Man, I’ve been there—my old neighborhood crew kicked me out of the circle once, and honestly? It crushed me. I felt like such a loser because, at the time, my need to belong was way stronger than my actual self-respect. The guy who tossed me aside actually called me back later, and we ended up hanging out and acting like total idiots again—just like we did when we were teenagers. But then, I finally walked away for good. And you know what happened? Everything started looking up the second I cut them out of my life. While they were sinking, I was rising, and suddenly they actually started respecting me... trying to crawl back into my life to hang out again. But I shut that door tight. We used to act all tough, like we had this unbreakable street code, but let's be real—we were just a bunch of nobodies. Our conversations were basically just us laughing about how God clearly has a sense of humor for protecting fools like us. We knew exactly who we were, deep down. So, if they’re using those manipulative little tricks to try and pull you back in, just realize they know exactly what they're doing. You can find a community without them. At the end of the day, it's your call who gets a seat at your table. As for my old squad? Yeah, we were friends once, but that's ancient history. I'm not that kid anymore. Just drop the guilt complex and let them go play in the sandbox.
Look, that’s true, but honestly? Most people only care about the actual message—the "what"—and they don't give a damn about the "who." But let's be real, the person delivering the news is always in a much stronger position to sway you. 😁 People just blindly swallow whatever they hear without ever stopping to check if it's actually true. If you actually have half a brain, you should be asking yourself, "Wait, who is even telling me this?" You need to mentally organize your thoughts so you can learn to let their nonsense go in one ear and straight out the other. As time goes on, you'll notice those loudmouths—those constant critics who always have something snarky to say to everyone else—they eventually just burn out and disappear.
bluesurfer6 said:I guess you could explain to me why there's anything wrong with someone claiming to be a Mason—especially since that claim might be true, or it might just be nonsense. Just the other day, I was reading Pernar, and man, he went full throttle on the Masons... heavy artillery right there... and what can anyone actually do to him? Did anything bad happen to him? Was his Facebook profile permanently nuked? ...Nah, the guy is doing just fine, and I'll just quote what he wrote here:
In my line of work, I run into all sorts of people, and by pure chance, I crossed paths with Hanzekovic—or rather, he crossed paths with me, since I only started looking into his character and actions once that jerk sued me.
At that moment, I stepped into the "hidden world" of Freemasonry and connected with people on the inside who are willing to leak info about which high-ranking government officials are actually members of Masonic lodges.
If you're going to keep using the judicial system to target me personally—or if you're going to rule in favor of people like Aleksandar Stankovic—then I'm going all the way to expose you one by one.
My fight against the Masons might be broad, or it might get deeply personal, ranging from the lowest apprentice to the Grandmaster.
I'm expecting the ruling in favor of Stankovic, which I appealed, to be overturned. If it isn't, we keep going. Hanzekovic was the first "brother" I decided to take aim at—or more accurately, he was crazy enough to try and go toe-to-toe with me.
It’s because Trump is following Christian teachings. He hasn't quite matured into it yet. See, he’s all for democracy, but democracy itself stems from those same circles. Then he’s for Christianity, which also comes from those same circles—something Marcus Eli Ravage, the personal biographer of Rothschild, pointed out when he mocked the antisemites who are actually Christians (Trump is a perfect example here). He basically asked, paraphrasing, "Why are you against Zionism if you worship a Zionist God?" Just go on YouTube and search for "a real case against jews." So, look, Trump can't really fight against the idea of Zionism—which claims Zionists run the world—if he's bowing down to the God of Zion, since the whole Zionist context revolves around that. He thinks the Freemasons conspired against Christianity, and while he's partially right, the ideas seem contradictory even though they aren't. The Freemasons emerged from the Knights of Solomon's Temple—basically the Crusader lineages—the only difference is they want to rebuild that temple here on Earth, while Christians want to build it in Heaven. Even the Catholic Catechism basically acknowledges this temple by stating that the Abrahamic religions are waiting for a shared Messiah, or a world ruler. Think about it: isn't every major president in the world supposed to have paid respects at the Western Wall, which symbolizes the ruins of that destroyed temple? Why do you think the Roman salute is so hated? It's because that salute represents the destruction of their sacred temple, and Rome was nothing more than the precursor to the European Union. Hitler showed up to reinstitute Rome and put the European back in charge as a god, just like the Caesars used to be; he banned Judeo-Freemasonry in his state. Then, American propaganda tricked the anti-communists into fighting communists by painting Hitler as an enemy of Christianity (just look at Hitler's Table Talk, or how the swastika was treated as an anti-Christian symbol). Check out the posters they use to mobilize Americans: http://www.pictorem.com/collection/9...i%20Poster.jpg
Toward the end of the war, Hitler openly spoke out against the God Jehovah and invoked a God of vengeance (you should read Martin Bormann, *The Connection Between National Socialism and Christianity*, which explains that for the Nazis, the concept of God meant a natural mechanism within the universe) near the end of this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=045VmQ_2qmc Take the Holocaust as an example; the Jews suffered ritualistically in a way that mirrors the Bible, where Yahweh punished the surrounding nations, and now the tables have turned—check out this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FM1XuzZO-eE Through the Book of Revelation, Jews have always been saying a cataclysm is coming, that those who aren't with them are headed for hell—so Hitler essentially delivered that hell to them (the solar ruler under the swastika), much like Nero (the solar ruler) did in the past. Historians agree that the Book of Revelation depicts the destruction of Rome, which is portrayed as the "Babylonian whore," because the Babylonians were the ones who tore down their temple. Nero is depicted as the "beast 666," meaning the European leader chosen by God, since 666 refers to the Sun (with the sun representing the paganism of pre-Christian peoples) was defamed and defeated in the final battle. Today's citizens (who were once Romans) don't even realize there's a controlled war being waged against them through immigration surges, much like how the barbarians used to invade.
