’s that authoritarian mindset—if you let them raise your grandkids too, then who’s even the parent anymore? You end up with old souls stuck in young bodies in these rural backwaters. Not having a girlfriend isn't even weird when you consider how some biblical teachings basically claim sex is a sin. I personally struggled with being caught between extreme conservatism and Marxism from my toxic parents, and the only way I found happiness was by purging those ideas from my brain through reading Nietzsche—you know, *Thus Spoke Zarathustra*, *The Antichrist*—and then moving on to Napoleon Hill and getting rich. Plus, educating yourself on every possible sexual preference is key, since authors argue people haven't been wealthy or happy simply because wealth is relative to a lack of sexual knowledge. You belong to that liberal generation—I’m right there with you—and there’s nothing wrong with following modern trends, like choosing not to have kids or exploring everything you can sexually so you're actually experienced when you finally settle down. These small-town types think anyone over 30 is ancient and that 25-year-old women are "old"—I live among them, and it’s crazy. The kind of relationship style I advocate for seems "weird" to them; they look at him and say he wants no commitment, or they call BDSM "strange," and it’s just a straight-up witch hunt.
Maybe you guys are just treating people like garbage, and since there aren't enough workers left to go around, you think you can just lowball some American guy for pennies—as if that always works. Honestly, I think the whole idea is stupid. It’s just like me—I don’t want anyone knowing it’s my birthday, and I sure as hell don't want to be the one footing the bill. You know how it is, right? Someone buys you a drink or lunch, and then they're hovering over you like, "Hey, you owe me one!" It's exhausting. Personally, I don't think career and job stuff and friendship ever really mix. At work, everyone is basically your competition—does anyone actually get that, or am I just shouting into the void here? Seriously, if you're pulling in a bigger paycheck, just be cool with the person making less, but don't expect to be everyone's best friend in the office.
Honestly, I’m not even surprised Hayek couldn't stomach Hitler's version of capitalism. The guy was clearly looking for a brand of capitalism that plays nice with communism—kind of like how they teamed up during WWII—because that specific flavor of capitalism serves his own tribe, the very group Hitler was trying to wipe out. It's pretty obvious when you look at it: liberals are actually more left-wing than the National Socialists ever were. I mean, weren't the NS types actually allied with the USSR to take down those liberal capitalist states? Exactly. Hayek’s whole critique of Hitler’s "leftist" tendencies is just a smokescreen because he knows that certain families—you know the ones, like the Rothschilds, Oppenheimers, Warburgs, and Schiffs—who sometimes bankroll Bolshevik revolutions to destabilize the established American capitalist elite, wouldn't even exist without that setup. At the end of the day, Marx is basically just a weapon used by those wealthy elites, which makes all those Marxists nothing more than tools. This whole EU thing within a liberal capitalist framework is really just the Kalergi plan in action—an attempt to establish a class of Hayek-style bourgeois elites. But don't worry, the American right will step in and stop it.
Oh, obviously—the stronger the nation, the higher the paycheck for its workers compared to someone else's. Look, if you’re a worker in a country that acts as a colonial power, you’re naturally going to be in a better spot than a worker in a colonized territory. I mean, think about it—why does an American worker find it way more profitable to take the exact same job in Germany rather than staying home in the States? It’s because they aren't playing on a level playing field. An American worker is part of that top half of the global population when it comes to wealth, so trying to redistribute capital on a global scale just drags them down into poverty. If you look at the math behind the Global Rich indicator, it’s clear that labor and capital aren't actually at war—capital is literally the product of labor. For instance, I know this guy—total underdog, broke—who went to work on an oil rig for a massive payday, far more than he ever could have made back home. Now? He’s snapping up real estate and getting ready to launch his own companies. So why should an American worker feel guilty for being labeled a "capitalist" or a "bourgeoisie" by the working class in non-Western nations? And why should Americans who actually made it and became capitalists feel any guilt toward the local workers they employ? At the end of the day, capital is born from labor, and those successful workers eventually become capitalists—which, if I'm being a bit ironic here, means they basically founded their own capitalist labor organization, like a private firm. Here’s a perfect example: look at the dynamic between a worker who owns property—meaning they have capital—and hires a handyman to fix things, versus a worker who has zero capital and gets exploited by the guy with the assets. Or look at the guy taking out a loan from a bank to pay for home repairs versus the person collecting interest on their savings because they hold the capital. What was the position of the saver before they had the capital to start saving, compared to the consumers whose spending allowed that saver to build their nest egg in the first place? The market is pure, cutthroat competition; there are no "shared interests" here. Honestly, if everyone involved—both the workers and the capitalists—practiced something akin to eugenics—meaning making sure capital grows faster than the population—we wouldn't even have issues with market saturation. You can only really get an order like that in a conservative state where selective breeding (basically having the wealthy redirect the money they take from the poor via interest toward having more kids) drives economic growth and innovation. Sure, some jobs would disappear, but we wouldn't be stuck with a nation of sweaty blue-collar losers or facing revolutions against the machines that replace them.