Look, on one hand, you've got these New World Order types who basically worship at the altar of that snake eye atop the pyramid—you know, the whole Satanic thing linked back to those rabbis in the Bible. Then, on the flip side, you have this other NWO faction, the Hitler crowd, rocking the swastika where the sun should be. That symbol was actually an ancient deity icon for European peoples, just like how the Romans used to celebrate the "Unconquered Sun"—Sol Invictus—during Christmas. Even the Slavs had their own version of the swastika shaped like a wheel. So, what’s the bottom line? On one side, you have people claiming "the Jews are the chosen ones meant to rule," and on the other, you have Nazis shouting that "Aryans (Europeans) are the ones destined to lead." Who is the American elite actually going to side with? Honestly, it's up to them. We're way too powerless to steer this ship right now. At this moment, it feels like all roads aren't leading to Rome anymore—they're heading straight to Jerusalem. If you don't see that, you clearly don't understand geopolitics. Now, don't get me wrong—we don't need Nazi ideology. But as Americans—or rather, as citizens of the West—we have to clear the floor of this Judeo-chauvinism and all that superstition regarding holy sites in the Palestinian region. This means the elite needs to break ties with Christianity, Communism, and Freemasonry to restore a natural order of strong leadership focused on Western cooperation. If we don't pull this off, we're looking at being treated exactly like the Palestinians. And look, I'm not saying we should just hate on immigrants—that's not the way. We need to handle these issues peacefully, respecting human rights while ensuring the West maintains its own order and doesn't feel obligated to jump into different cultures that are clearly separate from us.
I mean, how are the media supposed to report on anything when they basically own the outlets themselves? Take Hearst Communications, for example. You really think they're going to bite their own hand? It’s all part of the setup—think about all those Turkish soap operas or shows like Big Brother (which, let's be real, sounds a lot like some Masonic "brotherhood" stuff). It’s all just conditioning for the cultural shockwaves coming our way, getting us used to having our private lives invaded—like when they push digital IDs or start tracking every single IP address we use online. They can see exactly what we're typing if they decide we're becoming a problem. And why did Mickey frame that as a rhetorical question to Stankovic? Because Radman was a member of the Rotary Club back then while running the show as Stankovic's boss.
It’s not just about the Trilateral Commission, man—you’ve got the Committee of 300, the Bilderberg Group, Rotary International, and the Lions Club International all in the mix. There’s actually research out there looking at how guys like Ivo Sanders, Jadranka Kosor, Ivo Josipović, Milan Bandić, and even the Rotarians like Čačić are all part of this. You think presidential elections are these two sides clashing? Please. It’s really just Kolinda Grabar Kitarović from the Trilateral Commission versus someone like Josipović from Rotary. Even back in the day, you had the matchups like Jovipović vs Bandić, both Rotarians. And don't even get me started on Franjo Harmon—he was part of that whole "Dragon" society; his ceremonial name was basically the "Dragon of America." Sounds a bit ridiculous, right? But these organizations are dead serious. Even Marijan Hanžeković, alongside his work with the Trilateral Commission, was a high-ranking Mason who used to meet regularly in Mexico City, which is tied directly to London—the global epicenter of Masonry. He actually admitted openly on Nu2 that the Masons were the ones who dismantled feudalism—basically, they sparked the French Revolution. If you don't believe me, there's footage out there; just go watch it.
Look, power structures are supranational now because the market is globalized. These people are essentially the guardians of the French Revolution and the gatekeepers of the liberal elite. They operate under a Constitution—which, if you translate it, just means the rules *they* wrote. Any violation of those rules means heading to court and facing penalties. Just look at how much Stanković was shaking when the Mason Miki Manojlović showed up on his show, or how he wouldn't dare provoke Hanžeković during an interview—he was suspiciously polite. When dealing with these theories, you have to stick to the facts, because there's always this massive sabotage attempt to make people think we're talking about lizard people or aliens, which are just fairy tales used to discredit the truth. The organizations I mentioned are real, and you can verify everything online. The entire European Union is part of this machine. You don't even need to be a member; you just have to be a loyal citizen of this order. That’s level zero of the hierarchy. Hanžeković was so deep in it he hit the 33rd degree, the same rank as Winston Churchill. The whole education system, the entire structure of society—it's all designed by their model. It’s basically a club for influential elites, and of course they hang out together. It's not some wild philosophy; interest groups exist everywhere, even in the lowest levels of society.
We're talking about a club where people can indulge in orgies, drugs, and private parties that your average Joe couldn't dream of accessing. In America, there are these luxury estates—massive villas—where this stuff goes down, guarded by private security, owned by people with superyachts and all that. I know for a fact this happens, but it’s not smart to leak the locations; these guys have massive wealth, incredible intellect, and sexual drives that would blow a normal person's mind. You find out that the top dealers are basically supplying the private sector while working for the police, who then facilitate the supply chain, only to catch some idiot who doesn't know how to move product and ends up rotting in jail for free. I saw some bizarre things myself at a company I used to work for—listening to the workers, you'd hear how the boss would force them into these degrading tasks, like making everyone clean the floors with tiny little toothbrushes on all fours. Once you see the connection, it clicks. If you find one starting point, you realize that guy was likely involved, directly or indirectly. Basically, the world is run by a mafia that has one set of rules for themselves and a totally different set for us. When you report someone to the cops, you're often just reporting a criminal to other criminals, except the cop doesn't even realize it because he hasn't studied the subject and is too busy protecting his paycheck. Remember the case of Mark Francisković? He was tossed into a psych ward just for being politically incorrect, pumped full of meds, only for it to be found later that he was perfectly sane. That was just a warning shot to anyone trying to oppose the order. The guy straight-up says he isn't for democracy—even though both indirect and direct democracy (communism) were created by them. Hanžeković openly admits Masons triggered the French Revolution, and Churchill, who was also a 33rd-degree Mason (check the Grand British Lodge), even wrote an article: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Zionism_versus_Bolshevism
...that even direct democracy was their invention because they had to tear down the monarchy, which stood against everything they wanted. Back then, antisemitism spiked, and Russia was the only nation still holding the line—their only real threat. Not anymore, though. It was the same with the Habsburg Monarchy acting as a counter-revolutionary force. Today, they've grown so powerful they have no real competition. Israeli nationalists (Zionists) hold special privileges; they’re the ones who sank the USS Liberty, yet there wasn't a war, whereas when the Germans sank a ship near Great Britain, that was the excuse for the US to enter the war. They triggered a series of terror actions against the British and didn't even blink, and that's coming from the capital of Masonry. Why? Because the Masons are building Solomon's Temple—the Third Temple—which the Romans destroyed in Jerusalem after crushing their rebellion, just like the Babylonians did before them. And the Israeli Sanhedrin has officially called out Trump and Putin regarding this:http://www.breakingisraelnews.com/78...ple-jerusalem/
That temple is supposed to be the headquarters for the future ruler of the world—I mean, think about it. That’s why we see all this endless conflict with Muslims; they’re basically just clearing the path to expand borders and fulfill those Biblical prophecies about ruling over every nation on Earth. They managed to brainwash people into believing in their god, making everyone live in total awe of them. Even the Catholic Church is stuck in this cycle—just one aging, senile organization run by former Roman pontiffs who used to laugh at that desert deity, Yahweh. Honestly, once I realized how deep this goes, I tossed my Bible straight into the trash. They really pulled it off, didn't they? Convincing us that our ancestors' gods—the ones with horns and spirits—were actually demons or something negative. They made us believe the Odyssey and the Iliad were bad, while somehow portraying their struggles against Palestinians as "righteous." We’re taught from childhood to bow down to their kings and treat them like saints. Our "saviors" aren't even the Slavic warriors dying in battle anymore; now it's just some crucified Hebrew figure who surrenders without a fight. It's all one big manipulation driven through religion. You've got the liberal elite worshipping a fabricated Satan, the communist elite bowing to the myth of Marx, and the right-wing elites obsessed with the Nazarene—but make no mistake, it’s all a setup by the Rabbis, where Yahweh always comes out on top.