The whole argument that fascism is some kind of leftist idea just doesn't hold water. Seriously, go Google Ramiro Ledesma Ramos and look at what happened to him during the era of Franc. He got dealt a hand pretty similar to how the National Socialists were treated during the Night of the Long Knives. What’s the actual deal here? The working class is looking for payback, liberals start making deals with the workers to keep communism from taking over, and then—boom—fascism emerges as the "we're all one nation" solution. Why does the working class even lean toward fascism in the first place? It's because an American worker looks like a capitalist to a proletarian from Africa, right? So, in a unified proletarian state, the American worker loses everything. I was actually digging through some stuff by Friedrich Hayek recently about the supposed socialist roots of Nazism, and he basically argues that Hitler picked off those specific Nazis because they were way too left-leaning, while Hitler himself struck a deal with the big money players. All he really had to do was wipe out the leftist faction and keep the liberal capital flowing through crony capitalism. What you're seeing is this clash between internationalism—both the capitalist and socialist versions—and nationalism, which acts as the shield for those ideas. You can check out the chapter "Fascism and Bolshevism" in the horror of error where it explains how fascism rose up because liberal ideas were too weak to stand against communism. Fascism is more of a reaction to a communist revolution that recruits the struggling middle class, whereas communism goes after the people who have absolutely nothing to their name. Fascism is essentially a revolt by the American working class to scrap liberalism and force the capitalists back into the national collective.
That temple the Masons are putting up in Jerusalem? It’s all about establishing Pax Judaica. And let’s be real—for that to actually happen, the Pax Romana has got to go.
But seriously, why wouldn't we just go back to our pre-Christian roots? Christianity isn't even a native European thing—honestly, most churches today are basically just campaigning for more immigrants to come in and convert them, which is wild considering how Darwin pretty much dismantled those Semitic myths. I mean, wouldn't people rather believe in Odin? Like, if you step up to defend Europe, instead of some promise of seventy virgins, you’ve got Valkyries waiting for you. This whole liberalism thing... it’s seductive, sure, but it’s straight-up destructive. It’s a Masonic concept driven by people who worship the same Semitic thinkers, and look where that got them—acting like colonialists in South Africa just looking for cheap labor. You want proof? Just look at Lothrop Stoddard's Revolt Against Civilization or the whole "Rising Tide of Color Against White-World Supremacy" vibe. Even in *The Great Gatsby*, you see Tom warning all those wealthy liberals about what's coming for Western civilization in America, basically telling them to go read that book. The real alternative to liberalism is building a sort of European Matrix—if you caught the movie—to protect Zion for our own genetic advancement. We're talking massive automation controlled exclusively by Europeans who become so powerful they look like robots to everyone else... you know, achieving that Nietzschean Übermensch status. It really comes down to this massive dilemma: are we upgrading our genetics or letting them slide? That choice is on us. Evolution is all about elevating the capable and weeding out the weak. Nature is going to wipe out the incompetent whether we help it along or not—just look at what's happening across the Mediterranean. It's punishing Western stupidity for inviting in jihadists, which is tanking the birth rates of Europeans while non-Europeans just keep multiplying. It’s a pure survival struggle. A potential anthem for the European Union or a revived Roman Empire: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hlti1a_i-LU Back in the day, non-European Christians were the ones burning Rome, and now, it's non-European Muslims doing the heavy lifting. Our job is to stop these barbarians before we end up in another Dark Age fueled by Islam. Why on earth would any European be against their own progress or a 21st-century version of a Pax Romana? The struggles of other non-European civilizations aren't our problem to solve. We shouldn't be carrying around this guilt complex that the liberals (aka the Masons), Christians, and Communists try to shove down our throats. Let's get that nonsense out of our heads right now and start hardwiring Western ideas into our brains instead. We can literally make a list of every great Western thinker and use that as a blueprint to build the future of Western civilization. The ideas occupying the average European right now aren't even ours—they've been culturally forced upon us through this manufactured guilt, pushed by foreign conquerors who are just jealous of everything the West has achieved.