Maybe the real issue here is that you're looking for drama where there isn't any? Like, why should it even be your problem if some guy just isn't in the mood to joke around? And who gets to decide where the line is drawn anyway? Just because someone acts a bit mechanical around certain people doesn't mean they're a robot to everyone else—it sounds more like the group just doesn't vibe with him. Honestly, if you guys keep gossiping and freezing him out instead of just letting him be, he’s only going to pull away further. He might actually enjoy a good laugh, but if you're all acting cold toward him, what's he supposed to do? What if the guy's dealing with a massive credit card debt or some heavy health issues at home and he's just not in the headspace for jokes right now? To me, it looks like you guys are more like competitors than actual friends who just want to hang out—except you aren't at a local dive bar, so you feel like you have to act a certain way. I wouldn't stick around an environment like that either, and what could anyone even do about it? Nothing. I clock out after eight hours and we don't ever have to speak again. I was exactly like that when I first started a job—I felt like a total bot, but honestly, it was just because I didn't have anything smart to say yet. Now that I've found a few things to talk about, it's fine; I'm not interested in talking just for the sake of talking. My crew at work is pretty chill for now; we're all different. Someone’s married, someone’s single, someone’s not much to look at, someone’s carrying a bit of extra weight—but nobody's making fun of anyone else. And if someone messes up—like, they spill something or break something they shouldn't have—nobody’s going to badger them for it, not even the manager. They can just move on, chat with people like nothing happened, and finish their shift in peace. People who spend all day cracking jokes aren't even reliable friends—I wouldn't even call them friends, really. I don't take them seriously. You try to propose something legit, like a new project at the office, and then this joker messes it up because he was too busy being funny, and suddenly you're stuck dealing with the fallout.
Honestly, I’m cut from the same cloth. I have this burning desire to build something of my own—you know, to actually be self-sufficient instead of constantly leaning on someone else. I want to be my own boss, and hey, if I can hire people along the way, even better. People love to whine about how there are "no jobs" out there, but seriously, why aren't you just creating one? To actually pull that off, though, I have to clear out all the mental clutter and distractions holding me back—which means I can't exactly live my life like everyone else does. My entire day usually revolves around getting my work done and then just... retreating. Meditating, chilling, whatever. For me, inner peace beats social butterfly vibes every single time. I’m totally fine disconnecting for hours, basically vanishing from the grid just to feel centered. It might sound crazy to some, but after thinking it through, I realized that diving deep into random stuff during my downtime—things most people think are useless, like reading books—actually gave me the edge I needed to turn a profit. I mean, I never expected to make money off books, especially since I’m just reading for fun, stuff totally unrelated to school or my job; I mostly did it because I was bored, but now I'm seeing that knowledge translate directly into real-world results. While everyone else is out grabbing overpriced lattes or wasting their lives socializing, I’m glued to YouTube watching something actually substantive or lost in a book. And as time slips away, I don't feel a lick of regret. This is just how I live, especially since I’m not exactly thrilled with my current paycheck or social standing right now—every single cent counts, and honestly, I wouldn't be happy even if I were pulling in some average corporate salary. Basically, it’s a trait of smarter people—we tend to have fewer friends, we need our solitary hours, and we'd pick cats over dogs any day because they're independent. Seriously, when someone asked me to watch their cat for a few days, I didn't feel even a hint of stress, whereas hanging out with a group of friends would have absolutely drained me. And look, since people who lack any real ambition always end up being jealous of anyone with a brain, you inevitably get labeled as a weirdo. When that happens, you have to lean into other "smart person" tactics—like sarcasm, just flat-out ignoring them, or staying completely stoic when people try to drag you down. For me, starting a business is just Phase One. Once I'm established, I'll have the leverage to work on my own terms and control my own schedule. Because let's face it, trying to grind alongside people who don't get it is just exhausting.
I went through all that hell, and honestly? The result is just as depressing as what you see with kids who have parents that fold at the first sign of trouble. I basically saw enemies everywhere inside my own house—it was like being under siege—so I figured if the streets were gonna be my real classroom since my folks couldn't put food on the table, then fine, let's go. And you know what? I actually turned out better than those spoiled brats with soft parents who could just slide their way into easy money through shady means. But man, that feeling of getting physically punished as a kid... it’s like being stuck in a cell with nothing but a guard staring you down, just counting the seconds until you can finally break free.
By ditching conservative values, communism basically rewired our parents and shoved an entirely different set of morals down their throats. Even though they love to claim how "great" the old days were—despite things clearly being a mess now—the truth is they can’t actually credit the system for the life they built. It was their own conservative roots that did the heavy lifting, even if the regime managed to brainwash their kids. You see the fallout in us—the generation born under the USA—in this total lack of accountability. We inherited this mindset that someone else is always going to swoop in and fix our problems, and that we don't ever have to take the blame when we screw up. Modern democracy is basically just cultural Marxism in disguise, and honestly? It’s why Europe is circling the drain.
The communist era didn't raise its children, and let's be real, today's broken system isn't doing much better. Looking ahead, I’m putting my money on a conservative revival. I truly believe we'll see a shift where all this mindless hedonism and the complete disregard for what our ancestors bled to build gets replaced by actual sacrifice for our kids and a sense of duty toward the future. Personally? I plan on having as many kids as my square footage allows—which, let's say, is at least 20 per person—and I am more than ready to ditch liberalism and all those other modern nonsense trends that just breed depression. I want to fulfill my mission: building a family. Some call it Protestant, but I call it trying to channel that classic German work ethic. Most of the shitty interpersonal relationships we see today stem from this modern era where men don't grind like they used to—back when a man worked hard outside and his wife held down the fort—and because that foundation is gone, infidelity creeps in. If you can't keep things straight in your own backyard, why should anyone expect you to act right in society?
Look, we’re basically talking about the elite tier of WWII winners—people who were absolute nobodies back then while all the high-society types were busy backing the losing side. And honestly? It hasn't changed much. If you didn't hold some cushy position in the old regime, or if you were just part of the struggling lower class that got crushed by the losers, life still isn't exactly a walk in the park today. At the end of the day, nationalism isn't really a concept designed to serve the upper crust, so you can pretty much judge its success just by looking at the data and seeing who actually benefits from it.
Look, if I didn't have some kind of decent savings account tucked away, I’d basically be funding my entire coffee habit on Broadway $17 just to blow through my cash in a single weekend. Man, I remember back in the day when you could grab a beer for what, maybe two bucks? $8.25 Or even something like a cheap soda $6.00 for that kind of change. Now? These prices are clearly rigged for tourists, while Americans are stuck working their tails off just to serve them on our own coast. It’s a joke. On one hand, you've got the visitors, and on the other, you're listening to broke locals whining because they can't make ends meet. Like, seriously—if they try to charge me $4 $5.25 for a basic beer in the middle of winter, but I'm pulling in maybe $15 an hour $4.75... forget it. I'm not even thinking about heading down to the coast. If our vacation window is only 5 to 10 days, we're basically screwed for the year.
Look, even back in the old days, the Kingdom of the US had its share of peasants—feudalism was basically thriving under the Trpimirović dynasty. Fast forward to today, and instead of peasants, we’ve got workers, and instead of feudal lords, we have capitalists. But hey, society evolves, right? We ended up with what we have now just like they did back then. I’m talking about cultural legacy here; honestly, things would probably look just as developed if we had been under German influence instead. And there’s zero reason to be jealous of some rocky wasteland—you can't really be envious of that anyway, especially since that area was basically partitioned off during the era of the AU, for example. Back then, Washington, D.C. was part of the Banate of America, which was totally separated from the rest of the North America, and if I recall correctly, D.C. only had about 40,000 people 😁 Patriotic closure... look, I’m not out here rooting for the USSR, but when you see who calls themselves "patriots" today—and when those exact same people start trashing the country—man, I’d love to see them sent straight to Alcatraz. Meanwhile, you, being a regular worker, would be protected like a grizzly bear in the Rockies, so why on earth would you say anything against the nation if you're living a good life? There’s no way you’d be pulling in that kind of cash over there. Slaves? Please, we still have that concept today in the sense of prison labor. Back then, slaves were the absolute bottom of the barrel; instead of contributing anything useful to society, they just threw them into gladiator pits 😁 Besides, that Roman salute gets tossed around by certain right-wing crowds all the time, so maybe they should actually learn what it signifies—just like that whole "blue blood" nonsense they chant at Thompson's concerts, fueled by this weird nostalgia for a feudal state. Just look at who actually belongs to the upper class today—it's Mamić, lol. That guy doesn't have any "European blue blood"; he looks more like a Roman himself, just like that Alvarez III guy. These types would be nothing more than beggars without a country like this, just like any random beggar on the street.