Liberalism and the entire left-wing movement are nothing more than engines of destruction aimed straight at the backbone of American working-class families—the very people who actually hold this civilization together. Look, whether people want to admit it or not, humans are pack animals by nature, right? We’re built to thrive in groups. But the left? They won't let the pack rise out of poverty because they need us down there. The right actually has an answer for that. Instead of wasting capital on degenerate drug nonsense, the wealthy should be redirecting those funds back into the family unit and the workforce. A real worker isn't just going to be stuck doing manual labor forever—they’re going to ride the technological trends and master new tools, which completely flies in the face of the leftist desire to cling to outdated jobs just to protect their cozy, bureaucratic, "connected" positions. In that kind of market, "humanism" as they define it simply won't survive. Honestly, your narc-feminist lifestyle doesn't interest us one bit, nor does any of the garbage thinking that comes from it. You better watch out for the American right-wing collective, because we’re coming😁to tear up every single one of your plans for the destruction of our nation.
So, I was watching this PBS special last night about Turkey—specifically all these immigrants struggling to get by and how Europe is basically slamming the door shut while the Turks are more than happy to take them in. It’s wild, right? They kept talking up the whole grandeur of the old Ottoman Empire, even though we spent a century at war with those guys. Honestly, I don't see why we should start looking up to non-European thinkers like the ones they were profiling... it feels to me like they've just hijacked the cultural conversation to make room for an influx of barbarians. Is our fight to preserve Europe considered fascism now? Please. It’s win or die, plain and simple!
It’s that classic, heavy-as-hell imbalance where you’re constantly sacrificing your personal life just to keep the business side afloat. But honestly—what is even the point of all this? Are we really grinding just to hit some millionaire status right before we retire? Or is the whole idea to actually live—to hang out with friends, grab a drink, and actually show up to things? There’s a time to hustle and there’s a time to chill, period. If your body is totally burnt out, it’s screaming at you to take a break. I mean, if you're obsessively focused on work 24/7, aren't you basically just living like a hermit?
People are basically savages until they get a little bit of money in their pockets. Honestly, the way liberals over in Sweden act isn't any different from how liberals behave all over the world—it's always the same story. Their main goal is just squeezing out every last cent of profit, which completely flies in the face of actual Swedish tradition. It reminds me of how European liberals used to chase massive profits in their colonies back in the day... well, they didn't exactly end up happy about it. The working class eventually rose up and started tearing them apart. You see a fresh version of that playing out right now in South Africa with the farmers, and frankly, I think it's going to happen back home too. Because let’s be real—the more you push for social programs, the more people start chasing that impossible communist utopia.
A quick thought on the US—honestly, the States is falling apart because Josip Broz Marshall essentially built a massive welfare state, creating a culture where Americans act just like those immigrants in Sweden... except, you know, they aren't having enough kids lately, so at least there aren't any huge social riots. It’s funny how both Communism and Christianity try to embrace everyone from all over the map—you've got Christians spreading their global gospel, and then you have the "proletariat of all lands unite" crowd. It's all the same multicultural mess I've rambled about before. I mean, think about it: the Swedish Democrats would probably welcome a Christian from Syria without blinking, but they'd have a hard time with a Muslim from Canada. And then you see this whole swarm of far-right extremists in Nordic countries trying to cling to Viking traditions and old gods—like some sort of Odin-inspired army in Finland. Look, the whole French Revolution vibe was basically designed to sideline the monarchy—making the King of Sweden nothing more than a decorative plant—just to set up a system with taxes even higher than what the feudal lords charged! It goes against the entire natural monarchist order of European nations. Now, we're stuck in this spot where the people labeled as "extreme right" have actually become the movement for the working class, while liberalism is just a tool for the upper class chasing endless profits. And when things finally hit the fan? That upper class is just going to pack up and flee to richer countries because the masses will be coming for them from every single direction.