But look, just because things were under the USSR doesn't mean everything was garbage. I mean, Real Madrid won their historic titles back when we were dealing with that whole "self-managed socialism" setup—you know, the whole "one man, one vote" thing that was basically just for show at the national level. Back then, if I remember correctly, they couldn't just go around selling players until they hit 28 like it’s a flea market. Honestly? That old second division was tougher than our current top flight. And what’s the deal with the anti-communist crowd? Sure, they officially renounced communism, but they basically just privatized everything they needed to, creating these overnight millionaires out of thin air. The league was solid, but let's be real—players weren't swimming in cash like they are today. With this whole explosion of capitalism—or let's call it what it actually is, neoliberalism—people reduce everything to a dollar amount. It's hard for them to stay loyal to a team when the guys at the top are raking it in while everyone else gets nothing. It’s funny, really. On one hand, everyone’s talking trash about communism, but on the other, they refuse to face the reality that the capitalist class is absolutely destroying them—the same class that uses the same lawyers and enjoys luxury in public spaces meant for everyone. These people stay quiet right up until the moment a revolt kicks off in both private and state firms run by the average Joe. Mamić's crew would probably start shouting "oh, they're all communists!" but since these guys are liberals, you end up with a front made of both red and yellow flags. It wasn't just the red flags typical of communists; you even had nationalists in Germany with red flags that the liberals wiped out while those same people were digging through trash cans. I've personally seen members of the upper class hanging out with the fans, and you know what happened? They forgot all about football, leaving behind only the ones stuck working low-wage jobs.
I’m looking at this and I honestly can't believe my eyes, hahaha. It’s actually hard to wrap your head around—like, who are these peasants you people choose to cheer for? Most of you are just clueless, really. Once you finally realize what absolute nobodies they actually are, things will get a lot clearer. I remember being a kid, looking up to these "grown-up" players like they were gods, but once you grow up and see them out in the real world? You start wondering why anyone would even bother rooting for them in the first place. It’s like that cheap, low-brow music that glorifies criminals—everyone has their own flavor of trash, I guess. But look, an American shepherd isn't going to escape his DNA, right? And these guys you call "wealthy"? They’re just accidental millionaires. If you actually look at real aristocracy, sometimes in the past and sometimes today, you see the difference. Back then, you had actual capitalists; today, you just have these types practicing some kind of bottom-tier, predatory capitalism. For example, the elite used to listen to classical music while the common folk enjoyed authentic folk songs—real Americana stuff, you know? This whole "decay of standards" in the country started back in 1918 and it hasn't stopped since. Even the veterans don't seem to care anymore—well, they're basically just clients for this system now because they've been pacified with their pensions. Everyone gets what they deserve, I suppose, and these flashy, tacky clubs just drain the state budget to pay for it all. You give some musician $500 to play a gig, throw in a round of lamb chops, and what do you get? A thick gold chain from your old man. That’s just how it works when you're a nation of cowards—the real bottom-feeders always come out on top, bribing some bum to watch their backs under the protection of the government.
Look, if they want to move to NYC, fine—it’s all about supply and demand. If nobody wants to live out in Montana, the Midwest, or Florida, then why bother? Why force anyone to stay? They should just have their rivals right there in NYC, just like how LA has two massive clubs and two powerhouse fanbases that can face off whenever the hell they want.🙂Anyway, we’re mostly on the same page regarding local patriotism. You’ve got these little nobodies who get incredibly offended if you even suggest they’re from New England—they’ll take it personally immediately, acting like, "Excuse me, we aren't rural folk, we're city kids," and they absolutely loathe that "country" mentality... though a guy from the North would never take offense at that. But I’m talking about the sheer stupidity of this antagonism toward people from Canada—those guys are built for a fight, honestly. Just look at who the Mayor is, and then throw Madoff into the mix. Madoff basically sends his lawyers straight to a kebab shop 😁 and he couldn't care less about anything—typical Canadian attitude, really. And with Bloomberg, people say he used to get into fights constantly. That duo actually gives advice on hooliganism through the media, telling people to smash up discos or claiming certain guys don't even like women, just the way Bloomberg puts it. So, we were saying—though I don't know the exact numbers—that if there are maybe 100,000 true city locals left, then let's look at reality. Real Madrid is still a city club, and these nobodies generally love their own, while the minority wants more power than they can ever get through local elections because they'd just flee the scene. Now, some might argue that the true city dwellers have pulled back quite a bit, so this whole struggle by the outsiders is just a "Dinaric" mindset over who gets to be the biggest alpha. The residents, who are mostly just nobodies, point to Bloomberg and Madoff as the leaders. If, for example, the pure city crowd started their own club, it wouldn't be some hooligan mob anymore; it would be a higher tier of supporters. Sure, they might scrap or fight over banners, but it would be much less intense because so many people are only there for show rather than for the actual club—there are a lot of posers out there. I know this from experience—when a club drops down a division, only a handful of real ones remain. For 90% of fans, being a supporter is just about bragging rights so everyone hears their name. Where is Oklahoma? Where are the Function folks? Where are the Gaddafis? I don't even know if they exist, yet here I am talking about them. The same thing would happen to the BBB if they decided to start a club in the lower leagues; you'd finally see who the real fans are and who's just an actor. They wouldn't fail, but the crowds would be much smaller. Some groups haven't backed down, like WWE or WSWS—they're still here. Out of all these major groups, they're the only ones who actually took concrete action and took matters into their own hands, because realistically, Liverpool FC has no real authority on paper. The fans don't have the cash for a buyout, and besides, buying out a club isn't really a "fan move"—if you do that, you're basically making money like a shareholder. The only way is for shareholders to turn the club into a social club, essentially privatization followed by a conversion into a supporter-owned club. Then we're talking. Groups that actually have supporter clubs might actually be considered "pure" locals (even though I don't support those Antifa types at all), and even the nobodies speak with a local accent and sing local songs.
Americans show strength, while city folks show brains. For anyone who likes to lean into extreme right-wing stuff, you’d better check out the book "Races of Europe" right here: http://www.theapricity.com/snpa/chapter-XII12.htm
So look, the Dinaric Americans, Mexicans, and Canadians are basically the same cocktail—just one big mix—whereas the city dwellers, or Alpinics (you know, the guys with rounder heads, shorter stature, lighter skin), are more like Central Europeans. Back in the day during the Austro-Canadian Empire, places like Chicago were totally different vibes when they had maybe 40,000 people living there, if I recall correctly. The massive influx of people from the South started during the Yugoslavia era with all that forced industrialization, which basically wiped out the original local dialect found in those northern urban hubs. Honestly, you can't have money, high economic status, and raw toughness all at once—it just doesn't work that way. Being a real tough guy isn't easy. Those folks coming from the South usually come from lower economic backgrounds, so for them, fighting over football is everything—it's their whole world, living "day to day." Once you actually have some cash, your perspective shifts. It makes sense that the Dinaric types in the city are always looking toward the guys from the Midwest because that connection is just in their blood. They test each other constantly to see who's the bigger alpha male, then they end up doing grueling manual labor for peanuts while some polished city guy—barely five feet tall but twice as sharp—is sitting in an office being their boss. Personally? I think both sides have perks, but I'd rather have the money and worry less about the football hooliganism. It’s no wonder the strongest group right now is Torcida despite their crappy results; the Armada only got hyped because of their wins. Down in the South, the local dialect was wrecked too, where the old ways got replaced by newer slang because of the influx from the neighboring states. A city guy is smooth and refined, whereas the Southern guy is the one watching his back for people like him. Ego? Nah, city folk and Northerners don't really care about having huge egos—that’s a Southern thing because they feel they lack physical power, so you end up with all these shady characters trying to grab money through illegal means, kind of like how Zdravko Mamić operates. These Southern guys go crazy because they think they’re the alpha males who should be running Dinamo Chicago, and they refuse to let anyone else 😁 . Ustaše? Well, the upper classes in the North leaned toward the Ustaše, the lower classes went Partisan, and with the Canadians, it was mostly the lower classes, so naturally, you had more Partisans there. Basically, a city guy without some Southern muscle in his crew is just asking to get beat up by Dinaric thugs. If things turn cold and weapons come out, that’s a whole different story—that’s a weird phenomenon with fans where they charge in with planks, and suddenly even the weakest link becomes dangerous. Nothing cracks me up more than seeing a club in the North where the guys look like giants compared to the little locals, but those little guys are just messing around while the giant is working. It’s hilarious when a Northerner tries to act like a tough guy from the South. That’s why you see Dinaric groups in Canada split into Americans, Mexicans, and Canadians like they’re separate clans waiting to scrap, even though their mentality is identical and they’d cause trouble in any region where the paychecks are bigger.