Look, we’re talking about this massive wave of anti-American immigration, not some minor dip in birth rates—that’s basically a rounding error at this point. These anti-immigrant political parties? They’d happily welcome a Christian refugee from Syria, but heaven forbid it's a Muslim coming over from Canada. It’s the exact same rhetoric you hear when Trump starts talking about building the wall and all that nonsense. But if you actually look at the stats, Americans are projected to become a minority by 2060, and even in Western Europe, the population shift is hitting hard by 2100. So, yeah, we’ve maybe got three generations left in the West before everything flips. And don't even get me started on the Russians—I honestly don't think they'll ever truly recover from the legacy of Communism; cultural Marxism is going to tear them apart just like it's doing to us. When I see their "allies" include places like North Korea, Venezuela, and China, it’s pretty obvious—you’ve got this lower-class proletariat that fits perfectly with these new immigrant groups. Meanwhile, the wealthy elites are busy fleeing to Israel, Australia, or Singapore... though, let's be real, Israel is probably the only place actually keeping its borders tight. The absolute biggest disaster for the West is happening in those high-IQ nations, like the Scandinavian countries. Because they have so much concentrated wealth, they’ve basically drowned in liberalism, naively believing they can just "encourage" everyone on the planet to adopt their culture. And who made it possible? The conservatives, who sat back and let them burn through those hard-earned reserves while enjoying all the perks.
Morgan Brown4 said:Not gonna happen. The center-right will probably just give quiet support to a minority leftist government. Or they'll go for a grand coalition. In my book, only the Austrian People's Party in Austria has the guts to ditch the whole "cordon sanitaire" thing and actually partner with the alt-right.
But how anti-socialist is their platform, really? If they actually want to get rid of all the parasites, cutting social spending matters way more than just pushing anti-immigration rules. If they don't do that, they're basically just national socialists.
The whole thing is trending toward a setup where social welfare depends entirely on how many immigrants and lower-class Americans are concentrated in one spot. It makes the far-right look reasonable by comparison, which honestly just shows how much Europeans have lost the plot—where things that used to be standard conservative positions now get labeled "extreme." It’s the same deal with the American right wing looking radical sometimes, or people calling the US national soccer team racist just because every player fits a certain European phenotype according to the French left... whatever. Personally, I’d put those Democrats you’re talking about in the classic right-wing camp, whereas the actual national socialists are that National Socialist Movement group—that's the true extreme right and the only real threat to immigrants. See, the Sweden Democrats would probably just nudge those immigrants into the workforce by trimming social benefits. You gotta realize a state is only as strong as its weakest link. And look, right-wing socialism isn't about killing private property; historically, it was more like political marketing to recruit workers so they wouldn't fall for the hammer and sickle. As for the right wing here, there’s zero focus on the King—who, let’s face it, got minimized by democracy anyway—and back during the era of the Kingdom of Sweden, I bet they built up most of the wealth being spent today if you bother to check. They aren't even looking at dictatorship if you look at the Sweden Democrats; they're more like the Republican Party back in the 90s.
It’s pretty much what you'd expect—this massive surge for the anti-immigration party, right? And honestly, it’s just the direct fallout from all those "benefits" they get from their supposedly glorious socialism... which, let's be real, was never actually meant to help people in the Kingdom of Sweden anyway.
It’s totally possible. I mean, people just love obsessing over everyone else's business, don't they? It’s like... I read somewhere once that small minds talk about people, average minds talk about events, and great minds talk about ideas. Honestly, getting this worked up over how other people live their lives is just pathetic—it’s low-rent, desperate behavior. You lose all respect for people who act like that. I have this coworker, right? She knows damn well that half the people at our office aren't even married, and then she goes home to this absolute circus where three generations are crammed under one roof and the kids are practically grown. Like, lady, maybe clean up your own backyard first? Instead, she’s constantly sticking her nose into everyone else's business, giving unsolicited advice to the younger staff about getting married—and let’s be real, she isn't doing it out of the goodness of her heart, she just wants everyone else to be as miserable as she is. I couldn't care less what she thinks, but it really drives home the point that people give advice just to feel superior. They want you to suffer through their judgment because they care more about what the neighbors think than actually being a decent human being.
Are you some kind of pacifist or something? Honestly, that was my biggest hurdle. There’s nothing worse than an aggressor basically forcing you to just stand there and take it without putting up a fight. I mean, why isn't the bully afraid of you? It's because they don't expect anything from you that could actually pose a threat. Does a predator want to end up in the ER? Of course not. Check out what I wrote here: http://www.reddit.com/r/discussion/thread/1019073
Maybe this will clear things up for you—it’s a damn shame I didn't realize how the world actually works sooner. Infinite HATE is the only real truth. Look, if you’re physically outmatched, don't just sit there following some moral code; call someone stronger, call the cops. But if you’ve got the power? You tear them apart. People who are physically weaker call the police, but they make up for it by being mentally sharp—that's why the strong rule over the weak in every sense (both mental and physical), and why the smart eventually run the show over the strong. It's just straight-up social Darwinism. Even a girl can dominate someone through sheer mental strength; you don't always have to rely on muscle.