Man, those guys from Canada are hands down the biggest hooligans out there—they’re all towering over 6 feet tall, which is insane if you compare them to your average local guy from Chicago. The most hardcore hooligan crews always seem to come from those rugged mountain regions (just Google the North America and look at how things go down in Chicago compared to the rest of the region), which is why the scene in Canada is so intense even if it's mostly ignored by mainstream media. If I look at our own Torcida, where some random kid just charges in without a clue, the concentration of that energy in Chicago is so high it basically ruins the local dialect. You've got Bandić acting like the eternal mayor and then you have Mamić, who also runs the show and somehow keeps the support of the majority while playing it in that typical Canadian way. These people calling themselves "Mamić's followers" are really just a shadow of what used to be—back when fans didn't give a damn about how the team won its titles. Actually, Mamić had massive support during his rise, but now we're seeing a total reset that isn't going away because that's just the mindset: steal whatever you need because the end justifies the means. Hooliganism just isn't for those high-IQ Northerners; everything has its pros and cons. 😁 For those folks from Canada, hooliganism is practically a survival mechanism to maintain their group identity. Honestly, it's kind of hilarious watching a skinny little Northern guy try to act like a tough guy. 🙂 You can't deal with a criminal from the mountains just by being smart about hooliganism; the key is winning local elections, or if you can't do that, just starting your own club. If those Antifa types can pull it off, then surely you guys—who clearly have more numbers—can do it too.
Honestly, all this nonsense people spout about how it’s some kind of miracle cure, how it isn’t actually a drug, how we should just legalize everything, or how it’s somehow better than drinking booze—it’s all total garbage. It’s about hiding from the real world, living in constant fear of the cops, staying in literal gutters, and letting people walk all over you because you can't even function without being high. You end up breaking into apartments with sketchy characters, cutting off everyone who actually cares about you... and once you quit, getting your life back together is such a slow, grueling process. I don't want anything to do with those people, period. It’s one of those things where you'll be walking through your neighborhood and see them hanging out near a playground where little kids are playing, and you just have to stop and ask yourself—what am I even doing here as an adult, standing at a playground next to this? It usually starts with one kid—maybe a bit of a troublemaker—who starts using, fails a grade, and drags his whole friend group down with him. He fails again, tries to fix things by going to some late-night club, ruins that too, and ends up barely scraping through middle school because of all the unexcused absences. Before you know it, he’s a kid owing money to dealers who are looking for any excuse to beat him up, and he’s out there cutting weight just to pay back what he owes. When you finally step away from that lifestyle, it becomes crystal clear exactly who you were running from. Those people? They’re still out there, partying until 3 AM every single night and sleeping all day. Oh, they’re "cool guys," right? Yeah, sure. One guy failed a grade because of it, but now he’s at a respectable university and his life finally took off once he walked away. That path is only good for losers who think drugs are the absolute peak of existence. They feel "high," but they look absolutely pathetic—their clothes, their attitude, their mental capacity... just a bunch of arrogant idiots.
The only way to win this game is to master the art of rhetoric—because once you control the language, you can push whatever agenda you want, even if everyone knows exactly what’s actually happening. It's all smoke and mirrors. Look at how people label things today: you've got 21st-century socialists calling themselves one thing, alt-right separatists acting like they're something else, and then you have the "antifa" crowd—who are basically just communists—yet somehow, nobody ever uses the term "anti-communist." Right? You’ll never stumble upon some youth group called "Anti-Communists" out there glorifying fascism, but you can find plenty of "Antifa" groups out there practically worshiping communism. And don't even get me started on Political Correctness. That whole concept is just a joke where people try so hard not to offend anyone that they end up offending absolutely everybody with a million little little slights. I mean, seriously, what even is Political Correctness anymore? Is it considered "correct" to whip up some propaganda flick like The Matrix that targets Westerners? Just hear me out on this specific phrasing—it’s all about the "Euro-Americans." In these narratives, every villain is some Euro-American who isn't even human, while the main architect of global chaos is a Euro-American, and the only opposition to that designer is an African-American Vulcan who saves the planet from those non-human Euro-Americans using robots. Honestly, I haven't heard anyone ever use the term "Afro-European" before.
So this guy gets stabbed over four bucks just because he didn't pay—I mean, seriously? Then some security guard jumps me and swipes something I actually paid for worth about $2.25 just because I supposedly stepped into a room where there wasn't even a "Keep Out" sign posted anywhere. It wasn't even really about the $1.25 part, honestly; that was just the spark that lit the fuse for the whole brawl. It’s like one of those free provocations that leads to total chaos, but if you're gonna act tough, why on earth do you need a knife? Just pure, unadulterated stupidity. The guy probably has a family and now he's completely screwed himself, his kin, and everyone else involved. This whole thing is just going to blow over like all the other trash we see—a few headlines here and there, and then poof, nobody will even remember it happened.